Gross Aella Martin / Rachael Antier Slick / Abigail Glass / @Aella_Girl / @Aellagirl / @Miss_Aella / u/Sweatywoman / RedVerse / Apostate Slick / Knowingless - Rationalist LessWrong poly libertarian hooker girl throwing rape orgy parties. Former $100k/month OnlyFans star and $3,000/hour prostitute. Would rather come up with gross hypotheticals than shower.

[Tom Myers]

 

[Sprate Header]

View attachment 4589018View attachment 4589001View attachment 4589013

The phrase "nonviolently raped" just feels so fucking gross to read

 

[Dr. Butt]

The phrase "nonviolently raped" just feels so fucking gross to read

That tweet makes it sound like she literally does not understand that when you are raped, you DO NOT WANT the sex. It is not sex, the fun activity you do with the person you are in love with; it is a physical assault on your very being. She really, honestly, doesn't think that every single person on the planet would rather be mugged than raped? That's pretty fucked in the head if you ask me (no one asked me).

 

[GeorgeApley]

Everybody talks about her only showering 37 times in a year, but what really horrifies me is the amount of times she's taken a shit in a year. I don't know about you guys, but I usually take a shit once a day unless I'm out camping or am separated from decent shitting facilities for some other reason, so the idea of not shitting for almost 200 days out of the year is totally alien to me. I can't even begin to imagine how horrible it would feel to regularly carry around shit in your body for 3 days straight, and am absolutely confounded by the concept that someone would just fucking accept this as a way to live.

Constipation like that is a very common (like 100% of the time) side effect of opiate use

 

[Tomato flowers]

Whatever happened between her and her father was heinous enough that neither one of them will breathe a word to this day.

Juxtapose that with her non-consensual kink and “rather be raped or mugged” questions… ick.

 

[Mods Are Gay]

Whatever happened between her and her father was heinous enough that neither one of them will breathe a word to this day.

Juxtapose that with her non-consensual kink and “rather be raped or mugged” questions… ick.

This is what I’m saying. My first thought upon reading the bribe request was to think it came from someone related to her father’s ministry. Aella is internet-savvy enough to know this thread is here to stay.

 

[keke]

I’m just here to say: Watched a minute of one of her Destiny stream appearances recently (no surprise there, she normalizes pedo, incest, and zoophile shit he’s gotta have her on) during the deepfake AI twitch porn thing and the first thing I hear is “I was molested when I was ten and it didn’t really impact me.…“ pause, convo goes on, then adds “At the time I didn’t like it but there was no trauma.”

Bitch said this deadass serious as if the molested to prostitution pipline isn’t the punchline to 1000 jokes

Context was her saying the response to trauma can be more traumatising than the actual events. The example she gave was her casually mentioning being molested one time and people replying with normal things like “omg that’s so awful”. Apparently this response is worse than the scars of molestation. Lol. Knows nothing about even the tiniest base fact about psychology, calls herself a sex researcher for doing Reddit level philosophy. Lex Fridman is a retard for accrediting her.

Spoiler

There’s a stonetoss comic for her brand of genius

Edit: also plz someone ask Null in his next stream about how her AI child abuse material idea is useless, he mentioned it briefly and I’m interested in his particular explanation why, due to his unique experience with pedos on 8chan.

 

[Dr. Butt]

I wish this bint was a troon so JKR could do something to get rid of her.

 

[Sprate Header]

I’m just here to say: Watched a minute of one of her Destiny stream appearances recently (no surprise there, she normalizes pedo, incest, and zoophile shit he’s gotta have her on) during the deepfake AI twitch porn thing and the first thing I hear is “I was molested when I was ten and it didn’t really impact me.…“ pause, convo goes on, then adds “At the time I didn’t like it but there was no trauma.”

Bitch said this deadass serious as if the molested to prostitution pipline isn’t the punchline to 1000 jokes

Context was her saying the response to trauma can be more traumatising than the actual events. The example she gave was her casually mentioning being molested one time and people saying every normal things like “omg that’s so awful”. Apparently this is worse than the scars of molestation. Lol. Knows nothing about even the tiniest base fact about psychology, calls herself a sex researcher for doing Reddit level philosophy. Lex Fridman is a retard for accrediting her.

Spoiler

There’s a stonetoss comic for her brand of genius
View attachment 4590893

Edit: also plz someone ask Null in his next stream about how her AI child abuse material idea is useless, he mentioned it briefly and I’m interested in his particular explanation why, due to his unique experience with pedos on 8chan.

Spoiler: Alternative

 

[Markass the Worst]

View attachment 4591308

Spoiler: Alternative

View attachment 4591341

"Non-violent rape" is Aella's version of "consent accident".

 

[Freya]

How far gone is a person that uses the phrase "vanilla orgy"

 

[AirdropShitposts]

The whore wanting "professional, clean-cut men" is a huge tell. She doesn't want a man who has baggage, but is dejected that those same men are not willing to overlook the decade she spent being a whore. Even if people on the Internet were honest with her, and told her that, yeah, professional clean-cut men in their 30s are not looking for 35-year old camwhores, I doubt she would have listened or changed her lifestyle in any way.

I look at it differently, the most repellant thing about her "sex work" is that she's made it her personality. As others have mentioned, she's not really that committed to the bit. It's more like trying to find an acceptable way of being mildly exhibitionist by leveraging online progressive social mores. To me, she's not really selling the "I totally love sex" thing, it's more like she's trying to sell the idea that she should be thought of as someone who really loves sex. I didn't follow that link to all 50GB or whatever but her porn seems rather unremarkable, she's targeting a somewhat specific niche of people rather deliberately. I'm not saying there's nothing there for certain people to enjoy, I'm saying the whole aspect seems "off" like her rationalism, libertarianism, research, etc.

I think the comparisons to the porn star trying to go mainstream who broke her tailbone at TwitchCon, Adriana Chechik, is somewhat illustrative. Their interviews on various channels or podcasts (some the same) are very different in terms of the persona and brand they're trying to create. It's ironically the one with 1300 or more professional scenes that very broadly cover popular porn topics such as multiple award winning gangbangs, who knows how much internet content that may skirt local obscenity laws, etc. that seems to be both more human and more honest about sex. Also, if you married her she probably wouldn't make you take endless online surveys.

 

[BoglimArchives]

Hi Markass, I'm a longtime lurker who came across this thread. Is there a way I can private message you about something? Or do you have to message me first?

Thanks! here's to hoping you see this

Hello again, Corey Trevor here from the Moderation team of The Kiwi Farms.

I see you didn't deposit the $5000 dollars into the BitCoin escrow within the allotted time limit, as requested. I gather it's not for a lack of funds, but simply because you didn't take me as both a man of professionalism and seriousness.

You have both insulted me and insulted the future former United States Marines that operate under my employ by impugning both our honor and patience.

Errors have been made today and none by myself, madam. This thread will remain unless you pay me $10,000. The cost of insulting me exceeds far beyond a mere $5,000, however I am a generous if not reasonable man. You have 24 hours, madam.

Your pockets may not have limitations, but my kindness does. Let this be a lesson.

Semper Fidelis to all our armed forces.

 

[keke]

Fuck it I finally understand all those Muslims saying the West is a culture of decadence and degeneracy that needs to be destroyed.

Thought about this for ten seconds so dont take it too seriously, just food for thought:

Reminds me of that Chinese ideological theorist Wang Huning. One of the seven most powerful people in the Chinese government. Basically says the same shit except blames capitalism like a good commie but more specifically, and more interestingly, blames the commodification of absolutely everything. Including sex. This can be compared with destigmatisation and normalisation.

Spoiler: Rest of post ramble

One thing I really cannot stand about Aella and people like her is firstly, the divorcing of morality from philosophy - because they think anything that’s morality/seen as ethical because it’s a law is not rational, when laws only exist because of morality [source: my bro Aristotle for example]. If you’re going to pose philosophical questions, then you cannot simply reject any morality-based answers as if it a) does not inform ethics and b) does not inform philosophy.

This all relates to one point: That line of thinking and rationalising of everything [aka being irrational by ignoring humanity when it is illogical do to so since, check self, we’re humans] might be how civilisations cease to be civilised. Maybe humans need simple rules like “don’t abuse dogs” [even tho factory farms! even tho eat meat!] or ”no making AI generated child abuse material free, easy to access and legal“ to be better equipped to deal with each other peacefully. Common values. As Wang Huning thinks: the West is too decadent to survive, so China can just sit back and let the West’s appetites take it where they will.

By the way, the China theorist inclusion is solely because Huning has some valid criticisms of the west, pointed it out in 1988, and one symptom is things seen in Aella’s twitter polls lol. The kind of thing that’s so potent it’s been identified as country-destroying by people very invested in accurately determining this so to avoid destruction by that same fate.

 

[Mister Rogers]

This is what I’m saying. My first thought upon reading the bribe request was to think it came from someone related to her father’s ministry. Aella is internet-savvy enough to know this thread is here to stay.

I theorized the same just a little above. The "I don't know how you sleep at night" seems like something a more religious person might say? IDK. (I'm religious and my opinion is that Aella's brought all this on herself, but who knows what others may think.)

 

[Markass the Worst]

A few days ago, Aella posted on the Effective Altruism forum directly talking about this very thread, along with various other criticisms of her and EA (mostly about the TIME article going over claims of sexual harassment). It's titled "People Will Sometimes Just Lie About You", which is hilarious, because nothing in my OP is a lie. (archive)

Hi, Aella!



@Alfred MacDonald this directly talks about you and your posts here.

By the way, you can read the entire thing if you want (it is extremely, extremely long, which is typical of rationalists). Not once does it mention anything in my OP as being false, because it's all true. She has literally advocated for AI-generated child pornography to flood the market, and she has never addressed having such a deranged take. Not in this post, not ever.

 

[grapeshark77]

A few days ago, Aella posted on the Effective Altruism forum directly talking about this very thread, along with various other criticisms of her and EA (mostly about the TIME article going over claims of sexual harassment). It's titled "People Will Sometimes Just Lie About You", which is hilarious, because nothing in my OP is a lie. (archive)

Hi, Aella!

View attachment 4592230
View attachment 4592237
@Alfred MacDonald this directly talks about you and your posts here.

By the way, you can read the entire thing if you want (it is extremely, extremely long, which is typical of rationalists). Not once does it mention anything in my OP as being false, because it's all true. She has literally advocated for AI-generated child pornography to flood the market, and she has never addressed having such a deranged take. Not in this post, not ever.

The comments are pretty funny, it starts with a ton of people saying YES, everybody LIES about me! And then this happens:





First guy gets her dead to rights (and doesn't know who she is), another guy doesn't know who she is either, and then this person trying to explain that she's totally a celebrity wants to know why they're getting downvoted. Comedy gold.

 

[Sprate Header]

A few days ago, Aella posted on the Effective Altruism forum directly talking about this very thread, along with various other criticisms of her and EA (mostly about the TIME article going over claims of sexual harassment). It's titled "People Will Sometimes Just Lie About You", which is hilarious, because nothing in my OP is a lie. (archive)

Hi, Aella!

View attachment 4592230
View attachment 4592237
@Alfred MacDonald this directly talks about you and your posts here.

By the way, you can read the entire thing if you want (it is extremely, extremely long, which is typical of rationalists). Not once does it mention anything in my OP as being false, because it's all true. She has literally advocated for AI-generated child pornography to flood the market, and she has never addressed having such a deranged take. Not in this post, not ever.

Publicly accusing people of lying and not demonstrating how is like, soooo rational, guys. That's like one of Yud's first Sequences, c'mon man!

The comments are pretty funny, it starts with a ton of people saying YES, everybody LIES about me! And then this happens:

View attachment 4592796

View attachment 4592800

First guy gets her dead to rights (and doesn't know who she is), another guy doesn't know who she is either, and then this person trying to explain that she's totally a celebrity wants to know why they're getting downvoted. Comedy gold.

LMAO at the fact other rationalists are like "yeah, shit man, looks like the only thing you can do to combat this is spin a narrative"

Also lol'd at the guy asking wtf this has to do with effective altruism, cuz I was kind of passively wondering that too.

 

[Bonesjones]

The comments are pretty funny, it starts with a ton of people saying YES, everybody LIES about me! And then this happens:

View attachment 4592796

View attachment 4592800

First guy gets her dead to rights (and doesn't know who she is), another guy doesn't know who she is either, and then this person trying to explain that she's totally a celebrity wants to know why they're getting downvoted. Comedy gold.

Why do people who pretend to be smart just use more words to say things?

 

[Alfred MacDonald]

CATTY GAY MAN ALARM HAS BEEN SOUNDED

Undear Aella,

Why am I responding on KiwiFarms? Why not just post this on my own social media?

Because:

1. I have
2. You'll ignore that
3. You'll pay attention to this

So, this works for now.

Anyway, you will notice a theme throughout these:

"none of these were what I intended to do!"​

*twinks dimples* "how shall I bear it?!"​

*faints on 1950s couch*​

The Institutions™ which Aella views as beneath her have an already-ready answer for this kind of fuckery: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intention_(criminal_law)#The_test_of_intent

Yeah, you kinda did, girl. It didn't match your internal experience? Dude, my mom thinks you are a fuckgirl, and she barely understands the internet and is just figuring out how to use YouTube to watch gardening videos. We've all been fucked in a way that's contrary to our experience. I'm sure a bunch of people reading this right now are familiar with signing a job contract we ended up hating. The reality of getting health insurance for my brain condition didn't match my internal experience when I was getting fucked (in a different and much more substantial sense) so why is your internal experience special? Shall we #BelieveAella?

P.S. Protip: when you do university writing, there is no "presenting as fact." There is a spectrum of "worthless opinion" to "well-established opinion" (aka fact). If you bothered to spend any of your fortune on tutoring — you could have done a whole degree off the books part-time with your wealth — you'd know this.

You were constantly the center of attention and had every opportunity to address it, you simple-ass duckling. You were around the conversation; you heard the secondhand. One of your powermoves is acting naive and innocent — you knew exactly what was going on, and most of the women around me were pissed at you for it. If you truly, in all honesty had no idea what happened... try not organizing social events! Your blind spots create problems for others, and this is being euphemistic.

Do you know what your bodyguard said when the mother and I brought him water — because you weren't paying attention to him?

"She set up this whole thing, brought her boyfriend, and still hired a bodyguard."

You have an audience of, what, 10,000? I can see through you, but these are blissfully ignorant autists. Spare them your bullshit.

One day I want to give you a proctored LSAT so that I know if your ability for critical reading comprehension is a brain defect or if you're doing it intentionally.

You moved to a different spot because you weren't getting the attention you wanted.

And, in a given Aella conversation, you want to be the center of attention. With the exception of the ONE time you were drunk in discord and acted like a cool normal chick, you have made conscious and deliberate efforts to center the conversation either around you or to a conversation you initiated. You are self-centered as a rule, and somehow only when your inhibitions are down do you become tolerable. This is something to bring up with your therapist, but in the mean time, holy shit you act like a lizardperson. (Except the rare times when you are drunk. You are normal then. What the hell?)

And,

Anyone who reads what I say in context is going to walk away with the impression that you did these things because you were not the center of attention.

You are right: it's completely normal to walk away from a conversation you don't want to be part of.

You are right: It's completely normal to leave a conversation you're not interested in.

You are not right:

You left the conversation because it wasn't satisfying your ego, not because you "weren't interested in joining the topic." The topic was not-you. Yes, you will be not interested in that.

You are also not right:

No girl, you put the questions in there so you could be the object of attention, not because you were "interested" in them. If a card game consisted solely of questions you were interested in, it would begin with the net worth of every hetero/bi male in the room.


You are also not right:

No one does this. It's especially rude to, as a social response, stare at the ceiling like a child when you know everyone is going to pay attention to you because you are hosting the event.

The homeschool energy radiating from your replies is a massive aura surrounding your comments like the Wakanda shield.

90+% of your audience is going to eat this shit up. But if I post it here, you'll see it, and they'll see it, and shit will be stirred up as it should.

You're one of the most scheming, hollow people I've ever met and you give me the fucking creeps.

Anyway.

This is just a hostile reminder that I hope this reply finds you harmfully!

Disregards,
— Alfred​