Brenda Tits
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2021
Oh my life the testicle(s).@Tard Whisperer cant quote your post but I noticed an uncanny resemblance:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh my life the testicle(s).@Tard Whisperer cant quote your post but I noticed an uncanny resemblance:
I've seen more convincing fake nads getting BTFOed at the local dog show.@Tard Whisperer cant quote your post but I noticed an uncanny resemblance:
All of them will have kidney issues later in life (if they last long to see it). Multiple infections, NSAID chronic use, acute loss of blood, nephrotoxic medication, obstructive urinary syndrome... I bet some of them had an acute kidney injury, and that means chronic kidney disease in the future. These arms won't help the girls, and some guys probably won't be candidates to peritoneal dialysis.The hands remind me of people who've had multiple dialysis fistulae on the same limb/multiple recanalizations of failed fistulae, or a vascular steal hand.
...jeez, these ladies are all about a life of recurrent UTIs and urinary outlet problems, starting in their 20s. Some of them are going to need a dialysis fistula, and they'll already be one arm down for vascular access options.
Even now I am surprised why surgery like this is even legal. If this were any other sort of plastic surgery procedure, it would have been outlawed years ago for both the expected outcomes and complications that inevitably result.All of them will have kidney issues later in life (if they last long to see it). Multiple infections, NSAID chronic use, acute loss of blood, nephrotoxic medication, obstructive urinary syndrome... I bet some of them had an acute kidney injury, and that means chronic kidney disease in the future. These arms won't help the girls, and some guys probably won't be candidates to peritoneal dialysis.
Not clear on what you're insinuating. Remember this woman isn't claiming to be a medical expert or provider. She has a BA and essentially worked as Receptionist+.That said...
There are several technical and structural peculiarities of Jamie Reed's affidavit itself that are making me uneasy. I'm not going to get specific because I don't wish to provide ammunition to those trying to discredit her. However, I'm concerned that someone with even a passing knowledge of medicine or the relevant science could raise questions regarding whether Reed has a sufficient grasp of the theoretical underpinnings of her statements and whether she is even qualified to make some of the assertions she does.
I want to be clear that I believe that the premise is solid and her statements factual. The devil is in the details, though, and I have reservations about the manner of expression. I'm curious about how this affidavit came about. It's troubling to me that anyone who might have something important to say would not bother to write well enough to be taken seriously or verify the technical details of their claims.
Tl,dr: Jesus Christ, hire a technical writer.
She has a master's degree, but that's not what I meant. I just think she should have stuck to the known facts that were in her bailiwick. Some of the medical details that she included are straight up wrong, and I struggle to see why she brought them up at all. It just provides an opportunity for someone to discredit the entire thing.Not clear on what you're insinuating. Remember this woman isn't claiming to be a medical expert or provider. She has a BA and essentially worked as Receptionist+.
*her- it's a pooner troonShe has a master's degree, but that's not what I meant. I just think she should have stuck to the known facts that were in her bailiwick. Some of the medical details that she included are straight up wrong, and I struggle to see why she brought them up at all. It just provides an opportunity for someone to discredit the entire thing.
She's also married to a troon and raising children with him, so that really gives me pause.
I think the surgeons that do SRS are probably even more dysfunctional than troons themselves in some cases.One of the things I go back to: If you did this procedure on a dog, even if you thought you were "helping" the dog, you would probably go to jail for animal cruelty.
How many other human medical procedures would send you to jail if you were to do them on a dog?
Yes, yes there is!!I think the surgeons that do SRS are probably even more dysfunctional than troons themselves in some cases.
Is there a "detransitioner" flag, yet?
Let me guess...posting one on most websites and social media platforms automatically nets you a permaban, now.Yes, yes there is!!View attachment 4574220
That's one visually-confusing set of genitals. The phallus is so perfectly cylindrical, but then the end is a little sunken clitoral head that's becoming an innie again.Found the weirdest meta ever.
2 weeks post-op by dr. Özer u/melkdipje
Considering the hack jobs that pass for mastectomies I don't think any of these surgeons are particularly skilled.Call me a simpleton, but if that’s the case, then why is the forearm considered a good option for the donor tissue? Or, if they’re going to take it from there, why not go less deep? And is surgeon skill an element, either in precision of depth, or just overall minimization of potential permanent harm? I mean, I suppose surgeon skill is always an element of that for anything, but I mean - does this kind of outcome mean that the surgeon was sub-par, or is it an inherent risk and probable outcome no matter who performs it?
Impaired leg is worse ?Considering the hack jobs that pass for mastectomies I don't think any of these surgeons are particularly skilled.
So why exactly isnt the thigh used more often? Seems like 90% of them utilize the arm, which based on eye test alone leaves it marred and impaired(seriously shit gives me the same sinking feeling in my stomach that seeing an amputee does). Imagine losing your arm because of one of these operations, the amount of regret, and anger that would result could destroy a person.
Disagree, but also the scarring I've seen from the thigh grafts don't really look that bad.Impaired leg is worse ?
The fact that it is so reflective and smooth looking in the light makes her mangled genitalia look like a silicone prosthetic.That's one visually-confusing set of genitals. The phallus is so perfectly cylindrical, but then the end is a little sunken clitoral head that's becoming an innie again.
It's like someone attached a miniature version of a pocket pussy in place of a penis.
And also they cost like $30.She should have saved herself the trouble and gotten a double-ended strap-on so she could larp as a male without destroying her ability to even have sex at all.
Very interesting to know I will say that Ashton doesn't seem to have the same weird concave scar that a lot of other trannies do. I think she got lucky in this regard because I see people who look like God damn ghouls from fallout.Skeletal muscle can regenerate, as it contains myosatellite cells that are basically stem cells that are found in skeletal muscle tissue that can give rise to new muscle fibers. However, it is a slow, and lengthy process, and if the skeletal muscle injury is too great, the affected muscle will often just fill the damaged area with scar tissue.
What happens with these phalloplasty donor sites, is that the underlying innervation and blood supply of the muscle often gets damaged in the aftermath of tissue harvesting to create the neophallus in addition to the risk of damaging the integrity of the surface musculature itself due to how deep the surgeon often goes when they "peel" off the surface layers of skin and other connective tissues.
Since skeletal muscle needs functional innervation and circulation to maintain tone and regulation, if the nerves or vascularity in the area are damaged, the muscle tissue that is associated with it will shrink and permanently atrophy as a result.