Daddies and Littles - Child Abuse Fetish

I have a friend I grew up with since middle school who was very religious. Called us whores when we showed interest in boys, told us God wouldn't like those shorts we were wearing, shit like that. We generally just ignored it because it was so odd. And we would shut her up by bringing up Naruto or dumb anime shit.

Fast forward to like, two years ago. She proceeds to tell me and another childhood friend about how she has a "daddy" and that she's totally into infantilism and DDLG shit. She tells us in intricate detail how this dude makes her wear diapers, defecate in them, and then masturbate while still wearing it. She giggled the whole time while we just sat there too shocked to speak because it was just so ironic of what a gross deviant she had become when she used to be a super religious prude who got offended if you wore a tank top.

My favorite part of her tales of depravity was how her "daddy" dressed her up in a dog costume (she showed us pictures. Think Wilfred. I almost lost my shit looking at them.), made her piss herself while wearing it, and gave her the nickname 'Puddles'. From then on out me and the other buddy who was subjected to this shit referred to her as Puddles.

Did I mention this woman is an elementary school teacher?

Currently staying over at his house for the night.
I jokingly ask if his "little" is still awake, to which he responds "no, I told her to go to sleep or else I wont be happy".

He's sleeping in a fucking trenchcoat.

Why do I hang out with these people.
 
Chapter 1
Christine was feeling restless in Virginia. She had been trying for decades to find someone who would be pregnant with her beautiful daughter, Crystal. She had almost given up on ever finding a woman suitable to marry and raise Crystal, and so she traveled to California to find a lesbian willing to try. Out at a LGBTQKFDNAHBSEW+ meeting, she had met the woman of her dreams: Isabel. Isabel was smart, funny, and interested in Christine. After a few weeks of getting to know each other, Isabel invited Christine back to her limited-income housing. That night, after dinner, Isabel undressed herself, revealing A PICKLE!
"Isabel, you're not a TRUE AND HONEST woman? How could you lie to me like that?" Christine anguished.
"I'm a woman; I had an orchiectomy! You loved me as I am; I'm just a little different than you thought I was," Isabel retorted.
"You can't give me my Crystal!" Christine said, looking at Isabel's clearly-visible balls.
"No, but I can be your Crystal," Isabel said seductively as she wiped the cheese off her face and put her hands around Christine's ugly growth, continuing to speak.
"Mommy? Are you feeling good, like when you finish a Sonic game? I love playing with you, mommy".
"Is--Crystal, that feels so--" Christine exclaimed.
"I know, mommy. After this, we can spend time reshaping amiibos together! And write about Sonichu!"
Christine's duck exploded, and she hugged Isabel.
"Yes, sweetie. We can play Sonic and have fun forever and never get old. I love you so much, Crystal!"

On one hand, Satan is planning to make us his right hand men for doing this.
On the other hand, I'm so happy that I was the idea guy for one of the most horrible fanfics in the world.
I know that writing more would count as assisted suicide, but this is too good.
 
I'm surprised no one has mentioned the other thing these people do, which is to completely take Lolita at face value. They also post this shit in the 'Lolita' tag, which usually has dresses.
lolita proof 1.PNG lolita proof 2.png lolita proof 3.png

If anyone hasn't read the book, its narrator is a pedophile who isn't a pedophile, he just likes nymphets (fancy word for children), and he details his whirlwind romance with Lolita and she totally seduced him, guys. By the way, in the book, she's 12.
I'm so sure they don't condone pedophilia. :lol:
Unfortunately, I found this out while trying to look up pretty dresses of the poofy variety. A tad off-topic, but the Lolita community is very aware of the whole DD/lg thing, and they use the word 'ageplayer' like other communities use 'cuck', which is often and never in the right context. If you check the /cgl/ archive, and put in ageplayer, it's mostly just insults to coords about how ageplayish their dress is.
lolita proof 4.png
 
I'm surprised no one has mentioned the other thing these people do, which is to completely take Lolita at face value. They also post this shit in the 'Lolita' tag, which usually has dresses.
View attachment 103250 View attachment 103251 View attachment 103252

If anyone hasn't read the book, its narrator is a pedophile who isn't a pedophile, he just likes nymphets (fancy word for children), and he details his whirlwind romance with Lolita and she totally seduced him, guys. By the way, in the book, she's 12.
I'm so sure they don't condone pedophilia. :lol:
Unfortunately, I found this out while trying to look up pretty dresses of the poofy variety. A tad off-topic, but the Lolita community is very aware of the whole DD/lg thing, and they use the word 'ageplayer' like other communities use 'cuck', which is often and never in the right context. If you check the /cgl/ archive, and put in ageplayer, it's mostly just insults to coords about how ageplayish their dress is.
View attachment 103258

I thought the lolita community would hate people like that, given how much stigma there already is surrounding the lolita lifestyle.
 
Oh man. Age play shouldn't be any excuse for you to cut and curve your way from that title of "pedophilla". You and Jamie revisiting the time your dad took you to Toysrus and how he spank you because you were screaming for the Bratz toys but instead he gave you Barbie. Shouldn't be the first thing you think of for role play in the bed. It's only going to make your dad cringe and drink straight from the vodka bottle. Questioning himself on what happen to my little Jamie.
 
I'm surprised no one has mentioned the other thing these people do, which is to completely take Lolita at face value. They also post this shit in the 'Lolita' tag, which usually has dresses.
View attachment 103250 View attachment 103251 View attachment 103252

If anyone hasn't read the book, its narrator is a pedophile who isn't a pedophile, he just likes nymphets (fancy word for children), and he details his whirlwind romance with Lolita and she totally seduced him, guys. By the way, in the book, she's 12.
I'm so sure they don't condone pedophilia. :lol:
Unfortunately, I found this out while trying to look up pretty dresses of the poofy variety. A tad off-topic, but the Lolita community is very aware of the whole DD/lg thing, and they use the word 'ageplayer' like other communities use 'cuck', which is often and never in the right context. If you check the /cgl/ archive, and put in ageplayer, it's mostly just insults to coords about how ageplayish their dress is.
View attachment 103258
It's funny because Nabokov made it pretty clear what an unreliable narrator and sociopath Humbert was. He was incredibly disappointed that people thought it was a love story rather than realizing that, ya know, pedos are bad, m'kay?
 
Technically, Humbert was an ephebophile, not a pedophile. He liked pre-pubescent girls, old enough to be out of pull-ups and cut their own food but young enough to not have breasts, periods, or a certain degree of modesty. The "LG" players seem to act like toddlers or pre-schoolers, not "nymphet" age, so it's even more dumb as fuck that they're fixated on Lolita.
 
It's funny because Nabokov made it pretty clear what an unreliable narrator and sociopath Humbert was. He was incredibly disappointed that people thought it was a love story rather than realizing that, ya know, pedos are bad, m'kay?

Precisely. Especially since it's clear when you read the book that Humbert is telling this story in writing to try to defend himself in court for what he's done. Some of the phrasing that show he is readily apparent how wrong it is, that he just doesn't care (again, the story's framing device is him trying to defend himself to a court), and much of the stuff about "nymphlets" is him trying to justify fucking children. He even notes at one point that Lolita doesn't understand sex like an adult would and sees that as something that is an adult thing. He also goes in his mind on about how he wants to use Lolita to fuck her, have her have a child, then fuck the child.

It is also helpful to know that Nabokov loathed Freudian theories and the excuse that "well, I got stuck at x development" in adults, and that's part of Humbert's defense. It's also helpful to know that the story is set when Freud wouldn't have been considered complete idiocy to use . Incidentally, though Freud's heavily discredited in psychology, it is common in fiction to use Freudian theory because most authors don't understand how wrong it is.

Anyway, back to topic...

idiot.JPG

that's not creepy at all....JPG
 

Attachments

  • why is this a thing.JPG
    why is this a thing.JPG
    24.8 KB · Views: 1,155
A tad off-topic, but the Lolita community is very aware of the whole DD/lg thing, and they use the word 'ageplayer' like other communities use 'cuck', which is often and never in the right context. If you check the /cgl/ archive, and put in ageplayer, it's mostly just insults to coords about how ageplayish their dress is.

I wonder how big the influx of littles to Lolita communities really is. I've heard some terrifying stories from several local comms and I've already seen comms getting infested with sissies (but a part of me still hopes that all these littles don't have the spine to live their fetish in the real world)
 
I wonder how big the influx of littles to Lolita communities really is. I've heard some terrifyin. g stories from several local comms and I've already seen comms getting infested with sissies (but a part of me still hopes that all these littles don't have the spine to live their fetish in the real world)
The past two years I haven't been active as I have not had appropriate funds for the fashion sadly, but for about four years prior to that I've been an active member on both my local and online comms. These people are everywhere. Used to be they'd post on the "burn book" (lolita secrets on live journal) seeking support due to /cgl/ ripping littles and sissies apart. Rules regarding drama was more lenient back then too, so basically threads on this shit was allowed and they'd all post their experiences on these kind of folks but never doing anything about it. For a while people solely hated sissies but eventually started hating certain prints by very popular expensive brands because age players ate them up.

Best example is "dreamy baby room" by Angelic Pretty. The set came with a bonnet and at the height of this drama.
print_dreamy_baby_room_600.jpg


Almost everyone claimed to hate this print because it came out at the prime time littles were becoming super active on the lolita tags on Tumblr and people became more aware of it. Lots of chicks claimed they had people mistake them for such people during meetups.

I could sperg on but all in all some people really into the fashion are actually age players (or claim to be online. Whether they were out to just rustle jimmies, nobody knows), but the majority still hates both DDLG shit and sissies.

So much power-levelling and holier than thou in this thread.
"I work with children and this disgusts me" cool story, bro
"I know a primary school teacher who's into this" and you don't report them? Nice job essentially condoning their actions.
"Hey dude, I know I haven't seen you in like two years and I have no idea where you work and haven't been super involved in your life for like 4 years and unfriended you on Facebook long ago but some dude on this website where we all stalk retards wants me to report your weird fetish to your work."

I'm here to laugh, not be a hero. That chick wouldn't molest kids, it's just gross and hilarious. I'm not going to get doxxed by some bitch who gets off by shitting herself dressed as fucking Wilfred.
 
Last edited:
Back