- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
Again, you keep digging yourself deeper and deeper by showing that you should not be anti-education but that instead you should be pushing for education with how little you understand statistics yet you seem to think you do, similar to how you claim to know more about medicine than doctors because you listen to Alex Jones.And yet you worry yourself into fits over the coof like a fatass. Yeah my money is still on Alex.. you realize we are talking about the real you, not the retarded tan wrestler you have as an avatar, right?
"If 80% of the denominator has something, the odds are going to be higher than one of those 80% are in the numerator."
You realize that you basically just said "if 80% of people have the vax, then more people with the vax are dying," right? So thanks for finally agreeing with me lmao yes more people with the vax are dying and that share has been going up while the rates of people vaxed have stayed at 80% for over a year. Which has been my point this whole time - if the vax rates are still the same they were in September 2021, which they are, and the people dying from the coof while being vaxed have doubled and then doubled and then nearly doubled again within that same time span, the non-retarded conclusion to arrive at is that the vax is losing effectiveness over time, or possibly never was as effective as touted. Otherwise, as I tried explaining to you multiple times, the share of vaxtards in any given selection of death counts over time would decrease or stay constant since you'd be burning through the population subsets that had glaring comorbidities etc first. That's not what's happening, and it bears investigation as to what it is about the vax itself that is providing less "protection".
Using your own retarded example about seatbelts - if you somehow knew that 80% of people had been using one of only 3 brands of seatbelts consistently for over a year and you had X amount of deaths and X stayed the same over that year, sure, you could conclude that those brands of seatbelts are at least safe and effective.
That's not what's happening with the coof example though. If you had your seatbelts setup and discovered that Month 1 you had X deaths w/ a specific few brands of seatbelts, then in Month 6 you had 2X deaths, then in month 12 you had almost 3X deaths, and you didn't at least wonder whether those branded seatbelts were actually good seatbelts or not, you'd either be a retard or a sociopath. Someone with a brain and functioning empathy would say "hmm maybe we need new seatbelts". You say "lol dying with your seatbelt on is an alex Jones conspiracy theory, chud!"
The numbers you gave were from 2022, in which case 80% of the people were vaccinated, yet only 58% of the deaths were from the vaccinated people. That shows the vaccine works. Again, I know you've admitted to being an uneducated simpleton who has such a low IQ that he has a case worker, but it's really not hard logic to follow.
If the death rate was higher than 80%, then it'd show the vaccines do more harm than good. But instead it's less than 80% (I know you're a simpleton but even you can agree that 58 is lower than 80, right?).
Sorry, but you don't know more than doctors about medicine because you listen to Alex Jones and Tucker Carlson (who is vaccinated, by the way). Oh, and both of those guys admitted under oath that only an idiot would believe anything they say, so congratulations about that
I do agree that this is pointless, but only because you're demonstrating how much of an uneducated simpleton you are and how much you don't understand statistics, yet you parrot on like you do, just like how you claim that you know more than doctors because you listen to Alex Jones. I've thoroughly destroyed your argument using your own source, yet your low IQ simpleton brain just cannot fathom it. I've laid out in basic mathematics why you are wrong, yet you're proving how much you are anti-education by not understanding it.this whole waste of time has been made worth it though by me buckbreaking you so thoroughly that you, Hollywood Hulk Hogan, are now using the 13/50 stat as evidence in a debate as though you affirm it's truth. You, the one person still in this thread who is enough of a leftist to typically shriek about right wing racism, are using a statistic that everyone else on your side swears is an alt right super racist plot on par with eugenics and the final solution. Bravo, sir, bravo.
FWIW though that example kinda falls flat the way you're trying to use it. Even most of us who use it unironically understand that just because black people make up 13% of the population that doesn't translate 1;1 into turning into a murderous nigger, there are other factors involved and being an urbanite or coming from a fatherless home seem to really exacerbate the mix. If you're trying to use that for your argument you need to start factoring in other things with the coof and vax, things like comorbidities, boosters, age etc and considering we've had such a hangup just getting you to acknowledge the function of basic fractional math I don't think you're ready for that leap yet.