OK so sorry for some reason the reply I posted disappeared I think, whilst there were errors so it may have just faded into the ether.
Basically, the Trustee opposing means in the process of bankruptcy either;
1) Amounts have not been disclosed DURING the filing
2) Not made any attempts at paying the remaining amounts
3) Not attending meetings or credit councils
It is most likely all 3 meaning the discharge will be absolutely opposed and she could not challenge it. On a bankruptcy Canada website here (
https://bankruptcycanada.com/opposi...s the details,will provide a written decision.)
An element here states:
(e)
the bankrupt was irresponsible in their actions, such as through gambling, extravagant living beyond their means, or purposefully neglecting their business affairs which helped contribute to their bankruptcy filing.
Note this is rare and but what can happen is she is fined the amounts she has frauded such as taxes and income hidden. She cannot discharge until those fees are paid and she cannot go to jail for this but there may be other ways such as tax fraud. up to 200% of the tax or up to five years in Jail.
She should be absolutely shitting herself I could not find much on trustees in Canada opposing and only generic supplements. This means it is probably very unusual, the court can actually ask to review her account too which I think is highly likely as they will not believe her.
This will beyond a doubt fuck her and as for Reddit Karens, I don't think so in particular because the Trustee opposed it, and the community only knew of them.