Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 65 21.5%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 27.5%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 47 15.6%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 103 34.1%

  • Total voters
    302
She didn't say she couldn't afford lawyers. She said she had similar term sheet from DW with some nonsense like owning her personal twitter account and she had lawyers clean that mess and counter-offer.
"Now, if you are a young talent that was discovered on YouTube as I was way back in the day, who comes from no money as I was way back in the day, this could be, like, unfair, because I can't afford a lawyer to go through line by line of this and red line this."


So was all the "as I was way back in the day" stuff bullshit? I mean, one of the late superchats seemed to suggest that it was bullshit, and that she had come from big money. But I don't fucking know her from any other garden variety token conservative nigger.
 
"Listen, Nick hasn't changed."
*Proceeds to justify how he's changed*
"People are just mad because they had some incorrect vision of him in their head that doesn't fit into the box they want"
*Proceeds to justify why he's had a shift in content and presentation of himself*

Listen, Nick and crew. The shit you're all catching is mostly because you faggots are trying to hold two positions at once. You're trying to say he hasn't changed while defending why it's ok that he did. Just admit that he's changed and say he's allowed to change and if people don't like it then he appreciates them being around for the ride so far but they can hop off now. It honestly is THAT simple. But they have this idea that "changing" is bad and thus they can't admit to it or....something bad will happen? Their egos will be damaged? You guys make yourselves look way more retarded by trying to pull off this double-speak.

Also, Legal Mindset talking about Internet fwendship at the end there is emblematic of an issue that is sure to turn out hilarious.
The whole damage control done by Drex and Legal Mindcuck is a pathetic attempt. But most of the simps will accept it.
 
Always block anyone on twitter with pronouns in their bio if they start following you. They are just reporting everything you say to get you banned.
Or just kill yourself for even being on Twitter because nobody but morons are there.
I can’t stand this LM guy. They are all screeching about “muh free speech” but the moment it goes against them the censor it themselves. LM is a dickrider of the first degree and thinks he is in the big leagues. Fuck this guy.
He is a groveling Nicksucker.
 
Rumble stats for tonight: $492 in 87 chats. The actual chat log is 1MiB larger than the previous stream.

I will start uploading the the filtered rumblerant log data just for transparency. Uploading the whole log seems a bit wasteful of the server space but i will if requested. Not super useful until it gets in a db and you can query it.
 

Attachments

Candace Owens' take on multimillion dollar business contracts was about as insightful as one would expect from a journalism major who didn't even graduate because she was too poor for college.

Because graduating college with a journalism major is a sure-fire way to have insight and acumen, right?

Just check the insightful takes from all those journalism majors on Buzzfeed and Vice. Those guys are never wrong.
 
Because graduating college with a journalism major is a sure-fire way to have insight and acumen, right?
As a rule of thumb journalists are lazy and have no special technical expertise so they'll just quote some 'expert' and take it as Gospel truth. As someone that went to grad school in econ, I can't count how many times I've seen econ journalists make basic errors that would get them a failing grade in econ 101.
 
He hasn't cut off the youtube stream tonight. He has a real chance of hitting $1k superchats and must really want it.

edit: back to my point about interactions and the algorithm. Surely getting 5x and 12x the amount of comments, double the views, and 2x the amount of likes has nothing to do with it. It clearly was a grand conspiracy that was making Nick lose subs and youtube just magically decided to stop fucking with him right now.
View attachment 4302196
I am glad Nick doesn't read his thread anymore though, he might accidentally say something really stupid on stream about how totally not mad he is and that everyone should definitely not watch tomorrow's exciting stream where he and camalot have FUN 😠 talking about FUN 😠 thi—
 
I am glad Nick doesn't read his thread anymore though, he might accidentally say something really stupid on stream about how totally not mad he is and that everyone should definitely not watch tomorrow's exciting stream where he and camalot have FUN 😠 talking about FUN 😠 thi—
I totally approve of how Nick completely doesn't care about our opinions of him. Because if he did, it might piss him off! But as he has told us repeatedly, he completely doesn't care. That's a good decision on his part.
 
I liked Nick when he was talking about Crowder because he seemed to believe the people telling him and Crowder what to do are the same people.

They aren’t. The people telling Nick what to do were the fans. You know the people he says you should listen to.

Crowder actually listens to his audiance and routinely asks them for input. And then does what they want. And it pays off.

Nick routinely does not do what his fans want. There have been countless times when Chat brings up stuff, he’ll say he will look into it and doesn’t.

And everything he’s done that made him susessful, chat suggested he do first. Usually for ages before Nick actually did it. And then he does it while pretending nobody told him this would do well.
 
Last edited:
This has become the go-to for fanbases to try and nuke accounts that don't lockstep and bootlick. I got the same thing for making fun on some idiot in a TimcastIRL stream's comments. My account was frozen for 72 hours. I went back and checked my comments, the only one missing was the one I had made on that Timcast stream.

People love to crow about how they embrace free speech, but it's mostly just lip service. They will adopt leftoid hugbox tactics as soon as it becomes advantageous. Many such cases.

I get Tim. Dude's not really that gung-ho about free speech.
Rackets on the other hand...
 
But I don't fucking know her from any other garden variety token conservative nigger.
I don’t know anything about her upbringing, but she is one of those “left The Left” types that I try to warn people about and have a high level of distrust for. People may change their views on certain issues, but their underlying characteristics rarely to never change. Candace was a hyperbolic dumbfuck cunt when she was a hard lefty, she’s the same now that she’s running the trad con grift. Prime example is the way she repeatedly framed things on the Timcast stream (at least during the 45 minutes I could stand listening to it while making dinner). She would make these drastic exaggerations and straw man Crowder’s argument.

What I mean by people may change their views but are still the same, there is no better example than the John Brown Gun Club. Vast majority were anti-gun normal libtards that changed to pro-gun commie leftoids. They changed their stance on guns, but they’re still the same libtard at heart and will likely still believe a lot of the same anti-gun rhetoric, they just rationalize their new views out of necessity. Even if a member started hating trannies and got disavowed by their fellow leftoids, they are extremely unlikely to change their MO and core psychological characteristics from their libtard/leftoid ways.

As for the Con Inc drama, I don’t really care too much for either side. Crowder makes me want to puke when he and his dad talk about how Blair White is beautiful (fucking ugh as fuck) and totally passes (he looks like a plastic surgery disaster freakshow version of a woman, not an actual woman). I think Dave Landau is funny and if he wasn’t a regular cohost, I would go back to never watching. Daily Wire is my dad’s kind of conservatism; very uptight, stodgy, all business, lots of religious shit. Which in many ways is good, having a tightly focused and managed outfit is less likely to go off the rails. I could do a lot less with the religious moralfagging as it reminds me of the Moral Majority shit of the 80’s where a bunch of closeted pedos, cucks, faggots, etc. grandstanded as righteous moralists dictating their proclaimed values to everyone else. (Jerry Falwell started the moral majority and his son turned into a literal cuck, so look at how great that shit worked out)

Both Crowder and DW have good and bad aspects to them. Crowder is a drama queen. DW are shekel rubbing shysters. Why these negative aspects are surprising to anyone is beyond me. The drama seems overblown and stupid and manufactured.
 

Reputational damage: MORTAL
Also if you listen instead of watch Rekieta sounds homo af
Stop posting Pepsi's videos according to the comments he's a part of the machine trying to take DOWN Rekieta.

Screenshot_20230120-080038.png
 
Candace Owens' take on multimillion dollar business contracts was about as insightful as one would expect from a journalism major who didn't even graduate because she was too poor for college.

Also did I hear that wrong or did she flat out admit that she was a nobody who couldn't afford lawyers when she signed with the Daily Wire and then later on was trying to pretend like "oh we had our lawyers just red line this and negotiate that..."
The whole thing was lunacy. She also said she had no idea what happened then, as Nick had said, started talking like she was in the room for all of it. And yes, you heard correctly.
 
Back