Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

I mostly skim this thread.

Cant nick do most of the work in his own case hand it off to razz to correct?

Also if he pulled up, stopped the over sharing locked down the locals lewds, drank less did more law content and basically did the "guys I ve seen the error of my ways, I was having a mid life crisis I m gonna stop over sharing, also I ve sold the mustang because again I did a mid life on the internet."

Too late for that. People are burned. Even long-time supporters of the channel that used to toss superchats all the time are gone. Where is that transition to sending LOCALS tips or Rumble Rants? Gone...

Kayla is a not fat, but is also a medicated, mother of 5 in her 40s with large tattoos (who would also be divorced at that point). Her prospects are not great, especially considering the amount of documented embarrassing behavior that exists of her online due to Nick's show and locals crew.

Agree that money problems would definitely put a strain on the marriage, though if Kayla was more of an opportunist she might consider that there's not a lot of benefit in divorcing a poor man (and she's not getting any younger). In that case, divorcing before Nick starts losing properties and other assets might be the thing to do.


If this is the case then Kayla would likely jump ship with someone she, and possibly Nick, already knows and who she feels secure with (emotionally if not financially). Would be kind of funny if she leaves Nick for the masseuse.

If someone tells and shows you who they are, believe them. Nick looks like total shit lately so between all of the rumors and nonsense there is probably a shred of truth to a lot of it. Getting taken for 40 grand with nothing to show for it and the cope of "uh you don't know what's going on behind the scenes and everything is cool you prude losers" falls flat with his mopey tone and dejected slouch. Those supporters are never coming back, buddy.

Now he just wants a show to talk about how much he loves sex and cumming and other degen shit and is incredulous and "NOT MAD" that people left. I'm sorry my dude but that's fucking gross and not what people signed up for when they started following your show. If I was running contracts at Rumble I'd be fuming mad over this shithead move by pulling a bait and switch.

As for Kayla leaving, if the money has dried up, they are openly swinging because Nick can't perform, and are generally unhappy as people there is now a ticking clock. She's a 40 year old mother of 5 with no work experience who will take Nick to the cleaners if it comes to that. I'd be nervous too if I was him.

I do not share the general feeling that seems to be pointing toward divorce as inevitable. I am more inclined to think that even if they really did come to despise one another, they would put up with it for another 12 years until all the kids were 18. I also doubt Kayla was in it 'just for the money',

I also disagree that Kayla would have trouble finding a man because of the documented behaviour on the internet. Unless she has alogs dedicated enough to research and send the material to her potential dates, they would never know. She would have more issues BEING 40+ and having 5 KIDS, plus all the time being off the market in finding anyone else. We know WAY more about her public flaws than any potential beau would.

Also yes, Nick is a pile of lying shit. He can still do well if he could memory-hole this episode and find another audience, but that is easier said than done. I don't want to see him ruined, but I would not turn the garden hose on him if he were engulfed in flames, either. Just watch and laugh, my Kiwis... Put the matches away...

I recall Nick was ranting in a stream about how Schneider extended an olive branch of mentorship to him when he first started practicing law. Even to the extent that Schneider offered the dweeb the option to practice from Schneider‘s personal residence. Instead of acting like a normal human and being conciliatory and genuine in nature, in true Nick fashion he likely arrogantly rejected the offer in a demeaning way. “I’m a big time lolyer now, I don need nuffin from you old timer. Watch how good I can law without your help!” This lit the fuse. Then Nick publicly proceeded to harass and degrade Schnieder‘s kid who is handicapped through no fault of his own. Any father worth half a shit would rightfully want to destroy the asshole that treated him and his family this way.

I doubt it was something like this. I think the truth is more in the middle. He remembers Nick from the early days, met him in that one case and he came away with a negative impression. Now, years later, the codger is shown edited clips of Nick saying unhinged and ScAnDaLoUs things that offend his boomer sensibilities, so now he has 'always known that Rekeita was trouble. Dumb kid probably walked on my grass too!'.

 

[Not Who You Think]

That is what a rational person thinking long term would do sure. But the person you described is unlikely to think that way ("a medicated, mother of 5 in her 40s with large tattoos" who also posts her ass on locals for all to see). Her thought process, which probably operates on an emotional and subconscious level, is likely no more than "we are making a lot of money, things are fine." If in the future the money goes away that might switch "we don't have money any more, this sucks, I want out." But right now she likely has little to no awareness that super berries aren't forever and even if someone tried to tell her she would dismiss it with emotional thinking and copes.

That is certainly possible. While much of our speculating is not baseless, a lot of this is wait and see. In any case, its doubtful that things are going according to plan for either Kayla or Nick.

It would be good to hear more about what Kayla's reasons for laying low are to gauge how cognizant she is of her behavior. Unfortunately, for her, the only updates we've had in the last couple months is her leaving her kids so she and Nick could bring a bag of sex toys (aka the field kit) to Vegas and share a room with Camelot331, and evidence that she wants to swing at swinger island.

Tried to quote @Himedall All-seeing Waifu 's post:
I also disagree that Kayla would have trouble finding a man because of the documented behaviour on the internet. Unless she has alogs dedicated enough to research and send the material to her potential dates, they would never know. She would have more issues BEING 40+ and having 5 KIDS, plus all the time being off the market in finding anyone else. We know WAY more about her public flaws than any potential beau would.

A fair point. There is a possibility that Kayla finds someone who doesn't know about Nick, her streams with Nick, or if he does then he doesn't bother looking.

Another fair point in that her reputation may be among the least of her worries. That said, reputation is still worth considering since we live in an age where men will look up women online to screen for red flags (has she done porn, onlyfans, nudes/lewds, etc.). It may not be the deciding factor, but younger and more attractive women than Kayla have issues finding men for this reason, and this is with the use of aliases and without the presence of alogs. Public displays that are an indication of infidelity or embarrassment by association are becoming easier to find. Then there's the loose lips of any remaining family/friends to consider, but I digress.

A number of women have overlooked this to their detriment and only realize too late how important their reputation/history is.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

Nick's recent stream (the clip channel apocalypse one) ended up being pretty good. He was correct about oversharing and realized it. I thought it was a good one.

His show has been entertaining throughout all this drama stuff.

Thank you for reminding me I was going to do a deep dive into that stream, since the first segment, the "Clip Channelgeddon" part, was streamed to Youtube and thus has auto-captions.

The oversharing is an interesting admission. He did say he agrees with the idea that he had been oversharing about his personal life. But at other points in the stream, he talks about how he had received feedback from viewers that the sex talk had helped them, and I think he claimed to have gotten 9 messages from viewers that their marriages had been saved by Nick Rekieta's sex talk - sorry, his "openness about relationships".

So why is he pulling back about his relationship talk?

Maybe because he had realized that he could not talk about sex or relationships in the way he wanted to without opening the door to "Internet speculation" he does not like. Exhibit 1, from the Faran DMs:


I took the time to use the YT auto-captions to quickly get the clips of Nick's response to this DM leak from the "Clip Channelgeddon" stream on YouTube. Let's begin with the preliminaries.

• Is the DM real?
  Faran's statement did not deny the DM's authenticity.
  
  As far as I can tell, Nick did not address whether the DM was real or not, but instead seemed to accept that the DM was real.
  
  
• Did Nick say anything about the conversation referenced in the DM?
  Nick said "Faran misunderstood some things in our conversation". At another point he said that "shit gets misinterpreted, especially after a LOT of liquor", which appears to be a reference to the conversation.
  
  He also adds: "I know what I didn't say", which appears to suggest that he feels that at least part of the DM was inaccurate.
  Spoiler: Clips

Now let's go through the claims in the DM point-by-point, in reverse order.

• Did Nick respond to the claim that he told Faran he had a "sex room"?
  He denied having a "sex room", but he added "I WOULD!"
  
  Spoiler: Clip
  He later added "that'd be great but I don't".
  
  However, Nick said they own enough sex toys to fill a bag they call "the field kit", and in the past has talked about owning assorted paraphernalia such as a Saint Andrew's Cross as well.
  
  
• What about the claim that he told Faran he went to "swinger island"?
  I couldn't find a direct response - a search of the YT auto-captions for "island" returns 0 results - presumably because he would then have to address speculation beyond the DMs that suggests he may have traveled to Hedonism II, a Jamaican resort that counts the swinger community as a large part of its clientele. A search of the captions for "Hedonism" returns this superchat which attempted to defend him by saying "non-swingers" also go to Hedonism II. That's probably a true statement, but Nick didn't appear to love having to read it.
  
  Spoiler: Clip
  
  
• What about the claim that he told Faran "his wife wants to swing"?
  Nick denied that he or his wife are swingers. He said the marriage is "completely monogamous".
  
  He also said: "I did not, DID NOT, say that my wife and I are swingers. We are not. Again, for fuck's sake, do I look like I have time for that shit? We are not."
  
  Later in the show, he says again that the "swinging thing" is not true, adding "there's so many risks and pitfalls to that lifestyle that I would highly caution people against it, and I just don't think it's for me."
  
  Spoiler: Clips

In my opinion, Nick and Faran both appear to have latched onto the language that Faran "misunderstood" or (in more passive voice) that there was a misunderstanding in general, which gives Nick an out to deny the veracity of the contents of the DM without directly calling Faran a liar. He doesn't owe anyone an explanation, but his statement that "you can't stop Internet speculation" is odd when, to my knowledge, he hasn't given an alternative explanation of what he said to Faran. Nick certainly can't stop Internet speculation when his attempt to stop the speculation is as half-assed as his show prep.

 

[John Wesley Hardin]

How could Rackets have possibly fallen as far as he has? I remember enjoying him sometimes, as I’m sure many people did, and then instantly being repulsed by his sex talk and degeneracy and not able to watch him at all anymore. I had been losing interest before that, with his hours of toasts to retards and their dead grandpas, but I still thought he was alright. That seems to be a common story amongst former fans. He also used to have one of the few threads on the site where most people in the thread seemed to like him for the most part. That’s an absolute miracle. How do you fuck that up so spectacularly?

 

[Darkholme's Dungeon]

No. Nick is a LOLyer not a lawyer.

One lolsuit to rule them all.....

A number of women have overlooked this to their detriment and only realize too late how important their reputation/history is.

I'm not saying that anyone should do this (you shouldn't), but I personally think there's a non-zero chance that people (my guess will be troons/Ralphamale orbiters) will a-log her if she does leave him.

Nick certainly can't stop Internet speculation when his attempt to stop the speculation is as half-assed as his show prep.

I'm not sure what his "oh it's a misunderstanding" and trying to deflect accomplishes. First it's a mini-Streisand effect, and second it just makes him seem at best a terrible communicator and at worst a spin artist.

 

[gang weeder]

It would be good to hear more about what Kayla's reasons for laying low are to gauge how cognizant she is of her behavior. Unfortunately, for her, the only updates we've had in the last couple months is her leaving her kids so she and Nick could bring a bag of sex toys (aka the field kit) to Vegas and share a room with Camelot331, and evidence that she wants to swing at swinger island.

She probably just had a moment of clarity and realized that posting her ass for strangers on the Internet is a bad idea.

A fair point. There is a possibility that Kayla finds someone who doesn't know about Nick, her streams with Nick, or if he does then he doesn't bother looking.

In her age range she will be fine. Boomers have no fucking clue any of this shit exists (lolcows, kiwifarms, etc.). Even if a-logs brought it to light somehow she can probably just spin it as Internet weirdos harassing her because of her ex, which would have a large grain of truth to it. If she had actually done porn that might be a problem but she hasn't (that we know of).

How could Rackets have possibly fallen as far as he has? I remember enjoying him sometimes, as I’m sure many people did, and then instantly being repulsed by his sex talk and degeneracy and not able to watch him at all anymore. I had been losing interest before that, with his hours of toasts to retards and their dead grandpas, but I still thought he was alright. That seems to be a common story amongst former fans. He also used to have one of the few threads on the site where most people in the thread seemed to like him for the most part. That’s an absolute miracle. How do you fuck that up so spectacularly?

I think it's not really anything that crazy.

1. He got a lot of money and clout. This fueled his ego and vices.
2. He spent all day for months and even years inside a bubble of Internet weirdness disconnected from the real world. So he lost touch with normal social interactions and standards.
3. When he got backlash for behavior tied to #2, #1 caused him to think the problem couldn't possibly be him, because in his experience he has been an untouchable e-celeb and he is used to people siding with him.

This is actually a common pattern with e-celebs I feel like. It does parallel Ralph for instance, although Nick is still nowhere near Ralph levels, the Gunt followed the same format. I remember when he wasn't considered a lolcow and was on relatively friendly terms with Jewsh and Metokur and etc. But after a while he just couldn't handle all the e-fame money and booze.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Thank you for reminding me I was going to do a deep dive into that stream, since the first segment, the "Clip Channelgeddon" part, was streamed to Youtube and thus has auto-captions.

The oversharing is an interesting admission. He did say he agrees with the idea that he had been oversharing about his personal life. But at other points in the stream, he talks about how he had received feedback from viewers that the sex talk had helped them, and I think he claimed to have gotten 9 messages from viewers that their marriages had been saved by Nick Rekieta's sex talk - sorry, his "openness about relationships".

So why is he pulling back about his relationship talk?

Maybe because he had realized that he could not talk about sex or relationships in the way he wanted to without opening the door to "Internet speculation" he does not like. Exhibit 1, from the Faran DMs:
View attachment 4706536

I took the time to use the YT auto-captions to quickly get the clips of Nick's response to this DM leak from the "Clip Channelgeddon" stream on YouTube. Let's begin with the preliminaries.

• Is the DM real?
  Faran's statement did not deny the DM's authenticity.
  
  As far as I can tell, Nick did not address whether the DM was real or not, but instead seemed to accept that the DM was real.
  
  
• Did Nick say anything about the conversation referenced in the DM?
  Nick said "Faran misunderstood some things in our conversation". At another point he said that "shit gets misinterpreted, especially after a LOT of liquor", which appears to be a reference to the conversation.
  
  He also adds: "I know what I didn't say", which appears to suggest that he feels that at least part of the DM was inaccurate.
  Spoiler: Clips

  View attachment 4706901 View attachment 4706896

Now let's go through the claims in the DM point-by-point, in reverse order.

• Did Nick respond to the claim that he told Faran he had a "sex room"?
  He denied having a "sex room", but he added "I WOULD!"
  
  Spoiler: Clip

  View attachment 4706905
  He later added "that'd be great but I don't".
  
  However, Nick said they own enough sex toys to fill a bag they call "the field kit", and in the past has talked about owning assorted paraphernalia such as a Saint Andrew's Cross as well.
  
  
• What about the claim that he told Faran he went to "swinger island"?
  I couldn't find a direct response - a search of the YT auto-captions for "island" returns 0 results - presumably because he would then have to address speculation beyond the DMs that suggests he may have traveled to Hedonism II, a Jamaican resort that counts the swinger community as a large part of its clientele. A search of the captions for "Hedonism" returns this superchat which attempted to defend him by saying "non-swingers" also go to Hedonism II. That's probably a true statement, but Nick didn't appear to love having to read it.
  
  Spoiler: Clip

  View attachment 4706894
  
  
• What about the claim that he told Faran "his wife wants to swing"?
  Nick denied that he or his wife are swingers. He said the marriage is "completely monogamous".
  
  He also said: "I did not, DID NOT, say that my wife and I are swingers. We are not. Again, for fuck's sake, do I look like I have time for that shit? We are not."
  
  Later in the show, he says again that the "swinging thing" is not true, adding "there's so many risks and pitfalls to that lifestyle that I would highly caution people against it, and I just don't think it's for me."
  
  Spoiler: Clips

  View attachment 4706892View attachment 4707174View attachment 4706885

In my opinion, Nick and Faran both appear to have latched onto the language that Faran "misunderstood" or (in more passive voice) that there was a misunderstanding in general, which gives Nick an out to deny the veracity of the contents of the DM without directly calling Faran a liar. He doesn't owe anyone an explanation, but his statement that "you can't stop Internet speculation" is odd when, to my knowledge, he hasn't given an alternative explanation of what he said to Faran. Nick certainly can't stop Internet speculation when his attempt to stop the speculation is as half-assed as his show prep.

Calling BD on the 'we were virgins'. He talked on one of his sex streams that his wife laid him when they were 'serious' on his birthday in college while his buddy was across the dorm.

This came up when he was talkign about how Branca says he sees his wife as the same now as she was at 20-something, but Nick's memory substitutes LR as she is NOW into the memory. It was a cursed cloying reminisce before he went full coomer.

YOU SIT ON A BALLDO OF LIES!

 

[ForTheHoard]

Thank you for reminding me I was going to do a deep dive into that stream, since the first segment, the "Clip Channelgeddon" part, was streamed to Youtube and thus has auto-captions.

The oversharing is an interesting admission. He did say he agrees with the idea that he had been oversharing about his personal life. But at other points in the stream, he talks about how he had received feedback from viewers that the sex talk had helped them, and I think he claimed to have gotten 9 messages from viewers that their marriages had been saved by Nick Rekieta's sex talk - sorry, his "openness about relationships".

So why is he pulling back about his relationship talk?

Maybe because he had realized that he could not talk about sex or relationships in the way he wanted to without opening the door to "Internet speculation" he does not like. Exhibit 1, from the Faran DMs:
View attachment 4706536

I took the time to use the YT auto-captions to quickly get the clips of Nick's response to this DM leak from the "Clip Channelgeddon" stream on YouTube. Let's begin with the preliminaries.

• Is the DM real?
  Faran's statement did not deny the DM's authenticity.
  
  As far as I can tell, Nick did not address whether the DM was real or not, but instead seemed to accept that the DM was real.
  
  
• Did Nick say anything about the conversation referenced in the DM?
  Nick said "Faran misunderstood some things in our conversation". At another point he said that "shit gets misinterpreted, especially after a LOT of liquor", which appears to be a reference to the conversation.
  
  He also adds: "I know what I didn't say", which appears to suggest that he feels that at least part of the DM was inaccurate.
  Spoiler: Clips

  View attachment 4706901 View attachment 4706896

Now let's go through the claims in the DM point-by-point, in reverse order.

• Did Nick respond to the claim that he told Faran he had a "sex room"?
  He denied having a "sex room", but he added "I WOULD!"
  
  Spoiler: Clip

  View attachment 4706905
  He later added "that'd be great but I don't".
  
  However, Nick said they own enough sex toys to fill a bag they call "the field kit", and in the past has talked about owning assorted paraphernalia such as a Saint Andrew's Cross as well.
  
  
• What about the claim that he told Faran he went to "swinger island"?
  I couldn't find a direct response - a search of the YT auto-captions for "island" returns 0 results - presumably because he would then have to address speculation beyond the DMs that suggests he may have traveled to Hedonism II, a Jamaican resort that counts the swinger community as a large part of its clientele. A search of the captions for "Hedonism" returns this superchat which attempted to defend him by saying "non-swingers" also go to Hedonism II. That's probably a true statement, but Nick didn't appear to love having to read it.
  
  Spoiler: Clip

  View attachment 4706894
  
  
• What about the claim that he told Faran "his wife wants to swing"?
  Nick denied that he or his wife are swingers. He said the marriage is "completely monogamous".
  
  He also said: "I did not, DID NOT, say that my wife and I are swingers. We are not. Again, for fuck's sake, do I look like I have time for that shit? We are not."
  
  Later in the show, he says again that the "swinging thing" is not true, adding "there's so many risks and pitfalls to that lifestyle that I would highly caution people against it, and I just don't think it's for me."
  
  Spoiler: Clips

  View attachment 4706892View attachment 4707174View attachment 4706885

In my opinion, Nick and Faran both appear to have latched onto the language that Faran "misunderstood" or (in more passive voice) that there was a misunderstanding in general, which gives Nick an out to deny the veracity of the contents of the DM without directly calling Faran a liar. He doesn't owe anyone an explanation, but his statement that "you can't stop Internet speculation" is odd when, to my knowledge, he hasn't given an alternative explanation of what he said to Faran. Nick certainly can't stop Internet speculation when his attempt to stop the speculation is as half-assed as his show prep.

Saying "my wife and I are monogamous" does not disprove or deny Faran's statement that they are thinking about/wanting to swing. It just means they haven't partner swapped yet (if he's not directly lying). Much like his "against the wall" debacle, he's more than capable of managing semantics in a way where he's being dishonest without lying. He might not be a good lawyer, but he is a lawyer, and control of the English language to that degree is a minimum requirement for the field.

 

[gang weeder]

Saying "my wife and I are monogamous" does not disprove or deny Faran's statement that they are thinking about/wanting to swing. It just means they haven't partner swapped yet (if he's not directly lying). Much like his "against the wall" debacle, he's more than capable of managing semantics in a way where he's being dishonest without lying. He might not be a good lawyer, but he is a lawyer, and control of the English language to that degree is a minimum requirement for the field.

IMO he should really just shut the fuck up about it. If he wanted to do the smart thing. The more I hear him talk about it and deny it the more sure I am Kayla has cheated on him or something.

 

[Twitter Is Cancer]

IMO he should really just shut the fuck up about it. If he wanted to do the smart thing. The more I hear him talk about it and deny it the more sure I am Kayla has cheated on him or something.

We all already know she cheated on him, at least as far as having her tits massaged by a black sport bar drug dealer "masseur"
She had that happen once, according to her own bullshit story, then went back at least one more time.
The second time was cheating even if the first wasn't. Even based on her own bullshit story.

 

[gang weeder]

We all already know she cheated on him, at least as far as having her tits massaged by a black sport bar drug dealer "masseur"
She had that happen once, according to her own bullshit story, then went back at least one more time.
The second time was cheating even if the first wasn't. Even based on her own bullshit story.

Didn't know this lore but yeah doesn't surprise me. What surprises me more is that she thought sharing that with the Internet was a good idea.

 

[5t3n0g0ph3r]

IMO he should really just shut the fuck up about it. If he wanted to do the smart thing. The more I hear him talk about it and deny it the more sure I am Kayla has cheated on him or something.

Anytime a spouse wants to open the marriage, it leads to disaster. Nick has covered this throughout his channel's history, so he knows better. I think he never thought it would happen him. Now, is there definitive proof that Kayla is cheating on him? No (not yet, at least). Has she been shit-testing him (yet, another topic that he and Drexel have talked hours about)? I have no doubt she has been and Nick hadn't registered it as such at the time (again, probably didn't think it would happen to him). Add denial, alcohol, and coombrain, you get the disheveled Nick we see today.
Nick, you saw the trap and you still stuck your hand in it.

 

[AnOminous]

How do you fuck that up so spectacularly?

Nick is now the Jack Scalfani of law.

Nick, you saw the trap and you still stuck your hand Balldo in it.

FTFY.

She had that happen once, according to her own bullshit story, then went back at least one more time.

Which makes Nick an open cuck.

 

[Hot Dog]

@Himedall All-seeing Waifu I don't really think that divorce is inevitable but it looks like they could be heading down the path to a miserable marriage where both spouses clearly resent each other to the determent of their kids well being. Things certainly aren't looking up as they once did and for Kayla to start shit testing and tearing into Nick comes across as something a really unhappy immature woman would do.

The fire has already started and it's all downhill from here at this point. Just sit back and watch the shitshow.

 

[Lady Rackets Ass]

He’s watching pulp fiction tonight probably so he can masturbate to the gimp scene. I hope someone sends him a super berry about the scene discussing letting someone else massage your wife’s feet except in his case it would be your wife’s tits

 

[Dean Pentel]

@Himedall All-seeing Waifu I don't really think that divorce is inevitable but it looks like they could be heading down the path to a miserable marriage where both spouses clearly resent each other to the determent of their kids well being. Things certainly aren't looking up as they once did and for Kayla to start shit testing and tearing into Nick comes across as something a really unhappy immature woman would do.

The fire has already started and it's all downhill from here at this point. Just sit back and watch the shitshow.

Certainly not inevitable, but more probable all the time. I hope their divorce happens while Nick still has some money. Watching him recoil in utter Jewish horror at the prospect of how much she'll take from him while he quickly depletes what he has in degenerative self-destruction would be delightful to witness.

Plus getting to see him start letting his new boyfriend on his rapidly declining streams would be good too.

 

[Strix454]

We all already know she cheated on him, at least as far as having her tits massaged by a black sport bar drug dealer "masseur"
She had that happen once, according to her own bullshit story, then went back at least one more time.
The second time was cheating even if the first wasn't. Even based on her own bullshit story.

When the time comes, its best to remember that Nick will almost certainly define "cheating" and non-monogamy as proven vag penetration of her by another man with a penis. Nothing else will count. That includes her tit massages, Nick's hints that he goes for rub-and-tug happy ending massages, Nick supposedly getting felt up by women in vegas and so on. The same semantic games will also apply to any sex Nick might have had or eventually have with men.

Nick can deny being a swinger even if a comment by his wife that she wants to be a swinger is true. Nick would likely deny being a swinger even if he participated in acts with swingers. Semantically he will be correct, but he will still look like a fool.

He has already prepared his universal exit strategy for anything coming out. He has already "admitted" to everyone that he is a "sex pervert" and therefore anything that comes out about his sex life is simply people "misunderstanding" what he "has always been".

 

[Mocha Shaka Khan]

I recall Nick was ranting in a stream about how Schneider extended an olive branch of mentorship to him when he first started practicing law. Even to the extent that Schneider offered the dweeb the option to practice from Schneider‘s personal residence.

And then he reneged on that olive branch later on.

 

[Nothing To Say Here]

When the time comes, its best to remember that Nick will almost certainly define "cheating" and non-monogamy as proven vag penetration of her by another man with a penis. Nothing else will count. That includes her tit massages, Nick's hints that he goes for rub-and-tug happy ending massages, Nick supposedly getting felt up by women in vegas and so on. The same semantic games will also apply to any sex Nick might have had or eventually have with men.

Nick can deny being a swinger even if a comment by his wife that she wants to be a swinger is true. Nick would likely deny being a swinger even if he participated in acts with swingers. Semantically he will be correct, but he will still look like a fool.

He has already prepared his universal exit strategy for anything coming out. He has already "admitted" to everyone that he is a "sex pervert" and therefore anything that comes out about his sex life is simply people "misunderstanding" what he "has always been".

Every traditional societal norm: “Nick IS a swinger.”
Nick: “That depends on what the meaning of the word ’is’ is.”

 

[zyclonPD]

YOU SIT ON A BALLDO OF LIES!

I hope you have panoptes running at full steam. The locals coomers may be running a victory lap soon.