Diseased Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

But even on top of that, there is probably an atmosphere of hysteria and self-censorship around tranny issues that prevented the editors from insisting that the latest Rowling piece had to try to actually be funny before they published it.

this is a really naive take.

It’s funny to them because it’s misogyny. They love that they get to openly hate a woman, tranny issues are neither here nor there.
 
It's never enough for the fucking trannies, they can't just say they really connected with the character and are upset the actress won't get in line to suck the girl dick. No, the character has to have been problematic and poorly written from the start, anyone with the mental maturity to separate actress from character still can't enjoy her because trannies mad. Keep it up trannies, all the dogpiling and rewriting history on anything that doesn't explicitly lick your balls is just going to peak more normies.
It's childish. Overnight, JK Rowling went from beloved children's author to an angry hag who wrote some crappy books that "inexplicably" became popular. Her weird names became "dogwhistles" because the idea of a chinese person being named Cho Chang is suddenly impossible. And anyone who supported her was never a good actor to begin with.
 
Radcliffe was predominately raised by his mother, and the 'Radcliffe' name is the only goy thing about him. Also he's 5'4 lol
He's probably a child molester.

What a backstabbing piece of shit. I hope he dies of cancer. He would have no career at all without Rowling, as he has no talent whatsoever. His only claim to fame is his association with this franchise. He makes Wil Wheaton look like a ripped Chad by comparison.

This motherfucker owes his soul to Satan.
 
I wonder when the controversy around the game dies down. Especially when the same people are saying similar shit about atomic heart.
Expect a resurgence when the PS4 and Switch versions get released. I'm planning to get hold of a Switch copy because a friend who is a HP fan recently got a Switch for their child. They'll not play it much but I suspect they'll get enough in to enjoy it.
 
He's probably a child molester.

What a backstabbing piece of shit. I hope he dies of cancer. He would have no career at all without Rowling, as he has no talent whatsoever. His only claim to fame is his association with this franchise. He makes Wil Wheaton look like a ripped Chad by comparison.

This motherfucker owes his soul to Satan.
Their is an old saying, there are no friends in Hollywood and that will continue to be the case no matter what.
 
I’m sure that for a number of men, it’s a misogynistic thrill, but what do you make of the women (in the press and on social media) who also shit on Rowling? Lindsay Ellis comes to mind.
I doubt any woman actually hates Rowling, at least not the same, deranged way as troons do, but there will always be handmaidens and pickmes who think if they agree with the unhinged person, they won't meet the same fate. Basically self-preservation. It's of course possible that they also generally have stupid opinions, but either way, while women can hate other women, I can't imagine any reason why it would be aimed at Rowling. She's so inoffensive.
 
I doubt any woman actually hates Rowling, at least not the same, deranged way as troons do, but there will always be handmaidens and pickmes who think if they agree with the unhinged person, they won't meet the same fate. Basically self-preservation. It's of course possible that they also generally have stupid opinions, but either way, while women can hate other women, I can't imagine any reason why it would be aimed at Rowling. She's so inoffensive.

Oh, Lindsay Ellis hates her, but not over the troon thing. She hates Rowling for being an actually successful author.
 
I doubt any woman actually hates Rowling, at least not the same, deranged way as troons do, but there will always be handmaidens and pickmes who think if they agree with the unhinged person, they won't meet the same fate. Basically self-preservation. It's of course possible that they also generally have stupid opinions, but either way, while women can hate other women, I can't imagine any reason why it would be aimed at Rowling. She's so inoffensive.
This hasn’t been my experience. 95% of the enthusiastic enforcers of social justice stuff I know are women (or women who claim to be she/theys). Lots of women live to keep others in line and ostracize people who fall outside of their version of normal or correct. “Cancel culture” for lack of a better term is just the new, socially acceptable version of the sort of female social aggression that used to manifest as mean girls picking on someone for not wearing Abercrombie or gossipy church ladies.

I came across this article not long ago and it kinda helped me understand why I’ve found this behaviour so viscerally abhorrent since the days when it was confined to Tumblr, as someone who was the class girl-bullying punching bag as a kid. It reminds me of that.

(Tying it back to the Rowling discussion, it’s interesting that a lot of the female villains in Harry Potter - Umbridge, Mrs Dursley, the girls who bully Hermione - are that kind of villain, who try to ruin others’ lives for stepping out of line. And that I’ve now seen people claiming this portrayal is sexist.)
 
Holy shit, I didn't realise when I saw this tweet yesterday* that Evanna Lynch played LUNA! (*Well, actually the day before. Fucking openresty made me wait a day to post this.)

These people are their very own worst enemies! (which goes right along with the fact that they imagine most of their enemies anyway) I've heard it said before about others but it was never this spot-on! I mean their arguments at this point amount to basically:

"*insert insane/unhinged proposition, demand or idea here* and if you don't agree 100% then you are clearly evil enemy scum!"

I mean seriously guys, thanks for all the help! :)
 
This hasn’t been my experience. 95% of the enthusiastic enforcers of social justice stuff I know are women (or women who claim to be she/theys). Lots of women live to keep others in line and ostracize people who fall outside of their version of normal or correct. “Cancel culture” for lack of a better term is just the new, socially acceptable version of the sort of female social aggression that used to manifest as mean girls picking on someone for not wearing Abercrombie or gossipy church ladies.

I came across this article not long ago and it kinda helped me understand why I’ve found this behaviour so viscerally abhorrent since the days when it was confined to Tumblr, as someone who was the class girl-bullying punching bag as a kid. It reminds me of that.

(Tying it back to the Rowling discussion, it’s interesting that a lot of the female villains in Harry Potter - Umbridge, Mrs Dursley, the girls who bully Hermione - are that kind of villain, who try to ruin others’ lives for stepping out of line. And that I’ve now seen people claiming this portrayal is sexist.)
I'm talking about specific RDS, raging about her on Twitter, writing these endless articles about her transphobic crimes and so on. Those are all troons and handmaidens. Maybe in your personal life, if you are surrounded by weirdo SJWs, they will cancel you in your friend group if you dare to say something positive about Rowling, but normies should not go all mean girls on you over Rowling.

Edit: I agree women are quicker to follow all the "right things" du jour (like pronouns in bio and other retarded things) and make it spread. And women also like to cancel other women on Twitter, YA seems to be a pretty good example for that. But if you look at the Rowling case, it's not 95% women cancel culture. They might repeat the whole "oh yeah, I guess she said something problematic", but the majority of hate comes from men.
I also think the women cancel culture picks their targets either within their peers or someone who is "below" them (like the unpopular girl in class, or one YA author trying to cancel another one within their community). But JKR is neither, they probably realize that she is mostly uncancellable and prefer to focus on more vulnerable targets.
 
Last edited:
FYI, for any who were surprised by this:

...should remember that when you see a (white) man behaving so faggishly, stabbing the person in the back who made him everything, there has be something else at play. When in doubt, early life check.


Radcliffe was predominately raised by his mother, and the 'Radcliffe' name is the only goy thing about him. Also he's 5'4 lol

gaycliff has fetal alcohol syndrome. those fellas are easily manipulated, especially by lunatics. turncoat bitch.
 
His social media team did a great job deleting troon rage comments. You have to scroll really far down, or order by most recent, in order to find anything.

We'll see how many subscriptions he's going to lose out of this. But given he's at 10 million currently I doubt it'll be more than just a drop in the bucket.
He also isn't Jim.
 
"When I woke up this morning, I didn't know it would be the last time I watched a @BingingWBabish, but here we are."

The person who wrote that statement is 40 years old:
View attachment 4619588

Can you imagine what would happen if any of these people were forced to deal with actual hardship?

Fortunately, it won't reproduce, just like a real panda.


if you connect the dots with a pencil, you will see a Jigglypuff. <3

Because they absolutely do interact with minors and this is their thinly veiled attempt at deflection/defense. Like the guys habitually getting into „consent accidents“ being male feminists as a deflection.

and the sluts who write "no ONS" on their tinder bio
 
Found this on a /v/ thread where people are debating about whether or not Hogwart's Legacy is saving video games.
 

Attachments

  • 1677417188522488.jpg
    1677417188522488.jpg
    370.6 KB · Views: 85
Not so fast!

Here's why 12 million copies in 2 weeks is achshually not a success when you consider the relative popularity of the Harry Potter IP.

View attachment 4626842
Link (Posted on the same group as this one)

Laughs:Likes ratio is once again very close to 4:1 and people are roasting him in the comments.

I really hope this dipshit is just trolling because this might be the stupidest post about this game I've seen so far (and that's saying a lot). Pretty much every developer in existence who isn't already a juggernaut like Rockstar, COD devs etc. would fucking murder to have their game sell 12M copies in 2 weeks, because it is basically a studio/life-altering thing to have happen to you.

These people truly have no fucking clue what they're talking about.
 
Back