- Joined
- Nov 10, 2019
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hence why I didn't say he gets the bullet, but he definitely needs to be kept away from your teenage daughter regardless.On the other hand, I'm not quite sure this guy meets Null's definition of a pedophile, where you don't attach the label unless you'd be personally willing to line him against a wall and pull the trigger.
There's nothing sexual about what Matt Walsh is saying. He's not speaking about his preference in women he's speaking about how teenagers will be teenagers and he'd prefer that if children are born they're born into a family with a mother and a father.How do you do my fellow conservatards? Maybe I just didn't get the memo but why is everyone rushing to defend Matt Walsh from HHH and the Mediamatters hit piece he referenced?
Even if saying girls ages 16-24 are the most fertile doesn't meet everyone's definition of pedophilia, it is at the very least kinda creepy coming from someone in their mid-thirties. I mean, people rightfully call Ralph a creep for dating Faith the second she turned 18.
Seems like kinda a weird hill to die on. I'm just trying to understand why I need to have a positive opinion about this guy. On the other hand, I'm not quite sure this guy meets Null's definition of a pedophile, where you don't attach the label unless you'd be personally willing to line him against a wall and pull the trigger. So, he's a Daily Wire columnist who made some creepy comments? Like, where's the controversy? Why do I need to be riled up?
It more accurately meets the definition of ignorance because it's not true. And he said it when he himself was in the age range you cited, not his mid 30's.Even if saying girls ages 16-24 are the most fertile doesn't meet everyone's definition of pedophilia, it is at the very least kinda creepy coming from someone in their mid-thirties. I mean, people rightfully call Ralph a creep for dating Faith the second she turned 18.
You don't need to have a positive opinion about him, you just need to know the facts and can form your own views.Seems like kinda a weird hill to die on. I'm just trying to understand why I need to have a positive opinion about this guy. On the other hand, I'm not quite sure this guy meets Null's definition of a pedophile, where you don't attach the label unless you'd be personally willing to line him against a wall and pull the trigger. So, he's a Daily Wire columnist who made some creepy comments? Like, where's the controversy? Why do I need to be riled up?
If you alt-right manlets didn't cheer on tax cuts for the ultra rich and white knight the political party that enables that kind of shit I'd take you more seriously. Instead you get seething mad and throw a temper tantrum anytime anyone insults your theocratic boomer political partyFirst sentence in and you are already incorrect.
Now, you might actually think that you are somehow oppressed by those damn dirty christians, but christianity and it's influence on anything have been in sharp decline for nearly 40 years. Not only is god dead, but no one cares, you are beating a dead horse, and your efforts have been wasted.
Meanwhile, the richest people on earth are buying up all of the housing and farmland, setting up their own fiefdoms and using the government and press as weapons to supress any opposition, but you cheer them on because they preach from the same progressive bible that you are beholden to. It's no seceret that the 'progressive' values you worship has weakened society to the point that has allowed them to do so.
Congratulations, you have helped secure your own serfdom. It's all good though, at least women can now lose out on college scholarships because they now have to compete against men in skirts who exert minimal effort. Good job. Now gag on that
trans-clit.
@SSj_Ness gets really, really mad anytime anyone says anything bad about any of his fellow theocratic Republicans. He even feels the need to defend Matt Gaetz by saying a 40 year old man trying to fuck a 17 year old is no big deal. He defended Roy Moore for going after 14 year old girls when he was in his 30s. He defended Josh Duggar and said Joel Koskan did nothing wrong.How do you do my fellow conservatards? Maybe I just didn't get the memo but why is everyone rushing to defend Matt Walsh from HHH and the Mediamatters hit piece he referenced?
Even if saying girls ages 16-24 are the most fertile doesn't meet everyone's definition of pedophilia, it is at the very least kinda creepy coming from someone in their mid-thirties. I mean, people rightfully call Ralph a creep for dating Faith the second she turned 18.
Seems like kinda a weird hill to die on. I'm just trying to understand why I need to have a positive opinion about this guy. On the other hand, I'm not quite sure this guy meets Null's definition of a pedophile, where you don't attach the label unless you'd be personally willing to line him against a wall and pull the trigger. So, he's a Daily Wire columnist who made some creepy comments? Like, where's the controversy? Why do I need to be riled up?
You have a weird definition of bullying considering you threw such a temper tantrum that people didn't want to live in a theocracy that you spazed out at Null and got yourself banned. Although it's cute you made yet another sock all to back up the lie that you're not @SSj_NessThat's not my ban-evasion sockpuppet, this is, but it's nice to see I still live rent free in your head after bullying you over a year ago.
Libtards be like: "Will you hecking boomer Neo-Con Alt-Right Christian #GamerGaters stop with your anti-Semitic QAnon conspiracies about the Jews? You Atlas Shrugged-loving fascists and your love of Wall Street and tax cuts for the rich!"If you alt-right manlets didn't cheer on tax cuts for the ultra rich and white knight the political party that enables that kind of shit I'd take you more seriously. Instead you get seething mad and throw a temper tantrum anytime anyone insults your theocratic boomer political party
WALSH: That's my point, OK? So to all of a sudden act like this phenomenon of girls getting pregnant at that — at a young age — that we consider young, 16 or 17, to act like it's a new thing is ridiculous. It’s always been that way. … Girls between the ages of like 17 and 24 is when they're technically most fertile.
WALSH: So what I’m saying is that the problem is not, per se, teenage pregnancy — it’s unwed pregnancy. That’s the problem in society. It’s only problematic when you are not married and you don’t have the man there to help you take care of the kids because he’s a coward.
They like having a Republican theocrat hugbox and get upset when they gotta see viewpoints that aren't written by senile 75 year olds or Russian botsI still can’t believe how mad people get at HHH
I dunno, you Republican boomers are the ones who seem to have a fetish for elderly, obese men to the point you guys tried to get me banned from here because I didn't share your fetish. I wouldn't be throwing stones in a glass house here.Libtards be like: "Will you hecking boomer Neo-Con Alt-Right Christian #GamerGaters stop with your anti-Semitic QAnon conspiracies about the Jews? You Atlas Shrugged-loving fascists and your love of Wall Street and tax cuts for the rich!"
Shitlibs seem to completely lack the ability to understand that different groups of people think they are retarded faggots.
Theoretically, they could still have an echo chamber if they just learned how to use the ignore function.They like having a Republican theocrat hugbox and get upset when they gotta see viewpoints that aren't written by senile 75 year olds or Russian bots
I dunno, you Republican boomers are the ones who seem to have a fetish for elderly, obese men to the point you guys tried to get me banned from here because I didn't share your fetish. I wouldn't be throwing stones in a glass house here.
>Alternative viewpoints presented in text equivalent of this:They like having a Republican theocrat hugbox and get upset when they gotta see viewpoints that aren't written by senile 75 year olds or Russian bots
I dunno, you Republican boomers are the ones who seem to have a fetish for elderly, obese men to the point you guys tried to get me banned from here because I didn't share your fetish. I wouldn't be throwing stones in a glass house here.
Only a Qtard would shame trannies and their choice of lingerie.Debate user Hollywood Hulk Hogan on user Hollywood Hulk Hogan and his transvestite underwear collection.