Argue with Ukraine Happenings regulars about jannies, and if Useful_Mistake's moderation policies are insane and extremely autistic - "Someone should add to the name "now with more autistic slapfighting"" - There Is Light At The End

Status
Not open for further replies.

CaptainAutism69

True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Nov 16, 2022
If you want to post fake stuff for laughs, make it obviously fake.




I don't know how many times I have to repeat this. I genuinly don't care what your source is. It can be the mainstream media, it can be Russian media, can be independant stuff, can be a crackwhore down the block, I genuinly don't give a shit. Post whatever, but link to where you got that stuff from. If link is impossible (ex. "I heard it from a friend that Azov batalion is doing speeches to Lithuanian Šauliai), then just write it that down.


This is for submitions, not the additional posts
View attachment 4389817
I don't think my request requires additional effort, nor is extreme.
So instead of 'ooop my bad' you went for the doublenigger, double down approach.
OK, show me the rule where links/sources must be provided.
 
Why does that matter?

Also lmao, your argument is that Submissions do not need links, but somehow posts within threads do, or should?
Sounds like it. I think he should say that out loud 3 times in the mirror and allow it to sink in a bit. I like the dude, but he's gone totally Absolutefag over this.
 
Stop trying to bully the janny jfc you nerds are autistic "why can't we lie and make shit up"/"why does it matter" reeeeeeeeeeeee
Because you are not on 4chin, you're on a forum, and you're expected to act like you're in a community, you're supposed to have a minimal netiquette insight, it's why you're encouraged to write coherently and not spam randomly or post in l33tsp3ak.
Null himself wrote some general community guidelines, including a vague one on made up shit, but I can't find it, maybe others remember the location of the thread better.
But neither the admin nor the jannies should have to tell you to not do this. It's why you're expected to spoiler the gore. It's why you get a pink triangle if you're psychotic. It's why you get threadbanned if you cannot perform some minimal controls over the inner sperg.
 
Stop trying to bully the janny jfc you nerds are autistic "why can't we lie and make shit up"/"why does it matter" reeeeeeeeeeeee
For the record, I have never manipulated any image or video I have posted, nor have I ever posted anything that didn't seem like a realistically possible thing. Nor would I, for the sake of "lulz, bantz, dramaz, trollingz", or anything of the sort.

The only job of a jannie is to stop slapfights. Not to act as a censor. If I or anyone posts something so completely outlandish that it's beyond the realm of possibility, the other people here are more than capable and welcome to call me dumb and and put all kinds of mean stickers on the post to ward off the supposed gullible rubes who are led into extremist acts by my postings, lmao.
 
Last edited:
Stop trying to bully the janny jfc you nerds are autistic "why can't we lie and make shit up"/"why does it matter" reeeeeeeeeeeee
Because you are not on 4chin, you're on a forum, and you're expected to act like you're in a community, you're supposed to have a minimal netiquette insight, it's why you're encouraged to write coherently and not spam randomly or post in l33tsp3ak.
Null himself wrote some general community guidelines, including a vague one on made up shit, but I can't find it, maybe others remember the location of the thread better.
But neither the admin nor the jannies should have to tell you to not do this. It's why you're expected to spoiler the gore. It's why you get a pink triangle if you're psychotic. It's why you get threadbanned if you cannot perform some minimal controls over the inner sperg.
Not for nothing Romani bro but don't mod this thread. No one gives a rats ass (or a khokhol's draft notice) about your opinion on what we should post.
1675213326643.png

Lurk moar.
 
If you want to post fake stuff for laughs, make it obviously fake.




I don't know how many times I have to repeat this. I genuinly don't care what your source is. It can be the mainstream media, it can be Russian media, can be independant stuff, can be a crackwhore down the block, I genuinly don't give a shit. Post whatever, but link to where you got that stuff from. If link is impossible (ex. "I heard it from a friend that Azov batalion is doing speeches to Lithuanian Šauliai), then just write it that down.


This is for submitions, not the additional posts
View attachment 4389817
I don't think my request requires additional effort, nor is extreme.
Its not like that faggot contributes to the thread in any way shape or form except to toot his sides horn and pick fights.
 
So instead of 'ooop my bad' you went for the doublenigger, double down approach.
OK, show me the rule where links/sources must be provided.
For the record, I have never manipulated any image or video I have posted, nor have I ever posted anything that didn't seem like a realistically possible thing. Nor would I, for the sake of "lulz, bantz, dramaz, trollingz", or anything of the sort.

The only job of a jannie is to stop slapfights. Not to act as a censor. If I or anyone posts something so completely outlandish that it's beyond the realm of possibility, the other people here are more than capable and welcome to call me dumb and and put all kinds of mean stickers on the post to ward off the supposed gullible rubes who are led into extremist acts by my postings, lmao.
less crying. more citing.
Not for nothing Romani bro but don't mod this thread. No one gives a rats ass (or a khokhol's draft notice) about your opinion on what we should post.
tht advice is better spent on the ppl who r hysterically weeping over being asked to give a simple citation.
damn bro wht a flex! but hide ur power level more often ur scaring us. im literally shaking.
 
Stop trying to bully the janny jfc you nerds are autistic "why can't we lie and make shit up"/"why does it matter" reeeeeeeeeeeee
Because you are not on 4chin, you're on a forum, and you're expected to act like you're in a community, you're supposed to have a minimal netiquette insight, it's why you're encouraged to write coherently and not spam randomly or post in l33tsp3ak.
Null himself wrote some general community guidelines, including a vague one on made up shit, but I can't find it, maybe others remember the location of the thread better.
But neither the admin nor the jannies should have to tell you to not do this. It's why you're expected to spoiler the gore. It's why you get a pink triangle if you're psychotic. It's why you get threadbanned if you cannot perform some minimal controls over the inner sperg.
Show me the rule about linking sources in Happenings.

p.s. you have something brown on your nose there.
 
you have something brown on your nose there.
I worked as a janny and admin on a very large forum when I was younger, I feel a lot of sympathy for them after having to deal with Interweeb autism for like 3 years. Not even money could not make up for the horrors of dealing with endless waves of fags testing the boundaries of each and every rule, and that was well before the web got populated with iPhone spergs.
 
I worked as a janny and admin on a very large forum when I was younger, I feel a lot of sympathy for them after having to deal with Interweeb autism for like 3 years. Not even money could not make up for the horrors of dealing with endless waves of fags testing the boundaries of each and every rule, and that was well before the web got populated with iPhone spergs.
>I worked as a janny and admin on a very large forum when I was younger,
This explains a lot.
 
I worked as a janny and admin on a very large forum when I was younger, I feel a lot of sympathy for them after having to deal with Interweeb autism for like 3 years. Not even money could not make up for the horrors of dealing with endless waves of fags testing the boundaries of each and every rule, and that was well before the web got populated with iPhone spergs.
Lmao. He did it for free.
 
So instead of 'ooop my bad' you went for the doublenigger, double down approach.
You were wrong, though. Your cited rule wasn't applicable.
OK, show me the rule where links/sources must be provided.
Screenshot_20230201-103416_Brave.jpg

But in general, if we are dealing with articles, I will apply article-specific rules where, and if, needed.
Why does that matter?
I literally just answered you.
Also lmao, your argument is that Submissions do not need links, but somehow posts within threads do, or should?
My statement is that if you provide a screencap, you should additionally provide a link to where you got that screencap from (if possible). Same for videos.

The rules for OP posts in happenings is only relavant in so far that @CaptainAutism69 can't read very well when he wants to score a gotcha. That's fine, sometimes it happens to me too when I am frustrated.
I like the dude, but he's gone totally Absolutefag over this.
You're usually pretty decent too, but try to understand my perspective as well. @Forgetful Gynn has on several occations posted screencaps of articles that didn't actually exist, seemingly to provoke a response. He claims he didn't deceptively edit it. Maybe that's true, maybe it's false. I enacted a measure to stop that. Measure, which by the way, doesn't require any aditional effort on your part.

The only job of a jannie is to stop slapfights.
That's just not true.
Not to act as a censor
You are either deliberately not reading my posts or severely autistic.
 
You were wrong, though. Your cited rule wasn't applicable.

View attachment 4393464
Nigga, nothing here is telling you to provide sources. I don't know why you doubled down like a tard on this.
My statement is that if you provide a screencap, you should additionally provide a link to where you got that screencap from (if possible). Same for videos.

The rules for OP posts in happenings is only relavant in so far that @CaptainAutism69 can't read very well when he wants to score a gotcha. That's fine, sometimes it happens to me too when I am frustrated.
What do you mean I can't read very well. Show me the rule that states 'you must provide a source when posting something'.
You're usually pretty decent too, but try to understand my perspective as well. @Forgetful Gynn has on several occations posted screencaps of articles that didn't actually exist, seemingly to provoke a response. He claims he didn't deceptively edit it. Maybe that's true, maybe it's false. I enacted a measure to stop that. Measure, which by the way, doesn't require any aditional effort on your part.
He posted something which was probably taken from Telegram or Twatter, and he didn't 'fact check it', and people called him out on it and said 'homie, it's a fake', and he said 'sorry bru my bad'. Then you got all autistic on things. STOP.
You are either deliberately not reading my posts or severely autistic.
Pot. Kettle. Black.

you're in the wrong here. Stap!
 
Lol holy shit

Every time I think the forum's best in-house lolcow group can't produce even more milk they find a new way to fill the udders

Now it's the janny who generally agrees with their position on slavnigger family feud and has been consistently pro-rooshan who must be sperged at because he isn't pro-rooshan in a lolcow enough fashion :story:

The most energetic group of spergs in the joint, tireless in their autism, we can only hope they maintain this frenetic activity
 
Nigga, nothing here is telling you to provide sources. I don't know why you doubled down like a tard on this.
It's a forumwide rule to archive everything, and archival procedures involve links. Null explains, in great detail, what he considers to be archiving.
Now it's the janny who generally agrees with their position on slavnigger family feud and has been consistently pro-rooshan who must be sperged at because he isn't pro-rooshan in a lolcow enough fashion :story:
I am being sperged at because apparently they are too lazy to copy the link from the fucking page they are on.
What do you mean I can't read very well. Show me the rule that states 'you must provide a source when posting something'.
This proves my point exactly. You were citing an OP rule for non-OP posts. I mentioned as such. But, as frustrated as you seem to be, you have misread what my comment was addressing.
He posted something which was probably taken from Telegram or Twatter, and he didn't 'fact check it', and people called him out on it and said 'homie, it's a fake', and he said 'sorry bru my bad'. Then you got all autistic on things. STOP.
Nigger, where are you getting the idea that I want him to fact check things? You're making statements about me that I never said. I explicitly said that I only care that you lot provide a link to wherever you got your screencap from. I don't see a reason to have a autistic meltdown over this.
 
For what it's worth I don't think @Forgetful Gynn is a Machiavellian mastermind editing photos pixel by pixel in order to divide the forum which is weirdly what the narrative seems to be? A lot of people here find shit on imageboards and post it around. That's the Internet. It's kind of just what happens.

We need L50 back. At least when he was tripping he'd go off the deepend in a funny way and start hollerin about deepstate journos infiltrating his brain
 
For what it's worth I don't think @Forgetful Gynn is a Machiavellian mastermind editing photos pixel by pixel in order to divide the forum which is weirdly what the narrative seems to be? A lot of people here find shit on imageboards and post it around. That's the Internet. It's kind of just what happens.

We need L50 back. At least when he was tripping he'd go off the deepend in a funny way and start hollerin about deepstate journos infiltrating his brain
When I talked to him last night, he was amazed at how shitty the ukraine threads have become.

You're making statements about me that I never said. I explicitly said that I only care that you lot provide a link to wherever you got your screencap from. I don't see a reason to have a autistic meltdown over this.
Because you're too personally involved in a thread you moderate and you have never given us a reason why links are needed or what change they would bring. Do you just want to make it easier for people to go "oh, it's from this source lol, they're X shills, disregard" or are you trying to prevent any information that does not have a link but is likely still true from being posted?

I just cannot think of a good reason to force such a nonsense, petty, reddit rule.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back