- Joined
- Sep 26, 2019
Ehh... I'm not interested in buying it either, but I'm with everyone else on the $70 price tag being bullshit out of principle. It's a game that reuses a lot of assets being released on an aging system. Comparing it to games of the 90s doesn't work well, either, considering a lot of those costs went towards those expensive-ass ROM cartridges, where every megabit cost a chunk of change Nowadays, it's $70 for a license on your account to download the game that'll be worthless when Nintendo shutters the Switch eShop in a decade or so.There's no projection. I'm telling you Ninty fags to stop whining and "back in the good 'ole days" we paid just as much regularly for new games and they didn't have online play or DLC bullshit.
So stop whining.
If there's one thing I'd like to see out of Nintendo, it's a cancellation of Pikmin 4, so Arlo will dye his fur black and start cutting himself.
I agree, it looks like crap. I'm not a fan of Wayforward's low-key horny artstyle. On top of that, it's only a remake of the first two games, both of which were on GBA, a platform that's never not been trivial to emulate. Including remakes of Dual Strike and Days of Ruin would give the collection some real value, considering those are stuck on the DS, and DS games tend to stay on the DS due to needing a complete reworking because of how everything's designed for that format.Advance Wars looks like shit, honestly
There's just something off about the art. Like, it's way too smooth and clean, both in comparison to the subject matter (of the game; its tone) and the original's style. All of the animation also looks excessively tweened. It's like a robot was told to remake the game with every modern reboot cliche known to man and this came out.
>Hand-drawn/toyetic graphics (or, in this case, both- stylistic clashing be damned) replacing old spritework
>snarky title and/or box print that adds a very unsubtle nod to the fact that it's a reboot/remake somewhere in there multiple timesnot sure this is as common as the rest but it irritates me to no end
>not made by the original dev studio; instead, handed over to total newcomers to the franchise (in this case, Wayforward, a shovelware dev)
>scraps the vast majority of the original's UI for modern (blander) do-overs
>keeping the spirit of the series' design aesthetic alive at all is optional
whether it also has irritating little tweaks that make it being the definitive version debatable is yet to be seen, but knowing how remakes work there'll probably be at least a few.
I don't care much about Zelda, but I care even less about this remake. At least Zelda has a chance of being decent.
Plus, it's full price. Sixty bucks for two GBA games. Come on, that's gross.