Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[TheClappening]

Nick is watching the Northman for a Twitch watch party. I've never seen it, so I'm sticking around.

Chat is generally talking about the movie, except for some familiar faces from Locals.

(A character was just beheaded)

 

[Darkholme's Dungeon]

I've never seen it, so I'm sticking around.

May Muhammad guide you in your journey against the infidels.

 

[Trianon]

A lot of people in the Lawtube community would be bias towards Rekieta.

Here's how Legal Bytes can shine again.

Nick is watching the Northman for a Twitch watch party. I've never seen it, so I'm sticking around.

Chat is generally talking about the movie, except for some familiar faces from Locals.

(A character was just beheaded)
View attachment 4276230


View attachment 4276256

Sally was begging him not to pick The Northman for the movie party, guess Nick doesn't love her like she thought he did!

 

[Bepis]

View attachment 4276230

I've been watching the chat and I really think art has lolcow potential. Every minor offence in that chat seems to live rent free in his head. I'm expecting big things from him in the future.

 

[Captain Manning]

People who keep talking about the wall (and tripods) should be put on the wall. Check your 'tism.

I dunno about the wall, but I'm definitely tired of the tripod.

I keep tripping over it.

So anyways, do we put the tripod on the wall, or against the wall? It would be more out of the way if we put it up on the wall, but it seems more sensible to lean it against the wall in case we need it soon.

What? Why are you looking at me like that? We have to do something about the stupid tripod and it's been well established that there is some sort of a wall.

Here's how Legal Bytes can shine again.

I thought about that. It would be funny if she did it, but I'm getting the impression she's bowed out completely on Rekieta shit. Even though she's probably giggling at Nick now, she still got mauled pretty badly by the rest of Lawtube and might not want to try her luck again.

 

[ThisHill2DieOn]

This shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone, but I checked Legal Mindset’s vid with Rackets and he has definitely been purging comments. Not surprising. He dickrides Rackets’ coattails so hard that Andrew even co-opted Nick’s childhood friend, Drex. To quote Hitler, “good grief.”

Edit to clarify that comments have been purged from his YT vid. Idk about Rumble.

 

[Potatoherder]

Legalbytes actually got 8k subs over covering the logan paul stuff. First hit got her over 500k views but it seems to be diminishing returns. Considering how late to the ball he's been i expect Nick to cover it this week.

 

[ThisHill2DieOn]

I get your point, but bestiality is still illegal and actively prosecuted in most states.

Spoiler: “sick and terrible shit”

Go ahead and google (remember to always refer to web searches as “googling” or “to google” to erode their trademark) “man rapes puppy” and you will see multiple cases around the world every year. If you want to get even more fucked up shit, look up rape of infants. It’s more often than you might think and it fairly often involves perps literally fucking the infant to death.

 

[ColinQuinnsStent]

I'm not as good at this as @Yandex Captcha Solver, but I'm really loving what Cynthia has been dishing out tonight.

Spoiler: Queen Cynthia

I've been watching the chat and I really think art has lolcow potential. Every minor offence in that chat seems to live rent free in his head. I'm expecting big things from him in the future.

Psycho coomer, qu'est-ce que c'est? Fa fa fa fa, fa fa fa fa fa fapping in chat.

 

[ThisHill2DieOn]

I was one of the people on Nick's side on that one, and I have a bit of a different take on it. The reason I think Nick was being so obtuse about it, is because if you give leftists an inch they will take a mile, so he has to be very strict in his phrasing to preserve intent. They were trying to paint it as a threat, when any normal person can understand that the intent is that it's a phrase meant to convey how awful you believe a group is and how they should be dealt by authorities, but if you phrase it in the "and shot" manner, then you will have a swarm of people reporting you not only to youtube and twitter, but also to every place you may wish to work, including the bar association, which they still did but at least he has deniability.

I get where you're coming from, and if it was just for some Internet account, sure, but to go into a game you know is rigged and to play like it's not rigged is foolish.

It is literally JewTube bucks. Not having YT severely fucks his income. Rumble doesn’t pay shit for views, YT pays out big. Even with Rumble Rants, people like using YT and there is always a higher amount or YT Superchats to Rumble Rants. This may change with (to my understanding) Rumble now having a mobile option to give money, which is not only a big source of revenue for streamers (mobile viewers), but also a big reason why the internet is a shithole of fuckheaded retards that should have been cannon fodder in a great war.

It’s being coy. It is a literal dog whistle. But Nick loves money more than principles, as do a lot of people.

I do think you’re spot on with the last point. Nick knows the game is rigged against him. Which is why trying this childish semantics is retarded. He could easily frame his distaste in a vehement manner without allegories to executions, if he so chose. Especially considering he fancies himself such a wordsmith.

 

[KingOfHypocrisy]

 

[ThisHill2DieOn]

Kurt’s probably the one that could do it. But he’s dry beyond belief. Mindset would be my goto even with the Nock bias. I don’t think that would stop him pointing out stupid bits.

Kurt is a highly unstable element. He has had many really shitty moments consistently over the past few years. There is a reason why his shit-for-views channel has barely grown despite knowing many big players and heavily networking with likeminded streamers. He’s a dickweed cunt asswipe that is tolerated.

I think I said this before, but maybe not: the dark horse of LawTube(tm) is Robert Gouveia (formerly Robert Gruler). His presentations are great, fact filled, he has his views but he doesn’t beat you with them and is honest about his bias, plays devil’s advocate to represent differing views. He doesn’t do a lot of collabs. Just him putting out his opinions and doing some great analysis.

IMO, if you want good legal commentary from someone on “the right” that is honest and earnest, Robert Gouveia is a great channel to check out.

 

[TexOffender]

Legalbytes actually got 8k subs over covering the logan paul stuff. First hit got her over 500k views but it seems to be diminishing returns. Considering how late to the ball he's been i expect Nick to cover it this week.
View attachment 4276652
View attachment 4276658
View attachment 4276656

I watched these vids she put out. They were pretty good breakdowns of stuff. Kind of hope Logan Paul gets sued and dragged through the dirt.

 

[6MillionCoofs]

Edit to clarify that comments have been purged from his YT vid. Idk about Rumble.

That could just be YT. It purges shit all the time with no rhyme or reason and there’s no real way to tell. And i’m going to bet a lot of the comments might trip the bot.

 

[ThisHill2DieOn]

That could just be YT. It purges shit all the time with no rhyme or reason and there’s no real way to tell. And i’m going to bet a lot of the comments might trip the bot.

It does, but not stuff that has been posted beyond 30 seconds. Especially not comments that have been posted for hours. Look at the view count. Look at the comment count. Compare with other vids.

Shit doesn’t add up at outside glance. I wish I took screenshots, but there were comments just saying (paraphrasing) “why is the comment count so low?” that got kicked.

LM is dickride or die. Like I said. He rides Nick’s coattails so fucking hard he even made Nick’s childhood friend one of his streaming buddies.

All MGTOW and PUA are either outright faggots, faggot adjacent, cucks and/or incel retards. Literally every single one of these Rico Sauve retard niggers.

 

[Whistlin' Crustacean]

Rackets is going to have to make a showing of all four Finden factors:

1. Reasonable excuse
2. Prompt response
3. Defense on the merits
4. Lack of prejudice to the other side for relief of the default.

Rackets can probably make a sufficient showing on all four to get out of the default. But, if Plaintiff is thinking strategically, his lawyer can make Rackets look like a drunk dumbfuck who decided to stream and drink and whine and thirst after e-thots instead of just answering the complaint.

That's not particularly relevant to the law here, but the Court's first impression of Rackets is that he's just a whiny asshole.

If played right, this is like what happened in Greer v. AGT, where AGT got into the record all of Greer's past failed lolsuits. None of it was particularly relevant, but it did make him look like a sex pest and nobody likes a sex pest. Similarly, showing Rackets doing fuck all to actually answer this lolsuit makes him look like a blustering buffoon. Nobody likes a blustering buffoon.

This particular court's first impression of Nick happened some time ago. Jennifer Fischer is the same judge before whom he unsuccessfully defended a case a couple years ago (Case No. 34-CR-19-1198, searchable here). Some woman was accused of felony theft by swindle. Nick says the judge threw the book at her, ranting angrily about how if she can afford a lawyer, she can afford to return what she's stolen (which amounted to $386212.74). Afterwards, Nick, being the asshole who just has to get the last word in, informed the judge (literally in an elevator, if memory serves) that he was doing everything pro bono. As Nick told the story, he wasn't nice about it.

So the court's impression of Nick might very well be "a total prick" already.

Imagine. Nick just got his client locked up for 4 years, not to mention the restitution. The judged screamed at him and his client. Meanwhile, his YouTube channel is taking off. He's been thinking of basically retiring from law for years now, and now he finally has the ability to do so. The Rittenhouse trial is just 1 week away, and he's covering it. Knowing what Nick's like, does he:

• take the L, going home quietly;​

• tell the judge off, thinking that he'll never see her again?​

This isn't really a question, he told us what he did.

And now, 1.5 years later, some watermelon fucker is dragging him before that same judge as the defendant. That must chafe his balls worse than the balldo.

 

[Procrastinhater]

This particular court's first impression of Nick happened some time ago. Jennifer Fischer is the same judge before whom he unsuccessfully defended a case a couple years ago. Some woman was accused of felony theft by swindle. Nick says the judge threw the book at her, ranting angrily about how if she can afford a lawyer, she can afford to return what she's stolen (which amounted to $386212.74). Afterwards, Nick, being the asshole who just has to get the last word in, informed the judge (literally in an elevator, if memory serves) that he was doing everything pro bono. As Nick told the story, he wasn't nice about it.

So the court's impression of Nick might very well be "a total prick" already.

Tbf to Nick that Judge sounded like an utter Thundercunt, I can't say I'd have reacted any differently in that occasion. Then again I'm an asshole and I don't have to argue cases in front of her at some point so...

 

[Twitter Is Cancer]

Tbf to Nick that Judge sounded like an utter Thundercunt, I can't say I'd have reacted any differently in that occasion. Then again I'm an asshole and I don't have to argue cases in front of her at some point so...

I'm intrigued why anyone actually believes anything Rekieta says, especially when he casts himself in such a heroic selfless role.

 

[Procrastinhater]

I'm intrigued why anyone actually believes anything Rekieta says, especially when he casts himself in such a heroic selfless role.

That's a good point actually.

 

[DumDum Did Nothing Wrong]

lol Cynthia has become one of favorite characters during this arc.