- Joined
- Dec 15, 2021
I think the line work needs to be a little shaker, like an ms paint drawing done on a laptop touchbad. Otherwise good job.
Maybe bring a little bit of Dick’s wojacks energy into.
Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.
- Thread starter Himedall All-seeing Waifu
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Maybe bring a little bit of Dick’s wojacks energy into.
Cynthia Behave
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2023
Great point! I keep mentioning it too. Whatever one thinks of the Keffals mess there were multiple ethics complaints made against him months ago which - as far as we know - are outstanding. The OLRP is either lazy or very smart by sitting on this. Atp, I'm leaning into the latter... and now Schnieder is in the mix. I'm sure there are many well-connected MN lawyers who have issues with his conduct writ large. And Nick keeps poking the bear.
Why Nick doesn't just hang up his law license is a separate question. No one cares anymore, right? He could almost get more cred by being disbarred. (Wait. Is that the goal? He could grift tf out of that.)
Zero self-discipline on Nick's part. He just doesn't care. Viva and Barnes perfected the model if I'm not mistaken. They have a hard cut-off after 30 min (or something) before moving to Rumble. I'm convinced he just stays on YT for the superchats.
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2019
- Joined
- May 17, 2021
I am not sure why the Ethics Board are taking so long, but my default is to assume incompetency. Look at how the Homosexual Trouser Appeal went. 2 years for 'You fucked up your filings'. I will wait to speculate more.
As for the potential disbarring, the only reason, Nick has said he keeps the license up is ego 'I worked for it and it is mine. I do not want anyone to take something that is mine' to paraphrase. At this point though, I doubt how much clout he could get from it. (Less than the YT banning) but maybe enough to give a small bump to branch out to new audiences since his current stock seems stagnant and inbred.
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2019
Soliciting drugs via mail on a public chatroom? Aren't lawyers supposed to beintelligent, or at least know not to incriminate themselves?
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2023
I know seeing the screengrab from his YouTube, you’re hard pressed to believe he‘d be a member of Nicks locals.
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2022
I’m sure he’s only pretending to be retarded. “Dummies on the Kiwi Farms fell for another joke, it was all a work! Got ‘em again!”
Twitter Is Cancer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
Just look at that Simpsons style underbite. What a weak faggot girlyman he is.
- Joined
- May 17, 2021
But he said IN MINECRAFT! Joke is on you DEA! LOL get REKT, GG!
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2019
He looks like a non-schizo Terry Davis.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
And I'm not sure how, but it needs to be a bit smugger.
- Joined
- May 29, 2021
The "Keffals" complaints are IMO in a different category. I'm not sure if Nick even had to write a response on those. Those complaints are from randos about subjects that have nothing to with the legal profession or Nick's conduct in the profession. I really don't think those complaints are going anywhere and I think the agency moving those complaints to the bottom of the pile is a reasonable thing to do.
The Schnieder complaint is much more complicated and will be treated more seriously. That is why he had to do a formal response. The reason that one is more important is that it is a complaint by another attorney about Nick's conduct within the profession. An argument can be made that Nick was acting as an attorney in a case (his own) when he said the things he said. Nick can and will make arguments in his defense, but none of them are slam-dunk arguments. But I don't think anything will come of the complaints at this time beyond maybe telling Nick to knock it off or giving him some sort of warning.
Where Nick could get into real trouble in the future is verbally going after the judge in his case. That would be much more dangerous for him.
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2019
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2016
Charitably, that's a trick of the light in combination with some feature of a well hidden bra-like device, possibly built into the dress, that we can't see very well (which would be intentional to the design).
Sperg level 1: it's a probably some kind nipple slip.
Schizo level 1: it's a probably a slip of a tattoo of a nipple.
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
You are misinformed. The initial complaints were indeed thrown out without Nick having to write a response. But then he did the stream where showed the names of the complainants, having blacked out their addresses, but said he intended to post the unredacted documents on his Locals.
IMO he probably could have gotten away without anything happening to him if he just posted the documents without comment, but I think his comments in the stream in question were probably what got him in trouble in terms of an investigation being opened.
In November he disclosed that the OLPR was investigating him over this. I had missed this clip because it's age-gated on YT - here's a Rumble clip from Elissa;
https://rumble.com/v1tfwpf-rekieta-law-is-under-investigation-lets-rant.html
As of the start of January, Nick said that he hadn't received anything back from the OLPR about whether the investigation was open or closed.
The problem is for Nick is that this conduct is now becoming a pattern. Nick gets drunk on his stream and says something he might regret later, specifically something where the OLPR feels that they have cause to open an investigation.
That's an appeal. Different situation.
He had to have announced he was under investigation by November 10th since that's the date of Elissa's clip. From my reading a few months ago most ethics investigations (those farmed out to the local District Ethics Committee) are supposed to be completed within 3 months. If it goes over that time they have to tell the OLPR why they are going over the designated time. There's also the possibility that the OLPR kept this investigation for themselves, which I don't think would have even that soft deadline, but that would probably be worse for Rekieta if true, because it means the people at the top are taking a special interest in him.
It's possible that they closed the investigation without discipline, but if they did, I presume Nick would announce that and take a victory lap. I believe there is also the possibility of private discipline where Nick is admonished and told not to do it again. But I'm almost certain Nick would announce that too ("I'm being silenced!" is liquid gold for a content creator like Nick), and any private discipline would also be disclosed to any complainant(s) who would presumably leak that themselves if Nick didn't. So I don't think that happened either.
So my guess would be that it might still be open? If I had to guess, whoever got assigned this has basically gone "WTF is this stupid online drama" and put it on the back burner and never dealt with it. But we really have no idea.
Twitter Is Cancer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
Rekieta has three serious complaints open against him right now, and that's from a source familiar with the situation directly.
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2015
I am really just waiting for him to have his new running joke being "And I, not being a lawyer anymore..." as the cope.
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2021
It’s a bit too clean. Wojacks and soyjacks are usually shitty trace jobs done with MSPaint or KidPix.
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2021
Makes you wonder if he'd finally change the name of the show. Since it hasn't been about 'lawsplaining' for months now anyway.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Ballsplaining the Intercucks.