Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 20.8%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 84 27.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 48 15.6%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 107 34.9%

  • Total voters
    307
View attachment 4321557
He has been bleeding subscribers, you can check the superchat earnings here as well.
He was getting $1-2k average and is now consistently below $1k, one stream was $94.00.
It's difficult to actually determine how much his super chat income is down since it's split between Rumble and YouTube now. I know @Potatoherder has been doing a great job detailing his Rumble super chat earnings, but since they don't have an API, we don't have a playboard site for it yet.

But, of course, according to Nick, he doesn't even have to stream to make more money than he did in 2022.
 
"On the wall" obviously means execution by firing squad. You'd have to be naive or performing mental gymnastics in order to interpret it as anything else. "Maps belong on the wall" is also just a colorful way of saying that "Minor Attracted People" deserve to be executed. But there are at least two points of contention. Nick didn't literally say the words, "and shot." The troons lied about that part of it. And the troons made Nick's statement out to be a threat or a call to action, but it was neither of those things.
 
"On the wall" obviously means execution by firing squad. You'd have to be naive or performing mental gymnastics in order to interpret it as anything else. "Maps belong on the wall" is also just a colorful way of saying that "Minor Attracted People" deserve to be executed. But there are at least two points of contention. Nick didn't literally say the words, "and shot." The troons lied about that part of it. And the troons made Nick's statement out to be a threat or a call to action, but it was neither of those things.
The usual American idiom would be "against the wall" for execution by firing squad. On the wall obvious implies the same thing. Its been in common use for so long though that its generally lost any of its original meaning and context except for a small percentage of people. People typically use it to indicate the most sever possible punishment available (under the law) or treating them with no particular mercy by the law. If people mean it in a literal sense, they almost always use other words.
The phrase became a big deal in parts of the left after 2019 because Greta Thunberg used it to refer to politicians and was forced to apologize.
 
The fact of the matter is Nick was always a faggot into weird degenerate shit like ReDo of Healer, Doll House Phil and Futa. Most of the people in WW just ignored it because he was the only big voice on their side when it came to Vic. It's really no better than Troons and Keffels for #DropKiwiFarms at the end of the day.
Yes and no.

In fairness to the Weeb Warriors, Weeb Wars pretty much achieved its peak by mid-2019. The first bad news that somewhat applied the brakes to all that came down in September 2019 (Vic losing before Chupp). Things like Doll House Phil were 2020.

I'll grant that maybe there were cracks in his wholesome façade as early as 2020. Said cracks might have gone largely unnoticed to the faithful, and would more apparent now in hindsight. But this cope he (and Drex, and others) has about always being openly degenerate is still fucking bullshit. Nick was absolutely not like this in 2018 and 2019. Or, if he was, he hid it really well to the point where he fooled nearly everybody.

I maintain that the people most disappointed/angry at Nick are his oldest fans, and that they do have some legitimate cause to feel bamboozled.
 
Yes and no.

In fairness to the Weeb Warriors, Weeb Wars pretty much achieved its peak by mid-2019. The first bad news that somewhat applied the brakes to all that came down in September 2019 (Vic losing before Chupp). Things like Doll House Phil were 2020.

I'll grant that maybe there were cracks in his wholesome façade as early as 2020. Said cracks might have gone largely unnoticed to the faithful, and would more apparent now in hindsight. But this cope he (and Drex, and others) has about always being openly degenerate is still fucking bullshit. Nick was absolutely not like this in 2018 and 2019. Or, if he was, he hid it really well to the point where he fooled nearly everybody.

I maintain that the people most disappointed/angry at Nick are his oldest fans, and that they do have some legitimate cause to feel bamboozled.
If Rekieta really was always openly degenerate it raises some obvious questions about his trad dad chad weekly streams, Doug Tennapel and other overtly conservative "christians" he used to be solid with. He did the usual recitations on their shows and on his own as well, bleating about their faith and so on. I don't believe anything any of these online leeches say but even in terms of the crypto-jew christian LARP Rekieta was never convincing in the slightest.

Some of them come off as psychopaths, some come off as two-bit grifters who struck it lucky online, and some just seem like typical insincere money-oriented people. Rekieta always looked like a money grubber to me. The degeneracy is his genuine mental disintegration taking hold, on his way to a nervous breakdown or psychotic break and I don't see it as being relevant to "who he really is."

If everything someone says is a lie then even their own narration of their "degeneracy" shouldn't be taken at face value.
 

Attachments

  • if the rule brought you to this.jpg
    if the rule brought you to this.jpg
    29.2 KB · Views: 23
Things like Doll House Phil were 2020.
Having Doll House Phil on and being Balldo Nick is sort of the difference between Howard Stern having a Wack Pack and Howard Stern becoming, himself, a member of the Wack Pack.
Rekieta always looked like a money grubber to me.
He was always openly a money grubber and never even got mad about being called a grifter or a crypto-Jew or whatever.
 
Having Doll House Phil on and being Balldo Nick is sort of the difference between Howard Stern having a Wack Pack and Howard Stern becoming, himself, a member of the Wack Pack.

He was always openly a money grubber and never even got mad about being called a grifter or a crypto-Jew or whatever.
"I have orthodox jews in my family" - Rekieta
Jews, plural so they unless they all married in at once or something, a crypto he most certainly is. He follows that pattern, like Jon Del Arroz - the christian larp while being abysmally amoral or immoral and with the typical lust and greed oriented behavior. So christian! Much christ!
 
Yes and no.

In fairness to the Weeb Warriors, Weeb Wars pretty much achieved its peak by mid-2019. The first bad news that somewhat applied the brakes to all that came down in September 2019 (Vic losing before Chupp). Things like Doll House Phil were 2020.

I'll grant that maybe there were cracks in his wholesome façade as early as 2020. Said cracks might have gone largely unnoticed to the faithful, and would more apparent now in hindsight. But this cope he (and Drex, and others) has about always being openly degenerate is still fucking bullshit. Nick was absolutely not like this in 2018 and 2019. Or, if he was, he hid it really well to the point where he fooled nearly everybody.

I maintain that the people most disappointed/angry at Nick are his oldest fans, and that they do have some legitimate cause to feel bamboozled.
You neglect to mention that the WW people held on hope until 2021 or 2022, that the appeal would go through. Surprise it didn't. They were still very much in support of Nick up to that period. Luckily for Nick by then the Rittenhouse trial happened, and the dropoff of those WW fans unsubbing didn't really hurt him.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Procrastinhater
I'll grant that maybe there were cracks in his wholesome façade as early as 2020. Said cracks might have gone largely unnoticed to the faithful, and would more apparent now in hindsight. But this cope he (and Drex, and others) has about always being openly degenerate is still fucking bullshit. Nick was absolutely not like this in 2018 and 2019. Or, if he was, he hid it really well to the point where he fooled nearly everybody.

About all that could be said about him in 2018 and 2019 was that (a) he was drinking alot and (b) he was (IMO) way overstating his legal expertise & experience. He was a homeschooling guy with a big family who did streams generally ridiculing various degenerates. There was no shortage of people trying to be critical of him at the time for various reasons, but nobody really picked up that he was any kind of druggie sex degenerate. I mean I was a critic for various reasons back then, but I never picked any of the degenerate stuff up. He seemed like a normal dad who might occasionally drink too much.

When Drex started showing up, things could get weird. But they would get weird around Drex. I didn't get the impression then that Nick considered Drex a role model and I thought it could well be that he brought him on as a sort of entertaining weirdo. There was a certain amount of criticism that developed around the whole question of why Nick would have been long-term buddies with a guy like Drex.

One of the big turning points I can remember is his wife's massage story. Everything about that story and how she & nick acted seemed really wrong. That was at the point where I think some people started thinking there was something really wrong in how Nick was presenting himself. But it was all speculation and hunches.

But Nick was producing good content and had fans who were willing to cut him lots of slack for a long time. It was possible to brush off alot of stuff as maybe jokes or them having fun trolling the audience. I mean honestly Nick had work really hard to turn people who were rock-solid on his side against him. But he eventually managed to do it.
 
I maintain that the people most disappointed/angry at Nick are his oldest fans, and that they do have some legitimate cause to feel bamboozled.
Yup. The sudden switchover from laughing at degenerate shit to earnestly preaching the virtues of the very same shit was so jarring it gave me whiplash. Doll House Phil's business was supposed to be a joke. Drex making out with a tranny and getting year-long ED as a result was supposed to be a joke (as were Drex stories in general) . The Futa question was supposed to be a joke. The Balldo was supposed to be a joke.

We were all laughing with Nick at these ridiculous things. Then all of a sudden he gets a rumble contract, packs the boys in their little latex shell casing to violate the wife, and sets the pride flag to flying 24/7 as chat is flooded in a nightmarish stream of leathery hags begging for his attention. In a few short months, he literally became the things he seemed to mock for years.

All those years, did he not actually understand what we were all laughing at?
 
Anyone else still have lawnerd clips pop up in their recommendations? Even before the one clip where he nose guarded (after Elissa first started pointing out the nosedive) I started ignoring that channel cuz the dude still clips out shit from Rittenhouse and Depp. A lot of which aren't very different than the clips he uploaded when the trial was going on. Are people still that entertained by the slightly edited same ol clippings of those trials?
 
"On the wall" obviously means execution by firing squad. You'd have to be naive or performing mental gymnastics in order to interpret it as anything else. "Maps belong on the wall" is also just a colorful way of saying that "Minor Attracted People" deserve to be executed. But there are at least two points of contention. Nick didn't literally say the words, "and shot." The troons lied about that part of it. And the troons made Nick's statement out to be a threat or a call to action, but it was neither of those things.

The usual American idiom would be "against the wall" for execution by firing squad. On the wall obvious implies the same thing. Its been in common use for so long though that its generally lost any of its original meaning and context except for a small percentage of people. People typically use it to indicate the most sever possible punishment available (under the law) or treating them with no particular mercy by the law. If people mean it in a literal sense, they almost always use other words.
The phrase became a big deal in parts of the left after 2019 because Greta Thunberg used it to refer to politicians and was forced to apologize.
I agree with this in the context of if some random person off the street told me that another random person belonged up against the wall or similar phrasing, I’d assume they meant against the wall to face a firing squad. But in the context of Nick’s show, topics he’s covered have covered pedos & suspected pedos somewhat more than one would encounter hearing about in regular life, & “maps belong on the wall” was a phrase that was used often enough that it deviated from its original common use meaning & more meant “I’m calling this person out as a pedo”. Other times, I’m sure there was the true sentiment of “this person should die”. It’s one of those things where depending on surrounding context it’s up to the listener to infer the intent.

Doesn’t really matter at this point & I think most agree that Nick, despite his tendency to say he’s the most transparent, open, honest, person ever, frequently uses weasel words & language that isn’t really lying, but it’s not the truth either.

Makes me wonder about things said like on that locals stream where he was in the gay Jamaican shirt & when someone asked if he & kayla were swingers he said (paraphrasing) no… unless he was so drunk he forgot… & also said something weirdly specific like he’s never put his penis into another woman’s vagina or Kayla had never had another man’s penis in her vagina. Ok, well, that still leaves open a lot of other sexual things. Or per her recent locals post replying to Cynthia, Kayla would probably classify anything besides actual intercourse as just “having fun & being silly”.
 
Makes me wonder about things said like on that locals stream where he was in the gay Jamaican shirt & when someone asked if he & kayla were swingers he said (paraphrasing) no… unless he was so drunk he forgot… & also said something weirdly specific like he’s never put his penis into another woman’s vagina or Kayla had never had another man’s penis in her vagina. Ok, well, that still leaves open a lot of other sexual things. Or per her recent locals post replying to Cynthia, Kayla would probably classify anything besides actual intercourse as just “having fun & being silly”.
This combined with his cope with posting lewds in locals. "It's not the same as iDubbz cause everyone else was doing it." Changing your principles because everyone else is doing it doesn't jive with most people's marital ethics.
 
The usual American idiom would be "against the wall" for execution by firing squad. On the wall obvious implies the same thing. Its been in common use for so long though that its generally lost any of its original meaning and context except for a small percentage of people. People typically use it to indicate the most sever possible punishment available (under the law) or treating them with no particular mercy by the law. If people mean it in a literal sense, they almost always use other words.
The phrase became a big deal in parts of the left after 2019 because Greta Thunberg used it to refer to politicians and was forced to apologize.
Sure. I agree. The phrase, even though it refers to execution by firing squad, can be used as a figure of speech. It doesn't have to be meant literally. It could just be a strong way to express the opinion that someone should be dealt with, punished, removed from polite society, etc.
 
You neglect to mention that the WW people held on hope until 2021 or 2022, that the appeal would go through. Surprise it didn't. They were still very much in support of Nick up to that period. Luckily for Nick by then the Rittenhouse trial happened, and the dropoff of those WW fans unsubbing didn't really hurt him.
Yeah, and some of the WW people probably stuck it out longer than they should have. I wouldn't deny that. But the other thing is that Nick went on to do other things, and it was those "other things" were the problems started to show. I almost feel the need to bifurcate WW from Nick. You can still support what WW was trying to achieve, but express distain in what Nick has become. It's not like any of this shit going on retroactively makes KV look good.

I will also note that there was some dissention in this thread beginning in 2022. It wasn't like everybody was ignorant as to the direction Nick was taking. It's just that the "vibe" of the thread seemed to be that Nick was still more good than bad.

Then November happened.

I chalk this all up to the fact that people wanted to give Nick absolutely every benefit of the doubt until they simply couldn't anymore without looking foolish. The dramatic change in the tone of this thread is testament to how radical and undeniable Nick's transformation has been. It's a good thing too, because I think if this thread had it's heel turn right after Vic's COA appeal was lost, Nick would try to claim people are just salty over that. As it stands, the vast majority of criticism has been directed towards things other than Vic losing.
 
New possible ending to the Locals saga: hot young woman starts posting lewds for attention. Then everyone finds out she’s not quite a women yet and they’ve all been fapping to borderline cheese pizza. Everything gets deleted.

Rather than interpersonal drama of having horndogs thinking they’re in a relationship with internet ladies this is the main reason you do not encourage your community to post sexualised pictures of themselves on a source of income you rely on and can easily destroy your reputation.

Don’t get me wrong. If I could get a gang of MILFs to send me pictures of their tits all day I’d be super tempted but I also known it would bite me at some stage. I can’t see how a lawyer can’t see the thousand ways this could take him down.
 
Back