Culture Have More Sex Please



By Magdalene J. Taylor
Ms. Taylor is a writer covering sex and culture.

Sex is good. Sex is healthy. Sex is an essential part of our social fabric. And you — specifically — should probably be having more of it.
Americans, in the midst of a loneliness epidemic, are not having enough sex. Across almost every demographic group, American adults old and young, single and coupled, rich and poor are having less sex than they have had at any point in at least the past three decades.

Sex isn’t the sole form of fulfilling human interaction and certainly isn’t a salve for loneliness in all forms. Still, it should be seen as a critical part of our social well-being, not an indulgence or an afterthought. This is in large part because the rise in loneliness closely parallels a decline in sex. More than a quarter of Americans hadn’t had sex even once in the past year the last time the General Social Survey asked, in 2021. It was the highest such level of sexlessness in the survey’s history.

That figure includes almost 30 percent of men under 30, a figure that has tripled since 2008. In the 1990s, about half of Americans were having sex weekly or more — that figure is now under 40 percent. For many who are having sex, the frequency has dropped precipitously. And it’s not just sex: Partnership and cohabitation are down, too. Less time spent with friends and lovers — these aren’t distinct issues but symptoms of the same cultural malaise, an isolation that is demolishing Americans’ social lives, love lives and happiness.

Estimates vary, but somewhere between a third and two-thirds of Americans report being lonely. Loneliness exists on a feedback loop: Fraying cultural bonds, damaged physical health and reduced social contact both exacerbate loneliness and are exacerbated by it, to the point that loneliness lowers life expectancy. Loneliness is a challenging phenomenon for researchers to quantify, but there are telltale signs — and they point to a society losing its way. The number of Americans who report having no close friends at all has quadrupled since 1990, according to a Survey Center on American Life study. An average American in 2021 spent 58 percent less time with friends than in 2013, the Census Bureau found.

Covid-19 has contributed to the spike in loneliness and the decline in sex, but is only partially responsible. Between 2014 and 2019, the decrease in time people spent with friends was greater than it was during the pandemic. And during the pandemic, many Americans spent more and more time alone, with neither friends nor romantic partners. Younger Americans are, infamously, less likely to have sex than their parents’ generations — and when they do have sex, they’re doing it with fewer partners.

In my work as a writer covering sex and culture, I have spoken to dozens of men for whom a lack of sex is the defining characteristic of their daily life. It shapes their interests, their motivations, their hopes. Some are incels — short for “involuntary celibates,” believers in a toxic, misogynistic ideology — but more are not. Some believe the pursuit of sex will be entirely futile. In turn, they’ve begun to interpret going out, spending time with friends and meeting new people as futile, too. This thinking becomes cyclical — soon, they’re not only afraid of failing to find a sexual partner but they also grow to fear even platonic social interactions. Sex is only one component of their overall isolation but is in many cases the one upon which the overall problem hinges.
It’s easy to brush these men off as anomalies, or to label their state as a result of personal failings or even the consequences of modern masculinity. But while much of the research around the decline in sex focuses upon young men, almost every group of Americans is experiencing the absence of sex — and the consequences are profound. If a lack of sex is affecting the cultural and social participation of these young men, it’s likely to be affecting the rest of us, too. A lack of sex can easily translate into less socialization, fewer families and a sicker population: Sex reduces pain, relieves stress, improves sleep, lowers blood pressure and strengthens heart health.

Writers like myself have made male sexlessness a well-known issue, even as women are in the same bind. Data from the General Social Survey actually suggests they may be having even less sex than men. In 2021, roughly a quarter of women under 35 reported having had no sex in the past year. For men, the figure was 19 percent. And women who are having sex are less likely to be happy with the sex they’re having. Both men and women report feelings of regret and unhappiness following casual sex, but it’s more common among women — probably in part because of cultural perceptions of sexual autonomy. Sex can bring people together, but that only works when it’s good sex.

Not only are women and men marching together into sexlessness; they’re also on the same road to loneliness. Young women were more likely than men to report losing touch with friends during the pandemic, and a British study found that women were more likely than men to report feeling lonely “often” or “always.” Reporting often focuses on young-male sexlessness — and on incel ideology — but the decline in sex and rise in loneliness and social isolation are not male problems. In 21st-century America, loneliness is essentially omnipresent, and the high schooler’s cliché fear that “everyone else is having sex” has never been less true.

There is no one solution. The loneliness epidemic has been brought about by myriad factors that have been exacerbated over decades. Social media is one culprit; the 20th century’s war of attrition against walkable communities is another. But as loneliness has accelerated, it has become self-perpetuating: Our current societal loneliness — and sexlessness — is a result of social and cultural shifts, while its continuation perpetuates those shifts further.

The loneliness epidemic may be a societal issue, but it can be solved, at least partly, at the level of individual bedrooms. Those of us in a position to be having more sex ought to be doing so. Here is the rare opportunity to do something for the betterment of the world around you that involves nothing more than indulging in one of humanity’s most essential pleasures.

Having more sex is both personal guidance — your doctor might well agree — and a political statement. American society is less connected, made up of individuals who seem increasingly willing to isolate themselves. Having more sex can be an act of social solidarity.

Not everyone who wants to have more sex is easily capable of doing so. Disabilities, religious objections, asexuality and any set of day-to-day restrictions and responsibilities curtail or close off sex for many. There may be some who simply do not want to have more sex, or any sex at all. But even those who won’t have more sex should avoid apathy. Sex is intrinsic to a society built on social connection — and right now, our connections and our sex lives are collapsing alongside each other.

Many people — like some of the young men I have spoken to in my work — have resigned themselves to displacing their sexual desires, relying entirely on porn or other online stimuli, mirroring so many types of relationships that have been subsumed into the digital world. As a balm for loneliness, digital sex can be little better than digital friendship — a source of envy, resentfulness and spite, a driver of loneliness rather than a cure for it. It’s no match for the real thing.
So, anyone capable should have sex — as much as they can, as pleasurably as they can, as often as they can.

Magdalene J. Taylor is a writer covering sex and culture. She writes the newsletter “Many Such Cases.”
 
Deflection here, deflection there.

We are not defending them. They are just indefensible as the women they leave behind. Men and women of low quality producing broken children likely to grow up and propagate their parents' dynamic. Tragic but you can't stop every idiot from doing something stupid. It takes a degree of self-realization to break out of a cycle.
Brah, I promise you I’m not deflecting. I’m trying to help you realize that women have contributed to 50% of the survival of the species for 10,000 years.

Women are not your enemy.
 
The division between men and women in the present is mostly engineered either purposely and somewhat accidentally due to how our society developed. This is especially true in the US. This crosses all racial, and cultural lines. White men and white women shit on each other, while you will find literally endless examples of black men and black women going at it, while Asian men and Asian women too have their differences, I mean just look at r/hapa. The powers that be can see this division like anyone else can clear as day, and will exploit it for as long as possible.
Women have no morals, no ideas or thoughts-you think men are hedonistic, you have not seen the lengths women will go to experience nothing but pleasure, only pleasure with nothing else even imagined.
Women are not alien, nonhuman beings that don't have the same thoughts as men do. Yes women are certainly different than men, and yes there is a good chance that a woman may react differently to certain situations than a man would. If women were truly like this then there wouldn't be any successful female leaders in history. That is not the case since we do have historical records of good female rulers. Men and women are different and that's ok since that's how we were designed. Men may have built the majority of our current civilization and history, but that doesn't mean women are subhuman.

If we want to play the morality game then men lose hands down. The vast majority of murders, genocides, wars, rapes, mutilation, and whatever horrible thing committed in history were mostly committed by men. 120 days of sodom was written by a "man".

Yes there are of course evil women in history, female serial killers and the like but for every 10 that you show me I can show you 100 men. Either men have a far greater capacity for committing these crimes (most likely), or women are more moral. My biggest issue however is that when women do commit these acts they are given slaps on the wrist by the justice system like "they don't know any better" or people just don't care. Woman rapes a kid? "Damn I wish I had teachers like that!" Man rapes a kid? "Give him the chair!" when in reality they both need the chair.

Men grow up loving an ideal construct of women-whether that's Arthurian ladies, or Anime GFs that will take on the world with you and stand by you even if you walk into Hell itself. This ideal is beautiful, but every single woman does not meet it.
Men are retarded in this aspect and I agree. It is imperative that if any of you have children boy or girl you DO NOT have them believe in the "disney" romance BS when they get older. Yeah sure have them be innocent at first, but when puberty starts rolling around its a good time to tell the truth about human relationships and how they will be hurt, there is no "perfect" partner, and all the stuff they see in media is 100% fake. There is more to tell your teens about relationships than just "the birds and the bees" But to play devils advocate for women I will say expecting them to meet some fictional ideal is ludicrous.
 
Last edited:
Brah, I promise you I’m not deflecting. I’m trying to help you realize that women have contributed to 50% of the survival of the species for 10,000 years.

Women are not your enemy.
And plenty have more men have died childless so they could.

Main supporters of mutilating the genitals of children, advocates for big daddy government, constantly turn to men to solve issues as they look down on them, and rarely ever accepting responsibility for their own mistakes until it's far too late. If they're not my enemy, they sure as hell are making it hard to not consider them such while they advocate for taking my rights and livelihood away for carrying views that offend their delicate sensibilities.
This article was really bad and I’m unsure why there are ten pages of discussion spurred by it
gender wars
 
If "I" were given supreme authority to re order society as I saw fit, I would implement the most severe and pitiless patriarchal system conceivable.

Women would have no rights period. They would regularly have their tongues and limbs removed, a man's pleasure and joy would be of paramount importance. Worth the suffering of all the women in existence.

I would make use of in vitro fertilization and cloning to provide every man with at least a single wife, and perhaps more besides. Girls would be told from their birth they are inferior and they're entire purpose in existence is to serve men forever. If they rebelled? They would be made examples of in the cruelest ways imaginable.

It would make the greatest misogynists in history blush, and it would endure for a million years. Because women would be subjugated permanently, I would endeavor to render the concept of feminism unthinkable in the female brain, and to break the very spirit of independent thought and emotion women unfortunately possess.

It would be a glorious and beautiful society, but sadly since I have not been given this authority it will not come to be...
 
Main supporters of mutilating the genitals of children, advocates for big daddy government, constantly turn to men to solve issues as they look down on them, and rarely ever accepting responsibility for their own mistakes until it's far too late. If they're not my enemy, they sure as hell are making it hard to while they advocate for taking my rights and livelihood away for carrying views that offend their delicate sensibilities.
I don’t disagree with this point but remember that men generally support promiscuity (even though it always backfires and women tend to have more sex), dehumanizing women, and abandoning their children.

The collapse of the nuclear family is a street that goes both ways. It’s just easier to see your own grievances because they affect you. Since women are less logical, they have a harder time articulating the issues they face. It’s up to us as men to realize where we need to correct society and act accordingly. At the end of the day, we both want very similar things. The only difference is I think men also need to correct some behaviors as well.
 
I don’t disagree with this point but remember that men generally support promiscuity (even though it always backfires and women tend to have more sex), dehumanizing women, and abandoning their children.

The collapse of the nuclear family is a street that goes both ways. It’s just easier to see your own grievances because they affect you. Since women are less logical, they have a harder time articulating the issues they face. It’s up to us as men to realize where we need to correct society and act accordingly. At the end of the day, we both want very similar things. The only difference is I think men also need to correct some behaviors as well.
Trash men and trash women support all of that, women can't think on their own, and we need to return to tradition. Gotcha. Unironically, I think we are on the same side. Sluts of both genders need a beating until they learn to behave and be functional members of society instead of walking, self-propagating disasters.
 
You can't "correct" society. The current trends are accelerating and have the full support of the PTB. You as an individual are powerless regardless of your individual choices, or what vices you rid yourself of.

The only way things change is an actual political revolution entailing tens of millions hanging from lampposts from DC to LA. If you can't do that, then none of the problems addressed in the article or comments here will improve.
 
The only difference is I think men also need to correct some behaviors as well.
If men as a whole exercised some basic level of quality control not sticking their dicks in fat uggo dangerhairs things could change around very quickly. Even the worst women can get laid, can't say the same for the worst men. Generalizing of course.
 
Internet porn has really fucked up people by giving them weird ideas about how sex is supposed to work. Most women don't thrash around and scream during (consensual) sex, like to be choked, or enjoy anal, but they do their best to imitate porn, wind up hating it,

I've had the opposite experience. I always thought porn was for show. But no. Some girls do like slapping, choking, and in rare cases cutting, watersports etc. I had a girlfriend so obsessed with anal I had to forcibly hold her because she kept on trying to move her ass in range all the time. She thought that was a fun game.

One girl I broke up with told me she hoped I would break into her house and rape her sometime.

Women are fucking fucked up man.
 
Last edited:
As I said before: these single moms likely thumbed their noses at me when we were younger. Why should I suddenly give a fuck that they made a mistake and got impregnated by an asshole?
Too true, it isn't endearing to be told in your late 30's early 40's that "you'll do" , caring for a kid that isn't even yours by a woman who's run out of options "A" through "Y" and is willing to settle.
 
What did you expect, you made it all but illegal for me and many others to go out and socialize for years. Tinder hookup culture sucks, and its hard to organically encounter people, form relationships and explore dating opportunities when I can see half a persons face from six feet away under the watchful eye of the police making sure I'm only doing my designated grocery run for the week. I wonder how much of this is just from men and women like me who were casually in 'the game' before, stepped out with the apocalypse, and now its been so long, we don't really see much appeal in stepping back in - the situation hasn't improved, and odds are we've filled that time in our lives with something else.

I won't wade into the whole shitty men vs shitty women debate going on, other than to mention that it feels like its harder for me to find intellectually honest people. Not smart people, there's plenty of smart women I've met, but smart women (and men) who aren't deliberately blinding themselves to reality for ideological reasons, or smart people who refuse to ever actually learn. Nothing worse than talking with someone who's got self induced brainrot of the political or ignorant varieties. You don't even need to be smart, just passionate and knowledgeable about something.
 
What did you expect, you made it all but illegal for me and many others to go out and socialize for years. Tinder hookup culture sucks, and its hard to organically encounter people, form relationships and explore dating opportunities when I can see half a persons face from six feet away under the watchful eye of the police making sure I'm only doing my designated grocery run for the week. I wonder how much of this is just from men and women like me who were casually in 'the game' before, stepped out with the apocalypse, and now its been so long, we don't really see much appeal in stepping back in - the situation hasn't improved, and odds are we've filled that time in our lives with something else.
extroverts finally learned to live with themselves and i am so proud of them
now if only they could shut up about how awesome getting drunk at a place you can barely hear yourself totally is
 
I've had the opposite experience. I always thought porn was for show. But no. Some girls do like slapping, choking, and in rare cases cutting, watersports. I had a girlfriend so obsessed with anal I had to forcibly hold her because she kept on trying to move her ass in range all the time. She thought that was a fun game.

One girl I broke up with told me she hoped I would break into her house and rape her sometime.

Women are fucking fucked up man.
It's absolutely the case that women can be messed up-- that said, I think you were dealing with a particular kind of woman.

I've had a woman wipe makeup she was trying on onto my jacket sleeve without hesitation. I've had women I wasn't intimate with and otherwise wasn't doing anything with do stuff like play with my ears apropos of nothing. I've had one case do things that could constitute sexual assault if she didn't listen to me tell her to stop for the fourth time. Before I learned to value my personal space, a woman grabbed my groin in plain view of our group of friends.

Something something "muh sexes reversed". On some level, these women consider men to be akin to walking pleasure devices that will entertain them (generally or sexually) on demand. More than that, though-- and part of the reason they think/act that way-- is that they're not sober-minded. They're riding the highs of whatever emotions they're feeling in that moment without ever thinking to temper that emotionality with rationality, because they don't have to, because they're subconsciously counting on something (not even men or a man, specifically) to cover them.

I'm not sure if any of these women you've talked about have described themselves as a "storm" or if you understand them to be a regular participant in "drama", but those are presumably symptoms of this mindset. Women who are actively asking to be put in existentially compromising circumstances have never in their lives been exposed to the danger that such circumstances have. If they're not just drunk off the idea, they're drunk off processing the transgressive nature of the act since they've never been forced to worry about the injury, illness or death that can result from the crazy stuff they've cooked up if it turns out the guy that was willing to choke them was also willing to see the light in their eyes die.

I doubt these women are uncommon. Still, they're a particular kind of woman.

(As an aside, this might be the very first point where adult women-- if their upbringing didn't help them-- have to learn to "settle" and not give chase in the direction their fancy points, and most women have the sense to at least settle on not opening themselves to being choked to death.)
 
Last edited:
Back