Science Women Are Much More Selective And Find 80% Of Men Unattractive On Dating Apps, Per Recent Research

Link (Archive)

Women Are Much More Selective And Find 80% Of Men Unattractive On Dating Apps, Per Recent Research​

At this point just about everyone has had some kind of experience in the dating app world, whether it's brief or it led us to find our spouse. Research shows that women are actually much more selective on these platforms than men are.

It's no secret that the dating scene isn't exactly hospitable for singles these days, and even though there are fewer people getting married than ever before, there are more than enough people out there looking for a relationship of some kind. In 2020, it was estimated that 44.2 million people used online dating services in the US and it's predicted that this number will increase to 53.3 million in 2025. But recent research shows that women are actually much pickier about which men they find attractive, and it's likely harming their chance at finding their husband.

Women Are Much More Selective on Dating Apps Than Men Are, per Recent Research​

Twitter user @datepsych, Alexander, regularly posts content about dating statistics and compelling behavioral research, and his bio indicates that his research interests are specifically in "attractiveness & dating." He shared a thread called "new study on male dating app profiles and matches," quoting a line from the research, "Only one profile out of 100 was liked by more than 80% of women."
087D56FF-9D7C-486D-9557-E2C983248FDB.jpeg
The study finds that women only swipe right 30% of the time; about 20% of all female dating app users also turn down more than 80% of the potential male suitors on the apps. The results showed that out of a group of 100 profiles of bachelors, only 1 profile was "liked" by more than 80% of the women, and yet 38 of the profiles were "disliked" by that same group of participants.

"This is an effect that I have described in the past. Although we see high inter-rater agreement on attractiveness, agreement of individual pairs in a sample can be much lower. In other words, there can be high disagreement even for what an attractive face is," Andrew tweets.
Popular YouTube channel Better Bachelor posted a similar video explaining how women are only selecting the top 1% of men to be their potential mate, demanding that their future husband have a six-pack, a six-figure income, fancy car, and a fantastic sense of humor, among other things. Meanwhile, an OkCupid study found that women find 80% of men unattractive on dating apps.

Alexander also pointed out on Twitter that women generally aren't interested in huge age gaps, which is to be expected. "Age predicted attractiveness ratings and swipes for men: men too much older, or too much younger, than the women were penalized," he wrote. "Pretty consistent with past research indicating that women don't like large age gaps." The study also confirmed that any profiles that didn't have clear, high-resolution photos generated much less interest. Attraction is reported as a top factor for selection, but it also matters if the pictures are of good quality.
6BCD048A-1F66-4F48-B728-3C8842171090.jpegA71439C6-3D3A-42B9-A0E6-43E29DC604B5.jpeg
This makes many people feel less sympathetic to the women who complain about the lack of success they've had on dating apps. At some point, they have to admit that they're not helping their chances by being hyper-selective, especially if they're not in the top 1% themselves.
 
Nature is a bitch when it comes to mate selection. Either dance harder or go home alone.
or pick up the guns and knives

I don't know why people insist on applying stats about dating apps to the rest of reality.
because the people using those apps arent some special separate species from the rest of us, they're normal people so information and data about them applies to society at large
 
I don't know why people insist on applying stats about dating apps to the rest of reality.

If you go outside you will see all kinds of ugly awful people who are partnered up. They did not meet each other on apps.

If you are ugly and awful there is hope for you!
Jokes aside, trying to talk to people in public is fucking weird these days when they're looking at their phones.
 
Ironically, that top 20% of males have the least reason to stick with one woman since they have their pick of anybody.
Which is also born out in the real life data on how many times the super-desirable guy breaks up/divorces his current fling and picks up another.... which always comes as a complete SHOCK to the woman in question.

Despite the fact she probably poached him the same way that was just done to her.
 
It's over just LDAR

I'd be curious to know who these women are exactly using them. If they are all Lindsey Nagle types than I can see it. Most women don't need dating apps to find a man so who are these women?

Dating apps are made for the quick sex experience without risking to be seen as a slut by their friends, co-workers and relatives.
A lot of women on dating apps are ugly af. There are some real hotties too, but they mostly have some issues.
You see very few decent mid-tier women there.
 
It’s also true that women don’t care about how men look like men care about how women look, and a lot of the way men react to this (old) news really loses sight of that fact. They assume that they’ve blown their own mind, when really they’re just wishing they had more options (which is a default position).

It’s unfair if you’re really trying to get a quick smash in though, you will need to be a fine man to get that easily.

I’ve just never seen the fire here no matter how often it gets brought up. There’s a reason it’s a finding talked about by PUAs and nobody else.
 
Back