Tim Pool - 'journalist' who claims to be a sensible centrist & sucks Sargon of Akkad's wiener; Afraid of the Milkshake ANTIFAs

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Adam briefly reacted to Kanye walking off of Timcast on Chrissie mayr also stating Tim Pools sister superchatted in his original 6 stream confirming Tim screams at his family as well, Lisa confirmed this herself going as far as Tim accusing her of swatting him in her Video

Adam Crigler also did a live stream talking more in depth about the Kanye walk out earlier today among other things.
 
Local archive fren, there is a very real possibility of Tim telling her to take it down. Since he has a history of pressuring his family for the sake of his business. When he made his sister fly out after the wigger RA punked him, to co-sign his fake gang stories, or when Chris pool was going to sue Tim and Chris got a call from his mom saying to "leave Tim alone he's doing so well don't bring him down like this" at least according to Chris. Even during his recent Adam response stream he said "it's tough you're just going to have to deal with it as this company grows, it's only going to get worse" referring to the harassment they were getting.

Stream Title was "I want the real Tim Pool (my brother) back"
Uploaded 5 hours ago.
View attachment 3965256

So she messes up at one point and says "Christina" instead of the fake name, I'm pretty sure that means the friend was Ian's ex who was celebrating the swatting on Twitter who has since privated her account: https://twitter.com/czumbrock

Yeah, I wouldn't think of the Jews in general and wouldn't make the assumption of who "they" refers to.
I sperg about this earlier in the thread but I hate when people assume you mean some specific demographic when you say "they". It's just a very retarded discussion every time that if the person throwing a bitch fit stopped and thought about it for a second "they'd" get that it's usually not in regards to a race or whatever but some abstract group.
 
So she messes up at one point and says "Christina" instead of the fake name, I'm pretty sure that means the friend was Ian's ex who was celebrating the swatting on Twitter who has since privated her account: https://twitter.com/czumbrock


I sperg about this earlier in the thread but I hate when people assume you mean some specific demographic when you say "they". It's just a very retarded discussion every time that if the person throwing a bitch fit stopped and thought about it for a second "they'd" get that it's usually not in regards to a race or whatever but some abstract group.
I remember Tim having the same spergout when Luke couldn't shut the fuck up about big corporations and what not
 
Anyone who was under the impression that Tim was going to risk losing his podcast by letting Ye rant about Jews without frantically disclaiming it is just detached from reality. Of course that was going to happen, and this was only interesting as a drama stream.

Of course Ye is pissed off and that’s what he wants to talk about. I think Tim just bit more than he could chew. He isn’t charismatic enough to walk that line.
What charisma? Tim is a living NPC his emotional range is stunted. Dude has to be astroturfed, he is prob being paid by Susan to be a fencesitter.
 
Look, this may not be about the current controversy, but I just want to test the waters on something: Am I the only one that is seriously annoyed at the awkwardly crossed gun and sword in the background? Especially the newer iteration where there seems to be a picture slightly askew and slightly touching?

The electric guitar at least makes senee for a musician wannabe, but then in contrast to the crossed gun and sword it's vertical? With some cables visible behind it?

It looks like shit. Even Dave Rubin has better set design. Okay, maybe fags have an edge. But seriously am I the only one who thinks it looks bad?

Screenshot_20221130-134457_Brave.jpg
 
Look, this may not be about the current controversy, but I just want to test the waters on something: Am I the only one that is seriously annoyed at the awkwardly crossed gun and sword in the background? Especially the newer iteration where there seems to be a picture slightly askew and slightly touching?

The electric guitar at least makes senee for a musician wannabe, but then in contrast to the crossed gun and sword it's vertical? With some cables visible behind it?

It looks like shit. Even Dave Rubin has better set design. Okay, maybe fags have an edge. But seriously am I the only one who thinks it looks bad?

View attachment 3968370
No. It looks terrible. Mostly because they aren’t same size as each other so the crossing doesn’t really work.

Tim needs a much bigger gun.

Or he needs to stop compensating about the size of his penis.
 
No. It looks terrible. Mostly because they aren’t same size as each other so the crossing doesn’t really work.

Tim needs a much bigger gun.

Or he needs to stop compensating about the size of his penis.

It doesn't help that one's a flintlock pistol and the other's a fucking wazakashi. Like bruv get a saber or a cutlass or something.
 
So some quick notes from the Adam follow up:

- He thinks Tim is a complete bitch because after his episode Tim messaged Adam's girlfriend trying to convince her Adam is a liar. Adam checked his other social media to see if Tim tried to reach out to him there first, but he fond nothing.

- Adam also caught the Christina thing from Tim's sister's video and says he knows who it was, which means it's probably Ian's ex who was the property manager for Tim before Sarah, Britni, and Tim's sister.

- Adam claims Alison (Tim's girlfriend) came to him and Nisha about Lydia and Tim fucking as she knew about it and needed someone to talk to.

- Adam keeps sperging at the audience, claims Tim started a war now.

I remember Tim having the same spergout when Luke couldn't shut the fuck up about big corporations and what not
It happened with Bill Gates too. Is it really that hard to assume "they" is just some abstract group, because it might be the Jews, it might be Soros, Bill Gates, or whoever, but someone is doing some bullshit and it doesn't really matter who, it matters what and what you can do about it. I don't need to know who the leader of BLM is necessarily to point out that they burn down cities and shouldn't have public support.

My God was that Luke who said is Kanye afraid of the Press? What a passive agressive little bastard! Tim Pool being controlled opposition is no suprise. Ye was in his right to leave these NPCs.
The whole thing was really shitty after Kanye left, all of them kept coping and talking shit, and it continued on the next day.

Look, this may not be about the current controversy, but I just want to test the waters on something: Am I the only one that is seriously annoyed at the awkwardly crossed gun and sword in the background? Especially the newer iteration where there seems to be a picture slightly askew and slightly touching?
What annoys me is the blade facing up. I'm sure there's a version where that's normal but it looks weird to me.
 
I remember Tim having the same spergout when Luke couldn't shut the fuck up about big corporations and what not
Luke loves to talk about "the elites" his big claim to fame was confronting Lord Jacob Rothschild and getting him to respond to the new world order. How come he never mentions this though?
>Picture related
IMG_20221130_114452.jpg
And let's not forget his other buzzword name Klaus Schwab
Or Epstein but no, just buy my shirt making a meme out of a child molester, "Epstein didn't Epstein himself" tee-hee. (And let's talk about anarchism and how's it never been tried before). I got news, you can live in a government free anarchist society right now, there's few of them, Chad, Somalia, South Sudan, and Nigeria.

Tim pool is once again crying about Kanye, trying to craft a narrative that he's a victim and I'm getting attacked by the left and right (muh based populist centrist) https://youtu.be/DRhvpV20uWI
He's lying btw there are both right wing and left wing articles saying Kanye left after being "pushed back on his anti semitism" including the regular grifters like Quartering and AJW. Adam said something that makes a lot of sense, "Tim loves the attention", he loved the attention when he got swatted and made dozens of videos on it and released Cast Castle vlogs showing the footage. Tim is claiming Kanye staged the walk off, Notice how he's targeting the biggest out of the 3, not Milo or Fuentes? I have a theory Tim knew Kanye would react that way and wanted it to happen for the huge viral moment.
 
Luke loves to talk about "the elites" his big claim to fame was confronting Lord Jacob Rothschild and getting him to respond to the new world order. How come he never mentions this though?
>Picture
Because he knows what Kanye would be talking about and Susan's pups don't want that narrative out there. Despite claiming "WE NEED ALL SPEECH ON SO WE CAN CHALLENGE IT"
 
Because he knows what Kanye would be talking about and Susan's pups don't want that narrative out there. Despite claiming "WE NEED ALL SPEECH ON SO WE CAN CHALLENGE IT"
He literally straight up lies, saying "I'm being demonetized", while Google Adsense play's their ads on his videos, including the same exact video where he says he's being demonetized in. (Not the first time btw) lol
 
He literally straight up lies, saying "I'm being demonetized", while Google Adsense play's their ads on his videos, including the same exact video where he says he's being demonetized in. (Not the first time btw) lol
His constant back and forth about being on the brink of being banned is horseshit. He's also brought up that he's protected because Susan sees him as a way to deradicalize incels. He can't be both, but he's successfully playing both sides. Think of how much money has had invested into Timcast. He's probably close to 10 million if not more. Notice how none of that money went into private infrastructure that would keep his broadcast alive if Susan ever decided to pull the plug.

Tim's priorities tells me he's betting on Youtube, and probably knows he's safe there as long as he doesn't cross a few very specific lines. That explains his stance on election fraud and people talking about jews. He's going to keep selling the "fact" that he's an anti-establishment rebel when his first priority will always be his corporate relationship with Youtube. His personal website is just a means to double dip his paypigs thought he claims it's his safe haven for when he finally gets censored, yet it's nowhere near capable of handling a quarter of his normal audience. If YT shut him down for good, he would probably SHUT IT DOWN, fire everyone, and retire.
 

Adjust the time a little, but it's this time stamp.

Tim says that he is against people trying to police speech on Twitter, that adults who are voluntarily using the service don't need to be protected.

Then he mentions that people are sharing an address, which he apparently does not live at, and then says "That shouldn't be allowed. Doxxing is wrong. And it's for the intent of inciting violence, sure. But I'm not going to go to Elon, I mean, maybe, 'hey Elon, do something, I guess'."

So you are literally arguing that people do not need to be protected on Twitter, and that Twitter is for adults and its use is voluntary, and yet in the same sentence where you try and use yourself as an example and say that even though you're being doxxed you aren't going to tattle to Elon but halfway through your own sentence you convince yourself that maybe you should do just that.

This isn't "enlightened centrism", this is borderline dissociative personality disorder.
 

Adjust the time a little, but it's this time stamp.

Tim says that he is against people trying to police speech on Twitter, that adults who are voluntarily using the service don't need to be protected.

Then he mentions that people are sharing an address, which he apparently does not live at, and then says "That shouldn't be allowed. Doxxing is wrong. And it's for the intent of inciting violence, sure. But I'm not going to go to Elon, I mean, maybe, 'hey Elon, do something, I guess'."

So you are literally arguing that people do not need to be protected on Twitter, and that Twitter is for adults and its use is voluntary, and yet in the same sentence where you try and use yourself as an example and say that even though you're being doxxed you aren't going to tattle to Elon but halfway through your own sentence you convince yourself that maybe you should do just that.

This isn't "enlightened centrism", this is borderline dissociative personality disorder.
I'm more concerned about his opinion that Section 230 should be nuked because of some absurd case where Section 230 somehow grants immunity to any company which pays a third party to write a defaming hit piece and then publishes it themselves, even though Section 230 only offers protections for content posted by third parties, not commissioned work posted by the host.

Reminder that Section 230 is the reason Tim Pool has a revenue stream on Youtube, so what he's advocating for is to immolate his own source of income. The reason he can say (almost) anything he wants and make money on Youtube is because Youtube is not directly responsible for his actions, because Section 230 encourages social media sites to act as neutral providers, removing it would just make the editorializing mandatory for reasons of liability.

Imagine if a landline provider could be sued because of a prank call that occurred over their lines, and the phone company were obliged to editorialize phone calls as they happen, that's the future of the internet Tim Pool advocates for by wishing for Section 230 to be nuked.
He literally straight up lies, saying "I'm being demonetized", while Google Adsense play's their ads on his videos, including the same exact video where he says he's being demonetized in. (Not the first time btw) lol
That proves literally nothing, Google plays ads on every video on Youtube regardless of the author's monetization status. Not being monetized just means you're losing out on what would be your cut.
 
Last edited:
I'm more concerned about his opinion that Section 230 should be nuked because of some absurd case where Section 230 somehow grants immunity to any company which pays a third party to write a defaming hit piece and then publishes it themselves, even though Section 230 only offers protections for content posted by third parties, not commissioned work posted by the host.
Do you really think Tim cares about Section 230 one way or another? Do you really think Tim snapped at someone from Google who can cut his revenue off instantly? No, it's just another tall tale and fake outburst to get people to give him more donations.


That proves literally nothing, Google plays ads on every video on Youtube regardless of the author's monetization status. Not being monetized just means you're losing out on what would be your cut.
I'm not sure if that's true. They will play ads on channels that haven't been approved for monetization (As in those that didn't hit the threshold to apply), and ones that didn't turn it on, but I'm not sure if they'd play ads on one that had monetization taken away or restricted. They will play ads on ones that are in dispute though for DMCA, then give the revenue to whoever wins.
 
Back