His only "defense" of his tweets was that accosted doesn't mean to physically attack someone. It just means to verbally confront. Then he stressed that he supports PEACEFUL protests. But of course he doesn't support PEACEFUL protests of drag queens shows aimed at children. No those protests are terrorism.
The mental gymnastics and excuses that these retards make for justifying terrorism is pretty funny. Once again, it proves that 99% of political extremists are retards.
They’ll have to find someone bland and boring… that is also a minority, gender queer but not gay or lesbian, ideally someone black or Native American. Surely, they can find a gender special that is not rabidly insane.
We aren't Harvard Law Experts
claiming moral and legal authority over others. We're random, no-name shitposting assholes in the Internet's cheap seats.
He gave such a sloppy counterargument it does makes you wonder how this Harvard expert didn't expected to be confronted with his own tweets in a hearing, about Online Extremism. If he would had prepared he could have deleted his most spicy tweets and when asked he could have just said he disavowed previous statements. Guess that's hard to do when all you get paid for is tweeting crap 24 hours a day. That would have been a lot of tweets to go back to.
Soft disagree. Intersectionality has troons going up to bat for radfems on abortion. It’s similar to how women came out in support of batty boys back in the 70s and 80s. Troons like it because it gives them a chance to talk about vaginas despite not having one, and because much of the underlying legal framework for abortion and contraception can be applied for troon goals like child transitioning and fewer barriers to GRS in general. Abortion and contraception are also a core issue for FTMs. Although FTMs and MTFs are not the same and don’t need each other, they have a symbiosis and common goals.
They did the same with the defintion of man but apparently no one cares about that.Watching him squirm was satisfying. Really drives home the double standards that the 'woke' crowd have, especially on platforms like Twitter, where they've had an unopposed free ride for the past few years.
Speaking of the Trans lobby, i thought it was interesting (although not surprising) to learn that the Cambridge Dictionary has today changed its definition of a woman...
As well as an “adult female human being”, it now states that a woman can also be “an adult who lives and identifies as female though they may have been said to have a different sex at birth”.
Umm. OK.
Let's hope they add the definition of the word "woke" as it's understood by most sane people:
"An illiberal, intolerant, quasi-religious ideology that uses performative compassion for alleged victim groups to achieve power, moral superiority and social status. Requires no personal sacrifice, and is particularly popular among the privileged and university-educated."
Note to add - I was curious and thought I'd see that Alex is up to on Twitter and found out I'm blocked. It's odd as I don't tweet, and don't follow him! Anyone know how this happens?
We aren't Harvard Law Experts
If Al is going to spout off about accosting supreme court justices and then claim that he believes violent rhetoric is a threat to democracy, then he deserves to be humiliated and called out for his blatant hypocrisy despite how stupid and cringe the congress makes themselves look. It's also funny watching an entire circus of clown world idiots make a spectacle about twitter shit.
masslawyersweekly.com
It doesn't seem hard once you take away the keyboard. Get bent, Big Al. It makes me happy to see normal people hoist you by your own amhole.
