Science Pfizer Executive: ‘Mutate’ COVID via ‘Directed Evolution’ for Company to Continue Profiting Off of Vaccines … ‘COVID is Going to be a Cash Cow for Us’

  • Jordon Trishton Walker, Pfizer Director of Research and Development, Strategic Operations - mRNA Scientific Planner: “One of the things we're exploring is like, why don't we just mutate it [COVID] ourselves so we could create -- preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we're gonna do that though, there's a risk of like, as you could imagine -- no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f**king viruses.”
  • Walker: “Don’t tell anyone. Promise you won’t tell anyone. The way it [the experiment] would work is that we put the virus in monkeys, and we successively cause them to keep infecting each other, and we collect serial samples from them.”
  • Walker: “You have to be very controlled to make sure that this virus [COVID] that you mutate doesn’t create something that just goes everywhere. Which, I suspect, is the way that the virus started in Wuhan, to be honest. It makes no sense that this virus popped out of nowhere. It’s bullsh*t.”
  • Walker: “From what I’ve heard is they [Pfizer scientists] are optimizing it [COVID mutation process], but they’re going slow because everyone is very cautious -- obviously they don’t want to accelerate it too much. I think they are also just trying to do it as an exploratory thing because you obviously don’t want to advertise that you are figuring out future mutations.”
[NEW YORK – Jan. 25, 2023] Project Veritas released a new video today exposing a Pfizer executive, Jordon Trishton Walker, who claims that his company is exploring a way to “mutate” COVID via “Directed Evolution” to preempt the development of future vaccines.

Walker says that Directed Evolution is different than Gain-of-Function, which is defined as “a mutation that confers new or enhanced activity on a protein.” In other words, it means that a virus such as COVID can become more potent depending on the mutation / scientific experiment performed on it.

The Pfizer executive told a Veritas journalist about his company’s plan for COVID vaccines, while acknowledging that people would not like this information if it went public.

“One of the things we [Pfizer] are exploring is like, why don't we just mutate it [COVID] ourselves so we could create -- preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we're gonna do that though, there's a risk of like, as you could imagine -- no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f**king viruses,” Walker said.

“From what I’ve heard is they [Pfizer scientists] are optimizing it [COVID mutation process], but they’re going slow because everyone is very cautious -- obviously they don’t want to accelerate it too much. I think they are also just trying to do it as an exploratory thing because you obviously don’t want to advertise that you are figuring out future mutations,” he said.

“Don’t tell anyone. Promise you won’t tell anyone. The way it [the experiment] would work is that we put the virus in monkeys, and we successively cause them to keep infecting each other, and we collect serial samples from them.”

Walker drew parallels between this current Pfizer project and what may have happened at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China.

“You have to be very controlled to make sure that this virus [COVID] that you mutate doesn’t create something that just goes everywhere. Which, I suspect, is the way that the virus started in Wuhan, to be honest. It makes no sense that this virus popped out of nowhere. It’s bullsh*t,” he said.

“You’re not supposed to do Gain-of-Function research with viruses. Regularly not. We can do these selected structure mutations to make them more potent. There is research ongoing about that. I don’t know how that is going to work. There better not be any more outbreaks because Jesus Christ,” he said.

Walker also told the Veritas journalist that COVID has been instrumental for Pfizer’s recent business success:

Walker:Part of what they [Pfizer scientists] want to do is, to some extent, to try to figure out, you know, how there are all these new strains and variants that just pop up. So, it’s like trying to catch them before they pop up and we can develop a vaccine prophylactically, like, for new variants. So, that’s why they like, do it controlled in a lab, where they say this is a new epitope, and so if it comes out later on in the public, we already have a vaccine working.

Veritas Journalist:Oh my God. That’s perfect. Isn’t that the best business model though? Just control nature before nature even happens itself? Right?

Walker:Yeah. If it works.

Veritas Journalist:What do you mean if it works?

Walker:Because some of the times there are mutations that pop up that we are not prepared for. Like with Delta and Omicron. And things like that. Who knows? Either way, it’s going to be a cash cow. COVID is going to be a cash cow for us for a while going forward. Like obviously.

Veritas Journalist:Well, I think the whole research of the viruses and mutating it, like, would be the ultimate cash cow.

Walker:Yeah, it’d be perfect.
Walker went on to explain how Big Pharma and government officials, such as at the Food & Drug Administration [FDA], have mutual interests, and how that is not in the best interest of the American people:

Walker:[Big Pharma] is a revolving door for all government officials.

Veritas Journalist:Wow.

Walker:In any industry though. So, in the pharma industry, all the people who review our drugs -- eventually most of them will come work for pharma companies. And in the military, defense government officials eventually work for defense companies afterwards.



Veritas Journalist:How do you feel about that revolving door?

Walker:It’s pretty good for the industry to be honest. It’s bad for everybody else in America.

Veritas Journalist:Why is it bad for everybody else?

Walker:Because when the regulators reviewing our drugs know that once they stop regulating, they are going to work for the company, they are not going to be as hard towards the company that’s going to give them a job.

 
Is this something weird rich fucks do? Just casually talk about their super villain plans for genocide like it's the weather or some shit?

Holy shit.
Apparently, and I'm not even joking, it's at least partially to do with modern occult practices.
In the majority of these sorts of cults and secret societies, if you do something evil to someone, you'll be punished by whatever higher power they believe in. However, if you warn someone before you do that thing, you won't be punished because they didn't stop you from doing it and let you do it, and therefore they were technically okay with it.

If you tell someone you're going to kill them, and then kill them, it's technically morally okay in these cults; even if you then backtrack and say you won't kill them but still do, that's still morally acceptable. Side note; using symbolism to imply you're going to kill them also makes it morally okay, even if what you're saying is the polar opposite.
 
Apparently, and I'm not even joking, it's at least partially to do with modern occult practices.
In the majority of these sorts of cults and secret societies, if you do something evil to someone, you'll be punished by whatever higher power they believe in. However, if you warn someone before you do that thing, you won't be punished because they didn't stop you from doing it and let you do it, and therefore they were technically okay with it.

If you tell someone you're going to kill them, and then kill them, it's technically morally okay in these cults; even if you then backtrack and say you won't kill them but still do, that's still morally acceptable. Side note; using symbolism to imply you're going to kill them also makes it morally okay, even if what you're saying is the polar opposite.
yeah I've noticed this and come to believe similarly. It seems they run a drawinian morality where its "if you're dumb enough to do let us do X after we wink wink nudge nudge told you X is harmful to you...... its your fault, you consented"
 
The fuck is "malinformation?"
Misinformation that stinks?
It's information that's technically true but presented in a way that's false or misleading.

For example - I could say that "Living in Detroit isn't that bad" because there's only a reported (roughly) 1 in 100 chance that anything bad happens to you, which is true roughly based on crime stats. It also has a very low cost of living/housing costs and so on.

It's true that the 1 in 100 is accurate, but that 1 in 100 actually is the worst anywhere in the US (Detroit is #1 in Rape/Murder and #3 in assaults).


Them calling it Malinformation is technically Malinformation.
 
Well that would be pointless There’s nothing I could record or have access to that would be in any way relevant. I dont work with covid, my work is in another area, close enoigh to have a full understanding but different enough. I am not party to anything secret. Nobody is twirling moustaches and walking the corridors detailing nefarious plans in my line of work. I do my work, which is in an area that’s fairly sympathetic. I watch the same, probably publically available seminars and webinars the rest of the tens of thousands of people in my company do.
There IS no whistleblowing - I’m not in any kind of meeting or project where this is done, do you understand that? My company had nothing to do with any of the covid injections.
If people come forward they need to have materially relevant info. I hope they do. I have none. I’m looking at this the same way all of us are - piecing together the info you guys dig up and through my own lens of knowing the industry.
I mean I can go and nail my opinions to the church door, but that’s not going to do much. I have no power, and no more info than is in this thread.
There are almost 80k people working at Pfizer. If you lynch the lads making new antibiotics for what the covid team did, that’s fairly pointless. There will be under a hundred people with deep / not fragmentary knowledge of what happened at each of these companies. They will be general counsels, C level, and the ones in charge of and high enough in the work stream to have a full picture.
Well all get lynched I’m sure. I made enough of a visible pest of myself refusing the shots, certainly everyone in my work and personal life spent months having a go for it. My conscience is clear.
Well love got us here, so let's see where hate can take us. I'm feeling Madame Defarge-y.
 
Well love got us here, so let's see where hate can take us. I'm feeling Madame Defarge-y.
You should be angry. I am furious. The public aren’t anywhere near the anger levels they should be. If they understood what has been done to them they’d be putting heads on spikes. The financial damage that their grandchildren will be paying off for decades and the trashing of the economy, the grift, the loss of freedoms and the introduction and green lighting of surveillance and that before any damage from these damn things being injected into people.
Not angry enough, imo.
 
You should be angry. I am furious. The public aren’t anywhere near the anger levels they should be. If they understood what has been done to them they’d be putting heads on spikes. The financial damage that their grandchildren will be paying off for decades and the trashing of the economy, the grift, the loss of freedoms and the introduction and green lighting of surveillance and that before any damage from these damn things being injected into people.
Not angry enough, imo.
Id like to unequivocally apologize to you. I was a savage and this whole thing gives me difficulty discerning friend from foe. You're only doing me and all of us a good turn and I treated you with such contempt. Please forgive me.
 
Id like to unequivocally apologize to you. I was a savage and this whole thing gives me difficulty discerning friend from foe. You're only doing me and all of us a good turn and I treated you with such contempt. Please forgive me.
No forgiveness needed, my friend, no offence taken whatsoever. I totally get it.
You should be angry, we all should. One day this anger is going to peak and people are going to be wound up and loosed on a target, and it’s unlikely to be the right target.
I’m so angry and upset about it all it’s affected me deeply.
 
hang on

if these evil occult supergeniuses are running the world

how come nobody has fooled James O'Keefe?

I mean how hard it would it be to get someone to pretend to be taken in by his honeypots and release misleading information to their hot date?
They aren't super geniuses. They are barely average intellectually for villains. They do have massive amounts of arrogance enough to believe they could never be found out/stopped, and are so completely out of touch as to how normal people think and behave that they may not be able to accurately predict out behaviors.

Why they are able to do what they do is because they have generational power/wealth, they've been planning this for decades, and what they are doing is so psychotic as to be unbelievable to normal people. This is why we ignored "conspiracy theorists" who've been warning of these things since the 80s, because a normal person just doesn't have the capacity to be this evil.
 
Last edited:
They aren't super geniuses. They are barely average intellectually for villains. They do have massive amounts of arrogance enough to believe they could never be found out/stopped, and are so completely out of touch as to how normal people think and behave that they may not be able to accurately predict out behaviors.

Why they are able to do what they do is because they have generational power/wealth, they've been planning this for decades, and what they are doing is so psychotic as to be unbelievable to normal people. This is why we ignored "conspiracy theorists" who've been warning of these things since the 80s, because a normal person just doesn't have the capacity to be this evil.
that doesn't make any sense, how do you maintain your generational wealth without being smart
 
Back