- Joined
- Oct 1, 2013
In other words, "I'd love to, but I'm too busy boasting about my low intelligence and pedophilia to give a shit."
Are we sure his IQ's aren't in the low double digits? Because the way he speaks/acts seems like it is.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In other words, "I'd love to, but I'm too busy boasting about my low intelligence and pedophilia to give a shit."
In other words, "I'd love to, but I'm too busy boasting about my low intelligence and pedophilia to give a shit."
Are we sure his IQ's aren't in the low double digits? Because the way he speaks/acts seems like it is.
I read somewhere (I think it was here on the Farms) that pedophiles/child molesters tend to have intelligence comparable to the ages they prefer. I don't know if that's accurate though.Most pedophiles have lower-than-average intelligence.
Sexual attraction to children isn't necessarily caused by having a low IQ or vice versa, I think it's more likely because people with below average intelligence/mental retardation have poorer impulse control and therefore are more likely to act on their fantasies, or might not even have pedophilia yet resort to molesting children because they're unable to interact with and get sex from people their own age, thus would be the reason why convicted pedophiles tend to score lower on IQ testsMost pedophiles have lower-than-average intelligence. Low double digits is a bit of a stretch, considering he can read and write at least somewhat legitimately, but I'd be surprised if he cracked 100.
I personally think that was a troll.If JTM insists on defending himself in court...
You shouldn't call women the C-word, Jimbo.
The people known as "lolcows" can have a "shattering experience." To CWC, it was the fateful gal-pal reveal. To JTM, it looks like he now understands that he's notamong the smartest people alivethe smartest person he knowssmart.
If it is just the state whats the likelihood of a concurrent sentence vs a consecutive sentence?It could easily be prosecuted by the state and then by the feds. Happens in drug cases all the time.
Also he wouldn't be charged with just one felony, he'd be charged with a separate felony for each offense. They generally vastly overcharge in these cases.
The feds are the best bet for Internet CP though.
If it is just the state whats the likelihood of a concurrent sentence vs a consecutive sentence?
How bad is it when spellcheck is smarter than you?Meanwhile on James' Tumblr, more retardation and "I really don't care about Kiwifarms guise, believe me! Please!" spiel
View attachment 92331
I'm pretty sure he was never formally tested as those tests usually cost money and he just googled "real IQ test" or whatever and accepted the value they gave him at the end. The problem with that is most, if not all, free tests are very generous and typically give you results that are 10-20 points higher than they should be because they're not taking all factors into account.Like I stated earlier in this thread, I think he's either bullshitting about the 124 and probably got somewhere below 95, or just got a 124 score for being slightly smarter than everyone in his trailer park town (kind of like how Peggy Hill boasted about being a certified "genius" with a fake PhD who speaks fluent Es-puh-nole)
Again, IQ of 124 and supposedly a linguist yet he relies heavily on the spellcheck. Actual linguists don't bother with that because a) they know how to spell and b) they know that there are words that are spelled correctly and sound the same but mean something completely different. It is possible to write using nothing but actual words but the sentence is off because some of them have different meanings.James the rapist said:I wrote a post a while ago and wrote the word sook when I meant sought but because it is a word my spellcheck didn’t flag it so I assumed it to be correct.
Quite, obviously. Then again, anything is smarter than JTM.How bad is it when spellcheck is smarter than you?
Same here, whenever I took those free online tests I usually got around the same score that James claims is his actual IQ and even then I thought it was exaggerated, and then when I had an actual IQ test administered during a psych evaluation when I was 18 (you know, at a psychiatric office that cost actual money) to see if I was still on the autism spectrum, I ended up getting a score of 115. While I'm still disappointed and wish I could have scored higher, at least I can take comfort in the fact that mine is still substantially higher than James' IQ score probably is IRL.I'm pretty sure he was never formally tested as those tests usually cost money and he just googled "real IQ test" or whatever and accepted the value they gave him at the end. The problem with that is most, if not all, free tests are very generous and typically give you results that are 10-20 points higher than they should be because they're not taking all factors into account.
When I was younger I did take a bunch of these online tests and the values I got were very flattering but they were inconsistent. When I was tested later for realsies I found that on average they were around 10 points higher than my actual score. One was so out of whack to be 25 points higher which might explain his current score because Pedobear hasn't demonstrated any kind of advanced intelligence whatsoever.
Again, IQ of 124 and supposedly a linguist yet he relies heavily on the spellcheck. Actual linguists don't bother with that because a) they know how to spell and b) they know that there are words that are spelled correctly and sound the same but mean something completely different. It is possible to write using nothing but actual words but the sentence is off because some of them have different meanings.
"Two bee oar knot too bee, " might be the question but I think a better one is what the hell does it actually mean?
Meanwhile on James' Tumblr, more retardation and "I really don't care about Kiwifarms guise, believe me! Please!" spiel
View attachment 92331
It sounds wrong that he's using a word that translates to "softie".I'm Irish and in the area I'm from, "sook" is a slang word meaning "softie", or maybe someone who's sweet and affectionate. It's really odd seeing that word on a blog from outside Ireland.
In one of his videos on YouTube he claims when he gets drunk he tends to get more of a Scottish or Irish accent due to him having ancestors from the British Isles. But this doesn't exactly explain why'd he put it into text.I'm Irish and in the area I'm from, "sook" is a slang word meaning "softie", or maybe someone who's sweet and affectionate. It's really odd seeing that word on a blog from outside Ireland.
In one of his videos on YouTube he claims when he gets drunk he tends to get more of a Scottish or Irish accent due to him having ancestors from the British Isles. But this doesn't exactly explain why'd he put it into text.
I think he just wanted to convince us that he's smart by trying to explain away is grammar. He probably had no idea that it was an Irish word.In one of his videos on YouTube he claims when he gets drunk he tends to get more of a Scottish or Irish accent due to him having ancestors from the British Isles. But this doesn't exactly explain why'd he put it into text.
Reminds me of Iconoclast (he claimed to be an English major in college) trying to defend an exposed linguistic blunder.He probably had no idea that it was an Irish word.
As opposed to just sounding retarded otherwise?I have Wales in my blood somewhere iirc and I don't speak fucking Welsh when I drink. He must just sound retarded when he drinks.