Gross Aella Martin / Rachael Antier Slick / Abigail Glass / @Aella_Girl / @Aellagirl / @Miss_Aella / u/Sweatywoman / RedVerse / Apostate Slick / Knowingless - Rationalist LessWrong poly libertarian hooker girl throwing rape orgy parties. Former $100k/month OnlyFans star and $3,000/hour prostitute. Would rather come up with gross hypotheticals than shower.

How many people will show up to Aella's birthday gangbang?


  • Total voters
    168
  • Poll closed .
I swear, any simps of hers must be incels or other losers that would cuck themselves if they had a chance with women as every other thought that goes through this "Girl on the Internet Syndrome" whore is always "what's the most horrifically socially revolting thing I can do" . It's so obvious from how often it ends up in posts.
I believe that in this day and age there are many guys who wouldn't mind dating a semi-active prostitute. What she doesn't take into consideration is that maybe she's too insufferable even for them.
 
Is there anything else that suggests this or is that based on what has already been said regarding vetting and disallowing identifying guests? Have NDAs been explicitly mentioned?

From the "Privacy" section of her substack about her rape orgies

Privacy

We have people sign a NDA committing to not revealing identities of other people at the event. It’s pretty standard to ask for identity privacy at kink events, but noncon kink is a bit edgier and we’re trying to take it seriously.

We don’t require privacy about things that happen at the event. Anyone who attends is welcome to reveal their own identity as an attendee, and talk about things that happened there, as long as they don’t accidentally give information that people could use to triangulate someone else’s identity.
 
View attachment 4599594
What the fuck is going on with this man's body"? He has biceps, tits, and thicc thighs while also being lanky.
Yeah he is quite ugly himself. I wonder if it's just the radiation of the degeneracy they're surrounded with or if they get rejected from normal society and end up in these freakshows.

The only thing that really makes sense to go out of your way to seek out whoreaella is if he's hooked on opiates too. They can compare how many days it's been since they last actually took a shit.
 
Archive
So if someone actually raped you (and not this weird fetishy "consensual" non-consent) then you're not allowed to reveal their identity. Got it.

Right! I would never lie about Aella on Kiwi Farms. She is literally talking about making attendees sign numerous forms in that Substack post, ostensibly for everyone's "safety" but really to minimize damages & liability should something go wrong.

The entire Making Sure People Know What They're Getting Into section is all horrifying as well, ending with a frustrated paragraph in which she is very annoyed with one woman who froze up and did not realize that she would continue to be sexually assaulted if she did not take off her wrist band.

Making Sure People Know What They’re Getting Into​

All the instructions are clearly laid out on the invite to the event, starting with an all-caps command to READ THE INSTRUCTIONS GODDAMNIT.

At the event, we have people sign a brief form indicating they are aware of the nature of the event - that “red means no”, and that if you wear a wristband, people will try to sexually interact with you, that you know what you’re getting into, etc.

We also require people arrive before the doors close, so everyone is present to hear the opening circle. In the opening circle, we go over all of the instructions again, encouraging people to ask clarifying questions. In this circle we try very hard to make it clear that there is no pressure to participate. I say things like “If you thought you really wanted to do this, but now you’re here and you’re like fuck, now I don’t think I actually want to do this, then we strongly support you in not participating. Nobody actually wants to violate your real boundaries, and you are doing people a favor by taking care of yourself and not forcing yourself to do anything you don’t actually want to do. If the thing you decide is right for you is sitting on the sidelines the entire time, this is good and I absolutely encourage you to do this.”

My suspicion is the primary reason people might not say “red” to something they actually don’t want is fear of disrupting the scene or upsetting their partner. Thus, I also try to communicate that “saying red is doing your partner a favor. The aggressors here don’t actually want to violate you, they genuinely care about your wellbeing, and they actively want you to communicate if you don’t want something to be happening. You’re not only caring for yourself by communicating your boundaries, you’re also caring for others.

We also have people go through exercises where they pair off and practice ignoring ‘Nos’ and respecting ‘Reds’. We have Person A touch the other person - arm, wrist, hair, whatever - and have Person B say “no”, in order to allow Person A experience it being okay to ignore the word ‘no’. Person B also can say “red”, at which point Person A must immediately stop what they’re doing. The goal here is to give people the visceral sensation of both control and safety - it can be super scary to ignore the word no, and so we let people hear and ignore it. But the real safety is in respecting the word red - you get to experience the power of a safeword, and this communicates very directly, to both parties, that receivers are still in full control over their experience.

Despite all these steps, I think I might want to try being even more clear in the future? At our last event, one person managed to get through all of these steps and still be very unclear about how things worked or what the party was about; they wore a wristband when not actually wanting people to aggress upon them, and seemed to be unclear that they could and should take the wristband off whenever they wanted (luckily one of the other organizers noticed and recommended she remove her wristband, and then she did). I honestly have no idea how this happened - it’s possible they hadn’t read through the original invitation, and maybe had some important texts to respond to when we were going over all the rules in the opening circle, and thus weren’t paying attention?

I’m not sure exactly how to make sure this doesn’t happen in the future. I’m thinking maybe during the opening circle we should ask the audience questions about the rules to verify that people understand what’s going on, and maybe also on the consent form give them a list of boxes to check that they do in fact understand the rules?

The section on the wrist band system is also horrifying, in which she admits to all of the ways that men could rape a woman who clearly indicated that she did not consent, and then claim that they'd simply made a mistake, a "consent accident" if you will (e.g. being too confused about the different colors, not seeing the wrist band clearly, the wrist band potentially falling off, etc.)

Wristbands​

If an attendee puts on a wristband at the event, this means they’re “open for business”, and people can now initiate sexual contact with them without asking. Different wristband colors indicate openness to different genders - for example, if you’re wearing a blue wristband, you’re open to being aggressed upon by men. Red, you’re open to women (though we plan to change the color next time). You can stack wristband colors!

If at any point you no longer want people to make sexy dives at you, you can remove the wristband, after which default normal world consent rules apply.

If you’re attending as an aggressor, you don’t have to wear any bands - just check to see if someone you’re interested in is wearing a band that matches your gender! If you’re a switch, you can both wear a wristband indicating you’re opening to receiving, and aggress upon anyone else who’s open to you.

There’s lots of reasons we might want to introduce more wristbands to convey more information about preferences, but right now we’re trying really hard to keep the wristband system as simple as possible. Lights are low, bodies are moving, and if you have to stop and make sure you remembered the colors right, this introduces a lot of potential for error. In this kind of event, I think it’s super important to reduce the chances of mistakes.

In the future, I want to see if, instead of wristbands, we can use glow stick bracelets. It’ll probably take some experimenting to see if we can get a version that won’t fall off during vigorous sexy struggles, but having something glaringly super visible, where you only need the briefest of glimpses from far away to see the color, would help streamline things a lot.

I wanted to laugh at Aella but now I am fucking horrified. I thought this was a stupid self-righteous whore who was bad at statistics, but now I realize that she is a stupid self-righteous whore who is bad at statistics and is also setting up naive women to be raped.
 

Attachments

We also have people go through exercises where they pair off and practice ignoring ‘Nos’ and respecting ‘Reds’. We have Person A touch the other person - arm, wrist, hair, whatever - and have Person B say “no”, in order to allow Person A experience it being okay to ignore the word ‘no’.
So literally conditioning and training people to ignore someone saying "no" during a sexual interaction. Desensitizing them to the normal feelings, thoughts, and reactions that would cause a person to cease engaging in sexual conduct when the individual they are doing it to says "no." Teaching them to push through and continue taking action anyways.

This is a rape training camp. She can dress it up in a bunch of idk? whiny up talk? longwinded? pseudointellectual? garbage until the cows come home. But that's what it is.
 
So much excellent content it's hard to know where to start, but for those of you doomscrolling like me, the not-quite-sister site of our dear farms has some exquisite content:

Feel free to crosspost anything you think is particularly lulzy, or for the child porn retarded whore in this case, horrifying and rapey.

Anyone good with those 'this AI can detect if you're gay' mind running it on Nate Sores' face? Think they had sex while watching child porn together? Er sorry, 'AI child porn'
Screen Shot 2023-02-21 at 9.14.56 PM.png

Screen Shot 2023-02-21 at 9.15.25 PM.png

Screen Shot 2023-02-21 at 9.15.50 PM.png

Screen Shot 2023-02-21 at 9.17.40 PM.png

Screen Shot 2023-02-21 at 9.18.11 PM.png

Screen Shot 2023-02-21 at 9.18.58 PM.png


Screen Shot 2023-02-21 at 9.19.40 PM.png

Sidenote. Current value of the rundown shack she is squatting in Austin TX is 400k, very likely rented. Fled california, never having a real job, and leeching off of techbros. And I guess Nate was the last dumb fucking idiot she could 'girlfriend experience' prostitue herself to. She's poor even after going on and on about the "high-class" (high sticker price) prostitution. :story:
 
I'm not able to reply to aromatic's post about Nate directly for some reason (old lurker, new poster), but god DAMN is that post insightful. This is a perfect example for how Aella's stated goals do not meet her actual desires. By her own account, if she wanted to settle down and/or have kids, this guy is a catch. But instead, she says "Part of the reason we’re not working out is that we miss each other in some deeper ways". After going on and on for paragraphs, girl what the fuck does this mean? This is the most valuable thing you could expand upon. But I'm pretty sure the real reasons only reveal Aella's shallowness, so it's just this mysterious thing that's like totally weird, but maybe different for you, idk?
 
A few days ago, Aella posted on the Effective Altruism forum directly talking about this very thread, along with various other criticisms of her and EA (mostly about the TIME article going over claims of sexual harassment). It's titled "People Will Sometimes Just Lie About You", which is hilarious, because nothing in my OP is a lie. (archive)

Hi, Aella!

View attachment 4592230
That's a lot of words for someone who's claiming to have already received all this stuff from her porn and escorting but a single forum thread collecting information about her is some kind of new crime against her. Her grasp of statistics is further on display when she rationally suggests this thread's criticism will increase the likelihood of her being kidnapped unlike her totally safe casual sex with strangers and escorting with strangers.

View attachment 4593782

Lol. Her whole posts is about skepticism but she expects us to believe this rather ludicrous, unsubstantiated claim that anyone who "commits to strong lies about [her] online" (i.e. anyone who criticizes her actions at all) is mentally ill.
Looks like our libertarian could stand to do some reading of Thomas Szasz (not the serial killer from Batman, that's Victor Zsasz) and perhaps how the Soviets classified any dissenters as mentally ill.

This is not to say that I'm skeptical of Aella's claim that she interacts a lot with people who have a mental illness.
 
I'm not able to reply to aromatic's post about Nate directly for some reason (old lurker, new poster)
If a post is too long you won't be able to reply to it (prevents pages from getting extremely long with replies of long quotes). If you really want to quote a post anyway you can either manually make the quote yourself or change the end of the thread URL to /reply?quote= followed by the post ID (the one that shows up in the URL when you click on the post number).
 
The degree to which she has commodified her life is astounding. She has commodified her body. She has commodified her "affection". She has partly commodified her reproductive organs (eggs). She has commodified her very likeness to create AI porn of her. She commodified other women in order to climb the social ladder with her parties. To an extent she even has commodified her sisters.
I honestly wouldnt be surprised if she sold one of her kidneys.

She is a walking talking vending machine.

I hope she never has a child.
I pray she never has a daughter.
 
I don't know who Meghan is and Destiny is a cuck. But she apparently criticized Aella's research which is hilarious:
View attachment 4601994
source (a)
Meghan is an anti-porn feminist that Destiny had a debate with a couple hours ago.

Aella and Meghan have previously debated each other:

I haven't watched any of these lmfao
 
More fun for the front page. So craigslist used to have hookers, then there was backpage, now there are seedy sites like Tryst. This is her personals ad for paying her rent. As she's looking for a tech bro to trap with a baby, and pity fucks Nate sometimes, all while drinking the cum of disgusting weirdos (I have pictures, more to come on this).

Whore Aella has one as of three days ago. I guess she just deleted it. But oh hoho, the internet remembers. She's so retarded it's amazing.

https://tryst.link/escort/abigailglass (dead link)
"Abigail Glass"

Anyone know the details of how you do that IRS reporting thing and get 20-30% of what they collect, and a bunch of onlyfans whores were getting ruined by it?
I certainly wouldn't want our dear pedophile Rachael to have any trouble now. I sure hope she's paying all of those back taxes in crypto.



1677046535382.png


1677046852707.png

"Teehee I'm so insufferably annoying and quirky. I forget to shave my legs! Unicorn horse mask! I cried over nerd bait books, plz belieev. I only gift free prostitution to the least ugly freaks in my social circle, but not fat jews like yudkowsky so clearly I have standards LOL"

Warning. Screenshot is some 27 MiB. Blame chrome I don't know.


Main page:

Old archive of main page:

New archive of main page:



Edited to add more screenshots

Hmm glass abigail and abigail glass. Wonder if that username will turn up anything else
 
Last edited:
Back