The Sacred Cow of Homosexuality - lmao i'm gonna get so much shit for this

Because everyone’s been trained so well by social media and how it alters language and thought that they’re actually frightened to express any opinion other than homosexual being fabulous. I’ve talked before abpit how the feedback loop works. All options forcEd online. Set of correct opinions given. Anyone deviating or objecting is punished socially. Make a few visible example of homophobes losing jobs and having lives wrecked. At first it’s just lanagie but eventually people are trained like pavlovs dogs. Only instead of salivating when a bell rings they freak out when ‘bad’ thoughts are presented. It’s so ingrained that some opinions genuinely frighten people.
Homo stuff is the same. Previously most people were against it as a concept but knew it happened and were probably pretty tolerant of decent people they knew themselves and trusted. There’s a big difference between tolerance and promotion.
Nowadays if you even bring up anything g negative you’ll see the fear response. Even thinking the thought that it’s not great makes people frightened and they lash out like prisoners who will be punished if one gets over the wall.
Fear based conditioning, in short
 
The real crime was pushing the narrative being that soley sexual relationships and fetishes validate marriage, further dismantling the nuclear family. We slid down to the bottom of that slope over the course of 20 years and let them tell us the slippery slope isn't real. Not to say this is solely to blame. Third wave feminism convincing many women to not be women and to fight for left wing causes such as this were also to blame. Most left leaning policies lean toward making the population more submissive and lend themselves to self-destructive practices which decrease the population. Also social media being far-left enterprises didn't help. Many people think this is recent but Tom from MySpace has even bragged how his platform managed to curve "faggot" from being the most popular insult.

On a personal freedoms level tho I really don't care who you are into and have sex with as long as you are conscientious toward the people in your community and those you have a responsibility to.
 
I've observed the same phenomenon as the OP and various local fag-sympathizers have tried to trigger me by poasting dancing homosexuals on my profile.
Absolutely haram, deviant behavior, but expected from the k(iwi)uffar.
I think that a lot of older fags are rightfully triggered by trannies and have found a place here after getting expelled from the mainstream for being far right Nazis, lmao.
Since I am an extremely tolerant and progressive person, I have zero issues allying with lesbians and gays against troons. Temporarily wink-wink
 
Mind if I share this article those making a bold against the sacred cow of homosexuality like that hockey player from the Philadelphia Flyers mentioned in another thread on KF?

January 19, 2023

Those making a bold stand against the frenzied LGBTQ mafia are heroes​

By Olivia Murray


Over the course of Barack Obama’s initial political run at the national level, he was asked to define marriage — to this he responded that the institution is a “union between a man and a woman.” Then, as the LGBTQ mafia made headway over the next few years, his public position “evolved” and in 2015 during his presidential tenure, gay “marriage” was legalized.
Here’s a sobering truth: 2015 wasn’t that long ago. It’s only been seven and a half years.
We went from “we just want to get married” to… men in drag demanding access to your toddlers lest you be labeled a bigot; a Colorado school selling “Pride” flag pins to students; a highly disturbed man like Sam Brinton entitled to don lipstick and a mustache in the professional environment (the highest levels of government); and this: https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1613395136699842561

The legalization of gay marriage opened Pandora’s Box, and the fallout has been like a flashbang grenade. We are a stunned populace, reeling from the indescribable proliferation of perversion. Men undressing around little girls because they say they’re a woman? Fictional twisted murderers praised and claimed as “queer” icons?
 
The push for gay acceptance wasn’t *exactly* like troons today. The troon push is more aggressive while the gay push was more covert and sly.

But both tell the same lies that there is no slippery slope and that you can’t groom kids into it by fucking with them psychosexually.
 
The push for gay acceptance wasn’t *exactly* like troons today. The troon push is more aggressive while the gay push was more covert and sly.

But both tell the same lies that there is no slippery slope and that you can’t groom kids into it by fucking with them psychosexually.
But there was definitely a shift from "it's ok to disagree about homosexuals but they deserve the freedoms we have" to " if you don't support the lgbtq community your evil!" around 2013 to maybe 2015.
 
But there was definitely a shift from "it's ok to disagree about homosexuals but they deserve the freedoms we have" to " if you don't support the lgbtq community your evil!" around 2013 to maybe 2015.
Like everything bad, the mask came off in Obama Term 2 when they realized they can win without appealing to normal white people and can just use the courts/bureaucracy to get their way anyway.
 
But there was definitely a shift from "it's ok to disagree about homosexuals but they deserve the freedoms we have" to " if you don't support the lgbtq community your evil!" around 2013 to maybe 2015.

Lmao, intolerance of those who disapproved of homosexual activity on moral or religious grounds was rearing its ugly head as early as 2008, and it wasn't even unheard of in the early 00s or even the 90s.

After The Ball by Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen actually describe in detail on how to push propaganda to make the fag community out to be innocent victims, and their opponents, no matter how well meaning or moderate, to be ignorant bigots and barbarians. Even the authors admitted that such propaganda was complete horseshit, but said it needed to be pushed because it was for an "ethically good" reason.

The fact is, homosexuality is an alternative lifestyle, an aberration, a disordered sexual behavior, whether gay marriage is recognized or not.

And most people who practice an alternative lifestyle are infamously insecure about it to the point that they lash out against anyone who has problems with it, even if said people do not impose their morality on others. Homosexuality may not be as blatant a denial of reality as transgenderism, but it's a rebellion against nature regardless.

The fact that faggots and troons have only gotten even more intolerable and entitled after 2015, when they were given everything they could have ever wanted on a silver platter, speaks volumes.

As it turns out, the same sort of propaganda pushed by the likes of Marshal Kirk and Hunter Madsen was so successful at eroding opposition to gay marriage, the only thing left to do is to simply give the faggots what they wanted. Figuratively speaking, give them enough rope to hang themselves. Allow them to turn themselves into case studies on why most human societies throughout history criminalized or at least restricted homosexual behavior.



TL;DR, there was always an undercurrent of heterophobia and intolerance towards those who consider homosexual behavior to be sinful. They are also extremely jealous and angry at heterosexuals who can reproduce naturally and have a better chance at raising children who don't turn out to be absolute speds or delinquents. It doesn't matter if you refrain from imposing your morality onto them, they feel oppressed by your mere existence regardless.
 
TL;DR, there was always an undercurrent of heterophobia and intolerance towards those who consider homosexual behavior to be sinful. They are also extremely jealous and angry at heterosexuals who can reproduce naturally and have a better chance at raising children who don't turn out to be absolute speds or delinquents. It doesn't matter if you refrain from imposing your morality onto them, they feel oppressed by your mere existence regardless.
I'd be mad if I was so distorted that the only options to "reproduce" were turning kids like a vampire or turning myself into a level 4 biolab
 
Religious loons and I are allowed to have ill-informed, deranged opinions of one another based on having never met one another, but religious people are allowed to circlejerk and harrumph about how everyone *else* is insecure for objecting to their takes, but their constant bitching about persecution *isn't* insecurity.
 
Religious loons and I are allowed to have ill-informed, deranged opinions of one another based on having never met one another, but religious people are allowed to circlejerk and harrumph about how everyone *else* is insecure for objecting to their takes, but their constant bitching about persecution *isn't* insecurity.
I'm not religious and have actually become a fairly big fedora in recent years due to how stupid religious politicking has made my own side, well, stupid.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: FunPosting101
After The Ball by Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen actually describe in detail on how to push propaganda to make the fag community out to be innocent victims, and their opponents, no matter how well meaning or moderate, to be ignorant bigots and barbarians. Even the authors admitted that such propaganda was complete horseshit, but said it needed to be pushed because it was for an "ethically good" reason.
Ironic then Mashall Kirk passed away, because he might spin his in grave now to see there's now some pushback against his propraganda emerging here and there like the one last fall in Dearborn from a side they didn't expected.

Edit: Here the archived copy on Archive.md

A “very embarrassing” protest for everyone concerned. New in FrontPage:

The Leftist-Islamic alliance, which has been rolling along without a hitch for many years now, hit a pothole in Dearborn, Michigan last Monday. The disagreement between the two camps was so sharp and irreconcilable that it may herald a definitive end to this alliance. A parody story spoofing The Atlantic called the Muslims in Dearborn “the new face of the far-right,” and by the time this is all over, that might not be too far off the mark.

The Detroit Free Press reported Tuesday that “hundreds of protesters packed a Dearborn Public Schools board meeting this week and shut it down with cries of anger over certain LGBTQ books they said are too sexually explicit for children. And now, some community leaders anxiously await a rescheduled meeting set for Thursday night as others call for calm.” There were much more than cries of anger: “A heavy police presence failed to prevent the Monday night meeting from descending into chaos as demonstrators took it over and then various factions within them jostled for control, shouting at each other. Protesters often ignored the requests of police officers to stop interrupting board members.”
 
Ironic then Mashall Kirk passed away, because he might spin his in grave now to see there's now some pushback against his propraganda emerging here and there like the one last fall in Dearborn from a side they didn't expected.

Edit: Here the archived copy on Archive.md
Unlike white Christians, African and Arab Muslims get rowdy when they're mad. Because of that, they're much harder to crush.
 
There's nothing wrong with being gay except that Sodomites are kind of disgusting regardless of their sexuality. It is as with all things, creation of a subculture surrounding the promotion of a divergent behaviour that possibly could be an issue
Ultimately this promotion of "gay"ness rather than just the acceptance of gays is just one of many things aimed at dividing people into smaller groups of conflicting interests which makes them easier to rule.
Doesn't even have to be a conspiracy, these things can come up naturally cause every goody two shoes wants to have a cause to champion, especially if its a relatively safe thing, and so everyone can pick something in the pyramid of oppression olympics and "be an ally" of it.
 
Last edited:
Because everyone’s been trained so well by social media and how it alters language and thought that they’re actually frightened to express any opinion other than homosexual being fabulous. I’ve talked before abpit how the feedback loop works. All options forcEd online. Set of correct opinions given. Anyone deviating or objecting is punished socially. Make a few visible example of homophobes losing jobs and having lives wrecked. At first it’s just lanagie but eventually people are trained like pavlovs dogs. Only instead of salivating when a bell rings they freak out when ‘bad’ thoughts are presented. It’s so ingrained that some opinions genuinely frighten people.
Homo stuff is the same. Previously most people were against it as a concept but knew it happened and were probably pretty tolerant of decent people they knew themselves and trusted. There’s a big difference between tolerance and promotion.
Nowadays if you even bring up anything g negative you’ll see the fear response. Even thinking the thought that it’s not great makes people frightened and they lash out like prisoners who will be punished if one gets over the wall.
Fear based conditioning, in short

This is a huge part of it. There's also the issue that people react viscerally when you attack their moral identity. People believe things, but there are also things people believe you necessarily believe as part and parcel of being a good person. Those things vary in time and place. Attack those beliefs, and people will get upset, because you're saying they're not really good people, and that the people they say are bad people are actually not bad people. It's like how criticizing the pope in 15th century Europe didn't get people nearly as upset as criticizing the institution of the papacy itself. It's also like how your average Muslim will react differently if you say, "Those ISIS boys really are a bunch of cunts," versus, "Things like ISIS are just a natural product of Islam; it's a fundamentally anti-human religion."

In modern America, we have a lot of deep beliefs that form our moral identity, mostly centered around some version of "all people are equal," and one of those now is that any two people who like having sex, regardless of gender, should have the exact same social privileges as man and a woman. It's not just that people believe that, it's that they believe that believing that is necessary to be a good person.
 
Lmao, intolerance of those who disapproved of homosexual activity on moral or religious grounds was rearing its ugly head as early as 2008, and it wasn't even unheard of in the early 00s or even the 90s.

After The Ball by Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen actually describe in detail on how to push propaganda to make the fag community out to be innocent victims, and their opponents, no matter how well meaning or moderate, to be ignorant bigots and barbarians. Even the authors admitted that such propaganda was complete horseshit, but said it needed to be pushed because it was for an "ethically good" reason.

The fact is, homosexuality is an alternative lifestyle, an aberration, a disordered sexual behavior, whether gay marriage is recognized or not.

And most people who practice an alternative lifestyle are infamously insecure about it to the point that they lash out against anyone who has problems with it, even if said people do not impose their morality on others. Homosexuality may not be as blatant a denial of reality as transgenderism, but it's a rebellion against nature regardless.

The fact that faggots and troons have only gotten even more intolerable and entitled after 2015, when they were given everything they could have ever wanted on a silver platter, speaks volumes.

As it turns out, the same sort of propaganda pushed by the likes of Marshal Kirk and Hunter Madsen was so successful at eroding opposition to gay marriage, the only thing left to do is to simply give the faggots what they wanted. Figuratively speaking, give them enough rope to hang themselves. Allow them to turn themselves into case studies on why most human societies throughout history criminalized or at least restricted homosexual behavior.



TL;DR, there was always an undercurrent of heterophobia and intolerance towards those who consider homosexual behavior to be sinful. They are also extremely jealous and angry at heterosexuals who can reproduce naturally and have a better chance at raising children who don't turn out to be absolute speds or delinquents. It doesn't matter if you refrain from imposing your morality onto them, they feel oppressed by your mere existence regardless.
Was After The Ball the gay playbook from the 1980s that the majority of gays followed to nearly the letter until gay marriage was passed? I remember a youtube video talked about this old gay playbook that sounded almost exactly like how it all seemed to went down.
 
why do people simp for fags? the men who do it are probably fags themselves, the women who do it are feminists who see fags as allies in their war against men.
Same reason why people simp for niggers, they just wanna look like they give a shit about whatever minority is being oppressed today.
 
Back