Jim Sterling / James "Stephanie" Sterling / James Stanton/Sexton & in memoriam TotalBiscuit (John Bain) - One Gaming Lolcow Thread

I don't really get the purpose of these videos celebrating losing subscribers.
It's simple. As I said before in this thread, the only thing left of Jim's content is spite and self indulgence.

Due to his low self esteem he needs to have this public display of coping, sneeding and dialation. He can't help himself but to indulge in the creation of this public display to show the rest of his dying audience that he is still funny and totally not bothered by the lowering numbers of patrons and subscribers. While still being spiteful to those who left, calling them transphobic, assholes, Nazis or whatever new term he can come up with.

Either that or he has a rampant self humiliation fetish.

Edit: Watched the video and It's a bit funny that what I said above is still correct. Self indulgent video of people congratulating him on losing subs and him coping about it. Being spiteful by reading hate comments of former fans. Lmao.
 
Last edited:
1676946574259.png
Twitt Twatt Twitter Rat.
Do not open.
Legit.
I am warning you.
1676946757751.png
 
I'm not going to watch the video in a non-private browser window with my account actually logged in so I won't be able to comment this via YouTube but since we know Jim reads the thread it wont matter.

I've also said this before but I'll repeat myself and elaborate a bit.

Jim, the reason I stopped watching your content has less to do with the trans bullshit and more to do with the compromised integrity that comes with it.

I watched Total Biscuit because he had integrity. Whether you agreed with him or not you knew his opinions and reviews were untainted by corporate/developer influence. They were not bought and paid for like most of games media was at that time and still is today.

When TB passed I saw you as the next best option in terms of reviewer integrity. There is also Yahtzee from Zero Punctuation but thats a different form of content. While you didnt go through the options menu like TB did you still used to be able to deliver games reviews and industry commentary with a unique and uncompromising perspective that was also somewhat entertaining.

Since you began your transition, or tbh a bit before hand, you've sold out that integrity, you've compromised that perspective, in order to tow the troon line. What do I mean by that?

Well lets use Hogwarts Legacy as a timely example.

Your commentary on Hogwarts Legacy had nothing to do with the quality of the game or really anything to do with the game itself. Instead you spent the entire time harping on the fact that the IP is owned by someone who's political and world views you don't like and attempting to guilt trip anyone who does like the game into not playing it. And thats coming from someone who doesnt like Harry Potter media because its cringe and dumb in the first place.

In other words, the game doesnt matter anymore, only its socio-political context. I would say thats what a lot of the "too political" complaints are getting at more than anything to do with capitalism. Personally I've always know that you were on the left side of things and was able to decipher your content through that lens despite disagreeing with it in some ways. I even appreciated keeping rampant pofiteering in check to a degree when it comes to predatory micro-transactions and related business practices. On those things you have my agreement because they negatively impact ones ability to enjoy the video games they infect.

So the question remains, is there a path out of this hole you've dug yourself into, regardless of whether you desire to take it? I would say maybe. If you dialed back the political takes and trans bullshit you might be able to regain some shreds of credibility.

To illustrate what I mean lets use Hogwarts Legacy again.

A more credible way to cover that game, even without completely compromising your political views, would be to open the video with an actual review of the game itself and its game play. Tell us if the game on its own is a good game or not, if its fun to play, if it runs well, if the mechanics are engaging, if the story is interesting, etc. Once you've established those points you can then move on to discuss the games political context and how you feel about it in those terms. Ideally with a clear editing break so people who don't care can tune out, but either way it would be an improvement over a purely political take combined with an unnecessary attempt at guilt tripping.

Hell it would even make those points more compelling for the audience that does care about them if you have the context of the game being good or bad. From your perspective if the game is good its politics are even more of a shame, and if its bad then the people buying it out of spite are even more worthy of mockery.

Alas my gut tells me you're incapable of making those changes, that you're too far gone and too stubbornly dug in to the trans trenches.

If you're going to tailor your content to a fraction of a percent of the population you have no logical grounds to be shocked when you end up left with a fraction of a percent of the audience to show for it.
 
I'm not going to watch the video in a non-private browser window with my account actually logged in so I won't be able to comment this via YouTube but since we know Jim reads the thread it wont matter.

I've also said this before but I'll repeat myself and elaborate a bit.

Jim, the reason I stopped watching your content has less to do with the trans bullshit and more to do with the compromised integrity that comes with it.

I watched Total Biscuit because he had integrity. Whether you agreed with him or not you knew his opinions and reviews were untainted by corporate/developer influence. They were not bought and paid for like most of games media was at that time and still is today.

When TB passed I saw you as the next best option in terms of reviewer integrity. There is also Yahtzee from Zero Punctuation but thats a different form of content. While you didnt go through the options menu like TB did you still used to be able to deliver games reviews and industry commentary with a unique and uncompromising perspective that was also somewhat entertaining.

Since you began your transition, or tbh a bit before hand, you've sold out that integrity, you've compromised that perspective, in order to tow the troon line. What do I mean by that?

Well lets use Hogwarts Legacy as a timely example.

Your commentary on Hogwarts Legacy had nothing to do with the quality of the game or really anything to do with the game itself. Instead you spent the entire time harping on the fact that the IP is owned by someone who's political and world views you don't like and attempting to guilt trip anyone who does like the game into not playing it. And thats coming from someone who doesnt like Harry Potter media because its cringe and dumb in the first place.

In other words, the game doesnt matter anymore, only its socio-political context. I would say thats what a lot of the "too political" complaints are getting at more than anything to do with capitalism. Personally I've always know that you were on the left side of things and was able to decipher your content through that lens despite disagreeing with it in some ways. I even appreciated keeping rampant pofiteering in check to a degree when it comes to predatory micro-transactions and related business practices. On those things you have my agreement because they negatively impact ones ability to enjoy the video games they infect.

So the question remains, is there a path out of this hole you've dug yourself into, regardless of whether you desire to take it? I would say maybe. If you dialed back the political takes and trans bullshit you might be able to regain some shreds of credibility.

To illustrate what I mean lets use Hogwarts Legacy again.

A more credible way to cover that game, even without completely compromising your political views, would be to open the video with an actual review of the game itself and its game play. Tell us if the game on its own is a good game or not, if its fun to play, if it runs well, if the mechanics are engaging, if the story is interesting, etc. Once you've established those points you can then move on to discuss the games political context and how you feel about it in those terms. Ideally with a clear editing break so people who don't care can tune out, but either way it would be an improvement over a purely political take combined with an unnecessary attempt at guilt tripping.

Hell it would even make those points more compelling for the audience that does care about them if you have the context of the game being good or bad. From your perspective if the game is good its politics are even more of a shame, and if its bad then the people buying it out of spite are even more worthy of mockery.

Alas my gut tells me you're incapable of making those changes, that you're too far gone and too stubbornly dug in to the trans trenches.

If you're going to tailor your content to a fraction of a percent of the population you have no logical grounds to be shocked when you end up left with a fraction of a percent of the audience to show for it.
Local archive, if you want to watch, was posted here.
 
What this troon doesn't understand is that they have been dropped from the YouTube algorithm, and like the Amazing Atheist before him - there is no way back from that.

Talent only gets you so far on YouTube, the platform promoting your content to others who may be interested is what really makes you grow.

That isn't to say Jim was a talentless hack, just that there are probably plenty of people equally capable, equally talented who never got their break on YouTube by chance.

Other factors play a part sure, they always do, but the fact you aren't finding new people to watch you whilst your older viewers leave is all to do with the algorithm. Those who leave are doing so because your content is no longer appealing to them, not because muh bigotry.

All of this is just self entitled nonsense. You were entitled to absolutely none of this, and we're bestowed it by YouTube.
 
Normies love Harry Potter

Jim Jim Troonstar spent the past 2 weeks REEEEing about Harry Potter.
A troon screaming about Harry Potter. How original.

I think I first heard of him years ago around the time he gave a less-than-perfect score to Breath of the Wild. That got him attention.
 
A troon screaming about Harry Potter. How original.

I think I first heard of him years ago around the time he gave a less-than-perfect score to Breath of the Wild. That got him attention.
Yeah that review was linked the other day, it's pretty fucking retarded.
 
JIM STERLING FACTS
  1. Jim Sterling is Fat
  2. Jim Sterling is Ugly
  3. Jim Sterling is Old
  4. Jim Sterling doesn’t pass as a woman
  5. Jim Sterling is washed
  6. Jim Sterling is a Commie Consooomer
  7. Jim Sterling is a Cuck
  8. Jim Sterling‘s new content sucks
  9. Jim Sterling is mentally ill
  10. Jim Sterling is hemoragging subscribers
  11. Jim Sterling will never be a woman
  12. Jim Sterling is a fucking retard with god-awful takes
  13. Jim Sterling hates the audience that built his career
  14. Jim Sterling hates video games
  15. Jim Sterling is a coward
  16. Jim Sterling is a CRYBULLY
  17. Jim Sterling will never be a woman
  18. Jim Sterling will continue losing subscribers
  19. Jim Sterling is a LOLCow
  20. Jim Sterling is, worst of all, British

Imagine being a Fat, Washed, Aging, Dysgenic Commie LARPing as the world’s ugliest woman who looks disturbingly like a man.

Jim Sterling‘s obsession with J.K. Rowling is because JK is a successful natal woman who said women have unique experiences and perspectives men can’t have. This makes Jim Sterling so upset that he can’t even say her name and must wish for her death and ruination, becuase he’s a fat cowardly mentally-ill tranny basketcase.


While J.K Rowling’s latest Harry Potter game tops sales charts, Jim Sterling continues to lose subscribers. Another TERF W, Jim Sterling humiliated. Jim Sterling is JK Rowling’s bitch now, and I’m sure we’re in for more salty bitchfests about her from the buck-broken fat man. Sad!
 
View attachment 4587678
The coping and sneeding in these comments is great.
When people get mad at my journalistic articles about how Hitler did nothing wrong, it's obviously because I'm right and not because I come across as a neo-nazi edgelord.

It's not good journalism until it pisses off the people that matter, and you end up getting killed for it.
 
Last edited:
if Steph has 928k subscribers, i am one of them 👩‍👩‍👧‍👧 if Steph has 800k subs i am one of them 👩‍👩‍👦 if Steph only has one sub and that is me 🙋‍♀️ if Commander sterling has no fans 🙎‍♀️ that means i am no more on the earth 💀 if the world against the James "Stephanie" Sterling, i am against the world ❌🌎☄️ I watch Steph until my last breath 😍 Die Hard fan of Steph 🤓🌹 Hit Like if you think Steph is the best wrestler & fat in the world 🤼‍♀️😃
 
ashens has been a fag for years now.
His content has also really gotten stale and formulaic. I loved his channel back in the day but you can only do "I bought some tat from the pound shop and I will snarkily review it" so many times before it just becomes boring. I think the whole dry English wit thing has been run into the ground a thousand times over.
 
Back