Careercow Taylor Lorenz - Crybully "journalist", self-appointed Internet Hall Monitor, professional victim, stalks teenagers for e-clout

[IDanceonTrannyGraves]

Elon is being a fucking retard about this. He should have banned them for breaking the rules and been done with it.

 

[WhiteNight]

Elon is being a fucking retard about this. He should have banned them for breaking the rules and been done with it.

He did promise a general amnesty for all accounts, and the ban of Lorenz was supposedly for her past doxing. He has also said bans shouldn't be permanent.

But yeah he's being a retard. He makes stupid decisions and reverses them hours later. Maybe stop to think now and then.

 

[Evilronald]

CDAN has had a few blinds regarding Tay Tay.
Apparently she's fucking Bezos?
https://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2022/06/blind-item-7_7.html
(a)
(It doesn't name her but the comments section mentions her.)

Yes, the site is a trashy gossip blog and rarely posts any proof or reveal their blinds, *but* has been right about a lot of unlikely sounding things in the past - it had a lot on Epstein/Maxwell from very early on, the Clintons and other politicians etc.
So massive grain of salt but it would also explain a lot.

The quality of women available to billionaires must’ve really gone downhill since Jeffrey and Ghislaine were put out of business if Bezos is fucking Taylor Lorenz.

 

[GenericEdgelordSupreme]

Those opposed to transgenders and transgenderism are not the ones misgendering. Men who think they are women, women who think they are men misgender themselves. Those who speak out against this madness utter truths when so many insist on lies.

That's why I call it "sexing" now. If a tranny accuses you of misgendering them, just say, "I wasn't gendering you; I was sexing you." You don't ask an animal how it identifies; you look at it, then determine if it's male or female based on its anatomy using your own brain without the animal's input. So, even by their back-asswards mentally gymnastic logic (in addition to real logic) you're being accurate.

 

[Type93Torpedo]

That's why I call it "sexing" now. If a tranny accuses you of misgendering them, just say, "I wasn't gendering you; I was sexing you." You don't ask an animal how it identifies; you look at it, then determine if it's male or female based on its anatomy using your own brain without the animal's input. So, even by their back-asswards mentally gymnastic logic (in addition to real logic) you're being accurate.

They’ll just say “HoW ManY TrAns PeOPle WiLl be HarMed bY YoUr HaTe SpeEcH”, or the classic “source?”, or my personal favorite, going on a giant witch-hunt for arguments and research in favor of trannies

 

[Cuckoman]

If they actually do this they are in violation of the GDPR.

Lol, no.
Some nigger from Algeria blows up a preschool in paris and kills a bunch of kids.
French intelligence agency asks twitter for all tweets and dm's so they can track down his accomplices and the guy that built the bomb.
Twitter responds: no can do, we deleted the terrorists tweets and dm's because GDPR.

Lol, that is never going to fly.
You have noticed that intelligence agences are always complaining about end-to-end encryption but never ever complain about retention policies on social media. Why is that?

 

[PointOfNoReturnPoint]

Saw this in reddit earlier. Man that suspends account for prior doxxing gets hated by people that admit she has....doxxed people in the past.


Is this real life?

 

[Hannibalistique]

Lol, no.
Some nigger from Algeria blows up a preschool in paris and kills a bunch of kids.
French intelligence agency asks twitter for all tweets and dm's so they can track down his accomplices and the guy that built the bomb.
Twitter responds: no can do, we deleted the terrorists tweets and dm's because GDPR.

Lol, that is never going to fly.
You have noticed that intelligence agences are always complaining about end-to-end encryption but never ever complain about retention policies on social media. Why is that?

You lost this discussion yesterday, retard.

Take your meds.

 

[Trianon]

Also... is the reason she is having this party because she was banned and decided to call up friends? It was only one person hanging out but perhaps she decided on a whim to let her friends know to come over for a party lol

She did say something like that in the first video, that all the suspended journos were getting together to commiserate. Lunacy.

I really wish there was a good book or article that showed how journalism went from a highly respected field of work to becoming the laughing stock it is now. Like how did this happen and why?

A few answers to why journalism became the specific craphole it now is (acknowledging that it has always sucked to some degree):

Spoiler

• Media conglomerates pushed toward 24/7 news cycles with the advent of CNN in the '80s, whetting appetites for "fast" news and endless commentary about stories that were one-size-fits-all for the entire nation. (Big trial and crime coverage, constant horserace politics, etc.)
• The Fairness Doctrine requiring "equal-time" coverage of issues was lifted in 1987, which meant stories could be framed without acknowledging that there were other points of view. Although journalists technically adhered to trying to cover stories from multiple angles, eventually they could rationalize that one side was "correct" and thus the other side was undeserving of a fair hearing. (See always framing abortion issues as "abortion rights," etc.)
• The Telecommunications Act of 1996 lifted non-compete clauses that protected local stations from fierce competition. Deregulation allowed local news to get eaten up by mergers from said media conglomerates, accelerating the trend toward national coverage and making local news stations beholden to large corporate interests to maintain their foothold in communities.
• The internet delivered faster information than print news. Facebook lied about their video traffic to boost advertising revenue, which caused smaller media to "pivot to video," investing tons of resources in a format with absolutely no benefit for them. By the time it became clear that Facebook was not actually driving traffic to their content, they had already started giving away journalism for "free," devaluing the product and making it harder to maintain subscribers.
• Large media conglomerates cut costs by junking local reporters that didn't make a lot of money in small markets. The reduced resources to small coverage areas made journalism less of a trade profession, where it was expected that you'd cut your teeth in small markets to build credibility and experience before landing bigger jobs at larger papers and broadcasters.
• As the owners of most of the national media became centered in a select few cities, all journalists were able to hop into position immediately after pursuing a college degree or networking with rich owners. This meant they were given the opportunity to cover issues of major importance without having any practical real-world experience. This glut of twentysomething journalists was used against them by Obama pressman Ben Rhodes, who said this in an interview: "All these newspapers used to have foreign bureaus. Now they don’t. They call us to explain to them what’s happening in Moscow and Cairo. Most of the outlets are reporting on world events from Washington. The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old, and their only reporting experience consists of being around political campaigns. That’s a sea change. They literally know nothing.” He goes on to brag about how their lack of experience enabled the Obama admin to form an echo chamber surrounding Obamacare or other controversial policies, with the press debunking criticism with WH talking points, and they didn't have the skills to question the government's stance, which would have made them better reporters.
• More money given to larger reporting markets meant access journalism was no longer just about access to powerful sources but to an entire lifestyle enabled by pooling money at the top of the industry. No one wants to report hard stories when they can just get dressed up and go to the White House Correspondents Dinner again, which they will risk if they actually investigate anything.
• Continued cuts to local newsrooms left community papers and broadcasters vulnerable to hostile takeovers, where they would be sold to new owners who ruthlessly cut costs and jobs and sold their advertising lists to other companies. Without the resources to cover local issues, local papers relied more and more on syndicated, national content that was all political, thus AGAIN driving away their local subscription base.
• The fewer reporters who have to live in the communities they serve, the more cut off they are from the consequences of their inaccuracies and elitism. Journalists using Twitter began opining openly why people owned pickup trucks, why so many people were right-wing when it was "against their interests," why religion deserved coverage, etc. Rich, overeducated liberals with no life experience beyond living in a Manhattan apartment cannot be expected to understand the concerns of the working class poor in the Ozarks.

Taylor claims that she was not suspended for doxing but for posting a ton of links to her other social media handles. She says Elon was only "scrambling" for an excuse and landed on doxing - but also that he invented the "no offsite links" rule just to be able to ban her.




archive

archive

archive

She also wrote an article casting doubt on whether the @ElonJet account facilitated the harassment of Elon's son.

What happened in stalking incident Musk cited to ban @ElonJet - The W…

archived 19 Dec 2022 07:16:13 UTC

archive.md

Now, Taylor is a serial liar. She is being pedantic about not doxing anyone and perhaps relying on the fact that she was not suspended earlier to prove that she didn't violate any of Twitter's old guidelines. Her own definition of doxing doesn't really matter, just Twitter's definition. A lot of people at the time thought she warranted suspension for the LOTT unmasking.

But I do think it's possible that Elon was creating policies on the fly against her. Just because the "no outside links" thing makes such LITTLE sense and seems to perfectly describe one of three tweets she had up at the time. But because the suspension policy is still messy, it's unclear if she was caught by an automated drag of tweets with "link spam" in them, or if she was punished for doxing LibsofTikTok or Ariadna Jacob, or if she was punished for "asking a question." She either doesn't have an email that explains the situation or won't provide it. She will just use whatever excuse helps her narrative. But Elon is also probably doing that. I wash my hands of them.

 

[Paranoia Machine]

Honestly, this was probably the best exchange of events.
Taylor seethed hard enough to cause her last viable eggs to burst from the idea of being cut off from Twitter and the second richest man in the world put another handful of nails into Twitter's coffin while making himself look like an absolute cuck.

Honestly, imagine being a silver-spoon white girl with every opportunity at your manicured fingertips and somehow managing get to be middle-aged and have nothing to show for it. Even the common plain Jane has a legitimate career and family by now and she's over here at 43 having an "IM NOT MAD" moment over losing Twitter. Fucking magnificent.

And the fact that the former richest man in the world can't seem to afford a thicker skin tickles me to my rotten core. The constant need for validation, the inability to hold a relationship with a woman unless she is under the age of 25, The constant need to protect his image, labeling his father a monster while having a child with any woman whose legs he can get between, and then believing he should be cheered for just being himself. My God, the man gets upset and disables whole features of the site when he has no comeback.

This has been a very entertaining weekend.

 

[oramge cat]

Her hands weird me out View attachment 4100202

I'm almost wondering if it's actually a her, is there any proof?

 

[Trianon]

I'm almost wondering if it's actually a her, is there any proof?

There are old yearbook photos of her. If she is to be believed (lol), she has a cocktail of weird diseases and genetic dispositions that make her a literal lizard person who drinks 3 gallons of water a day, so who knows what that's doing to her joints.


archive

I think it's funny that this guy's thread says he couldn't find any other pictures of her in the yearbook. She's just ... on the track team. (Maybe because she was at an elite Swiss boarding school most of the time?)

 

[No Batty Boys in Jamaica]

Elon is such a giant cuck it’s not even funny. Since equality is not true, and the majority of people are retarded, democracy does not work and is a stupid fucking idea, and using a twitter poll to decide company policy is just asking for your shit to get fucked up.

His polls are usually pre-determined though.

 

[AltisticRight]

She can still cry and whinge from that shitty Mastogay journalist scum barrel instance. She will not be missed, she is ugly and fat, and I will not have sex with her.

 

[Polentic]

One More

Spoiler: Original Image

 

[Next Task]

Nah, she's not that special. 'Musk is changing the rules on Twitter just to try and ban little ol' me, who never did anything wrong!' is some peak narcissism. That the whole platform is being changed just to hurt the all-important speaker of truth to power Taylor Lorenz is lunacy.

As far as I can tell, part of the issue is Musk is being very slapdash at throwing all this shit on the wall to see what sticks, and is giving the appearance (accurately or not) of just listening to the last person to tweet him about what he should do next. I have a suspicion that he was having fun to begin with but he's not anymore, and that off-screen consequences have just made him sick of the whole thing and happy to move on. I don't think he's playing 4D chess, but it's still very possible he's playing basic 2D chess, and/or that he has no idea what he's doing, and/or he's been given reasons for why he can't make the fixes he thought he could make once he'd fired all the dangerhairs.

But that's more for the MUSK OWNS TWITTER thread. The thing with Taylor is that she's so fucking blatant about the bullshit she's pulling - in this case that she's soooooo important that Musk personally changed rules just to ban her, when we all know that, yes, she had numerous TOS violations previously ignored because she was a journo with 'friends' at Twitter. But all of it, all her lies and manipulations are transparent - and yet she's still protected. It's why the idea she's sleeping with the boss keeps reappearing, because people grasp for explanations as to how she could be so obviously terrible and yet still employed and defended.

The only other alternative is that it's a true sign of being properly brainwashed - there are five lights, that obvious man is a woman, Taylor Lorenz is a good journalist. It's not enough for you to have to accept the small lie, they want you to have to swallow the biggest, most obvious lies possible, to show how much they control you.

 

[ToroidalBoat]

Owned

Even more "poetic justice"?

 

[RumblyTumbly]

I'm not a huge Elon fan, but I will never feel sorry for people that advocated for mass bannings of people they didn't like and are now getting the brunt of what they created.

 

[Sayer of the N-Word]

One More
View attachment 4109247View attachment 4109244

Spoiler: Original Image

View attachment 4109253

I don't think I've ever seen a woman make a soyface before.

 

[I'm Retarded?]

I really wish there was a good book or article that showed how journalism went from a highly respected field of work to becoming the laughing stock it is now. Like how did this happen and why?

there's no magic to it. like most things in America, the narrative that the media was formerly some kind of bastion of truth and effortposting is a lie conjured by retards to shield them from the consequences of their own actions, and perpetuated by retards to make themselves look better by smearing other people. journalism has never been a respectable field of work, there have always been outliers but the core of the industry has always been information control for personal profit.

for most of the 20th century, starting circa WWII and lasting through the Cold War, the news media was in the direct employ of the state and served as a de facto ministry of propaganda. for various reasons a strong atmosphere of nationalism and societal responsibility had been whipped up especially at the end of the war, and a large part of society held the national institutions in very high esteem, regardless of the truth of things. so when the TV said something you took it for unassailable fact because Cronkite is a god damn saint and he would never do something so shameful as exploit his position or allow himself to be exploited to further the political agenda of a greater power. of course they passed this attitude on to their kids and that's why the boomers all think TV news is the real shit, or at least it used to be before all this 24 hour news cycle and innernets nonsense.

I don't think I've ever seen a woman make a soyface before.

that face used to be all over the place before it became the soyface meme. the name soyface came from the whole thing about how soy is supposedly feminizing all our men which is why they're now all taking awful selfies making that stupid face which used to only be a girl thing