Cultcow Mikemikev / Michael Coombs / Twinkle Toes / Velcro Pants - Pedo Teacher and Neo-Nazi, Advocate of Child Murder, Secret JewMuslim ANTIFA, A-Logs Null Constantly

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

I don't understand why all of you people are here typing this nonsense. It isn't funny at all. You find typing this funny?

I thought you said you were done here? You beat my estimate in only a minute. Holy shit what a tard.

 

[Mikemikev]

I thought you said you were done here? You beat my estimate in only a minute. Holy shit what a tard.

But you've decided to admit the question wasn't rhetorical.

 

[Luminous Being]

But I wasn't answered "show me proof of that", which I would have done. I was told the question was rhetorical.

It's a dismissive answer nonetheless. And it doesn't chagne the fact(!) that you called your ideas "fact" from the word go.

 

[Adamska]

Apparently writing an abstract is too hard for this one sane man. Hey, @chimpburgers , does he have a college level education? Because if so then daaaaammn, he probably flunked if this is too hard for him to do for a pet cause.

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

But you've decided to admit the question wasn't rhetorical.

Right there, with this sentence, you have just proven that it was rhetorical. "Do you accept this fact?" is the definitive rhetorical question.

No, I didn't.

 

[Mikemikev]

What's the point of writing a thesis if you can't answer whether or not you accept one fact?

The irony is that you're playing dumb, while actually being dumb.

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

What's the point of writing a thesis if you can't answer whether or not you accept one fact?

The part where you've yet to prove it is a fact.

The irony is that you're playing dumb, while actually being dumb.

Said the Holocaust denier.

 

[CatParty]

The irony is that you're playing dumb, while actually being dumb.

you're just deflecting. stop it.

What's the point of writing a thesis if you can't answer whether or not you accept one fact?

 

[Adamska]

What's the point of writing a thesis if you can't answer whether or not you accept one fact?

Because you're still being dishonest with words and an abstract is literally just a paragraph's worth of effort. Maybe a source or two since I ain't askin for a paper.

As mentioned, I know that you know you have no case.

 

[Luminous Being]

What's the point of writing a thesis if you can't answer whether or not you accept one fact?

If you don't show that something is a fact it does not have to be considered and can be dismissed without evidence as well. Have you ever seen/read a real debate?

 

[dacote]

Dear cow: do you refute the idea that social class, education and upbringing has a marked effect on observed intelligence in adults?

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

@Mikemikev why can't you just summarize your conspiracy theory?

 

[Mikemikev]

If you don't show that something is a fact it does not have to be considered and can be dismissed without evidence as well. Have you ever seen/read a real debate?

But ones opponent must say whether or not he considers it a fact, no?

 

[Luminous Being]

This, again, reminds me of "Professor" Charles Gellman of http://manhood101.com/.

"Do you consent? DO YOU CONSENT?"

But ones opponent must say whether or not he considers it a fact, no?

No. Not if the one making the claim has nothing to back it up. How stupid are you?

 

[Mikemikev]

@Mikemikev why can't you just summarize your conspiracy theory?

I was going to take it step by step. What's the point of writing to someone too stupid to understand the nature of questions? You might as well write about calculus and send it to an earthworm.

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

I was going to take it step by step. What's the point of writing to someone too stupid to understand the nature of questions? You might as well write about calculus and send it to an earthworm.

You're an idiot. Just summarize your fucking conspiracy theory already.

 

[Mikemikev]

No. Not if the one making the claim has nothing to back it up. How stupid are you?

I don't know whether I need to back it up unless I know whether my opponent accepts it.

But then you know this and you're just being an asshole. Why do you feel the need to be an asshole? Do people generally not like you IRL? Did you fail your studies?

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

I don't know whether I need to back it up unless I know whether my opponent accepts it.

Just do it, faggot.

 

[Mikemikev]

You're an idiot. Just summarize your fucking conspiracy theory already.

No, you're an idiot, in the classic sense of the word. I mean that sincerely.

 

[Luminous Being]

I don't know whether I need to back it up unless I know whether my opponent accepts it.

But then you know this and you're just being an asshole. Why do you feel the need to be an asshole? Do people generally not like you IRL? Did you fail your studies?

Again so you can write it down: Every single person here has been nothing but dismissive of your claims. To ask whether or not they accept your claims is meaningless because the answer is very likely going to be no.

I am relatively well liked I'd say and my studies went pretty well.