Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 65 21.5%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 27.5%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 47 15.6%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 103 34.1%

  • Total voters
    302
Shit on Crowder deal
While I would be inclined to agree with your take on it, I will repeat myself that I think Crowder's manager is carrying a lot of the blame for what went on because from what godking said, he didn't ask for anything and just wanted "the offer". It seems like he got AN offer and thought that was it? I can't blame Crowder then for going ballistic after his manager was a lazy fuck and couldn't be assed to at least engage in negotiations.

Bringing this back to Nick, I did find it funny when he tried to compare it to his Rumble and Locals contracts, but it's the only frame of reference he has about this sort of thing. Obviously, the money Crowder and The Daily Wire are playing with is nowhere near what Nick was negotiating for, so the expectations are going quite different as it pertains to freedoms and whatnot. To be fair to Nick, he did acknowledge that they're not on the same playing field, but then he kept on saying how his contract had pretty much no expectations or ownership, as long as he delivers a certain amount of shows, which is super awesome. Ya don't say! As was already mentioned, the amount Crowder could lose from being penalized is probably more than what Nick's whole contract is worth, so they're not even on the same planet with this stuff.
Nick, while admitting he is nowhere near that league, might fancy himself as having the potential for it. And if he didn't drift to coomer side, he very well might have had the potential for successes of that height.
 
$100k is several orders of magnitude higher than his nightly take in Rumble rants, and Rumble's cut would be a fraction of that. A $100k penalty for missing a show when he's guaranteed them 13 shows per month or ~150 shows over the course of a year would be insane.

Just looking at the numbers like that, $100k for a year's worth of streaming could very well be in the right ballpark.
I don't see any reason to believe Nick's commentary about his numbers anymore. His story has changed multiple times.

When discussions first started with Rumble/Locals about an exclusivity deal, he talked openly about it. Then he did the same thing he did with the Rittenhouse interview where he sperged at someone asking for news about it and said that he will announce the news as soon as it happens. Not hard to take away from that that the negotiations were going poorly at that point. Then he did the stream where he played hardball by whining about the negotiations and said something along the lines that he would be prepared to make 50% of YT revenue on Rumble, but not 25%, which was what Rumble were offering. Then he signed a deal.

Then he announced to the effect that 2023 would be a bigger year for him than 2022 even if he didn't stream at all. I took that to mean that (Rumble deal + sponsorship revenue) > YT super chat revenue, which, frankly, I don't believe for a single second. Playboard scrapes that shit. We know the ballpark of what he would have to make for that be true, and I don't see him coming close. Even if he was excluding trial content from that number, he was grossing $1.5-2k per night in superchats on the night show in the time right before the YT banning, per Playboard.

I think a subtext to this is that Rekieta occasionally makes statements to try to dunk on certain people on the fruit farm (shout out to @Potatoherder) who discuss his social media strategy and numbers, and it's hard to tell what statements are meant to be informative as opposed to dunks.
 
Around 12 minutes in to the show last night, he read a Superchat about a missing 5 year old. He followed this with, "If you are a praying person, please pray for the safety of that little boy." For some reason, this really jumped out at me. He used to tell people that he would personally be praying for the subject of the Superchat. I have never heard him delegate that sort of thing to the audience. I don't know, just an observation.

Relevant post below (edited for the sake of brevity):

Interestingly, during his 5 year YouTube anniversary stream, there was a anecdote told by Kayla where she referred to Nick's faux Christianity, here's the clip:
View attachment 4185611
apologies for the audio levels. I'm a boomer at clipping

You shouldn't have to be a believer to understand the significance of Kayla's assessment of her own husband.
 
Been away for a while and by fuck has Nick continue to fall. Jesus fuck, this man has fallen faster than the fat man did at Nagasaki. Seriously, Nick has fucked up and it would have been a shame if this wasn't this corner of the Internet. The man had everything and used to be far more reasonable. honest and respectable, yet he still made the same mistakes a lolcow would do. Pretty fucked up considering that he actually was a stand up guy that stood up for Vic and bashed many cunts online for being spiteful retards. I guess being an E-celeb is a cursed profession after all.
 
Try looking at this a different way and see if it fits:

Nick admits to being a sex pervert (claims he always has been). Nick is the one who defended his degeneracy, and he still does. The problem area is not admitting to his degeneracy. The problem is that Nick needs to comes to terms with is the fact that he marketed himself as a more traditional/moral person to appeal to that audience for personal gain. This is what seems to trigger him the most.
Well. He doesn't really admit to being a sex pervert. He always puts a spin on it that seems less than honest. In the same way that presenting himself as trad christian wasn't honest. He does these things and first of all tries to project them as being part of a committed marriage. He will try to say that anyone who sees what he is doing as sex pervert stuff is a prude. There was a clip I saw where he tried to say that couples assposting (as he did) is just a form of normal social fun that normal people get up to. He is also completely dishonest about contradictory opinions he has held in the past and people he shamed or attacked for doing what he is doing now. He also almost always misrepresents the comments made against him.

If he came out and said he was a bi swinger in an open marriage, that would at least square with what he is doing. But running around doing the things he is doing and saying that they are part of committed monogamous marriage doesn't line up with what he does. Even more in the wake of having pretended to be a trad christian, people are free to wonder if anything he says or presents himself as is true.

What really seems to trigger him is people contradicting his bullshit narratives. You can see how he obsesses about every negative opinion presented about him and how closely he follows every single criticism made. For whatever reason, he wants to act like a total sex pervert but pretend he is just an ordinary married guy. And nobody is going to get away with that kind of self-deception.
 
Well. He doesn't really admit to being a sex pervert. He always puts a spin on it that seems less than honest. In the same way that presenting himself as trad christian wasn't honest. He does these things and first of all tries to project them as being part of a committed marriage. He will try to say that anyone who sees what he is doing as sex pervert stuff is a prude. There was a clip I saw where he tried to say that couples assposting (as he did) is just a form of normal social fun that normal people get up to. He is also completely dishonest about contradictory opinions he has held in the past and people he shamed or attacked for doing what he is doing now. He also almost always misrepresents the comments made against him.

If he came out and said he was a bi swinger in an open marriage, that would at least square with what he is doing. But running around doing the things he is doing and saying that they are part of committed monogamous marriage doesn't line up with what he does. Even more in the wake of having pretended to be a trad christian, people are free to wonder if anything he says or presents himself as is true.

What really seems to trigger him is people contradicting his bullshit narratives. You can see how he obsesses about every negative opinion presented about him and how closely he follows every single criticism made. For whatever reason, he wants to act like a total sex pervert but pretend he is just an ordinary married guy. And nobody is going to get away with that kind of self-deception.

For your consideration:

 
I wonder how this all flies with the TOS clearly stating you only need to be 13+ to access the site. AFAIK Nick got no special cutout to have a 18+ space and locals would be moronic to do such a thing.
I think Rumble/Locals envisioned that their community was gonna be populated by "based and redpilled" types who take the political and social positions that Twitter and Youtube don't like.

Plus, uhhhh, Jimmy Dore? I guess he's there because he got tossed out of lefty Valhalla and it's useful to have a token liberal so that you can claim your free-speech position isn't anchored to any one ideology.

Anyways, Nick had that fanbase at one point. A 13+ requirement is fine if that was the expectation. Saying "niggerfaggot" in front of a 13 year old is different that showing a 13 year old genitalia. People aren't seeking out alt-tech because the mainstream options are too "prudish." They're seeking out alt-tech because mainline tech is up its own ass when it comes to social justice issues.

Basically, what I'm saying is I think, in Nick, they probably thought they were gonna get Nick's old audience, and old Nick, but have ended up with far more sexually degenerate versions of both. The whole robot thing might very well be their way of signaling that they're not happy with what they're seeing from Nick's Locals community.

He may point to sites like twitter and instagram for having the 13yr+ rule while having similar content but those sites don't have the label of alt-right hate site.
Incidentally, we do (deserved or not), and minors are technically prohibited.

1674157358497.png


Looking at Nick's Locals, I don't see the point of having it if all it's gonna be used for is posting T&A. There's endless amounts of places where you can post that shit. People are getting de-platformed for having the audacity to point out Keffals is a man. Not because they're looking to post pictures of their ass.

I think it's pathetic that Nick gets on a free speech platform and then makes a beeline for the pornographic shit. As if that's really what mainline tech has been working to suppress all this time.
 
I think Rumble/Locals envisioned that their community was gonna be populated by "based and redpilled" types who take the political and social positions that Twitter and Youtube don't like.

Plus, uhhhh, Jimmy Dore? I guess he's there because he got tossed out of lefty Valhalla and it's useful to have a token liberal so that you can claim your free-speech position isn't anchored to any one ideology.

Anyways, Nick had that fanbase at one point. A 13+ requirement is fine if that was the expectation. Saying "niggerfaggot" in front of a 13 year old is different that showing a 13 year old genitalia. People aren't seeking out alt-tech because the mainstream options are too "prudish." They're seeking out alt-tech because mainline tech is up its own ass when it comes to social justice issues.

Basically, what I'm saying is I think, in Nick, they probably thought they were gonna get Nick's old audience, and old Nick, but have ended up with far more sexually degenerate versions of both. The whole robot thing might very well be their way of signaling that they're not happy with what they're seeing from Nick's Locals community.


Incidentally, we do (deserved or not), and minors are technically prohibited.

View attachment 4299017

Looking at Nick's Locals, I don't see the point of having it if all it's gonna be used for is posting T&A. There's endless amounts of places where you can post that shit. People are getting de-platformed for having the audacity to point out Keffals is a man. Not because they're looking to post pictures of their ass.

I think it's pathetic that Nick gets on a free speech platform and then makes a beeline for the pornographic shit. As if that's really what mainline tech has been working to suppress all this time.
Frankly the red pill will eventually spoil and rot, just look at The Matrix Resurrections and what the Wachowskis have become. In fact any counter culture movement will decay and go against their principals it's just part of the power dynamic, the only difference is if they manage to topple the current MS and become the new status quo or fail and fade into obscurity. Same deal with Nick, used to be one of the finest fellas online before becoming this degenerate mess.

And speaking on degeneracy, imma be real and say a lot of people do have a degenerate side as much as they have a noble one. It's only the imbeciles with no shame and a big ego that flaunt it openly failing to realising it's a form of public indecency from a certain perspective. Nick using Locals (which I presume is meant to be more wholesome) as his virtual sex den is disgusting and he really needs to cut that shit out before someone he's pissed off is gonna get wise and use that against him. He should be lucky that it's former fans that are going against him right now on Locals because I can only imagine the shit show that will happen once a certain group of his detractors find out about this.
 
Look, I don’t even want Nick to do lawsplaining 100% of the time. You know what I’d like to see, as a four year long viewer of his? A debate with this guy. Maybe this’ll shake him up.

Nick has proven to be a hypocritical degenerate weirdo, but he's still right about the Subway V-cut being superior. It's abandonment was a corporate conspiracy to limit the amount of fixin's you could demand they cram into the sandwich. I will 100% ride and die with the V-cut.
 
Basically, what I'm saying is I think, in Nick, they probably thought they were gonna get Nick's old audience, and old Nick, but have ended up with far more sexually degenerate versions of both. The whole robot thing might very well be their way of signaling that they're not happy with what they're seeing from Nick's Locals community.

Incidentally, we do (deserved or not), and minors are technically prohibited.

Looking at Nick's Locals, I don't see the point of having it if all it's gonna be used for is posting T&A. There's endless amounts of places where you can post that shit. People are getting de-platformed for having the audacity to point out Keffals is a man. Not because they're looking to post pictures of their ass.
Twitter, unlike Locals, has a mature content filter.

Locals clearly didn't foresee one of their major content creators turning their community on the site into a place to trade nudes.

Nick clearly doesn't realize this, but Locals will get kicked off the App Store eventually if they allow this to be posted unfettered on their platform. Him trying to interrupt the Locals guy telling him that they're turning on the AI filter with "please add a block feature btw!" shows that he doesn't understand what's going on. There will be no need for a block feature for Nick's page because Locals does not intend for there to be any flame wars about people posting nudes. They want the posting of nudes to be brought to an end.
 
Twitter, unlike Locals, has a mature content filter.

Locals clearly didn't foresee one of their major content creators turning their community on the site into a place to trade nudes.

Nick clearly doesn't realize this, but Locals will get kicked off the App Store eventually if they allow this to be posted unfettered on their platform. Him trying to interrupt the Locals guy telling him that they're turning on the AI filter with "please add a block feature btw!" shows that he doesn't understand what's going on. There will be no need for a block feature for Nick's page because Locals does not intend for there to be any flame wars about people posting nudes. They want the posting of nudes to be brought to an end.
Imagine being so butt frustrated you beg a company to make a big gay block button. I’ll block everyone in this thread right now crying about blocking/being blocked is bitch made shit
 
While I would be inclined to agree with your take on it, I will repeat myself that I think Crowder's manager is carrying a lot of the blame for what went on because from what godking said, he didn't ask for anything and just wanted "the offer". It seems like he got AN offer and thought that was it? I can't blame Crowder then for going ballistic after his manager was a lazy fuck and couldn't be assed to at least engage in negotiations.
Crowder waited for months for a response from them. Daily Wire decided not to play ball either.

I don't even need that info to know you're full of shit. The fact you call Jeremy Boreing "godking" unironically makes you a faggot in every sense of the word.
 
There's a sort of opposite law where any left-wing "free speech" space turns into a bunch of commie faggot degenerates and gets so disgusting all the normies leave.
Discord’s Law - Any community allowed to fester away from public scrutiny will devolve in to a den of degeneracy.
 
I don't even need that info to know you're full of shit. The fact you call Jeremy Boreing "godking" unironically makes you a faggot in every sense of the word.
Pls forgive me :( I just find his last name hard to remember and write correctly so that was the first thing that came to my mind.

I'll have to rewatch both Crowder and DW's vids because I don't remember the agent waiting for a reply being mentioned.
 
Twitter, unlike Locals, has a mature content filter.
Yeah, and that's my point. Somebody like Sally could probably tweet most of her pictures at Nick and, at worse, it would be put behind one of those "sensitive content" warning things.

What we have here is a guy who got yeeted from both Twitter and Youtube at one point because he talked about super controversial issues like Keffals. He (rightfully) castigates mainline tech for such speech suppression, but then when he gets on a free speech platform it's all about tits and asses.

That is a INCREDIBLY shallow follow-up act from a guy who REALLY should know by now what free speech is getting suppressed. It ain't the wank material that he's wallowing like a pig in right now. Who the hell thinks that wine mommy lewds is free speech nirvana? It's like he's learning nothing from his time on the Internet.
 
Yeah, and that's my point. Somebody like Sally could probably tweet most of her pictures at Nick and, at worse, it would be put behind one of those "sensitive content" warning things.

What we have here is a guy who got yeeted from both Twitter and Youtube at one point because he talked about super controversial issues like Keffals. He (rightfully) castigates mainline tech for such speech suppression, but then when he gets on a free speech platform it's all about tits and asses.

That is a INCREDIBLY shallow follow-up act from a guy who REALLY should know by now what free speech is getting suppressed. It ain't the wank material that he's wallowing like a pig in right now. Who the hell thinks that wine mommy lewds is free speech nirvana? It's like he's learning nothing from his time on the Internet.
Still confused how pictures and videos are free speech in the context of social media based primarily around chatting. Nick, you can ban tit pics without becoming a Fascist despot.
 
Back