Russian Invasion of Ukraine Megathread - Episode III - Revenge of the Ruski (now unlocked with new skins and gameplay modes!!!)

Status
Not open for further replies.
They still want Odesa (and the rest of the south coast), but there's no way they're getting to it over land with the way things are right now. They might be thinking of establishing a new beachhead and forcing another front south of Odesa, or even south of the Dniester, as that part of the country is relatively isolated. That would let them put their artillery just barely in range of Odesa.
I noticed a lot of pro Russian retards constantly mention Odesa as if the Russians have a chance at capturing it. The notion is just as dumb as expecting the Afghan Goverment pulling though at middle of the Bagram airlift. But please please Russian Federation try to prove me and the other Ukrop shills wrong by sending your ships into a meat grinder littered with Anti Ship missle batteries, sea mines and a defense line that had 11 months and an unlimited budget to prepare.
 
Last edited:
I'm not a Eurocuck. I'm not bothered by shock images, I'm bothered by the attempts to use them as an appeal to emotion in place of an actual logical point.
Continue to show just precisely how normal and well adjusted you are.
Да, я хорошо. Никакой победы для жид Зеленский

Sources now suggest No.7 Salt Mine is now under Wagner control and that they crossed the Seversk-Soledar Highway, no comment was made in regards to the potential encirclement,

Still awaiting further confirmation if that's so but looks and sounds likely.

1673518890215.png
 
In general I want to say:
Russia is big enough and has enough modern-enough hardware that there isn't any "wunderwaffen" that will overcome a nearly 5 to 1 numerical advantage unless sent in large quantities. Even if we want to pretend you give 200 F-22s with trained pilots, all the logistics, weapons, etc, that's not going to win the war (unless Russia tapped out) it would only shift momentum - Russia is still lousy with SAMs, Russia still has plenty of MiGs, it'd probably take minimum 6 months to get air superiority over the front.

HIMARS has about as close as you're going to get to that Wunderwaffen though. they have only like 20 of the things and using just those they have schooled Russia by being able to out-do their artillery.

If they had enough to put even two batteries in each major sector, Russia would be collapsing even faster than they are now.

We would only he so blessed to see the Russians attempt an amphibious landing with the resources they have remaining. I'm just as doubtful that they are that retarded. Though I would be pleased to see if there are still enough retarded Russian decision makers hyped up on their own prewar hubris that they try.

If we're assuming Russia isn't completely retarded, my guess is that Russia is checking how feasible supplying their forces via landing ship is if ground routes become unavailable or unreliable; a landingship doesn't need a harbor if you put all the cargo on vehicles for roll-off. If they retasked all their landing ships to supply, they'd have something like 5,000 tons of shipping capacity, which wouldn't be enough to hold Crimea by itself, but might be enough of critical supplies to keep the sector from collapsing for a week or two to see something can be done.
I wouldn't say this means Russia is worried, just they are acknowledging the possibility.

The other possibility is that they are going to make a show of landing capabilities to off-balance Ukraine. 9 transports could bring a lot of forces, possibly enough to hit odessa, take the airport, and hope for airlift (Russia lacks the capability to supply a major op). I'm not sure of transit times, but assuming the ships could make runs every day, that's alot of forces in your backyard.
If not wildly successful, you'd have good odds of pinning down and piece-mealing your opposition, so Russia wouldn't do this. But the Ukrainians would need to be prepared for you to do if you can show the capacity. And every company guarding Odessa is a company not pressing Melitopol.

Disclaimer: I thought Russia was too smart to try to invade Ukraine; we know how well that thought has aged. Weigh speculations appropriately.
 
Just use google translate as Feline does.
What, you thought that she knew russian?
Everyone can play that game.
В России полно содомитов и пьяных растлителей малолетних.

I know that bint doesn't. Which is why I'm not even acknowledging them by putting in the effort to translate their nazi talk.
Besides I got the jist: "I'm a vatnigger, putins cock tastes great, loving snuff & guro is normal."
 
Addtional thing about the potential naval invasion of Odessa:
North Vietnam's Tet offensive, militarily, was a complete shitshow for the NVA. Months of prep, accomplished nothing on the battlefield.
In Hue, the only part of the offensive where the NVA took and held territory for a couple weeks and did the hardest fighting, by their own estimates took 3 to 1 combat losses against the US and ARVN; it might have been as high as 10 to 1, and more realistically around 5 to 1 - though the numbers are all sorts of fucked up. (Some ARVN units defected to the NVA, some civilians might have been VC, some VC were counted as civilian, NVA also only counted dead not injured so the result might have been even more skewed....) the take away is the NVA with their biggest success, and aided by retarded US high command decisions, got schooled super hard when you look only at battlemap, just an utter lopsided curb stomping.

From a messaging and propaganda standpoint, it was a massive overwhelming victory.
The US had said they couldn't launch an operation like Tet. The US command was so divorced from reality it took them days to send proper reinforcements. It turned public perception against the war, and gave anti-war factions something to seize on. The enemy wasn't "almsot defeated" and no one had the stomach for more pointless deaths for questionable objectives (there was no US invasion in reprisal for Tet)

Russia wouldn't need to achieve any tangible or lasting military results with a bum-rush to Odessa/near odessa. They just have to show the Eurocucks that they can pull it off and then let the Germans do what he KGB deep-covers in their government always do: cuck under and let Russia have their way. "This isn't almost over, this is just starting".
 
Please, no more salt, I'm going to get high blood pressure!

This morning: Konstantinovka missile strike and a missile strike in Kramatorsk as well.

Additional issues in the AFU, which given conditions is criminal imo:



AFU soldier complains the thermal underwear, which the AFU cannot can not supply him with, is freely sold at the market.

"I bought thermal underwear from you for 1200, and it is from the Armed Forces of Ukraine. On what basis are you selling it? …

I am a soldier. In my military unit they cannot give me such thermal underwear, and you sell military thermal underwear ...

It also says “Not for sale”. And you are selling it. On what basis?"

Corruption in his Ukraine? No, how can this be true? Ukraine is true and honest! I thought only the ruZZian orcs did this!
 
So I wanted to make this post for a while, but the main website I use does not have the annual update so it can't be helped.

Just keep one thing in mind when it comes to energy economics. You can only fool someone once in their lifetime.
I will focus on electricity in the European Union since that's where I am somewhat in my depth of topic. This does exclude other areas where energy is mostly used. Meaning:
1. Transportation
2. Heating
3. Industrial processes

The electrification of these areas is in process but will take some time. But each EV, each heatpump and each P2G/P2X facility is pushing the very product out that is exported by Russia. So let's compare 2021/2022.

142145.jpg

Energy Source in TWh20212022Difference
Solar134166+ 32
Wind (Off+Onshore)367394+ 27
Hydro (Storage + Water)324260- 64
Nuclear698580- 118
Coal (Hard + Brown)399423+ 24
Gas432435+ 3

The really hot summer in Europe reduced the water based production of electricity in most parts of Europe. In addition to that many nuclear power plants use the water of nearby rivers for cooling and thus were also negatively effected by the lack of water and high temperature.

When it comes to the difference in nuclear production you mostly have the beforementioned drought in the summer and the problems the French currently have with their nuclear power plant fleet. Many reactors show signs of corrosion damage and had to put off the grid for unplanned maintenance in addition to other plants being off the grid for planned maintenance.
The French nuclear power generation went from 359 TWh in 2021 to 278 TWh in 2022 alone. A difference of 81 TWh, which explains a large part of the total reduction in Europe. Add to that the drought and the shutdown of 3 reactors in Germany (Brokdorf, Grohnde, Gundremmingen C) in 2021 and it explains the total difference pretty decently.

Wind and Solar had a small increase and more coal was used for electricity generation. Gas usage remained mostly unchanged.

As a sidenote. The total production was down around 100 TWh. Made up by savings and the mild winter and thus low electricity use for heating.

This in the installed electricity generation capacity in Europe in 2021. The website still has not all the updated info for 2022. So that graph is currently not usable.
4214152.JPG

Most capacity addition happened in the renewable sector. Solar added another 41.4 GW in 2022, which is huuuuuge when the total in 2021 was at around 135 GW.
14214124.JPG

Wind power added an additional 15 GW of electricity generation capacity, which is less than 10 % of total generation installed in Europe. But wind power takes longer to plan and a good chunk of European countries have relaxed the needed paperwork and regulations for that. So we might see bigger increases in the near future,

Solar + 41,4 GW
Wind + 15 GW

And that alone in a little bit over 10 months of time and that despite supply chain issues, which seem to become more and more revolved as time goes on.
This is important, because after all, each renewable capacity installations is reducing Europes dependance on Russia and makes more electricity available for the other areas (Transportation, heating, industrial processes).

Just so showcase is with the German/Italian electricity generation for different weeks in summer.

Germany.JPGItaly.JPG

Germany has far more solar capacity installed than Italy and you can see how solar is pretty decently absorbing the load increase as people wake up, start working and so on and how it puts a little dent into the gas consumption. On the other hand Italy has little solar capacity installed. It's capable of absorbing a bit of the increase but especially in the morning/evning the flexible gas power plants have to be running.
If the trend in solar goes on. Italy will be way less reliant on gas, since the solar generation will start to replace gas more and more and Italy has way better solar potential than Germany. And Italy alone made up 117 TWh of gas derived electricity production in Europe in 2022. More than 25 % of Europes total.

I see an even higher increase of solar in 2023 and 2024. Wind will probably pick up a lot of speed starting at 2024. And if the capacity is installed, it will be very hard to convince people to go back to fossial consumption.
Russia literally shot themself in the foot when it comes to maintaining Europe as a potential energy customer.
 
Do Ukrainians have ordnance that can scatter mines?
Besides rockets & artillery shells, they also spread mines from dispensers mounted on rotary-wing aircraft (i.e. VSM-1)

They may also have something like the Russian version of the Volcano mine-laying system, but if it's from NATO it's likely one of these;
Systems that are part of the FASCAM range include:
The Remote Anti-Armor Mine System (RAAMS) are two types of 155mm howitzer projectiles containing nine anti-tank mines each: the M718 or M718A1 (RAAM-L) with a self-destruct time over 24 hours and the M741 or M741A1 (RAAM-S) with a self-destruct time under 24 hours. Both projectiles are used with the M577 or M577A1 Mechanical Time and Superquick (MTSQ) fuze, which triggers the ejection mechanism of the mines above enemy territory after a preset time.[1]

These mines can be delivered at ranges from 4 to 17.6 kilometers from the artillery battery position using either the M109 series or M198 or M777 series howitzers.[2]

Some 10,200 have been sent to Ukraine.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back