Russian Invasion of Ukraine Megathread - Episode III - Revenge of the Ruski (now unlocked with new skins and gameplay modes!!!)

Status
Not open for further replies.
They were a minority before 1900 popped up.
Erm, who was minority?

Sevastopol was.
Before Great War that was a small town (around 60 thousands population).

It's actually a very consistent ideology, you just don't like it cause it goes against your preferred muttpire expanding lmao
Europe has one problem with it - most nations are small and scattered. Have fun when try to drawn borders in former Yogslavia or to get Slovakia thrive on its own.

Best option in this cursed land is something like EU - integrated on some level in economic tier (euro wasn't a bad idea BEFORE some idiots give it Portugal and Finland in the same time), but with internal affairs on country level.
I was referring to Russia, a place that doesn't have any laws against gay or trans folk, but won't permit it to be leveraged for political purposes.
Man, you definetly didn't have any knowledge about ruzzia or their law. In Chechenya fat transes are killed accoding to the law, so don't go to ruzzia.

The ideal situation is every country should live in absolute terror of the consequences of chimping the fuck out.
Agree.
 
Last edited:
Yes, and you're correct with that, but I'm stating that the Russian government is legally the successor of the Soviet Union so therefore they took the Soviet Union's debts, took over all the Soviet embassies, are legally bound to nuclear treaties signed by the USSR during the Cold War period, and took over the Soviet Union's Seat in the Security Council on the United Nations.

You are correct that the Germans did kill millions of Ukrainians. In fact, the Nazis threw Bandera into prison even though he offered their services to them and that is when things became desperate that they released them and made them their auxiliaries. I was more focusing on the modern Ukrainian lens and it seemed that they saw Nazi oppression as a lesser evil to the Holodomor and Soviet occupation and probably as heroes thanks to a vocal minority of far-right groups. Hence, a good portion of Ukrainians highly revere them that they put up statues of collaborators like Bandera who established the Ukrainian Insurgent Army with the basis of being Anti-Russian, while ignoring the Nazi massacres on the Ukrainian populace.

It was larping as more Soviet and Empire but I agree with your point. The Russian invasion was entirely based on decommunization and its Casus Belli was to spite Lenin and the Bolsheviks for creating Ukraine, but then the Russians rename back the main street in Mariupol back to Lenina Street (since it's a tradition in Russia to have all your main streets be named after Lenin, even the main street of Yekaterinburg, the city where the Romanov family got shot) once they captured the city. Now there are calls to rename Bakhmut Artyomovsk even though Bakhmut was the name of the city during Imperial Russia and was the city's first name. The fact that Russia juggles between admiration of the Soviet Union and the Empire despite them being contradictory to each other is crazy.
I think it's mostly due to the fact the Russian Empire despite the glory of the 18th century, was an absolute joke by the end of 19th century, which lead to the October revolution and the Soviet Union rebounding Russia from absolute ruin to a superpower within 30 years.

And remember, the golden age of the USSR was the 1960s and 1970s which is the era most current Russian politicians grew up in as Putin and most of the Russian National Security Council were born in the 1950s, so they have fond memories of the USSR since it didn't stagnate and collapse until their 30s, unlike Ukraine, Zelensky was born in 1978, as well as most of the Ukrainian parliament was born during the 1970s so they grew up during the collapse of the USSR.
 
Last edited:
In fact, the Nazis threw Bandera into prison even though he offered their services to them and that is when things became desperate that they released them and made them their auxiliaries
He was released in september 1944, bit to late to form a collaborating ukrainian units.
Now the US is being threatened by a possibility now, that there will be a new reserve currency.
You have no knowledge about why USD is a reserve currency and why any shit from BRIC's will never be a reserve currency.

First of all - how stupid will be CPC to make theircurrency free in exchenge?

Second of all - what the heck is worthy to buy from Brasilia or India?
 
If you read many of the articles. Some up to 6 years ago, McCain and Graham visiting Ukraine were saying they needed to get rid of Putin. Not Russia, Putin specifically. He's not being co-operative with the US Agenda. Unlike say Gorbachev or Yeltsin.

I honestly think this is one of the behaviors which largely sabotages US foreign relationships. If you look at most other nations dealing with the US, they don't normally just actively play favorites with certain US presidents and instead chose to negotiate with whoever is the US leader whether they like them or not. Basically respect the office not the man. Even if you're talking about a non-democratic country, popular opinion within a nation is often going to greatly influence a nation's policies. People don't really like it when foreign governments start to directly involve themselves in their nation's internal politics. Canada does the same thing and it's one of the reasons so many countries have gotten so pissed at them in recent years. I mean shit, Xi Jinping almost got into a fist fight with Trudeau.
 
A lot of people think "shock and awe" is the only way to do an invasion. I don't believe you are one of them but a lot of folks can't wrap their little heads around the fact Russia just doesn't do offensives like the US military does.
The US get away with it because they choose their opponents carefully - sandniggers with rusty AKs, without proper AA, armor and organized army. Try to pull this shit on a regular army, and you'll see your "shock 'n' awe" turn into a "human waves into the meatgrinder"
The war in general has turned into a meatgrinder, i think the russians are being grinded the the most.
Yes, that's absolutely the case. In spite the fact that the russians outartillery AFU 10:1, and also have ammo stockpiles to continue the shelling, managed to pin down AFU in Bakhmut and blowing up their shit while slowly encircling the city.
False, they hate the Russian population, which can be expelled, and the land should remain to Ukraine.
You should be aware of it now, but most of the world do not agree to your autistic view on how a government should be related to the countries population. Fortunately for you, your gypo ass won't be deported to Streetshittistan.
Now the US is being threatened by a possibility now, that there will be a new reserve currency. If this goes live, then the US loses it's sole reserve currency status, putting it's multi trillion dollar debt into risk.
Amen to that. It's high time to break the USD hegemony.
It might even kick the US economy back to something resembling a functional normal one.
 
Now the US is being threatened by a possibility now, that there will be a new reserve currency. If this goes live, then the US loses it's sole reserve currency status, putting it's multi trillion dollar debt into risk.
About that. Three days ago the Indian refiners started paying traders in dirhams for Russian oil.

Of course, the catch is that the dirham exchange rate is rigidly nailed to the dollar so in effect they are just using a proxy currency. As such, I wouldn't call it an absolute victory for Russia - but the decision still speaks for itself.
 
Man, you definetly didn't have any knowledge about ruzzia or their law. In Chechenya fat transes are killed accoding to the law, so don't go to ruzzia.
Absolutely based, booking my vacation to Grozny now! But I do believe Chechnya is not Russia; its a Republic under the jurisdiction of the Russian Federation, and while not wholly autonomous, does have some leeway in dealing with degenerates.

I advise you to stay away from there Kurwachen, no matter how smitten you may be with those big Chechen men.

Some pictures:

Destroyed Humvee
1675766511561.png

DPR boys with the Archangel
1675766573239.png
 
A new batch of polls ahead of Biden’s speech confirms the evolution of what was once a very bipartisan issue. A Washington Post-ABC News poll, for instance, shows half of Republicans now say we’re doing “too much” for Ukraine.
More strikingly, an NBC News poll last week showed 63 percent of Republicans opposed “providing more funding and weapons to Ukraine,” while 32 percent were in support.
Support for Ukraine’s cause overall remains overwhelmingly bipartisan. But Republicans are more skeptical that Ukraine can emerge victorious. A Fox News poll released last week showed Democrats thought Ukraine was winning the war by a 2-to-1 margin, 61 percent to 26 percent. But Republicans were split, with 43 percent saying Russia was winning and 42 percent saying Ukraine was winning. It’s the second poll since the 2022 election that suggests Republicans are more likely than Democrats to view Russia as winning the war.

Similarly, a December poll from Fox News showed 34 percent of Democrats thought Ukraine was “very likely” to survive the invasion and remain a free country, but just 15 percent of Republicans agreed.

A Marquette University poll this month showed 37 percent of Democrats thought what happens with the war matters a “great deal” to life in the United States, compared to 24 percent of Republicans. And while a Pew Research Center poll at the start of the war showed half of Republicans regarded the invasion as a “major threat” to U.S. interests, just 29 percent now say that’s the case. (Democrats’ belief that Russia is a “major threat” in that time has declined only slightly, from half to 43 percent.)

A new Gallup poll gave people a binary choice between supporting Ukraine’s efforts to reclaim its territory, and ending the war quickly — even if it meant Russiawas allowed to keep conquered territory. A slight majority of Republicans picked the former, but 41 percent were willing to countenance Russia keeping the territory in the name of ending the war. That’s compared to just 16 percent of Democrats who believed the same.

And if you layer on top of that the financial question, Republicans appear even more open to Russia keeping some territory. A November poll for the Chicago Council on Global Affairs posed a somewhat similar dilemma: between supporting Ukraine for “as long as it takes” even if it means higher domestic gas and food prices, or negotiating a settlement “even if that means that Ukraine will lose some territory.”
Republicans had been split on the same question in the summer of 2022, but by November they chose the quicker settlement by a nearly 2-to-1 margin, 63-33. Democrats were essentially flipped, siding 61-36 in favor of “as long as it takes.”

The support is slowly dying. Send Null! He will negotiate peace and prosperity for us all!
 
Ukraine lowers conscription age to 16.... Can't wait to see all those children get press-ganged by the UKR Stasi....


Still supporting Ukraine? Congrats, you're no longer just a Nazi sympathiser you now also qualify as a child killer.
 
He was released in september 1944, bit to late to form a collaborating ukrainian units.

You have no knowledge about why USD is a reserve currency and why any shit from BRIC's will never be a reserve currency.

First of all - how stupid will be CPC to make theircurrency free in exchenge?

Second of all - what the heck is worthy to buy from Brasilia or India?
1675774245135.png


The dollar wasn't the currency people used to trade before the 20th century, and it doesn't have to be in the 21st, either.
 
CNN gets access to NATO exercise mimicking war with Russia

CNN's Nic Robertson gets a closer look at military training exercises by NATO forces in Estonia.


"Could be a game changer"
No, this is just stupid. Ukraine had more than 3000 tanks at the start of the war and large complexes of Soviet tank factories; how do a couple hundred tanks make any difference? They also mentioned the need for logistics, well, good luck with that in a country where the enemy turns off electricity every night.
 
Last edited:
He was released in september 1944, bit to late to form a collaborating ukrainian units.
Ah, my mistake, but he had already formed collaborating Ukrainian units before he was prisoned. While he was imprisoned, his organization, the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists, massacred Poles around Ukraine, numbering 35,000-133,000. They also went after Jews like the Lyiv pogroms.
 
Yeah, they have? Hundreds of channels from both sides are posting hundreds of videos of both sides getting absolutely wrecked. The difference is that Ukrainian conscripts are defending their country, russian conscripts are thrown into a war of ambiguous geopolitcal conflict. The whole " de-nazification " thing is way overplayed. The war in general has turned into a meatgrinder, i think the russians are being grinded the the most.
If the recently leaked casualty figures are correct, Ukraine is taking literally 10x the casualties russia is.
 
CNN gets access to NATO exercise mimicking war with Russia

CNN's Nic Robertson gets a closer look at military training exercises by NATO forces in Estonia.

It still blows my mind that they think a small number of MBTs are going to be such a big game changer. None of these tanks are invulnerable to AT weaponry. It's not like WW2 where Germany suddenly found a huge chunk of their AT weaponry useless against the T-34 because they couldn't score frontal kills. Leopard tanks were easily destroyed by outdated ATGMs in Syria, and Yemen has been scoring easy kills on Abrams tanks the Saudis bought from the US with old ATGMs they got from Iran.

I also wouldn't really be surprised if you don't end up with some of these tanks being killed by Javelins since Russia has captured a lot of them, and the Javelin, hilariously, is better suited for larger tanks like the Abrams since top attack works a lot better against larger tanks.
No, this is just stupid. Ukraine had more than 3000 tanks at the start of the war and large complexes of Soviet tank factories; how do a couple hundred tanks make any difference? They also mentioned the need for logistics, well, good luck with that in a country where the enemy turns off electricity every night.
What would really make a lot more sense would be industrial support for them to get their own factories back up and running.
 
About that. Three days ago the Indian refiners started paying traders in dirhams for Russian oil.

Of course, the catch is that the dirham exchange rate is rigidly nailed to the dollar so in effect they are just using a proxy currency. As such, I wouldn't call it an absolute victory for Russia - but the decision still speaks for itself.


Relying on a non Russian currency, artificially tied to the US dollar, makes Russia a firsthand cuck to the middle east, and secondhand cuck to the United States.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: RobotDog
It still blows my mind that they think a small number of MBTs are going to be such a big game changer.

Our ruling class has brainrot. They think American weapons are invincible and superpowered, and they don't think things like monthly ammunition production matter.

What would really make a lot more sense would be industrial support for them to get their own factories back up and running.

Hard to get factories working without electricity. Russia's teaching the world how vulnerable your infrastructure is in a war. Can't just fire up the coal-fired boiler in the factory to get power any more.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back