US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
The only time I ever saw a crowd boo Trump is when he talked of the vaccines. Yet at the behest of his advisors which included Fauci. Who we later found out created the fucking virus. He went forward.

Let's have a hypothetical. Trump. Probably one of the known people in the world at the moment. If you even hate him you'll listen. Comes out and says Fauci decieved him, the vax is a money grab and has shown to actually cause serious problems and possible death. The lockdowns were a fucking scam. He disavows not only Pfizer, but also Johnson and Johnson and others. Now he's just pissed off quite literally some of the most powerful corporations in the World. He's never explicitly called out corporations before. Just public figures.

Now what happens next?
People close to him, worried about his mental health, have him put in psychiatric care. When he comes out, he looks and moves just a little bit different, but don't worry, that's just because his mental health is better as he praises Fauci and J&J and Pfizer as well as states that Our Democracy(TM) must send money to Ukraine and Israel.
 
His whole campaign was about unfair trade practices fucking over the middle class. What did you do, just read Twitter during that period?

Trade practices isnt calling out a specific company. I mean I remember him calling out CNN for being fake news but that was a fairly popular sentiment.

Certainly not calling out specifically Pfizer and Johnson and Johnson for scamming the entire world.
 
Do you mean when he said stuff like "why are all people who drink Diet Coke fat? Eh, I'll still keep drinking that garbage" or do you have any specific examples.?
No he said he would personally fuck Ford over if they sent factories south to Mexico, by putting tariffs on the cars that were so high that nobody would buy them.
 
Trade practices isnt calling out a specific company. I mean I remember him calling out CNN for being fake news but that was a fairly popular sentiment.

Certainly not calling out specifically Pfizer and Johnson and Johnson for scamming the entire world.
Who do you think those trade practices benefit? It's about corporate greed. Are you mad that it was a critique on a macro sense or what? The business world was completely butt hurt about tarrifs.
 
Donald Trump is probably the healthiest president we've had in years. Keep in mind he doesn't drink or smoke, and those two things will take a lot out of you. Compare him to say, Pelosi and her pickled liver organs face everything and tell me who just looks healthier.
While booze and tobacco can affect your health, it's not the same for everybody. For example, Winston Churchill lived to 90 and drank like a fish and smoked like a chimney.
 
No he said he would personally fuck Ford over if they sent factories south to Mexico, by putting tariffs on the cars that were so high that nobody would buy them.
Who do you think those trade practices benefit? It's about corporate greed. Are you mad that it was a critique on a macro sense or what? The business world was completely butt hurt about tarrifs.

I'm trying to show you the context of what the environment is and whats being said. Saying you want to bring car manufacturing back to the US. Is not the same as calling out Big Pharma for pulling the biggest scam in world history. I hope you understand what I'm getting at.
 
I've not heard shit about Kyle's civil suits against all the media outlets that continued to call him a murderer after his acquittal.
same always blaming the cops for statements & trying to destitute kyle before jail with the law.
"it was good that you were here"
damming confirmation that cops could do nothing because optics & orange man bad for george floyd riot.

Kyle Rittenhouse was acquitted by a jury of his peers for the August 25, 2020 self-defense shooting death of two men, and the non-fatal shooting of a third man, Gaige Grosskreutz. Like the other two men, Grosskreutz is a career violent criminal. About a week before Rittenhouse’s criminal trial, Grosskreutz filed a federal lawsuit in the Eastern District of Wisconsin against The City of Kenosha, Kenosha County, former Sheriff Beth, former police chiefs, Daniel Miskinis and Eric Larson, and John & Jane Doe police officers 1-100. Notably missing from the list of defendants was Rittenhouse himself. The lawsuit was filed by far-left activist attorney Kimberly Motley. Motley herself, is currently defending against a federal lawsuit that alleges she committed conspiracy, tortious interference with parental rights, assault, fraud, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and false imprisonment. This suit is brought by an Afghan couple that accused Motley of helping a U.S. Marine abduct their infant relative.

Motley was present at Rittenhouse’s trial the day her client, Grosskreutz, admitted that Rittenhouse didn’t shoot him until Grosskreutz pointed his handgun at Rittenhouse. This likely made any civil suit from the career criminal nearly impossible. Most thought that was what happened. Most of us thought Grosskreutz and his lawyer abandoned the idea of a lawsuit. Almost 500 days later, the federal judge assigned to the case, Lynn Adelman, noticed the lawsuit had never been served on the defendants. He issued an order on February 1, 2023 saying that he would be dismissing the lawsuit if Motley didn’t have the documents served before February 22, 2023. Motley filed an amended federal lawsuit and added Rittenhouse last Tuesday, February 14, 2023. She is now scrambling to have all of the defendants served. All will be easy to serve, with the exception of Rittenhouse. Motley can ask for more time, but a reasonable judge would deny the motion.

According to the lawsuit, that reads more like political hyperbole, “Kyle Rittenhouse crossed into Wisconsin from Illinois, carrying an assault rifle on the streets of Kenosha, in open violation of the law.” The lawsuit also falsely asserts that police deputized Rittenhouse and other armed citizens. The lawsuit claims that Rittenhouse brought with him to kenosha a “band of white nationalist vigilantes.” Motley also claims that Rittenhouse“fired his assault rifle indiscriminately multiple times at citizens on the street.” It seems that Motley is hoping that no one watched Rittenhouse’s trial. This allegation is obviously false. Motley also wrote that “Grosskreutz tried to end Defendant Rittenhouse’s homicidal rampage.” Finally she alleged that myself, Rittenhouse, and at least nine law enforcement agencies conspired to deprive Grosskreutz of his constitutional rights.
 
So from O'Keefe's final video on Project Veritas. We can conclude, that there were various elements that had threatened or bribed, various members of Project Veritas, and the Veritas Board. To dump James O'Keefe. That was really, Big Pharma, and the establishments best option. He was too visible to be simply killed. So they went after the support network. Even if he isn't dead. He's now seperated from Project Veritas, so it's reputation and income which was pulling in $22,000,000 last year. Is going to drop like a rock.

Even if he starts up again, he's lost a lot of his reach and support network. They may even continue to mess with him legally.
strip.jpg

 
So from O'Keefe's final video on Project Veritas. We can conclude, that there were various elements that had threatened or bribed, various members of Project Veritas, and the Veritas Board. To dump James O'Keefe. That was really, Big Pharma, and the establishments best option. He was too visible to be simply killed. So they went after the support network. Even if he isn't dead. He's now seperated from Project Veritas, so it's reputation and income which was pulling in $22,000,000 last year. Is going to drop like a rock.

Even if he starts up again, he's lost a lot of his reach and support network. They may even continue to mess with him legally.
View attachment 4591894
So it sounds like the bad guy wins. And James will be left to just do a podcast.
 
Even if he starts up again, he's lost a lot of his reach and support network. They may even continue to mess with him legally.
Has he? I'm sure most people know him as the face of the company, not a group of literal whos on the board. If you're interacting with PV you're quite clued in to how stuff works and most of the donors will almost certainly buck, as will the employees. The board is going to be holding an empty company with no employees and no donors in short order.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back