Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[AnOminous]

For your consideration:

View attachment 4299137

That shirt is gayer than any pants Vic ever wore. Is Lady Rackets okay with the fact that Nick is now into dudes?

 

[Captain Manning]

The sub count will then start to drop again because he'll be too busy being cool and sexy to make content that people sub to him for.

Yeah, that's the thing. The Rittenhouse interview will help his sub numbers, but it'll be interesting to see where he goes from there. He still says the old content format doesn't interest him anymore.

 

[Apteryx Owenii]

I always thought he was three breaths away from being a lolcow (ever since the poll was put up) but even I didn't really expect to have to use the highlight function because of how fast it happened. That's the sort of thing I usually have to do with Pat Tomlinson.

I hope getting sued makes he do some ridiculous things himself, though. The whole nest of mini-cows that is his locals gets a little overwhelming. Although I like how fast it might crumble if they can't jerk off on amateur softcore anymore.

 

[Potatoherder]

Crowder released another video so Nick gets another go at the drama.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nG9BFUEoy1I

 

[Balldo's Gate]

Isn’t it strange though that the Rittenhouse announcement was in a reply made to someone asking & there hasn’t been any stand alone tweet or community page announcement or anything on it? Unless I missed it but I’m not seeing anything. Haven’t listened to shows lately to know if he’s said anything on stream.

I don't know why he's not promoting it more unless he's afraid that he may back out. It's a stupid move. People aren't watching and waiting for it anymore, he needs to advertise it.

Crowder released another video so Nick gets another go at the drama.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nG9BFUEoy1I

Ethan Ralph already covered this story pretty thoroughly. Very cogent and coherent commentary. What more could Nick add?

Yeah, that's the thing. The Rittenhouse interview will help his sub numbers, but it'll be interesting to see where he goes from there. He still says the old content format doesn't interest him anymore.

I don't know how much it will help his sub numbers. It will bring back people who were already subscribed, but then they may see Nick's new content and unsubscribe. May be a net negative in the long run.

 

[Yandex Captcha Solver]

New Elissa dropped. Nick coping about "rumors" about him once again. We are making "misjudgements" about him, which is clear as day.

 

[Strix454]

New Elissa dropped. Nick coping about "rumors" about him once again. We are making "misjudgements" about him, which is clear as day.

Is he really sharing a cope message from supersecretagent and superlawyer Spectre at around 1:17 in that clip and empathizing with him as a fellow victim?

 

[Puff]

Yeah, that's the thing. The Rittenhouse thing will be a boon for him, but it'll be interesting to see where he goes from there. He still says the old content format doesn't interest him anymore.

I will never understand the mindset that youtubers have of "I got rich and famous doing 'x', but that was shit and always was, so I'm going to do 'y' now".
Both would work in most cases.

Also if he'd stop giving a shit about what we said, this would be mostly over.

 

[Niggaurd]

Since Nick covered it I hope this isn't super off topic, but can I get a tldw on the Crowder-DW drama?

Also did anyone ever find that Elissa clips' porn?

 

[Not Who You Think]

Possible that the number boost from Rittenhouse makes Nick confident enough to make good on this:

Nick has expressed an interest, not only in viewing the pictures posted on Locals, but participating as well. He then goes on to his "woe is me, I'm 41" speech that we've heard so often. If he becomes successful enough (as he defines success) then there will likely be even more degeneracy. Good news for the farmers, I guess.

Also, here's a little bonus in honor of the recent discussion around Nick's relationships with men:

 

[footballteam]

Since Nick covered it I hope this isn't super off topic, but can I get a tldw on the Crowder-DW drama?

Boils down to a contract dispute over how much Crowder is worth to the DW.

DW made an initial offer of $50M over 4 years and SC balked but didn't counter it like a sane person... then got mad when the DW didn't go back and "redo" the offer.

All the stuff about Crowder funding the studio and production staff out of his own pocket is a bit of a red herring as that was due to his own request, apparently.

I believe SC said he wanted $150M in a video but that is a joke, I would assume.

DW is definitely a part of Con, Inc.... but they have done some good work... such as attacking the troon doctors at Vanderbilt hospital who were mutilating kids for cash.

 

[Weppers]

Boils down to a contract dispute over how much Crowder is worth to the DW.

DW made an initial offer of $50M over 4 years and SC balked but didn't counter it like a sane person... then got mad when the DW didn't go back and "redo" the offer.

All the stuff about Crowder funding the studio and production staff out of his own pocket is a bit of a red herring as that was due to his own request, apparently.

I believe SC said he wanted $150M in a video but that is a joke, I would assume.

DW is definitely a part of Con, Inc.... but they have done some good work... such as attacking the troon doctors at Vanderbilt hospital who were mutilating kids for cash.

Also important is that DW claws back large chunks of the money if Crowder's channel is demonitized on major platforms, which it already has been for years. It claws back more if too many sponsors leave, which means that anyone signing that contract would be at the mercy of any troon boycott campaigns not just because of Google or Facebook, but because of DW itself.

 

[ShinyStar]

Twitter, unlike Locals, has a mature content filter.

Locals clearly didn't foresee one of their major content creators turning their community on the site into a place to trade nudes.

Nick clearly doesn't realize this, but Locals will get kicked off the App Store eventually if they allow this to be posted unfettered on their platform. Him trying to interrupt the Locals guy telling him that they're turning on the AI filter with "please add a block feature btw!" shows that he doesn't understand what's going on. There will be no need for a block feature for Nick's page because Locals does not intend for there to be any flame wars about people posting nudes. They want the posting of nudes to be brought to an end.

I believe that Locals told Nick that the chatbot will be optional. What I'm sure Nick isn't catching is that while the chatbot is going to be optional, moderation is not going to be. Locals may not feel that they're able to force content creators to police their chats when they haven't given them the tools that would make such a feat possible. There are content creators who don't spend all day hanging out in their chats, and expecting them to be able to keep up with what happens in their absence is unreasonable. As soon as there's a bot that can do the policing for them, that excuse is gone. At that point, if a creator wants to do the work of going entry by entry through the chat and moderating it themselves, I'm sure that Locals will let them. If they don't, or won't moderate up to Local's standards, then Locals will be in a much more defensible position if they want to rethink contracts with creators who are putting their ability to work with payment processors in jeopardy.

Yeah, that's the thing. The Rittenhouse interview will help his sub numbers, but it'll be interesting to see where he goes from there. He still says the old content format doesn't interest him anymore.

I don't expect a huge bump in subs from Nick's Rittenhouse interview. He streamed the whole trial, live. I kinda think that people who are interested in Rittenhouse already know about Nick and have had the opportunity to subscribe if they like his content. I can even see a scenario where people who subscribed to Nick during Rittenhouse but haven't seen him in their feeds because of his lack of content, get reminded of his existence by this interview, find out about his headlong descent into degeneracy, and unsubscribe. I don't actually expect him to lose subs over this interview, but the longer he keeps courting two audiences, the more likely he is to completely alienate one or both of them.

 

[SargonF00t]

Also enjoy this dump of lewds from last night. Here is a little teaser of the cool manlet Andrew in his Mortal Combat t-shirt and him in the position for a bull

View attachment 4299719

So was this manlet the originally fake lewd Sargon?

Spoiler: Sargon's Magnificent Arse

 

[Puff]

So was this manlet the originally fake lewd Sargon?

View attachment 4301244

Spoiler the gross butt.

 

[dustnight]

Also if he'd stop giving a shit about what we said, this would be mostly over.

Guys HE DOESN'T CARE! which is why he's being extra careful about what he does at the moment. BUT HE'S TOTALLY ALWAYS BEEN UP FRONT ABOUT WHO HE IS/HAS ALWAYS BEEN THIS WAY YA'LL ARE JUST PROJECTING

 

[ShinyStar]

Also important is that DW claws back large chunks of the money if Crowder's channel is demonitized on major platforms, which it already has been for years. It claws back more if too many sponsors leave, which means that anyone signing that contract would be at the mercy of any troon boycott campaigns not just because of Google or Facebook, but because of DW itself.

Crowder is already at risk from troon boycott campaigns. The difference is that, if he's boycotted right now, he loses 100% of the revenue those sponsors take away. DW is saying that if a boycott happens, the losses will be split between the two. Crowder is imagining a scenario where he can alienate everyone who was willing to advertise on his show, and DW would eat 100% of the lost revenue. That's not very reasonable.

There is a risk involved in signing creators, and Crowder doesn't want to acknowledge that. Creators who get really big heads are a risk. They can always turn out like Rekieta and decide they've always been degenerates, or go the route of Owen Benjamin and start a cult of flatearthers, or be Gavin McGinness and shove something up their rectum while on air. Crowder may have a long history of stability, but him turning against potential business partners over fairly standard contract negotiations and airing it all in public is a pretty big warning sign, imo.

 

[Big Al's Famous Pork]

I would like to thank Rackets for wearing a shirt that will not horribly embarrass his children.

 

[Cherenkovblue]

Yeah, that's the thing. The Rittenhouse interview will help his sub numbers, but it'll be interesting to see where he goes from there. He still says the old content format doesn't interest him anymore.

...in which case people may tune in for Griftinhouse, and promptly tune back out again. I hope that's the case. Nothing says "fuck your balldo" like people not sticking around to see Nicky the Nose.

 

[DamnWolves!]

Crowder is already at risk from troon boycott campaigns. The difference is that, if he's boycotted right now, he loses 100% of the revenue those sponsors take away. DW is saying that if a boycott happens, the losses will be split between the two. Crowder is imagining a scenario where he can alienate everyone who was willing to advertise on his show, and DW would eat 100% of the lost revenue. That's not very reasonable.

Presumably, being on contract means some very high percentage of what your content earns is revenue attributable to the entity that's contracting you, in return for a steady paycheck.

Crowder has the pull (somehow; I don't know how this milquetoast Canuck, with takes barely spicier than ol' Benji "The Foreskin King" Shapiro himself, manages to pull in so many viewers) to demand full creative control, IMO. The contract drafter assumes the risk in consideration of the return, usually with some clauses thrown in for non-performance, sure, but it would be unusual to split the risk if you aren't going to be splitting the revenue.

Sports stars, with the notable exception of the NFL (presumably because NFL players who don't have names like "Brady" or "Manning" are basically Great Apes they've dressed up in football gear), almost always have guaranteed contracts against injury, for example. This situation isn't that different; it's at least within the realm of reasonable negotiation.

...in which case people may tune in for Griftinhouse, and promptly tune back out again. I hope that's the case. Nothing says "fuck your balldo" like people not sticking around to see Nicky the Nose.

INB4 Sally tries to monkeybranch to Rittenhouse via super chats once her rotten snatch sniffs out someone who can get her even more attention than Rackets can.