I find it runs faster in live mode which makes sense as it's writing to RAM instead of a SSD/HD, it only has to read from the USB drive and once the OS is loaded into RAM it rarely needs to access the USB drive again. Live mode has it's limitations though, storage space is limited and you must save anything to an external drive in case power is lost. On the other hand Live mode is great for experimenting, mess something up and all that's needed is a reboot and start over.
Linux trannies should really write a compatibility layer for it instead of pretending FOSS creative software is worth its salt at all.
They literally do. However chasing a moving target will never be perfect. If you want Adobe software to work well on Linux, you need Adobe to support it. There's just no way around that reality.
www.weforum.org
You know what, I agree with you. Linux is shit. That's why I use Windows, which is still shit, just less so.
The subforum has a decent chunk of linuxfags, as any generic tech forum will.
I think it is the easiest step into Linux for Windows users but no sane distro has a goal of being as close to a Windows experience as possible. There is an insane one whose name I can't recall that basically roleplays as Windows as much as possible and even has its own telemetry baked in but at the end of the day it's not Windows.
That's nonsense.
To clarify, I am not mad that I have a fucky wucky. My problem is that neither I nor anyone else can figure out a solution to it. Computers are fickle things so I can handle some glitches, but Mint has given me jack shit to work with. The old root issue is related to a partition that doesn't fucking exist.
Most people don't even think of smartphones as computers or Android/iOS as operating systems. It's just a smartphone to them.
No one can easily replicate it or seems to have experience with it so it seems pretty niche. The logs would tell a lot but the one guy had a good point with UUIDs being potentially problematic if you ever posted them somewhere else on a personal account.
I don't understand how that's a rebuttal of what I said. They learned a novel OS in droves because there was a worthwhile reason to do so, period.
It's apples and oranges and you're discounting how the people I'm referring to treat MacOS the same as Linux in this situation because it's also different. I don't get why it's such a big deal to act like people don't lock themselves into Windows and are their own worst enemy when it comes to the solutions on offer.
They "lock themselves into Windows" because Windows has useful applications that Linux doesn't. The idea that people ought to stop using useful Windows-specific applications to avoid "lock-in" is perhaps the most idiotic thing I can imagine.
Most people don't use "useful applications" these days. They use Google Chrome, Safari, and Edge. The vast majority of people don't do anything fancy on the computer which is why they can jump from their laptop to their phone to their work computer without missing a beat.
I do so love how Linux nerds will deny and discredit and minimize the importance of everyone else's use case and workflow, but also fight decade-long holy wars over which forked distro of a forked distro of a forked distro is the best.
