Ethan Klein / h3h3Productions - Opportunistic, two-faced e-celeb sperg with a penchant for hypocrisy and an Oedipus complex; sold out to Susan Wojcicki, the incompetent CEO of YouTube

Who would win in a fight?

  • Ethan Klein

    Votes: 293 3.9%
  • Sam Hyde

    Votes: 7,180 96.1%

  • Total voters
    7,473
I don't even understand the gist: Does that guy look like Harvey Weinstein?...no, not really I don't see the resemblance. So what?
It's the implications of it. He's basically saying: 'Hey, that guy looks like Harvey Weinstein haha. By the way, did you know he's a borderline rapists?' Boy wouldn't it be funny if he was a rapist just as well?' Because let's be real, that's what he is ultimately saying with statement
 
Its crazy how throughout all of human history and in every country and culture they have been part of there has been one single group who ends up the most disliked and hated.
The majority of those were because we supposedly "killed jesus" which, correct me if I'm wrong, him dying is kinda the entire point of the Christian religion to begin with, so "you're welcome".

edit: lol hoes mad
 
Last edited:
Ok I know Ethan Klein bad and all, but on what planet is taking out a website asking if someone looks like a vilified public figure libel? How could he lie to defame someone if he didn't even make a statement?
I don't even understand the gist: Does that guy look like Harvey Weinstein?...no, not really I don't see the resemblance. So what?

I sure hope there's more to this, or else that's a pretty concerning precedent that you can drag people in front of the courts just for conjuring an idea you consider unflattering.
Typically anti-SLAPPs aren't there to litigate the facts, just to establish that facts exist which exceed the "bald recitation" of causes of action.

So broadly, instead of "he defamed me" it's "he said A which is false, and B damages resulted, which constitutes defamation".

What evidence Ryan has may not stand up to cross exam or any kind of half-rigorous analysis, but at this point the judge is convinced that Ryan has at least brought facts, which if taken as true, support his alleged causes of action and make for a case that can be actually litigated. "Taken as true" is a big if.

So that litigation of the case might easily be Ryan losing, lest we forget those lulzy lawsuits filed related to Ethan pirating PPV events which this spat originates from.

I'm generally with you on the "how is this defamation?" train, but much like you can talk yourself into going to jail, I suspect Ethan may have talked himself into a civil suit he can't anti-SLAPP his way out of.
 
It's the implications of it. He's basically saying: 'Hey, that guy looks like Harvey Weinstein haha. By the way, did you know he's a borderline rapists?' Boy wouldn't it be funny if he was a rapist just as well?' Because let's be real, that's what he is ultimately saying with statement
He's also on record telling his viewers to intentionally game Google's autocomplete to directly associate his name with a known convicted sex pest. An association Ethan knows perfectly well is false and entirely manufactured by himself out of spite.

It's an extremely faggy and passive-aggressive form of defamation. Very FtM.
 
Anyone know why he got banned from tiktok?
2023-02-10-20-59-twitter.com.png
 
It's just not Ethan's day, I sure hope he does not kill himself.

As he looks into his reflection in his swimming pool he just hears "Wow, Ethan great moves." Then fade to black, Hila returns wiping the cum of Palestinian teenagers from her lips as she finds his lifeless corpse in the pool.

Hila cocks her AK ready for round 2

2024 Hila


Ironically Ryan would love to finance Hila's story

coming 2025 - Hila Klein Abortion extraordinaire.
 
It's funny that the thing that will destroy Ethan's Jewish arrogance is another Jew.
That's what I'm hoping for.

Jew or not, it's genuinely impressive that this dude was able to break through California's anti-SLAAP.

I checked the original Tech Times article that was posted, and it says that 90% of anti-SLAAP cases are granted in the state of California in general, not that each judge grants them, nor that this woman in particular has a very low count. No idea if it's actually as low as he claims, but my guess is he told a lie that sounded truthy to try to paint himself as the victim.
It's probably spread across all judges, and it just happens that Ethan's conduct is so egregious and any number of judges would have denied his motion.

Which is not good for Ethan.

There are plenty of spheres where Jews have a great deal of influence; finance, Hollywood, politics...

I don't think YouTube is one of those spheres. In reality, while his content circa 2015 was decent, his success was primarily predicated on the algorithm promoting his channel rather than his own talent. This is normal for most YouTubers. That said, he got so big he was no longer reliant on the algorithm to keep his numbers healthy.
The other thing is that Youtube actively courts Hollywood. Remember Will Smith?

I think if push comes to shove, Susan won't back Ethan over Kavanaugh. At least, I hope.
 
I used to like Ethan until he stabbed JonTron in the back. He became such a awful cunt after that. Nothing would make me happier than to see him lose it all. The Jew Mansion, the podcast, his wife, his child, and his sanity.
I struggle to think of anything Ethan has ever done that was worth a shit.

He won a lawsuit against a stupid faggot nobody cares about anymore (and it's not a legal precedent), and he kinda-sorta defended PewDiePie at one point. In the case of the later, it's doubtful Ethan would ever be able to make a dent in PewDiePie if he went the other route, and probably knows it. PewDiePie is so big, I don't think even Susan wants to fuck with him.

Am I missing something here?
 
Back