Executive Order 2023.02 (henceforth "NIGHTMARE WORLD WHERE FACT AND FICTION COEXIST")

Potentially unpopular opinion: I hope all this AI, ML, deepfake stuff gets outlawed completely.
While it seems fun to mess around with, I see no applicable use of this technology that isn’t outright malicious.
And how would you do that without basically outlawing computers entirely?
 
Do you plan on adding something to automatically indicate if it is AI?
Even if Google made something like this available as a plugin, it would just create an arms race where you test your creations against the filter until it's good enough to fool it. Known as "adversarial machine learning".

I hate the antichrist so much.
I'm sure that I heard you say you loved the Antichrist.

Guys, just came back from the secret MATI stream that happens every sunday.
Josh basically said what he put here word for word on the sunday stream.
ElevenLabs can't capture the gravelly shit quality of Josh's voice. He's safe for another... 6 months. Hold onto your papers, fellow scholars.

And how would you do that without basically outlawing computers entirely?
In the dystopian future computers will be strictly controlled based on capability or have mandatory frontdoor style spyware installed, a real government "fuck you" beyond the management engines schizos worry about. In particular, neuromorphic computers will be controlled to prevent unauthorized creation of "Strong AI". Big Tech will be allowed to use them, of course.
 
Last edited:
Potentially unpopular opinion: I hope all this AI, ML, deepfake stuff gets outlawed completely.
While it seems fun to mess around with, I see no applicable use of this technology that isn’t outright malicious.
I agree but its going to be impossible to mandate.
And if for some odd reason Elevenlabs get shutdown, someone will release the source code and it will become a REAL shitshow.
 
Between the shooting and curbstomping there is a sudden 'trap niggers in quicksand' that made me guffaw. It's almost real, that's some great AI stuff coming up. I'm hoping it will accelerate people into no longer believing crap they read online. A man can dream.
I don't think that will work for him. There's clear evidence of him saying that before AI's prevalence, right? He can lie, and he can lie forever, but the truth will be easy to point out.
 
Potentially unpopular opinion: I hope all this AI, ML, deepfake stuff gets outlawed completely.
While it seems fun to mess around with, I see no applicable use of this technology that isn’t outright malicious.
Making movies when an actor playing a role actually passed away. Cheaper voice-overs for movies, games anime, etc. Also one voice actor voicing releases in several languages. To sum up: entertaiment sphere is gonna use it.
 
It is not uncommon for people to question the authenticity of online content, especially when it comes to posts made by AI-powered language models like OpenAI's GPT. However, in this particular case, I would like to offer some evidence to suggest that Null's post is not AI generated.

First and foremost, it is important to note that AI language models like GPT have been trained on a massive dataset of text from the internet and other sources, but they are not capable of independent thought or creativity. They can only generate text based on the patterns and relationships they have learned from the data. This means that the text generated by AI language models can often be repetitive, formulaic, and lacking in nuance.

On the other hand, Null's post appears to be well-written and exhibits a distinct voice and perspective. The post is thoughtfully constructed, with a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. The writing style is engaging and demonstrates a strong command of the language, including the use of figurative language and other literary devices. These qualities are not consistent with text generated by AI language models.

Another aspect to consider is the content of Null's post. AI language models are often trained on a wide range of topics, but the depth of their knowledge on any given subject is limited by the data they have seen. The post by Null, however, shows a deep understanding and familiarity with the subject matter, suggesting that the author has firsthand experience and expertise in the area.

In conclusion, while it is certainly possible for text generated by AI language models to be mistaken for human-generated content, the post by Null appears to be the work of a human writer. The writing style, content, and tone of the post all suggest that the author is a knowledgeable and creative individual, rather than an AI-powered language model.
Fucking knock it off, ChapGpt shitposting is annoying.
 
is there any way you can hide it behind making a membership to post/view content the way doxes are flagged as not for public viewing?

I know lazy journos could still take us all out of context but lets not make it too easy for them
 
Well the post truth world is here to stay.

I wonder how far the ramifications of this new technology will stretch? Rate me rainbows all you want but maybe, just maybe, this new tech will force NPC's and coomers to start thinking. Since they cannot tell if what they saw/read was actual instructions from their social masters on what the should think about *blank* issue or some 4chan troll trying to get them to chimp out and look even more retarded.

It's a Brave New World out there.
 
Back