>>the decisions made regarding Havyn's care haven't been for her benefit or comfort whatsoever.
Good lord, yes, this. Please let this poor child go.
Have you ever been approaching the end of a dogs life and having to make the call on is it time to euthanize?
My god its so hard when they're still looking at you with those eyes and that tail.
Now imagine it's your child.
Now imagine you can't euthanize. You have to wait for them to be actively dying and chose not to take heroic measures. Havyn probably has a DNR for that situation.
So what the actual situation is every time Havyn has a new presenting health issue you have to either
A) treat it with an invasive and unpleasant treatment that will prolong her suffering but give you longer with your child.
B) allow it to deteriorate untreated until it kills her slowly.
And don't forget you are part of a global community all egging you on. All wanting Havyn to live as long as possible. When she dies. Its all over. It will all fall away and you will be left with a memory box and a house full of dusty medical equipment and years of unprocessed trauma that you buried while you got on with the business of trying to love this child.
I know we do low empathy black and white thinking here but it's not as simple as "let's do an intervention for her benefit or not".
Not wanting to shit on OP completely this was an interesting writeup and it's stimulating an interesting debate but I see no cow. If you move in the world of special needs kids this is really nothing out of the ordinary.