Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 22.0%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 29.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 41 14.3%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 95 33.2%

  • Total voters
    286
He's actually said that the stone glasses are from Lookout Mountain, Tennessee. I think the speculation that they're a war trophy are from someone saying they got similar glasses in Afghanistan. Both sets were probably made in China.
I believe it. Though I think China is a stretch. I assume they were made in Pakistan. How the fuck they ended up at a gift shop in Tennessee is beyond me though
 
So it's pretty much confirmed her husband is taking these photos? That sure is some alpha chad energy for a man to take pictures of his wife so other men can jerk off to them.
That one clearly looks like one she could've taken herself, doubt he's involved in the "artistic process". Definitely can't rule out him letting her have a free pass to do whatever she wants to fulfill herself, given that it's established that he's much older than her.
 
Streams are "tolerable" up to and until he reads any superchats that have nothing to do with the topic. Then the stream grinds to a halt for 5-10+ minutes per superchat.
Donation messages are always the worst part of watching any streamer. Just a ton of people trying way too hard to be funny and bombing hard or people who just straight up have no friends desperate for any kind of social connection, all the while the streamer has to nod politely and exchange pleasantries since they don't want to be rude to people who support them.
It reminds me of this one dude, years ago when I watched Nick, who used to send chats talking about the car he made in Forza( or some other car game) that was Rekeita Law themed, it was hilariously pathetic.
 
I like Matt Walsh. I'm not religious at all, but his religiosity doesn't offend me -- it seems sincerely held, but I wouldn't care much one way or the other. But I watched 'What is a Woman' with my wife, who is extremely troon sympathetic, and she was completely convinced by his arguments. I think he has a real knack for appealing to people's common sense and reminding them of the shit that we all believed just ten years or so ago.

The rest of the DW crowd are dull as ditchwater. But Crowder is no better. In fact, the only positive thing I can really say about YouTube conservatives is that they're marginally less dull and less stupid than the left.
Matt Walsh has a great ability to be very calm in hostile situations and make very cogent arguments. Just hold up the truth and the leftist troon ideology becomes obviously gross and weird to anyone that can build an Ages 6+ Lego set.
 
Nah, he's right about that. That question is a shit test. If you say another woman, you'll forever owe her, but Drex's answer reflects that shit test right back on her. Her response at that point should be that it was a hypothetical question... if she actually agrees and goes through with it, she's no longer "your girl." You should be peacing out of that "relationship."

If you wanna invite another dude to come over and eiffel tower the ho, though, that's up to you. You can call that gay if you want, I'm not judging one way or the other. Main point should be that you end the relationship either way. She can be a ho with or without you, just don't marry yourself into it. And don't catch anything that a round of antibiotics won't take care of.
Here's the thing, though, if it's just hypothetical then you say neither. I don't even get this shit. If your other is saying you have to choose, then tell them you don't like this shit (if you don't). I don't like this coy beat around the bush shit. Say what the fuck you mean and be up front. Stop wasting time. It came across to me as Drex justifying his ball rubbing gangbang party days as alpha shit and not weird creep shit. And yeah, gangbangs are pretty fucking gay IMO.

edit-
this shit is serendipitous
Drex is sorta retarded in that he's like an NPC repeating the same answers to everything, but I'll at least give him credit for being one of the few people in the lawtube sphere that seems like he doesn't give a shit if and when people insult him.
 
Here's the thing, though, if it's just hypothetical then you say neither. I don't even get this shit. If your other is saying you have to choose, then tell them you don't like this shit (if you don't). I don't like this coy beat around the bush shit. Say what the fuck you mean and be up front. Stop wasting time. It came across to me as Drex justifying his ball rubbing gangbang party days as alpha shit and not weird creep shit. And yeah, gangbangs are pretty fucking gay IMO.
If you take the cop out answer and say neither, you won't know if it was really hypothetical.
 
Nobody tuned into Rackets' to listen to Drexel anyway.
Go away Drexel.
Nick Nick Nick Nick Nick, listen listen, Nick, listen, okay Nick, okay, look, Nick, you don't, Nick, Nick, look, listen, Nick, man... Nick, look... nigger shit.

If you take the cop out answer and say neither, you won't know if it was really hypothetical.
How about you just dump her after she says she wants to be double teamed instead of gangbanging her with your friends?
 
Setting aside an area for discussion, and setting down rules for that doesn't make you a censor necessarily. Rickets' argument that he doesn't want to ban things would make sense if he were, say, Mark Zuckerberg talking about Facebook, but he's just some dude with a place to chat.

I assume that if he set up an event, and some guy came onto the stage screaming nigger into the mic, or some woman ran up and started taking her clothes off, he wouldn't have a problem with those people being removed for the purpose of continuing the event. I'm sure he knows this and just wants to keep his playpen for degenerates several years late for their taxidermist appointments, but it's still worth pointing out bad it is of an argument.

I know he's a libertine, not a libertarian, but since he insists on calling himself one I'd like to point out that a component of more than one libertarian argument is the idea that societal shaming and ostracization can prevent bad behaviors, for instance legalizing all drugs not leading to an outbreak necessarily of crackheads due to the poor perception of people who use crack in society. There's no argument in libertarianism that you shouldn't have the freedom, the right to mock, humiliate, deride, or otherwise negatively speak of people and actions you find distasteful.
 
If you take the cop out answer and say neither, you won't know if it was really hypothetical.
I feel the need to clarify in that I don't care about the hypothetical. Asking about relationships outside of monogamy is not something I'm into. So I'm not one to entertain this shit and play mind games. Maybe Drex is. And good for his weird nigger ass that he has a son with some bitch and some other cunt he's cock strung to while proclaiming himself a strong independent man that won't be tied down to no hoes! This nigger is pretzel of sexual frustration, confusion and retardation.
 
"New" Mandy pic. Are there any autists able to confirm what phone this is? The centered lens makes me think of some old androids circa 2011-2015

2269720_ijyf29m8bfp34op.gif
 
Back