- Joined
- Aug 23, 2019
>tell someone to kill themselves
>Get arrested for practicing medicine without a license
Fucking Canada
>Get arrested for practicing medicine without a license
Fucking Canada
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have a question, I don't think you're lying when you mention that you resigned from SS, my question is, if the uproar that started thanks to NYT hadn't happened, would you continue as administrators of SS? Or were you already considering leaving the site before?
I knew my son was suicidal, after he left an abusive relationship. He was trying to find support from other males who had been subjected to domestic abuse and had then become suicidal. He did not get this, instead he was told life wouldn’t get any better and was directed to the SN method. Once it became known who my son was, Marquis or one of his associates then used my son as one of their success stories.I’m a member of this site. This site is nothing like how the media portrays it. It’s supportive and many of the posts are vents rather than people looking for methods. The user demographics are broad, so there is a wealth of opinions. The user, FC, doesn’t seem malicious. She seems like a very depressed individual who uses the site as a way to vent. If you don’t like her, ignore her. She’s allowed to express her opinions. SS values freedom of speech. If people don’t like it they are free to leave.
Regarding family members of SS users who died. It’s pure cope. They didn’t give a shit about suicidal people before. SS is a scapegoat. Shutting down SS will not change suicide rates. In reality, it will stop people from venting. The real issues are much more complex and can’t be changed by ranting on Twitter.
We also know that “ranting” on Twitter won’t change things but it gets to right people. We don’t only post on Twitter, we are also working with the U.K. government on this subject.I’m a member of this site. This site is nothing like how the media portrays it. It’s supportive and many of the posts are vents rather than people looking for methods. The user demographics are broad, so there is a wealth of opinions. The user, FC, doesn’t seem malicious. She seems like a very depressed individual who uses the site as a way to vent. If you don’t like her, ignore her. She’s allowed to express her opinions. SS values freedom of speech. If people don’t like it they are free to leave.
Regarding family members of SS users who died. It’s pure cope. They didn’t give a shit about suicidal people before. SS is a scapegoat. Shutting down SS will not change suicide rates. In reality, it will stop people from venting. The real issues are much more complex and can’t be changed by ranting on Twitter.
The online safety bill which is currently going through parliament, would have prevented the forum and harmful content being available. The government knew about the site in 2018 if they had actioned the online safety then, a lots of deaths would have been prevented. Following Joes inquest the coroner issued a regulation 28 in prevention of future deaths.@Sjm411 what legislation would have stopped what happened to your son? What could have been reasonably outlawed?
There has sadly been a few instances of questionable behavior, morals, desicion makings and opinions from the jannies. Especially with how they seem to favor women and other trannies, regardless of how extreme their posts can be. I’ve straight out witnessed bullying and witch hunts towards those who have criticized FC and other trannies such as "DeathDuetoDysphoria/CantDoItAnymore" who was mentioned earlier in this thread. Certain individuals as for example, "Suicidebydeath" have also recently created several threads where they posted numberous screenshots and quotes from FC where she was being "kind" to others, but left out all the posts where she’d been toxic to try and white wash her image on her behalves. It is beyond me why she has such so many white knights who put in an extreme amount of time and effort into trying to fix her reputation, on a suicide forum… when they are individuals who seem to struggle a lot more IRL than she does tbh, as she never told her story, but somehow has well over 17 000 posts. She whines about how lucky dead people are daily and how she’s jealous of those who die to diseases and in accidents. She seems completely uneffected by what she does and says to other people and don’t care that she hurt others.Even the fucking suicide forum starts joining their thread to complain about their jannies![]()
Thanks for the welcome, and no worries. I’m glad to be here after seeing what a mess SS has turned into.Not to sound like a patronizing faggot, but I’m sorry that you’ve found yourself being an active member there. Welcome to the Farms.
Anyway. There was some discussion, iirc, on whether she was a bot due to the repetitive nature of her comments. I don’t post, and I don’t get particularly invested in threads there, but I couldn’t begin to count the number of times her bs has derailed threads, even other users’ goodbye threads. I can understand why many longtime users are leaving due to the drama.
I’m a hard line believer in free speech, but at the same time I recognize that certain situations call for certain amounts of self control, especially in dealing with the suicidal or mentally ill. FC and members like her can’t realistically determine whether what they post will ultimately push someone over the edge, considering the nasty shit that I’ve seen some favorited users posting. The fact that she’s autistic probably exacerbates this, as she may have an extremely solipsistic worldview, and simply can not relate to the idea that others exist and suffer on an intellectual level. I’ve seen similar behavior in other autistic female users like FireFox, for example.
Ultimately this sort of thing is bad for the site in general, as very few sites can survive both calculated external efforts to have it shut down, and a festering rot internally amongst members.
Glad to be here. I honestly never knew much of KF until I read the SS thread about it.I can't believe SS members have to flee to the farms to discuss their own community.
Welcome, obviously. Please tell us everything. This is quickly becoming my favourite thread.
With all the conflict that is going on, you’d think that an admin would sit down with those involved to try and sort things out or that FC would squash the whole thing privately with the people she has an issue with, but seems like they don’t want to do neither. Instead, they keep the drama alive and do nothing to improve the situation. It’s dragging everyone on the site into it as they create public threads about it to attack the people who disagree with her, when really this all could have been avoided if they weren’t childish and vicious. They focus on how bad FC has it when she has never told her story so I don’t know how "horrible" her life and struggles are, and they completely ignore the suffering that others who are open and honest about their life go through as a result of her actions. I also feel as if things are increasingly becoming more toxic. It’s seems that it’s all about who has it worse, who whines more and who gets more attention. I truly hate it. It further disencourages people from recovering or sharing anything positive.It does seem that FC is afforded more leniency or treatment than others. I don't deny that she uses the site to vent and stuff, but some of her behavior is quite questionable and should probably be looked into.
I agree that most people are supportive of your desicions in general on there. But I’m not going to sugar coat the flaws and issues of the site either. I don’t fully agree, it’s a equal mix of venting and discussions of methods. Most of the members would not have signed up on the site if it wasn’t for them wanting to research methods, let’s be honest. It’s a suicide forum, not a venting forum, primarely. It says it in the name.I’m a member of this site. This site is nothing like how the media portrays it. It’s supportive and many of the posts are vents rather than people looking for methods. The user demographics are broad, so there is a wealth of opinions. The user, FC, doesn’t seem malicious. She seems like a very depressed individual who uses the site as a way to vent. If you don’t like her, ignore her. She’s allowed to express her opinions. SS values freedom of speech. If people don’t like it they are free to leave.
Regarding family members of SS users who died. It’s pure cope. They didn’t give a shit about suicidal people before. SS is a scapegoat. Shutting down SS will not change suicide rates. In reality, it will stop people from venting. The real issues are much more complex and can’t be changed by ranting on Twitter.
Any legislation to remove sites like SS would set a precedent for removing sites like KF.
I’ve heard about the Funercal Cry being a man theory a couple times before. I’m not sure if it’s Rain, I’ve heard that rumour too. They take their side and ignore the actions of others who break the rules in honor of FC. I guess there’s no way of really knowing.I honestly think Funeral Cry is an alt of Rainandsadness, the troon in command. I also believe Funeral Cry to be a man. I'm not quite sure why though. they're both equally insufferable![]()
Not really. Content will always be available to whoever wants it, no matter who wants it gone and no matter what their reason.The online safety bill which is currently going through parliament, would have prevented the forum and harmful content being available.
The online safety bill which is currently going through parliament, would have prevented the forum and harmful content being available. The government knew about the site in 2018 if they had actioned the online safety then, a lots of deaths would have been prevented. Following Joes inquest the coroner issued a regulation 28 in prevention of future deaths.
Since his death, sales of SN in the uk have become restricted.
And look at what the state is doing when this happens. Now, MAID in Canada is actually the government endorsing suicide.All that said, legislating speech on the Internet sounds like an attractive solution but doing that also suppresses dissenting opinions, this time through the state.
And look at what the state is doing when this happens. Now, MAID in Canada is actually the government endorsing suicide.
Advocating government control of this invites the worst of both worlds. Open suicide discussion forums with people talking about their actual feelings get shut down, while the government literally coerces doctors into advocating euthanasia.
I will never get comfort from loosing my son. We have said all along we believe there should be a space for people to be able to talk about their feelings. However a place that openly gives methods, encourages suicide, giving step by step guides to the information should not be there. This isn’t about freedom of speech, as it stands if I did what the member did with Joe, in person I would be prosecuted, which is why it is now becoming law that what is illegal offline will be illegal online. The coroner who carried out the inquest stated that the members who had held discussions with Joe were breaking the UK law of assisting suicide.@Sjm411
The most common suicide method in the UK is hanging. How is restricting SN going to change anything?
Like I said.. banning the site will not change suicide rates. It might bring you some comfort, but that’s about it. Anyway, new sites will take its place and information on ctb methods are all over the internet.