- Joined
- Mar 12, 2021
Some of those laws tend to not actually care about if the cartridges in question are even in actual use anymore, hence why in some places you'll see shit like 7.92mm Mauser, .303 British, or .30-06 Springfield remaining verboten even though they haven't been in even reservist use since the Cold War.I'm guessing there are similar laws to Mexico where you can't own the military's chosen calibers? IE 38 Super, .40, and .45 take the place of 9mm?
I recall some of those countries (Mexico, I believe), also decided that .357 Magnum and .44 Magnum are military cartridges, and though I'm sure that they must have seen some sort of small use in some corner of some army somewhere, that same logic would then have to apply to .22LR, yet doesn't (but I'm not gonna be the one to jinx that). France has (had?) legislation like that though, and they actually updated it to remove some of the old obsolete calibers from the restriction at some point.
The only instance I can think of even relating to .44 Magnum is the AAI QSPR, but those weren't chambered for .44 Magnum, and they built less than a dozen of them. Presumably the logic is just that a particularly powerful handgun is a military weapon, even though this hasn't been true since probably the Colt Walker.
I see the appeal in a .40 caliber Steyr AUG if you're expecting to fight violent and armed druggies, and it wouldn't be nearly as loud or blasty as the short carbine 5.56mm AUG, which makes a difference if you may have to fight indoors. Seems to take Glock mags too, thought might be that they want the ability to use their spare pistol mags if they have to, however likely that may end up actually being.From what I've gathered, the police, of all agencies, really fucking like it still, especially in Brazil. They literally made a Steyer Aug SMG in .40 just for them.
The extendable buttplate is a curious addition.