Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 65 21.5%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 27.5%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 47 15.6%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 103 34.1%

  • Total voters
    302
Aside from what's already been said, I think a big reason why Nick's attitude flipped sideways during the Depp trial was money and attention. Money changes people, especially when the earnings come with popularity and getting your dick metaphorically sucked by your audience and guests. He started getting a lot of this during and after the Rittenhouse trial, but all of a sudden he has Lawtubers appear alongside him during Depp vs. Heard and he was one of (if not the only) source of watching the whole thing without the "Amber is the victim" narrative. After that, everything changed because as far as content creators go, he had made it.
 
I think the difference between the normal, human desire for one last hurrah as you're getting older and a full blown midlife crisis is a matter of degree. Also the addict's mantra of "If some feels good, more must feel even better."
Correct. Although the more cynical part of my mind tend me to think that it is a difference of ability to carry out that desire that leads to a difference in manifestation in each case. Many of us will never have the ability to lead the kind of life that might allow us to imbibe our vices as generously as we may secretly wish--even unbeknownst to ourselves

As many have said 'Money is an amplifier'. It tends to exaggerate both our vices and virtues--but to different degrees. Virtues may be amplified by a linear factor, but vices exponentially so. It makes good men great, but it also inflates the most minor of flaws a yawning crevasse of moral bankruptcy.

Thus riches doth make cruel moral caricatures of us all-- to butcher a line from the Bard.

I suggest that all who seek to raise their fortunes in this world ponder and reflect on Kipling's 'If—'. Polish your character now before your flaws are exhibited to the world.
 
Last edited:
Wasn't Nick crying about how Montegraph hasn't served all his papers? Monty should go to Vegas and do it.
Rekietamania .png
 
So I have a question: what the fuck does Ryan the editor actually do? Supposedly he gets paid well according to Nick. There's one thing he could do that would really help Nick's streams:

Add timestamps to the live stream VODs

Even before Nick came out as a blazing swinger hypocrite, I had stopped watching Nick's streams because they basically devolved into 2 hours of reading super chats and toasting to people's dead grandma, and maybe an hour tops of what I actually wanted to watch. There was a guy in the youtube comments named something like Aggrolith that would timestamp all of his streams, but he stopped doing it sometime around the Depp trial. I rarely saw anyone do the timestamps after that, so I dipped.

If Ryan added this to all the streams, I'd still go check out whatever lolsuit nick decides to cover (if he even fucking does that anymore). But even then, Nick has been so insufferable the past couple months that I don't even care to see him in my subscriber feed anymore.
 
Seriously what the fuck happened to Nick during the Depp trial to make him go full mask off coomer like this?
If he's being honest that he was always like this he at least had the sense to keep it under the table and not broadcast it, not when its contrary to the image he was presenting publically.
But then during the Depp trial he said he "had the worst day of his life" and he "had a lot of thinking to do" and since then he's been a fucking trainwreck?
So what was it that tipped Balldo over the ledge?
I think there was some drama with the people who were "renting" his other house for free. I watched essentially every night until things got too weird shortly after Depp. It was heavily inferred if not outright stated that it was LR's cousin/bestie's family who had the house, and he had been dropping hints/outright saying over the last few months prior that he needed them to get out or buy the house off him because even-though he could technically afford it, and I beleive they were atleast covering the mortgage at that point, the whole deal had went on way longer than anticipated and he was tired of it/felt like he was being taken advantage of.

The implication at the time seemed to be that they had a "buy the house or get out, its going on the market" talk with the cousin's family and it caused a huge blow out with LR's family. This is why he's saying stuff like he may be able to move to Texas now. It was her previous super strong relationship (and probable financial, material, and child care support) with her family that kept them tied there. I think it also kept her in church and from sluting it up and publicly doing drugs all the time. Now that LR has finally said "fuck you, dad" and they have money to hire baby sitters and shit instead of using family (that's another change that happened around the same time) she isn't holding nick back from being the coomer retard he always wanted to be - so long as he'll do party drugs and shit with her.
 
Dude is clearly having a midlife crisis at the moment. That's really it, the only noteworthy part is that he is having his while being a somewhat popular figure online. He's getting attention from women who are having their own midlife crises and retarded fans who would happily suck is cock and pay for the privilege.

There's a good chance he and his wife end up in devoice when the novelty of this new found sexually liberation wears off or one of them pushes (or get caught) the boundaries a little too far.

The age Nick is currently at is a real minefield for men. Most men go through their teens and early twenties horny as all hell and you either choose between having one sexual partner and being tied down or 'in a relationship', or playing the field -- and for most of us, getting nowhere near as many women as we think we deserve.

Mid to late twenties, you bite the bullet, finally accept that if you really want regular sex, you're going to have to have that relationship. So you get married or start living together. Maybe have a couple of kids. Your partner is exhausted from taking care of the kids, so despite having settled down, and limited yourself to one partner, you still aren't getting all the sex you think you deserve.

Mid thirties to early forties, something peculiar happens. You've achieved some success in your career, so you've got some spare money. You've shaken off that awkwardness of your youth and you've achieved a degree of confidence. And there are hoardes of desperate women -- all those women who never got around to having a long term relationship because they thought their career was more important. All those women who did have a long term relationship but their partners just dumped them for a younger model.

Even if you exclude those women with children from consideration, you've reached a point in your life when -- as long as you're clean, solvent and presentable -- and really, any two out of those three will be adequate -- those hoardes of desperate women will start launching themselves in your direction. And sure, they'll have relationships as their long-term end-goal, but these are all women who've been around the block. They know what the game is and how it's played. Married men in their mid-thirties and upwards aren't waiting for sex. If you want their attention, you've got to put out.

Lots of men find the temptation under those circumstances just way too much to handle. Those really hot women who wouldn't look at you when you were twenty years younger are all desperate to get you into bed now that you're forty. And you don't have to limit yourself to women your own age. It seems younger women find you irresistable as well. You're already married with a couple of kids, so you obviously aren't a commitment-phobe and these eggs aren't getting any younger.

And all this is true for ordinary guys. You don't need some kind of celebrity status to be subject to these pressures. If you have any kind of social life or work in a mixed workplace, chances are you're going to have to deal with it at some point. Given that, it's not at all surprising to me that Nick's finding himself a bit shook by the number of wine moms desperate for his attention.
 
Last edited:
"Fuck you mom and dad, I'm going to whore out my wife and sexually humiliate her before a public audience!" doesn't quite sound right.

"Fuck you parental in-laws, I'm going to whore out your daughter and sexually humiliate her before a public audience!" sounds like something a self-diagnosed ODD retard would do.
He has said on stream that the reason they live in bumfuck nowhere, MN is to be near Kayla's family. Sounds like he was being paid handsomely (and/or given a free house) to stay near them.
 
The age Nick is currently at is a real minefield for men. Most men go through their teens and early twenties horny as all hell and you either choose between having one sexual partner and being tied down or 'in a relationship', or playing the field -- and for most of us, getting nowhere near as many women as we think we deserve.

Mid to late twenties, you bite the bullet, finally accept that if you really want regular sex, you're going to have to have that relationship. So you get married or start living together. Maybe have a couple of kids. Your partner is exhausted from taking care of the kids, so despite having settled down, and limited yourself to one partner, you still aren't getting all the sex you think you deserve.

Mid thirties to early forties, something peculiar happens. You've achieved some success in your career, so you've got some spare money. You've shaken off that awkwardness of your youth and you've achieved a degree of confidence. And there are hoardes of desperate women -- all those women who never got around to having a long term relationship because they thought their career was more important. All those women who did have a long term relationship but their partners just dumped them for a younger model.

Even if you exclude those women with children from consideration, you've reached a point in your life when -- as long as you're clean, solvent and presentable -- and really, any two out of those three will be adequate -- hoardes of desperate women will start launching themselves in your direction. And sure, they'll have relationships as their long-term end-goal, but these are all women who've been around the block. They know what the game is and how it's played. Married men in their mid-thirties and upwards aren't waiting for sex. If you want their attention, you've got to put out.

Lots of men find the temptation under those circumstances just way too much to handle. Those really hot women who wouldn't look at you when you were twenty years younger are all desperate to get you into bed now that you're forty.
And this is true for ordinary guys. You don't need some kind of celebrity status to be subject to these pressures. If you have any kind of social life or work in a mixed workplace, chances are you're going to have to deal with it at some point.
Just wondering, does love ever get into this part of the equation? Or men are just creatures incapable of loving; just going from one pleasurable sensation to another until they die?
 
Just wondering, does love ever get into this part of the equation? Or men are just creatures incapable of loving; just going from one pleasurable sensation to another until they die?
Sometimes people hurt the ones they love not out of malice but out of stupidity. People are stupid, we like to think that with age comes maturity but there's plenty of old fools out there, man or woman.
 
Just wondering, does love ever get into this part of the equation? Or men are just creatures incapable of loving; just going from one pleasurable sensation to another until they die?

Of course it does. The women I'm writing about are all looking for love. And the men whose marriages collapse as a consequence do so because they also regard themselves as 'falling in love with somebody else'.

It's not what I consider love though. Fundamentally, for me, love is about commitment. It's a modern, consumerist form of 'love' that's characterised as serial monogamy. And given it's how most of our thought leaders -- celebrities, politicians, media people, etc -- have conducted themselves for the last fifty years or so, you can hardly blame ordinary people for thinking that's how it's supposed to work.
 
The other thing supporting the theory is Nick's occasional rants about how hard his life has been. In objective terms, it doesn't seem to have been hard. He certainly hasn't been done in by working. But if he had to tow the line for one or two sets of parents for years as an adult, that would be tough.
No tough would be working 12 hour days of menial labor. Or living in your car because your wife kicks you out and you have no money or family to help out.

This is privileged rich person problems. Fuck him and his arrested development.
 
Of course it does. The women I'm writing about are all looking for love. And the men whose marriages collapse as a consequence do so because they also regard themselves as 'falling in love with somebody else'.

It's not what I consider love though. Fundamentally, for me, love is about commitment. It's a modern, consumerist form of 'love' that's characterised as serial monogamy. And given it's how most of our thought leaders -- celebrities, politicians, media people, etc -- have conducted themselves for the last fifty years or so, you can hardly blame ordinary people for thinking that's how it's supposed to work.
I very much agree with your assessment. Always makes me think of Dostoevsky's definition of love.

"Active love is a harsh and fearful thing compared with the love in dreams. Love in dreams thirsts for immediate action, quickly performed, and with everyone watching. Indeed, it will go as far as the giving even of one's life, provided it does not take long but is soon over, as on stage, and everyone is looking on and praising. Whereas active love is labor and persistence, and for some people, perhaps, a whole science."

-Fyodor Dostoevsky
 
Just wondering, does love ever get into this part of the equation? Or men are just creatures incapable of loving; just going from one pleasurable sensation to another until they die?
There are men who want to live a Christian life with a Christian marriage. There are still stories of men who marry their high school sweetheart celebrating their 50th wedding anniversary with their five children. Yes, it happens.

Technology has made cheating easier and fewer people believe in objective morality, so it's becoming less common, I fear.
 
Gay 90s is in a not great location toward the outer part of downtown minneapolis. It used to be right about at the edge of where the good police presence downtown at night was. So it was a place where you could end up having alot of violent street crime. It would also have all the other typical problems any other downtown bar like that would have with drunks and fights associated with the club. Post-George Floyd the whole downtown is supposedly a alot less safe.

But I've never heard of it having a "BDSM dungeon". I think it would tend more toward stage show style demonstrations and meet-up nights for people into that stuff. Having a dungeon combined with a club in that town seems unlikely. People dying on a regular basis at a dungeon inside the club seems kind of crazy. Its not something that could be covered up and there would be all kinds of hand wringing over it if there were.
Probably confusing it with Ground Zero. Which doesn't afaik have a dungeon, though on Bondage-a-Go-Go nights has some mild flogging upstairs.

But The Gay 90s is right on Hennepin - it's the edge of the strictly business part of downtown, but right by a ton of other restaurants and bars, a short walk from Murray's, Oceanaire, and the Fine Line, down the street from some great theaters (Pantages, Orpheum, State, the Hennepin Theater Trust) and First Avenue, across from a newish Marriott in their upscale line, and near Target Center. There's also a police station on the other side of the block and an upscale apartment building next door. Plus the Central Library just nearby. Yes, weekend night "incidents" happen; it's a nighttime activity area of a large city. And yes, the parking garages and Greyhound station next to them (7 blocks down) are sketch. But relatively speaking, it's in a good part of downtown. It's only scary for people unaccustomed to cities.
 
BEHOLD! The deep philosophical conversations on LOCALS! When is it ethical to send D-pics!


View attachment 4355503View attachment 4355513


View attachment 4355517View attachment 4355520

I am more motivated than ever to get reply-threading working on my archive.

Worth noting that icancook is one of his longtime regular superchatters, too.

Shocking how strong the correlation is from people who give exorbitant amounts of money to complete strangers online to weirdo sex pests.
 
Shocking how strong the correlation is from people who give exorbitant amounts of money to complete strangers online to weirdo sex pests.
It's really fucking weird. I would sometimes donate to a content creator if they were not very big and thought it would be a funny super chat or whatever, but dropping real money on Nick who is rich just seems silly. What are they trying to prove?
 
Back