- Joined
- Mar 13, 2022
Straight from theView attachment 4599573
Genius move by the diseased whore.
Archive, can be found on this page searching "birthday":
![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Straight from theView attachment 4599573
Genius move by the diseased whore.
Archive, can be found on this page searching "birthday":
![]()
I believe that in this day and age there are many guys who wouldn't mind dating a semi-active prostitute. What she doesn't take into consideration is that maybe she's too insufferable even for them.I swear, any simps of hers must be incels or other losers that would cuck themselves if they had a chance with women as every other thought that goes through this "Girl on the Internet Syndrome" whore is always "what's the most horrifically socially revolting thing I can do" . It's so obvious from how often it ends up in posts.
Is there anything else that suggests this or is that based on what has already been said regarding vetting and disallowing identifying guests? Have NDAs been explicitly mentioned?
Privacy
We have people sign a NDA committing to not revealing identities of other people at the event. It’s pretty standard to ask for identity privacy at kink events, but noncon kink is a bit edgier and we’re trying to take it seriously.
We don’t require privacy about things that happen at the event. Anyone who attends is welcome to reveal their own identity as an attendee, and talk about things that happened there, as long as they don’t accidentally give information that people could use to triangulate someone else’s identity.
Attempted GhostArchiveFrom the "Privacy" section of her substack about her rape orgies
Yeah he is quite ugly himself. I wonder if it's just the radiation of the degeneracy they're surrounded with or if they get rejected from normal society and end up in these freakshows.View attachment 4599594
What the fuck is going on with this man's body"? He has biceps, tits, and thicc thighs while also being lanky.
ArchiveFrom the "Privacy" section of her substack about her rape orgies
Archive
So if someone actually raped you (and not this weird fetishy "consensual" non-consent) then you're not allowed to reveal their identity. Got it.
Making Sure People Know What They’re Getting Into
All the instructions are clearly laid out on the invite to the event, starting with an all-caps command to READ THE INSTRUCTIONS GODDAMNIT.
At the event, we have people sign a brief form indicating they are aware of the nature of the event - that “red means no”, and that if you wear a wristband, people will try to sexually interact with you, that you know what you’re getting into, etc.
We also require people arrive before the doors close, so everyone is present to hear the opening circle. In the opening circle, we go over all of the instructions again, encouraging people to ask clarifying questions. In this circle we try very hard to make it clear that there is no pressure to participate. I say things like “If you thought you really wanted to do this, but now you’re here and you’re like fuck, now I don’t think I actually want to do this, then we strongly support you in not participating. Nobody actually wants to violate your real boundaries, and you are doing people a favor by taking care of yourself and not forcing yourself to do anything you don’t actually want to do. If the thing you decide is right for you is sitting on the sidelines the entire time, this is good and I absolutely encourage you to do this.”
My suspicion is the primary reason people might not say “red” to something they actually don’t want is fear of disrupting the scene or upsetting their partner. Thus, I also try to communicate that “saying red is doing your partner a favor. The aggressors here don’t actually want to violate you, they genuinely care about your wellbeing, and they actively want you to communicate if you don’t want something to be happening. You’re not only caring for yourself by communicating your boundaries, you’re also caring for others.”
We also have people go through exercises where they pair off and practice ignoring ‘Nos’ and respecting ‘Reds’. We have Person A touch the other person - arm, wrist, hair, whatever - and have Person B say “no”, in order to allow Person A experience it being okay to ignore the word ‘no’. Person B also can say “red”, at which point Person A must immediately stop what they’re doing. The goal here is to give people the visceral sensation of both control and safety - it can be super scary to ignore the word no, and so we let people hear and ignore it. But the real safety is in respecting the word red - you get to experience the power of a safeword, and this communicates very directly, to both parties, that receivers are still in full control over their experience.
Despite all these steps, I think I might want to try being even more clear in the future? At our last event, one person managed to get through all of these steps and still be very unclear about how things worked or what the party was about; they wore a wristband when not actually wanting people to aggress upon them, and seemed to be unclear that they could and should take the wristband off whenever they wanted (luckily one of the other organizers noticed and recommended she remove her wristband, and then she did). I honestly have no idea how this happened - it’s possible they hadn’t read through the original invitation, and maybe had some important texts to respond to when we were going over all the rules in the opening circle, and thus weren’t paying attention?
I’m not sure exactly how to make sure this doesn’t happen in the future. I’m thinking maybe during the opening circle we should ask the audience questions about the rules to verify that people understand what’s going on, and maybe also on the consent form give them a list of boxes to check that they do in fact understand the rules?
Wristbands
If an attendee puts on a wristband at the event, this means they’re “open for business”, and people can now initiate sexual contact with them without asking. Different wristband colors indicate openness to different genders - for example, if you’re wearing a blue wristband, you’re open to being aggressed upon by men. Red, you’re open to women (though we plan to change the color next time). You can stack wristband colors!
If at any point you no longer want people to make sexy dives at you, you can remove the wristband, after which default normal world consent rules apply.
If you’re attending as an aggressor, you don’t have to wear any bands - just check to see if someone you’re interested in is wearing a band that matches your gender! If you’re a switch, you can both wear a wristband indicating you’re opening to receiving, and aggress upon anyone else who’s open to you.
There’s lots of reasons we might want to introduce more wristbands to convey more information about preferences, but right now we’re trying really hard to keep the wristband system as simple as possible. Lights are low, bodies are moving, and if you have to stop and make sure you remembered the colors right, this introduces a lot of potential for error. In this kind of event, I think it’s super important to reduce the chances of mistakes.
In the future, I want to see if, instead of wristbands, we can use glow stick bracelets. It’ll probably take some experimenting to see if we can get a version that won’t fall off during vigorous sexy struggles, but having something glaringly super visible, where you only need the briefest of glimpses from far away to see the color, would help streamline things a lot.
So literally conditioning and training people to ignore someone saying "no" during a sexual interaction. Desensitizing them to the normal feelings, thoughts, and reactions that would cause a person to cease engaging in sexual conduct when the individual they are doing it to says "no." Teaching them to push through and continue taking action anyways.We also have people go through exercises where they pair off and practice ignoring ‘Nos’ and respecting ‘Reds’. We have Person A touch the other person - arm, wrist, hair, whatever - and have Person B say “no”, in order to allow Person A experience it being okay to ignore the word ‘no’.
That's a lot of words for someone who's claiming to have already received all this stuff from her porn and escorting but a single forum thread collecting information about her is some kind of new crime against her. Her grasp of statistics is further on display when she rationally suggests this thread's criticism will increase the likelihood of her being kidnapped unlike her totally safe casual sex with strangers and escorting with strangers.A few days ago, Aella posted on the Effective Altruism forum directly talking about this very thread, along with various other criticisms of her and EA (mostly about the TIME article going over claims of sexual harassment). It's titled "People Will Sometimes Just Lie About You", which is hilarious, because nothing in my OP is a lie. (archive)
Hi, Aella!
View attachment 4592230
Looks like our libertarian could stand to do some reading of Thomas Szasz (not the serial killer from Batman, that's Victor Zsasz) and perhaps how the Soviets classified any dissenters as mentally ill.View attachment 4593782
Lol. Her whole posts is about skepticism but she expects us to believe this rather ludicrous, unsubstantiated claim that anyone who "commits to strong lies about [her] online" (i.e. anyone who criticizes her actions at all) is mentally ill.
If a post is too long you won't be able to reply to it (prevents pages from getting extremely long with replies of long quotes). If you really want to quote a post anyway you can either manually make the quote yourself or change the end of the thread URL toI'm not able to reply to aromatic's post about Nate directly for some reason (old lurker, new poster)
/reply?quote=
followed by the post ID (the one that shows up in the URL when you click on the post number).I don't know who Meghan is and Destiny is a cuck. But she apparently criticized Aella's research which is hilarious:
View attachment 4601994
source (a)