Inactive Alison Rapp / Maria Mint / 123grapeman - Pedo Defense Force, CP Advocate, Whore. Husband Jake Rapp found his balls and divorced her.

[Cthulu]

And your in bed with a pedo apoligest Kingwumpus

 

[WhoWhatWhere]

Lmao, I know her.

She wrote some butthurt awful article on gamergate, got fired for it and went to reddit to cry.

She also blamed gained weight and blamed gamergate for it. No, really.
https://np.reddit.com/r/GamerGhazi/comments/41klh2/my_personal_experiences_with_misogyny_sizism/

You could make an entire thread about her.

(Psst... They have. You're in it)

 

[Human Institute Director]

Why does it even matter whether her thesis defends cp or not? She made public tweets where she defends someone arrested for cp detention. You can't interpret your way out of this. It's even worse since her job consists in maintaining a public image. How could this shit reach Facebook trends when a single tweet can shatter the narrative they're pushing?

 

[Bugaboo]

So all the Nyberg shit and now this chick's terrible fucked up views have taught me is that I can be Anti-GG and probably get away with murder in their eyes
What is in the water in SJW town, they all seem to ignore blatant facts

 

[JU 199]

I thought the Nyberg incident was the most delusional they could be. I was wrong.

I present to you the esteemed gentlemen defending thou fair maiden. The Bearded Virgins of the Roundtable if you will.

Jeff Grubb tells the harrowing tale of Alison being attacked by a hate group.

Rich McCormick describes her essay as a "nuanced Western understanding of Japanese cultural norms"

Paul Tamburro categorizes the thesis as "Japan's right to uphold its own boundaries".

Sikandar Mahmood has a more nuanced take on her thesis: "she is against western dictatorship, pressure over Japan in this matter".

Mike McWhertor just ignores the thesis and says read Kotaku for why it isn't bad.

Sam Machkovech can't defend the thesis on his own so he also just links to Kotaku (almost like they all communicate behind the scenes on what to write).

Matthew Dunn uses Anita Sarkeesian as the voice of reason in his article which is almost identical to all the others.

They're like an army of creepy, uncanny valley twins.

 

[DZ 305]

So all the Nyberg shit and now this chick's terrible fucked up views have taught me is that I can be Anti-GG and probably get away with murder in their eyes
What is in the water in SJW town, they all seem to ignore blatant facts

Estrogen mostly, with a load of salt

 

[AnOminous]

View attachment 80717

Do these dumb cunts all have to look like complete stereotypes?

 

[Hellfire]

So all the Nyberg shit and now this chick's terrible fucked up views have taught me is that I can be Anti-GG and probably get away with murder in their eyes
What is in the water in SJW town, they all seem to ignore blatant facts

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drinking_the_Kool-Aid

 

[Mike Hunt]

I might have missed it, but did Rapp, at any point, disclose what second job she did? Articles have mostly been focusing on the supposed harrassment and hate, but only gave the smallest of lip service, if any, to Nintendo's actual reason for firing her.

Rapp whined that other Nintendo employees had on the side jobs, as well. That she's not forthcoming about her own, aside from simply mentioning she had one, says a lot about her own intent to massage the situation to her favor and a lack of personal responsibility even though she probably knew back then that what she did would run foul of Nintendo's terms of employment.

If anything, she really is a good PR person. She knows how to get a lot of white knights to do her bidding.

 

[Jewelsmakerguy]

Do these dumb cunts all have to look like complete stereotypes?

From what I've seen these days, it feels like it's a requirement for these people. And if you don't look like a punchable, smug cunt, then you're not a true feminist.

 

[MiloWuCollusion]

Honestly, I'm kind of surprised she wasn't pulled into HR and given some sort of speech to the effect of "What the fuck were you thinking? That kind of thing is completely inappropriate for a publicly facing employee of Nintendo. You are obviously fired. Now, if you go quietly and don't cause a fuss, we'll attribute your termination to something relatively minor like moonlighting without approval so we can save face and you have a chance of getting a job somewhere else."

Or maybe she was, and doesn't completely comprehend "not causing a fuss"

By her own accord, she was pulled out and Nintendo give her multiple warnings before the pedothesis (also some speculation she is a leaker). She is just that dumb .

 

[Owen Grady]

Is there really, honestly any reason why Nintendo can't just come out and say that they fired her (at least in part) because she posted shit in favor of child porn distribution? They have got to have so much goddamned money. What sort of threat -- financially, in PR, or otherwise -- would a bunch of immature idiots screaming "GAMERGATE!!" possibly pose to them? A boycott from Rapp's defenders will obviously do nothing (assuming the eight people doing so would follow through with it -- which they couldn't), nor would any rational human being take her side if Nintendo just outright said that they fired her at least in part because of her views on advocating child pornography.

Please, some legal Kiwi come to my aid here. Is providing such clarity not worth the hassle it brings? Are there other factors I'm not considering? How could making the reasons for Rapp's firing clear do anything but help their publicity?

 

[HickoryDickory]

I might have missed it, but did Rapp, at any point, disclose what second job she did? Articles have mostly been focusing on the supposed harrassment and hate, but only gave the smallest of lip service, if any, to Nintendo's actual reason for firing her.

Rapp whined that other Nintendo employees had on the side jobs, as well. That she's not forthcoming about her own, aside from simply mentioning she had one, says a lot about her own intent to massage the situation to her favor and a lack of personal responsibility even though she probably knew back then that what she did would run foul of Nintendo's terms of employment.

If anything, she really is a good PR person. She knows how to get a lot of white knights to do her bidding.

I figured it was her mature photoshoots.

 

[Mike Hunt]

I figured it was her mature photoshoots.

It probably is. Did she own up to it and put two and two together for her adoring fans? I'm of the inclination that she didn't intentionally. Or I might have missed it in the flurry of tweets.

 

[MiloWuCollusion]

Is there really, honestly any reason why Nintendo can't just come out and say that they fired her (at least in part) because she posted shit in favor of child porn distribution? They have got to have so much goddamned money. What sort of threat -- financially, in PR, or otherwise -- would a bunch of immature idiots screaming "GAMERGATE!!" possibly pose to them? A boycott from Rapp's defenders will obviously do nothing (assuming the eight people doing so would follow through with it -- which they couldn't), nor would any rational human being take her side if Nintendo just outright said that they fired her at least in part because of her views on advocating child pornography.

Please, some legal Kiwi come to my aid here. Is providing such clarity not worth the hassle it brings? Are there other factors I'm not considering? How could making the reasons for Rapp's firing clear do anything but help their publicity?

No legal, so I cannot speak in that regard but Nintendo goes to insane lenghts to keep their brand image... the key word is "insane". Nintendo just doesn't want this kind of attention in any way, even if there is moments where it would be actually wiser to deal with X situation otherwise. Swapnote lost its online functionality because a incident with pedophiles in Japan even if you could argue that shit is kind of inevitable as many tech gadgets have by default a messenger app. There could be many other solutions but for Nintendo is easier just to deal with a situation as quietly and fast as possible, long term consequences be damned.

In this case, you should also note that Rapp... is kind of an idiot , I bet you that they made it clear to her that she should have leave the company as quiet as possible. If this goes bigger, is just a matter of time that some of the maintsream sites get to the part of Child Pornography and "second job that she need aliases". Is not going to end pretty to Nintendo either way.

Nintendo should have let her go way before the Xenoblade and Fates shitstorm as some people are mentioning that Rapp was pretty outspoken of her SJW shit and getting in internet fights since Treehouse E3 streams got traction. Hell, they shouldn't have hired her since her fucking thesis is in her curriculum.

 

[An Ounce of Vagina]

At this point I'm convinced that if Hitler had a vagina then the sjw would swear up and down that the holocaust was justified.

 

[DrJonesHat]

I think the consensus is that Nintendo doesn't want to admit they ever hired a child porn apologist in the first place, which would happen if they said why they fired her. Better to say they fired her for being a cam girl on the side.

 

[soliloquyR]

Is there really, honestly any reason why Nintendo can't just come out and say that they fired her (at least in part) because she posted shit in favor of child porn distribution? They have got to have so much goddamned money. What sort of threat -- financially, in PR, or otherwise -- would a bunch of immature idiots screaming "GAMERGATE!!" possibly pose to them? A boycott from Rapp's defenders will obviously do nothing (assuming the eight people doing so would follow through with it -- which they couldn't), nor would any rational human being take her side if Nintendo just outright said that they fired her at least in part because of her views on advocating child pornography.

Please, some legal Kiwi come to my aid here. Is providing such clarity not worth the hassle it brings? Are there other factors I'm not considering? How could making the reasons for Rapp's firing clear do anything but help their publicity?

It's to save face so they don't have to openly say, "We hired a pedophile supporter to work with children." because that would look bad for their company's reputation and background checking abilities, and drive away potential investors and developers, as well as employees.

 

[MiloWuCollusion]

I think the consensus is that Nintendo doesn't want to admit they ever hired a child porn apologist in the first place, which would happen if they said why they fired her.

Why the hell they were not aware of this is anyone guess, NoA is a disaster management wise. This is the kind of shit that is totally in the ball of the Northamerican branch of Nintendo, way above localization and distribution.

Her pedothesis was in the goddamn curriculum, for godsake.

 

[selere]

Goobergate is srs bsznes guys, they're literal nazis and next they will be sending poor innocent women to concentration camps and ramble ramble ramble.