Uh. No. The Abrams and the Bradley function like any vehicle of their type. An experienced crew can figure out how to use them in a day. In a week they can have mastery. This issue is as I have said maintenance.
This^ deferred maintenance is the big issue with all equipment. Most of the captured Russian equipment is still having deferred maintenance being done.
The US has way more resources then Russia.
Yeah the US has twice the population, and despite being half the size of Russia has roughly 5 times the economic value per square mile then Russia does.
The Ukraine War has done more damage to America's historic strategic rival in a single year then decades of cold war shenanigans.
Lastly this ^ Russia doesn't have many European friends left after the war. Erdogan can play both sides, orban is more concerned with staying leader of hungry then getting involved, and Sweden and Norway will be fast tracked to joining NATO. Regardless of what culture war shenanigans occur.
These aren't SUVs. This is the most POG statement ever, and I have had to listen to a lot of POGs. You should ask an American in a tank battalion of an armored division how long it takes to properly crew those, not Z-man's rent boy.
A proper crew can take weeks of training assuming they don't know how to drive or operate any sort of armored vehicle. But if we're taking about retraining crews that use BMPs and BTRs having them retrained on how to operate a Brady is a few weeks top to teach them the ins and puts of the APCs and armored personal carriers.
fify
I see. Tell me, what happened to our domestic petroleum industry? That gas at the WaWa has to come from somewhere, and most of it isn't domestic anymore.
The US is still one of the largest domestic natural gas producers, coal and energy extraction are going to see major investments in the next decade.
Children, this is the American liberal on copium. Just say no.
Russia is basically sanctioned, any Russian goods that are on ships won't be insured. Ie which means those big crude oil tankers coming from Rostov on dons ports won't be allowed into most ports because they don't have insurance. That means of a Chinese oil tanker is carrying Russian crude they can't check into a major port like hamburg or even Istanbul
What do the Russian sanctions mean for the insurance industry? Our Legal and Consulting teams share their insights.
davies-group.com
www.gov.uk
Sanctions do to have effects and it turns out when you take offline one of the world's largest exporters of cheap resources and wheat it causes problems for both sides.
Do you remember which country has closed its borders to all men of fighting age, again? It's the same country that conscripts people at literal gunpoint.
This is why Ukraine isn't really hurting for man power it has nearly all of it's manpower enlisted in reserves right now. Unless you believe the propaganda from Russian TV which says NATO mercs are being overwhelmed by the awesomeness of the T-90M tank which despite a plethora of pictures, hasn't been defeated so checkmate NATO.
The common man is not relevant at a geopolitical stage. The common man does not represent the US. Common man in the US is a 60% white polarized mutt with an IQ in rapid collapse and dependent on multiple psychotropic drugs while eating shit food and having 30BMI. Sorry to say but this average person, often seen riding some fatmobile in a store or MAGA rally, is a lost cause.
Now for what actually matters, Geopolitics and POWER.
From an idealistic perspective that should work for shitlib biomass, the US is fighting against an authoritarian Russian regime that's dangerous to democracies nearby.
From a neocon/neolib perspective, the US is weaking one of its two main competitors at the tiny cost of like 7% of the military budget or something. It's also a good opportunity to revive NATO and increase the cohesion of the US-Europe alliance, while distancing it from Russia.
From an economic perspective, the US will rebuild Ukraine and put all its corporations in it and open up another US-aligned market in the area.
From a military perspective, the US gets to test its weapons against the Russian forces, which is extremely useful. It also gets to observe the Russian military and Wagner, hence the AWACS in the area monitoring 24/7.
Again, still curious what mask you thought I was metaphorically wearing?
The war if anything has shown me that US equipment even the worst off tech has a better survivability rate our in Ukraine.
Russia has millions of men but is an empire that has to deal with internal issues as well.
People we're whining the west is in collapse because George Floyd riots and the DNC allowed commies to be off their leash for a few months. Of course there is more evidence to suggest that foreign countries probably had a hand in this.
Russia meanwhile has flashpoints in nogorono karabakh, Kyrgyzstan/Uzbekistan border flare up, issues with islamists and far right terror groups within Russia not to mention sympathetic terror cells being sided by Ukraine. Even if Russia somehow makes 2023 the year they defeat Ukraine totally (which I doubt ATM) this won't make any of it's internal problems better. If anything this could lead to a multi decade conflict within the Russian federation.
lmao
View attachment 4331587
Перемога и зрада, like clockwork
View attachment 4331597
"are not likely to arrive for many months, if not
years"
Well duh the Abrams and Leopard tanks are replenishing the stockpiles in eastern Europe. They're the first countries who are sending their old Soviet stock along with specialized US gear into Ukraine. Vizegrad nations will leave this war with Top tier NATO armies instead.