You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.
I get the impression that it was his parents with the tight grip on the pursestrings, whereas they lived near the in-laws and they appear to be the type to be more concerned about morality. So it may be two sets of parents he was waiting for a chance to say "FUCK YOUUU" to.
This is why you should get that rebellious fuck you dad stuff out of the way early in your life. Because it's just fucking embarrassing in middle age. Your dad isn't that bad. In fact you're going to turn into him. Like it or not.
You don't. You're a man and the trade off for being the gatekeeper to relationships is you don't get to be the gatekeeper to sex. Plus your wife isn't guilting you into it, a bunch of spergs on the internet are. We don't know the full story and we have no investment in whether you have sex with your wife or not. You should do it because you love your wife and marriage isn't a zero sum game.
That should be plenty, but if that's not rational enough to convince you consider this: The damage you will incur by being mildly uncomfortable with the idea of having sex with your wife while she's pregnant does not and will never outweigh the risk of the damage to your relationship it could cause.
As a man there are times when you need to be a stalwart oak who will never bend regardless of the cost to yourself. Dealing with your wife's constantly shifting emotional state while she bears your child is not one of those times. So go have sex, it's important.
You don't. You're a man and the trade off for being the gatekeeper to relationships is you don't get to be the gatekeeper to sex. Plus your wife isn't guilting you into it, a bunch of spergs on the internet are. We don't know the full story and we have no investment in whether you have sex with your wife or not. You should do it because you love your wife and marriage isn't a zero sum game.
That should be plenty, but if that's not rational enough to convince you consider this: The damage you will incur by being mildly uncomfortable with the idea of having sex with your wife while she's pregnant does not and will never outweigh the risk of the damage to your relationship it could cause.
As a man there are times when you need to be a stalwart oak who will never bend regardless of the cost to yourself. Dealing with your wife's constantly shifting emotional state while she bears your child is not one of those times. So go have sex, it's important.
Seriously, he thinks he had to do all that shit for William Mitchell? That's bullshit. It is literally a fifth-tier toilet you can't even find by searching its name because Mitchell Hamline blocks out all the results.
I'm not personally a fan of the whole law school elite bullshit based on rankings, because any idiot can learn law at any school. The fact that this guy (knowing what we know about him now) felt he only needed to apply to one school and then pull personal strings by personally appearing says he felt entitled to it. Or had connections. He just had to show up personally and then he'd automatically get admitted just by showing his pretty face.
In a fifth-tier toilet.
Anyway.
That's nothing like most people apply to law schools, i.e. most people don't just say "I'll find the shittiest law school in the area and pull some strings."
The general approach, much like applying to undergrad shit, is you have a couple dream schools, like Harvard or Georgetown, and since you're spending ridiculous amounts of money already, why not? Spend a certain amount of effort into tailoring those towards their current retard affirmative action programs, claim ADHD or some shit, because you're probably not Harvard material unless you're a nigger or something.
Then the schools you're probably qualified for, don't really amp it up, but throw in any remotely diverse shit you have. I used ADHD in this context, and it worked!
Then your safeties. This is those sixth-tier toilets. Like William Mitchell. Nick just started out there. And felt he actually had to meet with an admission committee to get in even there.
I didn't meet a single person to get into my first-tier law school (well it was near the bottom of that tier at the time and has since fallen off thanks to wokeshit). I just filled out the forms and got admitted.
I find it somewhat fascinating that Nick actually felt he had to meet people at a seventh-tier toilet just to get in to law school. In retrospect.
Vic, should he bring a case of legal malpractice against Ty within the 2 year statute of limitations, would have difficulties showing causation. In texas, legal malpractice claims are handled just like the run of the mill negligence case (duty, breach, causation, damages. Classic 1L shit.). The issue that Vic would have is showing that but-for the counsel of Ty, Vic would have prevailed in the underlying case and been entitled to a judgment in there favor. Let's just say, that ain't happening.
Ty handled the case like an idiot for sure, but it's not in the legal malpractice area of acting like an idiot.
You don't have to show you would have won, necessarily, but that the results of the suit would have been better were it not for the malpractice. I do not believe a competent lawyer who got the evidence in, instead of bungling a simple notarization, would have lost on the TCPA motion and caused Vic to owe hundreds of thousands of dollars to the defendants.
At the time that opposition was being filed, Ty was on Nick's stream talking mad shit instead of attending to the filing. Which was shitty and badly formatted and generally a joke considering the prices being charged. And then on top of that, Ty filed bogus notarizations falsely signed claiming he was personally present with people a hundred miles or more away.
This is something strip mall lawyer Sam Johnson noticed and ultimately it was what sank the case. I'd fucking hire that guy. Imagine looking at literally thousands of pages of absolute bullshit filed by all the parties at the cost of probably over a million dollars combined, and seeing that one little thing. And then grabbing it and chucking it like it was a Molotov into the middle of the case.
And then your client wins, and the appeals court uses it as its excuse for smacking down the other side.
Seriously, if you have a case like this in Texas, hire this guy. Forget any grudge you have. He'll do it. Better Call Sam!
The biggest question is how Nick was able to pay for housing in the Minneapolis/St. Paul area for himself and family while in law school. I don't see a way he could have done that without outside help.
I have a relatively tismy memory when it comes to weird shit. I'm pretty sure he mentioned that he didn't live in the St. Paul area, but he had family that did, so he'd drive to school for a couple of hours or so to get to his classes, stay at a family member's home, then drive back the following day. I can't remember what stream he said it on.
Seriously, he thinks he had to do all that shit for William Mitchell? That's bullshit. It is literally a fifth-tier toilet you can't even find by searching its name because Mitchell Hamline blocks out all the results.
I'm not personally a fan of the whole law school elite bullshit based on rankings, because any idiot can learn law at any school. The fact that this guy (knowing what we know about him now) felt he only needed to apply to one school and then pull personal strings by personally appearing says he felt entitled to it. Or had connections. He just had to show up personally and then he'd automatically get admitted just by showing his pretty face.
In a fifth-tier toilet.
Anyway.
That's nothing like most people apply to law schools, i.e. most people don't just say "I'll find the shittiest law school in the area and pull some strings."
The general approach, much like applying to undergrad shit, is you have a couple dream schools, like Harvard or Georgetown, and since you're spending ridiculous amounts of money already, why not? Spend a certain amount of effort into tailoring those towards their current retard affirmative action programs, claim ADHD or some shit, because you're probably not Harvard material unless you're a nigger or something.
Then the schools you're probably qualified for, don't really amp it up, but throw in any remotely diverse shit you have. I used ADHD in this context, and it worked!
Then your safeties. This is those sixth-tier toilets. Like William Mitchell. Nick just started out there. And felt he actually had to meet with an admission committee to get in even there.
I didn't meet a single person to get into my first-tier law school (well it was near the bottom of that tier at the time and has since fallen off thanks to wokeshit). I just filled out the forms and got admitted.
I find it somewhat fascinating that Nick actually felt he had to meet people at a seventh-tier toilet just to get in to law school. In retrospect.
I was never too critical of Nick's law school story, because I just went to the local school where I already live, and i went to undergrad there too. But, it's a mid tier state school, and I plan on staying in state my whole life. Nick constantly talks about how he wants out of MN so bad, and for some reason the course he charted out of that was to go to a school that virtually shackled him to small town MN unless he was like 1st in his class. Seems like another half baked decision from the master...
I was never too critical of Nick's law school story, because I just went to the local school where I already live, and i went to undergrad there too. But, it's a mid tier state school, and I plan on staying in state my whole life. Nick constantly talks about how he wants out of MN so bad, and for some reason the course he charted out of that was to go to a school that virtually shackled him to small town MN unless he was like 1st in his class. Seems like another half baked decision from the master...
Nick, how can you keep this animal around you and your family knowing that he has zero conflict with not just having a relationship with the child of a friend, but a BDSM relationship? That is cucked beyond cucked and treading dangerous waters. But I dunno maybe there's something about it being fine in the Bible so it can be justified.
Also, I think everyone has brought up Nick's family, but no one brought up his mother. I feel bad for asking about her, but that's something that's always been absent from the conversations. Nick's father and grandfather have been brought up (with that photo of his dad looking slightly disappointed next to him). His sister because gay shit. People have also brought up Drexel's parents.
I'm just curious because Mommy issues could explain a lot of shit. Like why he's going after dried up whores.
(I mention that bc I'm still confused about Kristen, the half-sister, who is 7 years older. She's either: 1. Celeste's bio kid and Bob adopted her bc we know she went by Rekieta; 2. Bob's and he was married before or had a kid out of wedlock or whatever. Whoever bio-parent she has would have been 19-20 when she was born. I'm betting on #2. Likely she spent much of her time with her bio mom making Nick basically an only child - that would make perfect sense for his narcissism. Sorry, only-ies. It's a thing. Also, they moved to MN when Nick was around 8-9 yo IIRC. I'm wondering if Kristen stayed with her bio mom in TX.)
AS FOR YOUR QUESTION:
Celeste and Bob are very Catholic. There are pics on her IG of meeting the Pope and a long history of giving to Catholic charities.
As many of you know I'm a cast-out (LOL - it was low-key intentional) member of Nick's culty fandom but was a pretty regular watcher for 3+ years. He hardly EVER mentioned his mom but harps ON AND ON ALL THE FUCKING TIME about his male lineage and their hard-working example. BUT because Rekieta is now an embarrassing walking wound of a mid-life crisis who wants to discuss himself almost all of the time recently, Celeste has recently been mentioned.
His mom always worked outside the home (yay Celeste!). We also know that a lot of his porn habits developed from a young age- like 8-9 - and he was often alone watching HBO After Dark (or whatever it was called) and buffering into porn. Dad didn't seem to care about R-rated movies, and would be on the road for weeks (sometimes months) at a time.
...
Fwiw, there is some evidence that having a working mom is a little harder on boys yet beneficial for girls. Most Farmers here seem smart enough to understand why that would be so... I won't harp on it because it leans into dumb mother-blaming. I happen to be a (happy) single mom of 3, I've waded into the research.
PS Still haven't figured out this quote reply thing bc I'm Xoomering. Hoping this works.
Indeed. Any father would be justified in doing so if his daughter was loved by Drexel.
Drexel: "Women are retards! Wanna hear about how many retards I've fucked?" Sigma.
Drexel: "It's not worth getting married in this day and age, but it IS worth risking unwanted pregnancies, child support, jail time, STDs, abortions, broken lives, and fatherless children!" Smart.
Drexel: "I traveled internationally to pump and dump a girl and her dad didn't seem too happy about it, ha ha!" Lovely.
AS FOR YOUR QUESTION:
Celeste and Bob are very Catholic. There are pics on her IG of meeting the Pope and a long history of giving to Catholic charities.
While I'm already posting I found another clip of Nick and Ty discussing their communications prior to him going to law school. Didn't want to post it before I had something else to contribute so as to not beat a dead horse but here it is. Feel free to refer to my above spoiler when they start discussing how Nick's mom is "hot":
You can highlight text in a statement and select "+ Quote" to add to your message later by selecting "Insert quotes..." that will appear next to "Attach files" or if you hit reply under a message it'll pull the whole quote at once without you having to do anything else. You can freely edit the text in the quote box as you see fit to trim it down to just what you want to reply to or add your own text for clarity or comedic purposes.
While I'm already posting I found another clip of Nick and Ty discussing their communications prior to him going to law school. Didn't want to post it before I had something else to contribute so as to not beat a dead horse but here it is. Feel free to refer to my above spoiler when they start discussing how Nick's mom is "hot":
I was never too critical of Nick's law school story, because I just went to the local school where I already live, and i went to undergrad there too. But, it's a mid tier state school, and I plan on staying in state my whole life. Nick constantly talks about how he wants out of MN so bad, and for some reason the course he charted out of that was to go to a school that virtually shackled him to small town MN unless he was like 1st in his class. Seems like another half baked decision from the master...
It was Nick's decision to attend a fourth-rate college (Southwest Minnesota State - the High School after High School), get a useless degree (creative writing) and then marry a (maybe) financially well-endowed baby-factory from the area that trapped him in rural MN. By the time he went to law school, he was already an older guy with a big family. There were few prospects for him no matter how he did in school.
The problems he has really can't be fixed by moving. There are lots of places he could go to and just discover he isn't as rich as he thinks he is. Trading rural MN for rural texas wouldn't make any particular difference. He doesn't go outside much, so climate is really not an issue. And that swinger utopia he thinks is somewhere else probably isn't. Any good sex he wants he is going to have to pay for because of his age and body. And if he wants to debauch with pure trash, he can find craig's list quality girls just as easily where he is as anywhere else. And if he is so desperate for guys, he could buy as many as wanted there too.
Yeah. The taxes are bad there. But its not like Nick has any grand plans about what to do with even more money.
For your consideration: Nick Rekieta's Good Friend Drexel Johnson-Yarbrough
This post was made to honor the contributions of the kiwis who took the time to gather some of the pieces that culminated in this sizable post. You know who you are, and I thank you.
Although this post is focusing a lot on the grooming allegations, it isn't really about trying to incriminate Drexel. It's primarily for posterity and about explaining where these ideas likely came from and laughing at this creepy moron. Feel free to draw your own conclusions, but Drexel isn't worth getting upset over. I wouldn’t recommend getting too invested the daughter either since it is presently unclear whether she was innocent or degenerate from a young age.
This is a cursory glance at Drexel and is far from exhaustive. Let's start with a recent-ish picture of Drexel to help paint a picture of who we're talking about along with some quotes.
Mother and Daughter:
This section contains a compilation of videos pertaining to Drexel's interactions with the friend/mother and sub/daughter in order of when Drexel spoke about them (not necessarily the order things happened in) because it makes it easier to categorize. All the information doesn't line up anyway so there's no definitive way to know exactly what happened. There's more I didn't include that are remarks he made about going to movies or other interactions, but I didn't see the need to go overboard. If you want to use this as a springboard and do a deep dive on your own, go ahead.
In Drexel's first appearance on Nick's show in October 2018, he says he just went to a place called Sanctuary in Portland on bondage and kink night (apparently they didn't know?) with a female friend and two other females (all white) because they can attract more women. His strategy seems to involve bringing women with him so he can appear more attractive/trustworthy and thereby have sex with strangers. Later streams with Nick reveal that it’s more likely that this is actually due to his fear of #MeToo, which is also why he will document sexual encounters on his phone. This proves to backfire when the mother finds out (though Nick tried to warn him).
The required age to get into this club is 21+. Presuming that they got in legally put these girls at least at age 21. The first mention of a sub on Nick's channel that I found occurs in May 2019.
In September 2019 we get the first account of what happened with the mother. The mother found out that her daughter had been a sub for Drexel at 12:04AM August 20th of that year. The only thing Drexel takes from the experience is that he no longer likes Apple products because it was Apple that "caused shit to hit the fan" and not his own behavior. Looks like his safety net of documenting everything backfired. Note that Drexel claims no one knows about the relationship, which conflicts with his "always have a chaperone" rule.
The story goes on and the daughter goes back to her place and deletes everything on her phone. Drexel sends her a message and it shows up on an iPad in Minnesota (where her mom is). Sexting and pictures are found due to the devices sharing data. The likely reason the mother hadn't found out about their activities sooner would be that the daughter's iPad must have been left at her mom's (though why Drexel would send the daughter pictures or why the daughter was taking pictures and then deleting them when only Drexel needs them for his safety net, remains a mystery).
Drexel says that as of September 2019 he had known the mother for about 13 years and goes on to assert that the mother's reaction was unwarranted and that he was actually saving her daughter (something he maintains to this day).
Drexel gets Nick to read out the some of the texts Drexel received from the mom because the pain of Drexel's friend of 13 years is just fun Youtube content to him and Nick. Smiles all around and Nick finishes with a joke.
The chat consoles Drex by saying "at least [he] was a good daddy". Later, Drexel recounts going to the movies with the friend and her daughter (as they often do, apparently).
One important takeaway from this is when Drexel says "my mind has gone places, and my dick followed". Not the only time he has expressed this sentiment on stream. Drexel goes on to say that if you asked him a little over a year ago he wouldn't have had sex with his friend's daughter (meaning sometime within a little over a year ago something changed). He also claims that was never the intent... but Nick *knowing look and pause for laughter*... and then Nick jokes about Drexel's sincerity.
So far, we are told that Drexel has known the mother for about 13 years as of September 2019, so the relationship starts at about 2006. As of September 2019, the first sexual encounter was within the time frame of “a little over a year ago” so sometime prior to September 2018. Drexel's story from October 2018 puts the daughter well within that time frame, and Drexel also singles out one of the three white women in Portland as his friend. The claim that he didn't know it was bondage night at Sanctuary seems less believable now since later, he claims the sexual relationship with the daughter started with a trip to the bondage club Sanctuary.
Another stream from October 18 2019. Drexel tells stories about him and his sub in Portland, making much of how he doesn't care that she still listens to The Little Mermaid soundtrack, and about going to Boyeurism. Drexel later goes on to describe how men are more emotionally capable than women because men are willing to not deal with the issue and just weather the storm. Interesting take. Nick highlights that Drexel knew the mother wouldn't like it if she found out about him and the daughter and uses that example for why it’s best to just keep your head down when you're in trouble until the heat is off and not address/deal with the problem. You know, like any other chad-dad or alpha-male would.
Spanking and 50 Shades of Grey are brought up and Drexel shares that he is pro-spanking and does so with his sub. Insights on the female psyche are shared. Nick brings up a Vice article that he believes could be satire which argues that humiliation, degradation and pain are fun and great and (for women) being dominated is fun and desirable and what women were designed to do. Drexel agrees with all of it.
Here Drexel brings up how long he's known his sub and explains that is the reason he can be so soft/rough with his sub. Had he met her when she was an adult grown person (he uses ages 20-23 as an example) he wouldn't know her as well. The reason he would make such an obvious statement is likely to highlight that knowing females when they are much younger is preferable to him (rather than start getting to know a girl when she's already an adult). Drexel does some math in his head and here we get the number 13 as the age he's known his sub from. Drexel says the dynamic is different because how you view them is different. I'll bet it is.
The crazy thing (to Drexel) when he spoke to the mother the second time *cue nervous face rubbing* is that she couldn't believe her daughter was a sub because she's so strong. Drexel asserts that the stronger the will, the greater the fall into submission, and that the dom has to get them to a certain point.
A stream in February 2020 has Drexel relaying a story of when Drexel went to Florida with the mother and daughter before she became his sub, verifying that he was close enough with them to go on vacation. It was Harry Potter themed at Universal Studios which means it could happen any time after the early 2010s. Drexel says the daughter was a junior in college at the time.
A stream from June 2020 has Drexel describing the friend's daughter as a tween (which would be between 10-12 years old) when they saw Twilight Eclipse in theatres which came out in 2010. For clarity, Drexel had seen the first one and didn't want to see another one until the daughter asked him to go and they went.
So, Drexel knew the mother for 13 years as of September 2019 (since 2006) and knew the daughter since she was 13 in the first anecdote. Going with the start date of 2006 for the relationship with the mother, then that would make the daughter about 26 by the time the relationship turned sexual sometime in in 2018.
The second anecdote with Eclipse ignores the date for the mother (2006) and has Drexel knowing her as a tween (10-12 years old) as of 2010, making her 18-20 when the relationship turned sexual sometime in 2018 and potentially 6-8 years old when they first met around 2006.
The stream in August 2020 has Drexel addressing a question the mother had for him: Why'd you have to fuck her? His defense is that he has a male sex drive, implying that no man with a male sex drive would refuse bondage sex with their friend's daughter who they knew as a kid if asked. His follow up defense is also compelling: "I was like uuuuuuh," and then giving a quizzical look that seems to amuse Nick. Funny stuff.
Drex provides another non-answer to the question by just saying "a man has to make choices". Nick finishes the exchange by mockingly saying that choosing not to do fuck his friend's daughter would be the right thing to do and then they both laugh at the idea.
The stream continues and Drexel tackles the subject of demeaning women. For those of you having trouble following: degradation, humiliation, and pain are good, but degradation, demeaning, and dehumanizing a woman is bad. Reminder that this comes from the man who unironically refers to all black women as German Shepherds. Drexel goes on to detail an early part of his relationship with his sub. He confirms that he went to Sanctuary and calls it a bondage club and shares and anecdote about w woman who wasn’t allowed to look up that made her uncomfortable. Odd that he calls it a bondage club given that in his first appearance on Nick's show he claimed that there was only a bondage night and they were all surprised by it. Maybe the girls were, but it seems less likely that Drexel was.
It’s strange that the daughter would just jump straight into bondage sex with Drexel if they actually practice BDSM responsibly. More likely that they engaged in some normative sexual activity first. It is possible that Drexel took the daughter to Sanctuary the first time to see what it was like, they had a discussion, and then went back to begin their official sub/dom relationship in private (remember, the first time Drexel talked about Sanctuary he had two other women there and Drexel said no one could snitch to the mom about their relationship because no one knew).
Moving on, a stream in December 2020 has Drexel mentioning having gone to see another movie with the mother and daughter in the past. The movie is Nocturnal from 2016, further establishing the theme of going to the movies together.
Now we have Migtown episode 103 from November 2022. A longer clip, so here are the highlights. Drex is physical man who likes to hug and lift up women and it is asserted that all the women love it. Drexel goes further and says that if he lifts up someone's girl and she seems happy/excited about it, he's going to fuck her. This is because he knows that women want to be picked up and feel like "a little girl". Anna seems to counter this somewhat which causes Drexel to launch into an anecdote about his sub and her then boyfriend before she was his sub (possibly to prove his earlier point).
The sub is called T at this point. The story goes that T was at the state fair with her boyfriend at the time and Drexel was also there. Drexel provides this insight into his conduct: "I was being me". Drexel being himself allegedly made the boyfriend insecure and they got into a big fight. We can trust Drexel's assessment because he gave the boyfriend a wimpy/silly voice.
T calls Drexel later and says she had a big fight with the boyfriend about Drexel, who claims he didn't do anything. All Drexel did was [scene missing] as he always does. Much nebulous talk of "Drexel being Drexel" as a valid explanation in lieu of any specifics or meaningful reasoning.
What could Drexel have done to make him upset? Possible that Drexel got handsy with his guy's girlfriend, picked her up, and then Drexel's "gotta fuck this guy's bitch" instincts were telegraphed to the boyfriend. After all, Drexel just finished talking about that. Given Drexel's approach to women in general, it's doubtful he conducted himself in a way that was respectful to T's relationship with the boyfriend. Drexel likely felt protective of T for his own reasons and acted in a way that seemed appropriate to him. Drexel's touching was likely normalized to T, but someone unaccustomed to seeing it (like T's boyfriend) might not appreciate it. We may never know for sure but knowing how Drexel operates, and the women who fall for it, it would be safe to say that the ex-boyfriend dodged a bullet with T.
Drexel reveals this whole story happened before T moved to Portland. T had just moved in and made a call to Drexel, declares she’s a sub, and says he's her only link to BDSM. So, T already knew that she was a sub even though Drexel is her only link... Curious. How did she know this about herself before Drexel got involved if he was her only link? Really makes you think...
Drexel summed up the whole affair recently:
Revision promptly followed:
Many aspects of the story are not addressed or outright contradicted by the narratives already given by Drexel when he didn't have his guard up like he does now. Drexel also doesn't seem to know what grooming is. Most people associate it with pedophilia (likely due to the rigorous conversation around the anti-grooming bill in Florida that protected children), but it can absolutely happen to adults. The purpose of grooming is to gain consent regardless of age and this is used by sex cults and human trafficking (among other things). Children are generally more trusting than adults, so they are the most vulnerable to these tactics. In any case, it's usually a slow process which makes it more difficult to detect. Some may even confuse grooming with seduction due to their similarities. In any case, Drexel being involved in T's life from such an early age only makes his position worse regarding the allegation of grooming. Note that Drexel paints himself as a reluctant hero in the above post.
A particularly relevant clip comes from a stream on October 14 2020 where Nick and Drexel discuss the Ryan Haywood case. The clip should contain enough context for what Ryan was in trouble for. The main takeaway from this clip is that, as Nick and Drexel understand the situation, Ryan's behavior was suspect and manipulative because he filled an inappropriate daddy role for at least one of the girls (sexually and otherwise) and Ryan's defense was that he was doing it to save her from prostitution. This mirrors Drexel's defense regarding T and how he did it to save her from the "real bad guys". How stunning and brave of him.
An Attempt Was Made: A Potential Summary
This summary of events won't satisfy all the evidence presented here. That would be impossible. This is merely an attempt at making sense of part of this sordid story, so feel free to disagree.
Drexel gets to know a woman and her daughter around 2006. They go to the movies and on vacations together as Drexel establishes himself within the family. Much time passes and the daughter gets a boyfriend and Drexel gets to meet him. Drexel does [scene missing] as he always does and the meeting doesn't go well and T breaks up with her boyfriend.
The most plausible interpretation of events is that Drexel's sexual relationship with the daughter occurred prior to T going to Portland in September of 2018 (when college would start) due to the comment Drexel made in September 2019 about when his intentions toward her changed "over a year ago", meaning it could happen within the span of over a year ago. This would correlate with Drexel saying T contacted him as soon as she got to Portland for school with sexual intent. The BDSM things likely happened afterward, unless she really just decided to go from friends straight to sub and dom with no prior sexual relationship in between.
The clip from October 2018 creates all kinds of problems with Drexel’s narrative of him going to Sanctuary with T and her being aware of where they were going and what they were doing. This begs the question of why Drexel would take a girl who wants to experiment with BDSM to Sanctuary and then pretend not to know what it was on Nick's stream. This casts doubt on bondage being entirely T's idea and without Drexel's leading.
The timeline for when T became interested in BDSM is also very shaky: T contacted Drexel already knowing she’s a sub as soon as she moves in at college, or T was just being curious about BDSM and wanted to try it out, etc.
In any case, Drexel likely brought T to Sanctuary in 2018 with two other "chaperones" where he may or may not have feigned surprise that it was a bondage place where they "saw some things" that made T curious/uncomfortable like the woman who wasn't allowed to look up. Afterward, Drexel and T had a conversation to establish what she was willing to do, and then they went back alone (Drexel says in the September 2019 stream that no one knew about the sub/dom relationship) and began their official sub/dom relationship sometime between Nick's shows in October 2018 and May 2019 since that's when he first mentions having a sub (post-Sanctuary visit).
The relationship continues on a steady course for disaster with the mother in August and not much changes from there other than Drexel's bragging rights over having a friend's daughter as a sub and him being more open about it in general.
Drexel's Values:
When trying to understand someone, looking at what they value is a good place to start. Fortunately, Drexel already has a metric of value for females laid out for us that proves relevant to this analysis.
A stream in October 2019 has Drexel and Nick discussing females and males of value. It comes to a point where Drexel brings up "the wall" which is when a female realizes that she isn't high-value anymore because she's older, has more resources, and has high standards. On the opposite end is the high-value female who has low standards, is a virgin of 18 years, never been on a yacht, and is easily impressed by trinkets.
Nick then compares these high-value females to children and Drexel becomes visibly uncomfortable. Nick tries to correct the situation by saying that it's the same with males since he doesn’t want to be sexist (not realizing that sexism isn't the main problem here). They explain what a high value male (age 40) offers the much younger high value female: a higher disposable income (resources). Curiously enough, nothing else the high-value male has to offer is mentioned. It seems the main problem is that if a female has the same means of acquiring resources, this will no longer impress the female. This is why Drexel and Nick claim that the age gap is a necessity.
The high value females that Drexel and Nick are describing (young, virginal, low-standards, easily impressed by trinkets) are very easy to take advantage of because the man is holding a significant position of power due to the female's inexperience and lack of resources. In this scenario, the potential for sexual/psychological abuse is high.
This next section was already covered, but I will presented it again here with the focus on Drexel's philosophy of women. Drexel affirms the idea from VICE Magazine that humiliation, degradation and pain are fun and great and women are designed to be the receivers of these things and thus women want it. Also, these men who humiliate, degrade, and inflict pain on women aren't sadistic assholes because [Error 404].
Drexel explains why he can be soft with T and why their sub/dom relationship works. It's because Drexel has known her for so long. If Drexel had met T as an adult (fully grown person) then he wouldn't have known her for as long as he would have if he had known her sooner (possibly age 13). This rather obvious conclusion is followed up by Drexel saying "the dynamic is different because how you view them is different and you can do softer things due to the nature of the relationship". This is likely because Drexel would do softer things with T because at the time, she was a child (whatever those "soft things" were). So, rather than get to know T at age 20, 13 is the requisite age in this scenario.
Drexel also explains that T is strong willed so her fall into submission is greater, as he (as her dom/alpha) breaks her down.
What does this all mean? Well, following Drexel's metrics for a female of high value would mean that a man would ideally have known the female since she was a child before engaging in a sexual relationship (BDSM in particular). This wouldn't be a low-value childhood friend her age either, since the high value man would have to be much older (about 20 years or so) so he can leverage her lack of resources and sexual inexperience. Remember that Drexel and Nick are discussing these things unironically and these are not jokes.
Best case-scenario, Nick and Drexel are unaware that they are paraphrasing/advocating the values of a sexual predator who would prefer much younger females. Some may think there is some wisdom about females in their words, and there is; for sexual predators. As such it will likely work on some females, which is why sexual predators employ these tactics in the first place.
The fact that Drexel and T's relationship culminated in a more sexually intense (BDSM) relationship centered on degradation, humiliation, and pain makes it even more suspicious, and their comfort with these activities makes prior sexual misconduct (physical or otherwise) even more likely.
As a side note, Drexel's worldview of men and women is something of a self-fulfilling prophecy in that he creates the problem of cucks and sluts by enabling it through his actions, and then sells the solution via his platform of choice to the normies who get off on it. This is also how he reinforces/perpetuates his worldview since he can always defer to his own experiences over any alternative that he is presented with (a common practice for people unwilling to engage with different perspectives).
BONUS ROUND:
Drexel shows porn of himself to women he approaches (or who approach him) so he can bait them into "what she can get". This will make women "fall in line". Yet another reason for him to document his degeneracy it seems.
Drexel draws the line at defecating on someone, but anything else goes. Drexel urinating on T is absolutely within the realm of possibility. In fact it his description fits her, well, to a T: a girl with daddy issues who regularly asks him to choke, slap, and spank her. Drexel refers to T as if she were his only sub after all. Then there's the clip from Migtown Episode 55 where Drexel offers hard-core pornographer Duke Skywalker advice as they discuss peeing on women. One would be hard pressed to think of a legitimate reason why Drexel hasn't done this to T(oilet).
As for any pedophile allegations, I created a short compilation of clips to help illustrate where people might get that idea from the things he's said. Keep his views regarding the age gap in mind while you watch as a thought experiment. This isn't definitive proof, but if Drexel wants people to not think he has pedophilic tendencies then he has to stop saying dumb crap like this, especially when he's sexually active with a girl much younger than him whom he's known since she was a kid:
- Midgets are like children to him, but a tattoo of Africa changes things.
- His mind goes where his dick follows regardless of professed intentions.
- Being called daddy is a turn on, but you know, only if it’s sexual *nervous glance*.
- Absolutely likes being called daddy.
- Men should be making women feel like a little girl, and if they don't then he's "fucking their bitch".
These could be considered warning signs for most people. There may be more examples out there, but these are enough to establish a pattern and raise a few eyebrows even if they didn't know about him playing dom for someone he knew since she was a kid.
Drexel told a story about him and a friend of his called Warstarter. Drexel also had a stripper stage and pole in his house until his daughter was born. Apparently, having a daughter only changed the décor of Drexel’s house considering he still does gang bangs with married women and such.
Drexel thinks he wouldn't need to get rid of the stripper stage and pole if he had a son. Reminder that Drexel goes to Boyeurism with T in Portland on an unknown basis. If he kept the stripper stage and pole with his son around...
Nick's Friend Drexel:
The clip below features Drexel answering to someone concerned about Drexel being around Nick's kids. Here we see Drexel deflect the allegations and instead tries to shame the concerned party by assuming their porn habits. He also adds a racial component to his defense when he talks about going out in public with Nick's eldest daughter, and both he and Nick ignore the precedent set with T:
Now consider the two clips below, wherein Drexel addresses people who are quick to point out flaws in others and gives his own thoughts on racial profiling in public:
Drexel should take his own advice and avoid deflecting criticism in such a conspicuous manner. His "You ain't shit! I bet you watch porn!" defense is laughable considering what he's done. Also, his selective application of when racial assumptions are appropriate reeks of hypocrisy.
A few notes for Nick:
- Being a long-time friend is not a deterrent to Drexel eventually banging your daughter. A precedent has been set, and we ALL know it.
- Your math is wrong, Drexel does not need to wait 20 years to have your daughter as his sub. If she's about 10/11 years old now, this could happen well before your "life is over" at 55.
- Don't let your daughter get a tattoo (temporary or otherwise) of Africa on her butt. Remember, Drexel's mind goes places and his dick follows regardless of professed intent.
- If anything does occur with your kids, Drexel will hide it from you.
- If Drexel is found out by you, he will probably laugh about it on the internet.
- If you haven't already, start buying your kids Apple products.
Conclusion:
So, is Drexel a groomer?
In all seriousness, the outlook isn't good. His predatory value system combined with a sizable requisite age gap that he uses to justify his sordid history with T and his overall behavior suggests that Drexel is more of a degenerate than even he knows.
Drexel leveraged the relationship he had with T since her childhood to put himself in a position of sexual dominance. Unless he suffers from periodic blackouts, there is no way he could be confused about how he got into a sexual position with T and it is extremely doubtful that it was all one-sided given his compliance thus far and the nature of his relationships with females in general. Drexel embraced every opportunity and gave himself excuses that he didn't allow for others like Ryan Haywood.
Null made a salient point about grooming/sexual abuse on his MATI stream in late January after he recounted a narrative he had heard about Drexel and T:
Food for thought.
And so, the current account of Drexel, T(oilet), and the mother whose trust they betrayed comes to a close. Drexel may put out more information, but he will just be fighting his own words posted here and elsewhere. It will likely just be the most recent narrative, nothing more.
I doubt this post will change anyone’s mind regarding Drexel, and that’s fine. It’s mainly here for posterity anyway. However, I do look forward to people outing themselves as they attempt to defend this creepy moron as they either struggle to account for the evidence presented here and elsewhere, ignore it just like Nick has done for years, or dismiss the whole thing in a fit of frustration. It could happen anywhere; here on the farms or on Youtube. Take the panel of idiots below for example, who don’t even define what grooming is (one doesn’t even know what it is) but try to defend Drexel anyway:
Apparently, these are people associated with the Lawtube community. Reminder that Viva Frei and Robert Barnes both went to bat for Jack Murphy on a livestream in early January 2022. The original video is gone, but you can view it by proxy here.
By the way, nice defense there Drexel, trying to throw mommy and friends under the bus in your latest narrative. One problem: they are not the ones who had bondage sex with T(oilet) after knowing her since she was a child. That was all you. You could have said no, but you didn’t, because you can’t, because you are a weak person. You are so weak that you have to deflect responsibility onto women because that’s the only thing you know how to do. You are not an “alpha”. You are degenerate manosphere trash; an opportunist reminiscent of Jack Murphy and his own views on the age gap, the fixation on BDSM, and reminders that you fuck feminists.
Speaking of Jack Murphy, you would think that if he taught us anything, it would be that there is nothing more alpha-chad-manly than taking red pills from an aging degenerate pretending to be “one of the good ones”. I mean… what could go wrong?
Nick has stated he's not into pregnant women (I think going as far to imply he wouldn't have sex with a pregnant woman because it's weird), which seemed like a lie to me....
It's really odd. The only time I didn't crave the variety of other women was when my wife was pregnant. It was like getting into bed with a different woman every night. Different breasts. Different belly. Different ass.
Of course, you have to actually be INTO women because a pregnant woman is at her most feminine. All those parts of her that make her a woman are swollen and engorged. Those child bearing hips are actually doing their job and bearing children, FFS> Her feminity is turned up to eleven.
But if your thing happens to be fantasizing that she's a man. that's not going to work at all. Even if she normally straps on the big black dildo and pretends to be Drex while she pegs you, her big pregnant belly is going to get in the way and destroy the illusion.
Some thoughts about Drex:
- If he met the woman (mother) around 2006, he would have been just about out of college and the woman (with a 13 year old) would probably have been in her mid-30s..
- So Drex at the peak of his "alpha-ness" in his early 20s is hanging out with an older woman with kids and going on family trips with them. The big black masta player PUA into young virgianal woman is scoring trash.
- Going to the state fair with your girlfriend while you are in college and her then bringing along a creepy old black guy who used to fuck her mother is a sign to dump her immediately. The boyfriend made the alpha move here. Not Drex. Drex was displaying pure simp behavior, not the boyfriend. Drex was in the role of bring-along girl friend for the woman on the date.
Obviously Nick is going grey, but rather than dye his hair a more natural brown colour, he goes for a black dye that looks ridiculously unnatural, especially with his beard.
I gotta say that mega post having laid it all out in one place like that, I think even less of Nick and his pet coon than ever.
Nick because he flat out justified and rationalized the same thought process as rapists, sadists and child molesters, and thats just vile to me. I guess the saying "you can tell a lot about a man by the company he chooses to keep" is true.
As for Big Alpha Drexel, the self proclaimed "Black Bull" and non simp, the guy is fucking scum.
Plain and simple.
Any man with a daughter that espouses those Supreme Gentleman tier beliefs is a fucking shitbag, Elliot Rodger almost had more of an excuse for that fucked up way of thinking, he was a deeply closeted homosexual that thought he was straight, full of teenage hormones, and felt rejected by women because he didn't understand the major creeper vibes he gave off are picked up by women from 100 yards.
Drexel doesn't even have the bad excuse Elliot Rodger had, this nigger has a fucking daughter, but the guy is like a Bonobo, totally controlled by animalistic urges.
I hate to say it, but if Nick leaves that gross nigger around his daughters he has no one to blame but himself, because its not a matter of if this fucker goes all Uncle Bully on one of Nicks daughters, but when, Drex is the definition of a nigger, totally unable to control his urges, and he'll blame everyone and everything but himself for that when he gets caught.
Fuck that guy.
ghostarchive.org
