Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.7%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 94 26.5%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 57 16.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 137 38.6%

  • Total voters
    355
Yeah, Furries always seemed to me to be more akin to the people who'd use a glory hole than genuine animal fuckers. They're too fat/ugly/weird to persuade a human to have sex with them unless they completely conceal themselves within some kind of acrylic fur suit.

If you're genuinely into bestiality, you probably aren't spending hundreds on a fur suit. You'd just be sneaking onto somebody's farm at night.
There's always roadkill, just ask Kero.
 
YOU LOST NICHOLAS REKIETA,
YOU FAILED NICHOLAS REKIETA,
YOU'RE DUMB NICHOLAS REKIETA,
YOU'RE THE DUMBEST LITIGANT EVER NICHOLAS REKIETA,
YOU'RE A FAILURE NICHOLAS REKIETA.
Leave the meme filks to the professionals, sir...

You're a retard, Mr. Nick
You really are a tool
You're as fugly as a tranny, you're legally a big fool, Mr. Nick.
You're suck big bananas with a greasy black peel!

You're a degenerate, Mr. Nick
Your head's an empty hole
Your brain is addled by cooming, you're got hypocrisy in your soul, Mr. Nick
I wouldn't touch you with Drex's allegedly thirty-foot pole!

You're a vile one, Mr. Nick
You have a case of crabs in your junk
You have all the prickly character of a middle-aged man in funk, Mr. Nick.
And you owe it all to your coom-brained obsession with spunk!

You're a foul one, Mr. Nick
You're a titty-streaming skank
Your heart is full of unwashed cocks, your soul is full of spank, Mr. Nick
The three words that best describe you are as follows, and I quote
"Skink, skank, skunk!"

You're all rotten, Mr. Nick
You're the king of middle-aged sluts
You're entertaining wine-moms on your locals every night, Mr. Nick
Your brain is an appalling dump heap overflowing with the most disgraceful
Assortment of deplorable rubbish imaginable, proving Ethan Ralph was right.
 
A lot of people in the Lawtube community would be bias towards Rekieta. Any inconvenient details that crop up on Nick's side would likely be glossed over.
Kurt’s probably the one that could do it. But he’s dry beyond belief. Mindset would be my goto even with the Nock bias. I don’t think that would stop him pointing out stupid bits.
 
Kurt’s probably the one that could do it. But he’s dry beyond belief. Mindset would be my goto even with the Nock bias. I don’t think that would stop him pointing out stupid bits.
Kurt is a bitchy queen. I tried listening to him but it's impossible to tolerate him and his obvious overcompensation for extremely low self-esteem.

Edit: To be fair though, his coverage of that chick who tried to sue the bar association to give her a law license despite failing the test or whatever was hilarious.
 
SO WHAT IS VIVA HIDING?
Easy. He’s canadian. Also his work ethic is better than Nick’s. And Nick would probably be the first to tell you that. In fact, i think he has said as much in the past.

Viva also picked up pretty quickly what not to do, probably because he got advice from people like Nick the second he blew up. People not so immersed in internet culture tend to be able to keep their shit together better.

He also does stuff with Barnes which explains his ablity to get the guests he does.
 
Yes, I have to say I didn't realize animal fucking was a thing until I started reading KiwiFarms. Even in circles where people are out and proud about all manner of kinks (the kind of things that, just twenty years ago, people would kill themselves before being publicly exposed as involved in).

Even among those people, you still don't generally get people owning their desire to shag an animal -- let alone admitting to the actual practice. But even so, surely the numbers can't be so great as to make up the membership of the Libertarian Party -- let alone the much larger number of unaffiliated supporters. My money is still on dope fiends.
Not to defend zoophillia but there is some data on this:
According to Kinsley's work on sexuality, it was 8% for men and 4% for women, if that held true until now then we'd have a around 19 million people (6%) who are zoophiles alone. I think the rate was significantly higher for rural men and women, but on the other side working class men/women were severely underrepresented in the study proportionate to the US population, and Jews over-represented, so maybe it's just a white collar/jewish thing?

Granted, this study was done in the 1940s-1950s and in person (and shame was a thing back then). Pretty sure the number would be higher in the general public. I've seen arguments that since the USA is a lot more urban so the rate should decrease. But I need only to point you to the emergence of furries and generally increase in public degeneracy. Sure, people aren't going out and pulling a Mr. Hands all day, but I'm disinclined to believe the incidence has gone down.
Unfortunately all the pdfs are paywalled by Project MUSE now, fucking "non-profit" universities.

Not a physiologist. I'm sure someone on the farms has a deeper understanding than me.

Back on track. Nick's basically doing badly done attack runs on his "detractors". It only takes one to fuck up and crash.
Предельная перегрузка - G overload
Предельный угол атаки - Critical angle of attack
Высота опасная - Altitude Warning
Or this one (Stroke is an appropriate callsign for Nick):
 
SO WHAT IS VIVA HIDING?
Last I checked, at pretty much every possible instance, Viva has made himself out to be very clueless and innocent when it comes to internet culture and he does a very good job at keeping away from anything even slightly lewd regarding anything and anyone. To me he seems like he tries to be as genuine and optimistic as possible, although the last few years have taken it's toll in the optimism department. I don't think he drinks or smokes or anything like that, has two kids, is Jewish (and I think he leans towards Orthodoxy so no liberal degeneracy bullshit) and actually goes out to document shit (or to go ice fishing) rather than just staying inside all day and circlejerking with chat. Not streaming for 40 hours a week probably helps with that.
 
Plus didn't he get admitted to the federal bar as well? In that case he can also cover the corresponding shitshow there.
There isn't really admission to a general federal bar. You apply with each individual District or Circuit Court. It's a simple matter of being in good standing in the state where you're practicing, and generally automatic if you're licensed in the state where the district is, or in a state the Circuit covers for a Circuit Court.

You (usually) need a certificate of good standing from the highest court in the state as well as (often) two members to vouch for your character, have practiced for a term beforehand (like three years for SCOTUS), not have been disciplined recently (also often three years), and be of generally good character. So a court can refuse to admit you to the bar for its own reasons, although they must be constitutional reasons, not just prejudice.

For instance, here's the process for SCOTUS:

So unless you've been a bad boy, and if you do the proper paperwork, admission is a fairly mechanical process.

There's also a "Federal Bar Association," but that is just a voluntary membership association open to any licensed attorney (or with a free membership for law students).

The phrase "federal bar" is also sometimes used as a general description of people who practice in the federal courts.
 
There isn't really admission to a general federal bar. You apply with each individual District or Circuit Court. It's a simple matter of being in good standing in the state where you're practicing, and generally automatic if you're licensed in the state where the district is, or in a state the Circuit covers for a Circuit Court.

You (usually) need a certificate of good standing from the highest court in the state as well as (often) two members to vouch for your character, have practiced for a term beforehand (like three years for SCOTUS), not have been disciplined recently (also often three years), and be of generally good character. So a court can refuse to admit you to the bar for its own reasons, although they must be constitutional reasons, not just prejudice.

For instance, here's the process for SCOTUS:

So unless you've been a bad boy, and if you do the proper paperwork, admission is a fairly mechanical process.

There's also a "Federal Bar Association," but that is just a voluntary membership association open to any licensed attorney (or with a free membership for law students).

The phrase "federal bar" is also sometimes used as a general description of people who practice in the federal courts.
This is why I always found it embarrassing how often Kurt would casually bring up his admittance to the SCOTUS bar. Maybe he's stopped it these days, but back when I was subscribed to him he would always find a way to work it in and it just came across as sad.
 
This is why I always found it embarrassing how often Kurt would casually bring up his admittance to the SCOTUS bar. Maybe he's stopped it these days, but back when I was subscribed to him he would always find a way to work it in and it just came across as sad.
The only members of the SCOTUS bar are the ones who have stood up for oral arguments and answered questions. The rest are superlawyers who paid the fee.
 
Not to defend zoophillia but there is some data on this:
According to Kinsley's work on sexuality, it was 8% for men and 4% for women, if that held true until now then we'd have a around 19 million people (6%) who are zoophiles alone. I think the rate was significantly higher for rural men and women, but on the other side working class men/women were severely underrepresented in the study proportionate to the US population, and Jews over-represented, so maybe it's just a white collar/jewish thing?

Granted, this study was done in the 1940s-1950s and in person (and shame was a thing back then). Pretty sure the number would be higher in the general public. I've seen arguments that since the USA is a lot more urban so the rate should decrease. But I need only to point you to the emergence of furries and generally increase in public degeneracy. Sure, people aren't going out and pulling a Mr. Hands all day, but I'm disinclined to believe the incidence has gone down.
Unfortunately all the pdfs are paywalled by Project MUSE now, fucking "non-profit" universities.

Not a physiologist. I'm sure someone on the farms has a deeper understanding than me.

Back on track. Nick's basically doing badly done attack runs on his "detractors". It only takes one to fuck up and crash.
Предельная перегрузка - G overload
Предельный угол атаки - Critical angle of attack
Высота опасная - Altitude Warning
Or this one (Stroke is an appropriate callsign for Nick):
I wouldn’t put too much faith in Kinsey. He was a Rockefeller stooge and a lot of his data was faulty (he and his researchers inserted themselves into experiments or he used child molestors as a baseline).
This is why I always found it embarrassing how often Kurt would casually bring up his admittance to the SCOTUS bar. Maybe he's stopped it these days, but back when I was subscribed to him he would always find a way to work it in and it just came across as sad.
Kurt is a misery addicted incel. He will sabotage the success he wants because he’s afraid of failing.
 
This is why I always found it embarrassing how often Kurt would casually bring up his admittance to the SCOTUS bar. Maybe he's stopped it these days, but back when I was subscribed to him he would always find a way to work it in and it just came across as sad.
I think you are confusing Kurt getting admitted to the Texas bar.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Procrastinhater
Yeah I strongly defended Nick for this incident, even if it wasn't the wisest thing for him to say. IIRC he said "you go on the wall next to all the other pedophiles and groomers", which was wildly exaggerated by Keffals into "you should be put against a wall and shot"
Stop with the bullshit. You put people on a fucking wall for one reason alone.

To canoe their skull.
 
Stop with the bullshit. You put people on a fucking wall for one reason alone.

To canoe their skull.
I was gonna say to balldo their ass like the booty warrior but that works too.
Balldo That Ass (BTA), - Lolyer wars
People who keep talking about the wall (and tripods) should be put on the wall.
Please, be a shining example for us all.
 
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Procrastinhater
The only members of the SCOTUS bar are the ones who have stood up for oral arguments and answered questions. The rest are superlawyers who paid the fee.
You have to be a member even to file a petition for a writ of certiorari, and the vast majority of the people who do that never have a case heard. You can also sit in the bar member section of the audience for oral arguments, rather than having to rub shoulders with low class scum like journalists (other than the ones who actually are members).
 
Back