Thread Watch

I wasn't suggesting people harass her. My remark was akin to what happened to Alison Rapp..
643.jpg


The first line heavily suggests that you wanted to go all *wink wink nudge nudge* on it at least without explicitly saying it. At least that's how it appears to me. As far as "dox" goes, I don't understand it when OMG DOX becomes more important than content that's actually worth laughing at. In this case unless people go out of their way to suggest that Alex's mother/sister be contacted(don't), I don't think there's a huge risk that they're going to be harassed by our members. The cow isn't "sensational" enough to warrant a :ween: horde.

Still, it's always worthwhile to weigh whether something is actually being achieved by the dox or not. Is the Lolcow making a lot of noise from simply having a relative's name been known to us or are the "doxers" jumping up and down going "omg, haha, we doxed your children, aren't you going to react!" without the Lolcow responding ? In the former case it's funny and content about the lolcow, in the latter case it's just juvenile imo.

It's a very case by case basis. In the case of just a facebook account and real name, the "doxing" is pretty minimal. It's different when phone numbers / street addresses of unrelated/only tangentially related people are put up without any other discernible end goal than to get people to :julay: them on the phone, especially if people in the thread express desire to contact them for no good reason.

If you do believe that a case of tangential people's dox is not only not serving the purpose of the thread but has a high chance of putting a person unconnected or only very tangentially connected person, it's best to report it so staff can individually review whether the information is serving the thread and/or whether it's inviting harassment. Because individual Staff members may have different views regarding the subject, if the conclusion of the report is unsatisfactory, you can make a Talk to Staff thread if you want a wider sampling of staff to weigh on the issue, utilize the Thread Watch thread or PM an individual staff member who you think would have the best expertise regarding the subject. Debating the doxing ethics in the threads themselves is largely going to produce a whole lot of clutter.
 
https://kiwifarms.net/threads/onision.4851

This thread is just a honeypot for idiots and I love it. How many a-logs and morons do we have here? Three? All over some narcissist who was so fucking stupid he makes Sgt. Bilko look like George S. Patton.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Listen, if you're really this determined to embarrass yourself, just make you trolling call/email/what-the-fuck-ever already so we can get on with laughing at you. He's a youtuber for fuck's sake, not the antichrist.

Whoa! I don't hate the guy - more like sympathize really, I just wanted to have some fun...! Please don't mistake me for a moralfag or a troll, I actually like it here.

Besides, knowledge and analysis is my shtick, which is why I'm here. Not for a vendetta against Onion, though I've clearly stepped out of my line.
 
This thread is just a honeypot for idiots and I love it. How many a-logs and morons do we have here? Three? All over some narcissist who was so fucking stupid he makes Sgt. Bilko look like George S. Patton.

It is weird how many people have shown up here and spazzed all over.

I'm suprised there isn't a thread about the "Anti-Onision" group over at Community Watch.
 
This thread is just a honeypot for idiots and I love it. How many a-logs and morons do we have here? Three? All over some narcissist who was so fucking stupid he makes Sgt. Bilko look like George S. Patton.

Would we need Halal permissions to make threads on these guys since they're already members or do they not count?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Small Onion
Why does everyone mistake my amusement for hate? I've clearly stated over 9,000 times I don't hate the guy.

And no, I'm not one of his exes. Ew. (Although I do sympathize with them a little too much.)
You clearly are autistic though, and care way too hard about some retarded man who is desperate to not fall by the wayside since he's not able to look as young as he used to and who is a life long fuck-up.
 
Why does everyone mistake my amusement for hate? I've clearly stated over 9,000 times I don't hate the guy.

Because every post you write is transparently passive aggressive and they all read like you're struggling to keep a burgeoning urge to fly into an episode of psychotic rage subdued from boiling over.

To be more specific, they read like a jealous stalker with a hint of "look at that slut, I hope she dies" who then realized they're in public eyeshot and begrudgingly polarized the contents of their feelings to blend in.
 
Why does everyone mistake my amusement for hate? I've clearly stated over 9,000 times I don't hate the guy.

And no, I'm not one of his exes. Ew. (Although I do sympathize with them a little too much.)

You're taking it a little too seriously. Maybe you should stay away from threads that remind you of your personal experiences. That's only a suggestion, though.
 
Back