Culture Have More Sex Please



By Magdalene J. Taylor
Ms. Taylor is a writer covering sex and culture.

Sex is good. Sex is healthy. Sex is an essential part of our social fabric. And you — specifically — should probably be having more of it.
Americans, in the midst of a loneliness epidemic, are not having enough sex. Across almost every demographic group, American adults old and young, single and coupled, rich and poor are having less sex than they have had at any point in at least the past three decades.

Sex isn’t the sole form of fulfilling human interaction and certainly isn’t a salve for loneliness in all forms. Still, it should be seen as a critical part of our social well-being, not an indulgence or an afterthought. This is in large part because the rise in loneliness closely parallels a decline in sex. More than a quarter of Americans hadn’t had sex even once in the past year the last time the General Social Survey asked, in 2021. It was the highest such level of sexlessness in the survey’s history.

That figure includes almost 30 percent of men under 30, a figure that has tripled since 2008. In the 1990s, about half of Americans were having sex weekly or more — that figure is now under 40 percent. For many who are having sex, the frequency has dropped precipitously. And it’s not just sex: Partnership and cohabitation are down, too. Less time spent with friends and lovers — these aren’t distinct issues but symptoms of the same cultural malaise, an isolation that is demolishing Americans’ social lives, love lives and happiness.

Estimates vary, but somewhere between a third and two-thirds of Americans report being lonely. Loneliness exists on a feedback loop: Fraying cultural bonds, damaged physical health and reduced social contact both exacerbate loneliness and are exacerbated by it, to the point that loneliness lowers life expectancy. Loneliness is a challenging phenomenon for researchers to quantify, but there are telltale signs — and they point to a society losing its way. The number of Americans who report having no close friends at all has quadrupled since 1990, according to a Survey Center on American Life study. An average American in 2021 spent 58 percent less time with friends than in 2013, the Census Bureau found.

Covid-19 has contributed to the spike in loneliness and the decline in sex, but is only partially responsible. Between 2014 and 2019, the decrease in time people spent with friends was greater than it was during the pandemic. And during the pandemic, many Americans spent more and more time alone, with neither friends nor romantic partners. Younger Americans are, infamously, less likely to have sex than their parents’ generations — and when they do have sex, they’re doing it with fewer partners.

In my work as a writer covering sex and culture, I have spoken to dozens of men for whom a lack of sex is the defining characteristic of their daily life. It shapes their interests, their motivations, their hopes. Some are incels — short for “involuntary celibates,” believers in a toxic, misogynistic ideology — but more are not. Some believe the pursuit of sex will be entirely futile. In turn, they’ve begun to interpret going out, spending time with friends and meeting new people as futile, too. This thinking becomes cyclical — soon, they’re not only afraid of failing to find a sexual partner but they also grow to fear even platonic social interactions. Sex is only one component of their overall isolation but is in many cases the one upon which the overall problem hinges.
It’s easy to brush these men off as anomalies, or to label their state as a result of personal failings or even the consequences of modern masculinity. But while much of the research around the decline in sex focuses upon young men, almost every group of Americans is experiencing the absence of sex — and the consequences are profound. If a lack of sex is affecting the cultural and social participation of these young men, it’s likely to be affecting the rest of us, too. A lack of sex can easily translate into less socialization, fewer families and a sicker population: Sex reduces pain, relieves stress, improves sleep, lowers blood pressure and strengthens heart health.

Writers like myself have made male sexlessness a well-known issue, even as women are in the same bind. Data from the General Social Survey actually suggests they may be having even less sex than men. In 2021, roughly a quarter of women under 35 reported having had no sex in the past year. For men, the figure was 19 percent. And women who are having sex are less likely to be happy with the sex they’re having. Both men and women report feelings of regret and unhappiness following casual sex, but it’s more common among women — probably in part because of cultural perceptions of sexual autonomy. Sex can bring people together, but that only works when it’s good sex.

Not only are women and men marching together into sexlessness; they’re also on the same road to loneliness. Young women were more likely than men to report losing touch with friends during the pandemic, and a British study found that women were more likely than men to report feeling lonely “often” or “always.” Reporting often focuses on young-male sexlessness — and on incel ideology — but the decline in sex and rise in loneliness and social isolation are not male problems. In 21st-century America, loneliness is essentially omnipresent, and the high schooler’s cliché fear that “everyone else is having sex” has never been less true.

There is no one solution. The loneliness epidemic has been brought about by myriad factors that have been exacerbated over decades. Social media is one culprit; the 20th century’s war of attrition against walkable communities is another. But as loneliness has accelerated, it has become self-perpetuating: Our current societal loneliness — and sexlessness — is a result of social and cultural shifts, while its continuation perpetuates those shifts further.

The loneliness epidemic may be a societal issue, but it can be solved, at least partly, at the level of individual bedrooms. Those of us in a position to be having more sex ought to be doing so. Here is the rare opportunity to do something for the betterment of the world around you that involves nothing more than indulging in one of humanity’s most essential pleasures.

Having more sex is both personal guidance — your doctor might well agree — and a political statement. American society is less connected, made up of individuals who seem increasingly willing to isolate themselves. Having more sex can be an act of social solidarity.

Not everyone who wants to have more sex is easily capable of doing so. Disabilities, religious objections, asexuality and any set of day-to-day restrictions and responsibilities curtail or close off sex for many. There may be some who simply do not want to have more sex, or any sex at all. But even those who won’t have more sex should avoid apathy. Sex is intrinsic to a society built on social connection — and right now, our connections and our sex lives are collapsing alongside each other.

Many people — like some of the young men I have spoken to in my work — have resigned themselves to displacing their sexual desires, relying entirely on porn or other online stimuli, mirroring so many types of relationships that have been subsumed into the digital world. As a balm for loneliness, digital sex can be little better than digital friendship — a source of envy, resentfulness and spite, a driver of loneliness rather than a cure for it. It’s no match for the real thing.
So, anyone capable should have sex — as much as they can, as pleasurably as they can, as often as they can.

Magdalene J. Taylor is a writer covering sex and culture. She writes the newsletter “Many Such Cases.”
 
Internet porn has really fucked up people by giving them weird ideas about how sex is supposed to work. Most women don't thrash around and scream during (consensual) sex, like to be choked, or enjoy anal, but they do their best to imitate porn, wind up hating it, and then decide that they won't bother with it anymore. Also, men who watch too much porn have a hard time getting excited when an IRL situation doesn't match their fetish and the women aren't as attractive as some of the bimbos on Pornhub. People of all two genders are also increasingly obese, and fat people are always more likely to drop out of the dating marketplace or not enter it in the first place. This is also true for people with anxiety problems like a lot of the incel types in this thread who are boasting about how they don't date.
 
I knew this thread was going to be full or crybaby incels
>Everyone I don't like and doesn't agree with me is an incel
That word is so overused nowadays. It describes people that genuinely hate women (so people like Elliot Rogers, that one Algerian-French Canadian dude that killed a bunch of women due to his daddy problems and deep seated hatred for women or Nick Fuentes and his Catboy League, who the term originally was meant to describe: mentally ill sociopaths thay hate women) and want to see them dead to people in this thread who have misgivings towards women due to their frankly bad behavior for the most part, but otherwise don't hate women. It's like calling someone a conspiracy theorist. It's a sign that someone doesn't havr anything meaningful to add and is just laying bare their idiocy.
 
or Anime GFs that will take on the world with you and stand by you even if you walk into Hell itself. This ideal is beautiful, but every single woman does not meet it.
I just want one that will play Videh and curl up on the couch to watch shit with me.

Walking into hell itself is above my pay grade, and if we get to a world* where my paygrade is expected to fight Satan we are fucked anyways.

*Before anyone says it I know by saying this I am basically guaranteed that I am going to have to fight The Big Red man with bottle of Setzer and a Cream Pie, but can we pretend for one sentence that the universe isn't fucking going insane.
 
>Everyone I don't like and doesn't agree with me is an incel
That word is so overused nowadays. It describes people that genuinely hate women (so people like Elliot Rogers, that one Algerian-French Canadian dude that killed a bunch of women due to his daddy problems and deep seated hatred for women or Nick Fuentes and his Catboy League, who the term originally was meant to describe: mentally ill sociopaths thay hate women) and want to see them dead to people in this thread who have misgivings towards women due to their frankly bad behavior for the most part, but otherwise don't hate women. It's like calling someone a conspiracy theorist. It's a sign that someone doesn't havr anything meaningful to add and is just laying bare their idiocy.
Most volcels are just incels in disguise.
 
>Everyone I don't like and doesn't agree with me is an incel
That word is so overused nowadays. It describes people that genuinely hate women (so people like Elliot Rogers, that one Algerian-French Canadian dude that killed a bunch of women due to his daddy problems and deep seated hatred for women or Nick Fuentes and his Catboy League, who the term originally was meant to describe: mentally ill sociopaths thay hate women) and want to see them dead to people in this thread who have misgivings towards women due to their frankly bad behavior for the most part, but otherwise don't hate women. It's like calling someone a conspiracy theorist. It's a sign that someone doesn't havr anything meaningful to add and is just laying bare their idiocy.
The goal was not to address any of the issues men may have but shame them for having any in the first place.
 
>Everyone I don't like and doesn't agree with me is an incel
That word is so overused nowadays. It describes people that genuinely hate women (so people like Elliot Rogers, that one Algerian-French Canadian dude that killed a bunch of women due to his daddy problems and deep seated hatred for women or Nick Fuentes and his Catboy League, who the term originally was meant to describe: mentally ill sociopaths thay hate women) and want to see them dead to people in this thread who have misgivings towards women due to their frankly bad behavior for the most part, but otherwise don't hate women. It's like calling someone a conspiracy theorist. It's a sign that someone doesn't havr anything meaningful to add and is just laying bare their idiocy.
It's very simple.
 

Attachments

  • 1676421369862.png
    1676421369862.png
    610.1 KB · Views: 18
Men grow up loving an ideal construct of women-whether that's Arthurian ladies, or Anime GFs that will take on the world with you and stand by you even if you walk into Hell itself.
If I remember your namesake's story, she condemned her boyfriend to Hell. His sister tried to protect him but Inanna/Ishtar had her tortured, then decided they could trade places every six months. So your ideal woman isn't your girlfriend, it's your sister. That was the wisdom of the black-headed people.

I could never date a single mother. It's losing at every option. Either she's a good mother; in which case you're always, rightfully, second to the kid. Or you're first in her life and she's a bad mother, and why would you want to marry a bad mother?
A man's life is sacrifice, whether it's for children, society, one's elderly parents, whoever. That is the supreme virtue of the masculine image of God, that he sacrificed himself for people who didn't understand what he was doing, and in doing so elevated them to be his co-heirs in the Kingdom of God. But he also taught us to shake the dust off our feet when the situation was hopeless.
 
How if no one is ever attracted to you or displays any interest?

If you're ugly or socially awkward enough it's virtually impossible.

Why are you poor? Just be rich brah. Same energy.
I know many ugly men and women who managed to get married and have kids. Being ugly isn't the problem people think it is when you have a nice disposition. The problem many incels have is that they don't want to accept their lack of good looks and compensate by improving any other feat they could have. You're ugly, but you are funny or can dance or are even a bit entertaining, you'll be fine.

So it's our fault for their rampant degeneracy because we don't make enough money? Seriously? How the hell is that supposed to work? Men aren't the majority making the decision to end marriages.
Men not being able to support a family is a big issue, but it's not men's fault. It's current economy's fault. Men are victims of it as much as women.

There is a constant here and that's women wanting men to provide and men being ok with providing. I know many men who are more than willing to do all work while wives stay home to take care of it and the children, but they sadly admit that this is impossible because one salary ain't enough.

OTOH, we also need to make a distinction between two types of women who want a provider: there is one group who acknowledges why she has to stay home as it's the best for the kids that she's present and aware of their lives. And then are the ones who want a sugar daddy rather than a husband and expect them to provide for the life of luxury they try to copy from Instathots influencers. These are to blame too because they are quick to dismiss a good man only because he won't accept to buy her a new car every year.
 
I could never date a single mother. It's losing at every option. Either she's a good mother; in which case you're always, rightfully, second to the kid. Or you're first in her life and she's a bad mother, and why would you want to marry a bad mother?
Here’s the thing - there would be no single mothers without an epidemic of absentee fathers. Men are frankly more to blame for the generation raised by women because at least the women are raising their progeny.

You already know I think the small hats invented feminism to trick women into working during their childbearing years but what if I told you they also invented porn in order to trick men into thinking they’re Genghis Khan, so they are more willing to abandon their children?
 
Here’s the thing - there would be no single mothers without an epidemic of absentee fathers. Men are frankly more to blame for the generation raised by women because at least the women are raising their progeny.

You already know I think the small hats invented feminism to trick women into working during their childbearing years but what if I told you they also invented porn in order to trick men into thinking they’re Genghis Khan, so they are more willing to abandon their children?
here's a brilliant idea
don't have sex without marriage or pick someone who will leave you
 
If I remember your namesake's story, she condemned her boyfriend to Hell. His sister tried to protect him but Inanna/Ishtar had her tortured, then decided they could trade places every six months. So your ideal woman isn't your girlfriend, it's your sister. That was the wisdom of the black-headed people.


A man's life is sacrifice, whether it's for children, society, one's elderly parents, whoever. That is the supreme virtue of the masculine image of God, that he sacrificed himself for people who didn't understand what he was doing, and in doing so elevated them to be his co-heirs in the Kingdom of God. But he also taught us to shake the dust off our feet when the situation was hopeless.
I'll gladly sacrifice myself for my kids, not someone else's.
Here’s the thing - there would be no single mothers without an epidemic of absentee fathers. Men are frankly more to blame for the generation raised by women because at least the women are raising their progeny.

You already know I think the small hats invented feminism to trick women into working during their childbearing years but what if I told you they also invented porn in order to trick men into thinking they’re Genghis Khan, so they are more willing to abandon their children?
Having seen many single mothers I can't agree it's the fault of men. These women choose to fuck and procreate with men who'll leave. Why should we pick up the bill? Why should we even pity them? Odds are they thumbed their noses up at us before they had a kid.
 
Here’s the thing - there would be no single mothers without an epidemic of absentee fathers. Men are frankly more to blame for the generation raised by women because at least the women are raising their progeny.

You already know I think the small hats invented feminism to trick women into working during their childbearing years but what if I told you they also invented porn in order to trick men into thinking they’re Genghis Khan, so they are more willing to abandon their children?
who pushed to normalize (and state-subsidize) out of wedlock children, legalize adultery, and liberalize divorce law?
there were lots of societal and legal mechanisms in place to keep families intact. it was feminism that undermined or outright abolished them. if the other side had had their way instead, we'd still live in a society governed by strictly enforced monogamy today.
 
Having seen many single mothers I can't agree it's the fault of men. These women choose to fuck and procreate with men who'll leave. Why should we pick up the bill? Why should we even pity them? Odds are they thumbed their noses up at us before they had a kid.
Because when a man fucks up it's his responsibility. When a woman fucks up, it's society's responsibility.
 
here's a brilliant idea
don't have sex without marriage or pick someone who will leave you
Having seen many single mothers I can't agree it's the fault of men. These women choose to fuck and procreate with men who'll leave. Why should we pick up the bill? Why should we even pity them? Odds are they thumbed their noses up at us before they had a kid.
Here’s a better idea: men should be raising their own kids because a single father is more attractive to women than the other way around and men are better at raising stoic children, which our society desperately needs.

Based on your posts, I highly doubt you have abandoned children out in the world. You shouldn’t be defending these men; they are dregs on society. Not “alphas.”
 
Here’s a better idea: men should be raising their own kids because a single father is more attractive to women than the other way around and men are better at raising stoic children, which our society desperately needs.

Based on your posts, I highly doubt you have abandoned children out in the world. You shouldn’t be defending these men; they are dregs on society. Not “alphas.”
I'm not defending these men by any metrics. I'm just not cleaning up their mess as a step-dad. These men are assholes without a doubt, barring ones fucked over by courts, but they also aren't the arbiters of sex.

As I said before: these single moms likely thumbed their noses at me when we were younger. Why should I suddenly give a fuck that they made a mistake and got impregnated by an asshole?
 
It's fucking sad that even someone like my dad, who I think has a level head when it comes to shit like this, thinks exactly this. Women are overly materialistic and base when it comes to their ego. Of course, a woman shouldn't just trust any man for no reason, but women on the whole care too much about status and other material benefits of a relationship rather than being with someone that truly cares for you and wants the best for you. I don't think all women are like this nor do I resent women for it, but that's a running theme throughout all of society nowadayd. Even in churches, synagouges and mosques around the world, this mindset has been planted in every woman that she needs someone that signals her social and material wealth rather than someone that can take care of her, her children and even her family in addition to bring a constant source of love, affection and goodwill. Frankly, shit's fucked. The best thing you can do nowadays is not even bother with women for the most part unless you see one that is not only a good friend but a good peraon, a rarity nowadays.
A woman sees a man's wallet the way he sees a woman's tits. Tale old as time.
 
Here’s a better idea: men should be raising their own kids because a single father is more attractive to women than the other way around and men are better at raising stoic children, which our society desperately needs.

Based on your posts, I highly doubt you have abandoned children out in the world. You shouldn’t be defending these men; they are dregs on society. Not “alphas.”
Deflection here, deflection there.

We are not defending them. They are just indefensible as the women they leave behind. Men and women of low quality producing broken children likely to grow up and propagate their parents' dynamic. Tragic but you can't stop every idiot from doing something stupid. It takes a degree of self-realization to break out of a cycle.
 
Back