BreadTube - The Unofficial ContraPoints Dickriders Club and the culture / drama surrounding the community.

Spoilers: I’ve been to parts of Eastern Europe. The people who live in commie blocks are usually the scum of the earth. Nobody likes them but they have no choice based on their small salary
That's definitely not been my experience. I've lived in Eastern Europe for years and commieblock neighborhoods have just as much variety in residents as any other neighborhood housing type. You'll have good districts and bad districts and places which are a mix of both. Depending on what era they were built, some have extremely good sound insulation and it would take a small explosion before you hear any of your neighbors while others are like a cheap motel where anything above lower-average conversation speech can be heard with relative clarity. Some areas can be quite affluent and gentrified while others look like they haven't changed since the Brezhnev era.
 
Not sure if Adam Something is part of breadtube but he’s some leftard Hungarian who lives in Czechia who makes videos calling commie apartment blocks nice

Spoilers: I’ve been to parts of Eastern Europe. The people who live in commie blocks are usually the scum of the earth. Nobody likes them but they have no choice based on their small salary
Yeah and the problem with commie block housing was they forced entire populations to be forcibly removed from their land and forced at gunpoint into these houses. This wasn't the case everywhere and when you consider your choices are dilapidated ruins or commie blocks it makes more sense.
UBERSOY did a video vindicating Jewish IQ while also being a self-admitted Jew himself.

Strange, is it not?
I would argue UberSoy is less Breadtube and deserves his own spot. He's somewhere in the middle between Breadtube and right wing tube. He's not the "centrist" side of things but more of the obscure political tubers.
That's definitely not been my experience. I've lived in Eastern Europe for years and commieblock neighborhoods have just as much variety in residents as any other neighborhood housing type. You'll have good districts and bad districts and places which are a mix of both. Depending on what era they were built, some have extremely good sound insulation and it would take a small explosion before you hear any of your neighbors while others are like a cheap motel where anything above lower-average conversation speech can be heard with relative clarity. Some areas can be quite affluent and gentrified while others look like they haven't changed since the Brezhnev era.
Commie bloc housing quality really depended on who, where, materials, and building quality.
There are some Ukrainian Commie blocs that are still standing even after 3,000 artillery strikes and 30 missile hits. Yet somehow the structure is so hardened That it has been rebuilt, and now is slowly moving towards being more stable and secure.
Then you can go to the Russian federation where Scam commie blocks are being built where the concrete is already cracking and it's not even winter yet. Some with essentially crushed first floors that somehow don't collapse.
 
Yeah and the problem with commie block housing was they forced entire populations to be forcibly removed from their land and forced at gunpoint into these houses. This wasn't the case everywhere and when you consider your choices are dilapidated ruins or commie blocks it makes more sense.
This was absolutely the case in Romania during Ceaucescu's systematization campaign (and in pockets of Siberia and Central Asia where they were trying to bring the millennia-old traditional nomadic lifestyles of the natives to an end - a policy which ultimately failed). Coincidentally, the Romanian commieblocks are among the lower quality examples of the construction method (outside of the grand constructions lining the main boulevards of Bucharest). In the Soviet Union on the other hand, the Stalinka and Khrushchevka were absolutely a step up compared to the utterly destitute, rotting wooden hovels sprawling across the Eurasian landscape and communalkas of Saint Petersburg which were essentially former palaces of the Imperial aristocracy subdivided with paper-thin walls and shared facilities. Many of them were lit with a single lightbulb. Aesthetically they often suck (the Stalinkas at least tried to follow basic classical design and have really good sound insulation- they're regarded as the 'nicest' of the commieblocks and it was a major status symbol to live in a Stalinka) but that being said they were effective in virtually eliminating homelessness across the Soviet Union and other states from the socialist bloc. Doesn't change the fact that socialism/communism sucks ass in almost every other aspect though.
Commie bloc housing quality really depended on who, where, materials, and building quality.
There are some Ukrainian Commie blocs that are still standing even after 3,000 artillery strikes and 30 missile hits. Yet somehow the structure is so hardened That it has been rebuilt, and now is slowly moving towards being more stable and secure.
Absolutely, as an American, before I first traveled to Eastern Europe I assumed that almost all commieblocks were shoddily built, crumbling pigeonholes on the verge of collapse but was pleasantly surprised to find that a lot of them are unbelievably resilient, secure and sturdy. The ones built across the former Yugoslavia are also extremely well constructed and impenetrable, and were easily repaired after the Yugoslav wars. Not going to deny that a great bulk of them are really ugly externally but the interiors have been modernizing quite a bit over the years and are more spacious and cozy than one would imagine (except the Khrushchevkas which are pretty snug). Also the Soviet ones are usually spaced reasonably apart so there's a ton of greenery everywhere (where the local biome permits, of course). It's nice seeing essentially a forest from the balcony. Their no-nonsense practicality is undeniable.

Edit: Phrasing
 
Last edited:

Emerican Johnson thinks that troons are under attack by the ebil capitalists, even though troons wouldn't have gotten as far as they have without being enabled by capitalists themselves.


He also whines about national Bolshevism, a meme ideology no one takes seriously, not even leftypol.


Musk's handling of Twitter was meh, but the leaking out of the internal documents to expose FBI and Democratic party censorship, and forcing journalists to abide by the same terms of service everyone else does, made it all worthwhile, and even self-proclaimed libertarians, left or right, could appreciate it.
 

Emerican Johnson thinks that troons are under attack by the ebil capitalists, even though troons wouldn't have gotten as far as they have without being enabled by capitalists themselves.


He also whines about national Bolshevism, a meme ideology no one takes seriously, not even leftypol.


Musk's handling of Twitter was meh, but the leaking out of the internal documents to expose FBI and Democratic party censorship, and forcing journalists to abide by the same terms of service everyone else does, made it all worthwhile, and even self-proclaimed libertarians, left or right, could appreciate it.
i like when thoughslime videos are posted so i can see how ridiculous he looks each time lmfao what a freak show
 
UBERSOY did a video vindicating Jewish IQ while also being a self-admitted Jew himself.

Strange, is it not?
I watched that video. It wasn't bad, but it's nothing out of the ordinary whenever one goes down the JQ rabbithole. People in the comments have brought up the small sample sizes, which he has dismissed, even when Lynn's own book shows a table of all the studies and its corresponding numbers. One study done by Kirkegaard et al. has a sample size of 53, Levinson picked kids from yeshiva schools, and the others are bloated due to verbal IQ, a thing Jews are indeed superior in. I would have liked to have seen more data from Israel as well as the math/physics related scores, as that will tell you whether they are 'superior'.

LAC's video needed work, anyways. But Sean Last still comes out on top; his article on this issue lays out the nepotism and media control, something Ubersoy and his buddy only lightly touched on.

Still, it's still better sourced than anything Shaun or BreadTube can offer, so there is that.
 

Musk's handling of Twitter was meh, but the leaking out of the internal documents to expose FBI and Democratic party censorship, and forcing journalists to abide by the same terms of service everyone else does, made it all worthwhile, and even self-proclaimed libertarians, left or right, could appreciate it.
i like when thoughslime videos are posted so i can see how ridiculous he looks each time lmfao what a freak show
Didn't this nigga come out as a tranny few month ago? Either he's completly retarded or backed down on his new grift lmao
 
Didn't this nigga come out as a tranny few month ago? Either he's completly retarded or backed down on his new grift lmao

He came out as a troon in 2019 in the video where he complained about the Quartering's takes on Shera.

He came out as nonbinary, which conveniently allows him to be a complete and total faggot without actually mutilating himself or injecting himself with poisonous wrong-sex hormones.

He's also a major douchebag about his chosen gender identity, and even directs his ire towards those who tried to be nice to him, as he admits here:

 

He also whines about national Bolshevism, a meme ideology no one takes seriously, not even leftypol.
Patsocs are different from nazbols because they're not racialists, they're basically just communists who want to co-opt american conservatism because they have enough brain cells to rub together to realize that evil conservachuds are the real proletariat and not black trans sex worker folx. It's communism with a civic nationalist paintjob.

also isn't this noncompete faggot literally on a paid white monkey propaganda trip in vietnam to shill for their government? This guy is so braindead retarded that he made me root for vaush in his debate against him.
 
You wanna know what is easily one of the most eye-rolling controversies when it comes to discussing fiction? The freakout whenever vampires have backstories that involve them being confederates at some point in history.

Nevermind the fact that these stories usually showcase vampires raping, killing and doing a bunch of other ethically questionable stuff. But wait, there's a flashback and the character is wearing a confederate uniform? Oh, no. NOW he is evil. It's a incredibly arbitrary and moralistic line to have when vampire fiction is usually known be morally messed up (it's almost as if it's an inherent part of the premise or something).

And of course there's a new video from a pseudo-intellectual creator talking about it, courtesy of Princess Weekes.


Now, from what I've seen of this person's other content and the video's comment section, it seems to be basically 45 minutes about how much Twilight/True Blood/The Vampire Diaries and its writers are all racist and evil. I don't hate myself enough to sit through that.
 
You wanna know what is easily one of the most eye-rolling controversies when it comes to discussing fiction? The freakout whenever vampires have backstories that involve them being confederates at some point in history.

Nevermind the fact that these stories usually showcase vampires raping, killing and doing a bunch of other ethically questionable stuff. But wait, there's a flashback and the character is wearing a confederate uniform? Oh, no. NOW he is evil. It's a incredibly arbitrary and moralistic line to have when vampire fiction is usually known be morally messed up (it's almost as if it's an inherent part of the premise or something).

And of course there's a new video from a pseudo-intellectual creator talking about it, courtesy of Princess Weekes.


Now, from what I've seen of this person's other content and the video's comment section, it seems to be basically 45 minutes about how much Twilight/True Blood/The Vampire Diaries and its writers are all racist and evil. I don't hate myself enough to sit through that.

Both leftists and christian moralists alike will freak out over villains doing villainous things, like misogyny, racism, etc. Anita Sarkeesian and Big Joel did this multiple times.

Another example is accusing JK Rowling of supporting moral relativism/nihilism because Lord Voldemort openly endorsed that position at the climax of the Philosopher's Stone.

I've heard of parents who don't let their kids get bad-guy action figures, and thus have the most boring battles between their toys because they were forced to use crude cardboard cutouts or paper drawings as a stand in for the villains.
 
You wanna know what is easily one of the most eye-rolling controversies when it comes to discussing fiction? The freakout whenever vampires have backstories that involve them being confederates at some point in history.

Nevermind the fact that these stories usually showcase vampires raping, killing and doing a bunch of other ethically questionable stuff. But wait, there's a flashback and the character is wearing a confederate uniform? Oh, no. NOW he is evil. It's a incredibly arbitrary and moralistic line to have when vampire fiction is usually known be morally messed up (it's almost as if it's an inherent part of the premise or something).

And of course there's a new video from a pseudo-intellectual creator talking about it, courtesy of Princess Weekes.


Now, from what I've seen of this person's other content and the video's comment section, it seems to be basically 45 minutes about how much Twilight/True Blood/The Vampire Diaries and its writers are all racist and evil. I don't hate myself enough to sit through that.
Im just tired of the gay ass blend of vampire and not the good old Nosferatu. Imagine an ugly motherfucker just slaughtering some slave niggers because he’s a big ugly mess and wants to feel good about himself. I’d watch a movie like that.

Also if it’s not plainly obvious I hate the confederate vampire bs. It’s uninspired and honestly gives slaves an unneeded amount of worth considering all they did was eat watermelon and stink. Can’t even have a racist vampire but he’s a confederate? SMH.
 
Found an interesting quote that definitely applies to the subjects of this thread:

You've got that eternal idiotic idea that if anarchy came it would come from the poor. Why should it? The poor have been rebels, but they have never been anarchists; they have more interest than anyone else in there being some decent government. The poor man really has a stake in the country. The rich man hasn't; he can go away to New Guinea in a yacht. The poor have sometimes objected to being governed badly; the rich have always objected to being governed at all. Aristocrats were always anarchists

-G.K. Chesterton
 
I'm surprised that they don't complain about the subtle dogwhistles that the Confederate slave owner Vampires are all Sepharedic Jews. Since Jews had a higher propotion of slave owners.

They also moved away from Nosferatu type Vampire movies because many prominent Jews like Greenblatt and Adam Silver (NBA Commissioner) look like Nosferatu and Boatsinker cartoons.

1672360247216.png


1672360127609.png
 
Another reason why it's not consistent is because they believe that "the means of production" should be owned collectively.

The trouble is, virtually anything you can get your hands on, even that which is normally considered "personal property" can be used as a means of production with enough creativity.
And knowing people, if there will always be a hierarchy regardless of whether it is officially set in stone or not. Imagine the long dragged out drama surrounding "ownership" when everyone in power has a say in it.
 
You wanna know what is easily one of the most eye-rolling controversies when it comes to discussing fiction? The freakout whenever vampires have backstories that involve them being confederates at some point in history.

Nevermind the fact that these stories usually showcase vampires raping, killing and doing a bunch of other ethically questionable stuff. But wait, there's a flashback and the character is wearing a confederate uniform? Oh, no. NOW he is evil. It's a incredibly arbitrary and moralistic line to have when vampire fiction is usually known be morally messed up (it's almost as if it's an inherent part of the premise or something).

And of course there's a new video from a pseudo-intellectual creator talking about it, courtesy of Princess Weekes.


Now, from what I've seen of this person's other content and the video's comment section, it seems to be basically 45 minutes about how much Twilight/True Blood/The Vampire Diaries and its writers are all racist and evil. I don't hate myself enough to sit through that.
I for once am not even going to humor such a retarded idea. Nazi vampires yes, confederate vampire's seems a bit cringe tho.

Emerican Johnson thinks that troons are under attack by the ebil capitalists, even though troons wouldn't have gotten as far as they have without being enabled by capitalists themselves.


He also whines about national Bolshevism, a meme ideology no one takes seriously, not even leftypol.


Musk's handling of Twitter was meh, but the leaking out of the internal documents to expose FBI and Democratic party censorship, and forcing journalists to abide by the same terms of service everyone else does, made it all worthwhile, and even self-proclaimed libertarians, left or right, could appreciate it.
At the end of the day take solace in the fact that the average retarded conservative obama was a musilim redneck probably has more IQ points then thought slime.
He came out as a troon in 2019 in the video where he complained about the Quartering's takes on Shera.

He came out as nonbinary, which conveniently allows him to be a complete and total faggot without actually mutilating himself or injecting himself with poisonous wrong-sex hormones.

He's also a major douchebag about his chosen gender identity, and even directs his ire towards those who tried to be nice to him, as he admits here:

Thought slime is one of the more disgusting bread tubers to think about here.

I watched that video. It wasn't bad, but it's nothing out of the ordinary whenever one goes down the JQ rabbithole. People in the comments have brought up the small sample sizes, which he has dismissed, even when Lynn's own book shows a table of all the studies and its corresponding numbers. One study done by Kirkegaard et al. has a sample size of 53, Levinson picked kids from yeshiva schools, and the others are bloated due to verbal IQ, a thing Jews are indeed superior in. I would have liked to have seen more data from Israel as well as the math/physics related scores, as that will tell you whether they are 'superior'.

LAC's video needed work, anyways. But Sean Last still comes out on top; his article on this issue lays out the nepotism and media control, something Ubersoy and his buddy only lightly touched on.

Still, it's still better sourced than anything Shaun or BreadTube can offer, so there is that.
One thing I can say about UberSoy that separates him from your average run of the mill Breadtube user is at the end of the day he's not coming from the right are just dumb and left are smart angle like every bread tuber makes their assumptions out to be.
 
Patsocs are different from nazbols because they're not racialists, they're basically just communists who want to co-opt american conservatism because they have enough brain cells to rub together to realize that evil conservachuds are the real proletariat and not black trans sex worker folx. It's communism with a civic nationalist paintjob.

also isn't this noncompete faggot literally on a paid white monkey propaganda trip in vietnam to shill for their government? This guy is so braindead retarded that he made me root for vaush in his debate against him.

Huh, I see.

It's ironic that at the end of the day, right wingers make better commies than the commies themselves.
 
Huh, I see.

It's ironic that at the end of the day, right wingers make better commies than the commies themselves.
The Soviet Union only worked when you had nationalist sentiment along with the leaving the Fuck alone of the plebs to build their own housing.
You can't have a queer version of the Soviet Union as leftists begin to eat themselves creating power vacuums the right will naturally exploit often leading to worse regimes. Think of the corrupt capitalist leader, the socialist leader and the barbarian religious warlord who ends up taking over. The biggest danger of leftist movements is they often create big power vacuums when they fail to solidify control.
 
The Soviet Union only worked when you had nationalist sentiment along with the leaving the Fuck alone of the plebs to build their own housing.
You can't have a queer version of the Soviet Union as leftists begin to eat themselves creating power vacuums the right will naturally exploit often leading to worse regimes. Think of the corrupt capitalist leader, the socialist leader and the barbarian religious warlord who ends up taking over. The biggest danger of leftist movements is they often create big power vacuums when they fail to solidify control.

It should also never be forgotten that the Bolsheviks started off as being very socially liberal, libertarian almost.

 
Back