How Biden's New Washing Machine Regulations Could Ruin Laundry Day - They're waging a war on all appliances, not just gas stoves

Manufacturers say government climate change initiative would make your washing cycles longer, clothes dirtier​

1678841185803.png
WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 25: U.S. President Joe Biden makes an announcement on additional military support for Ukraine in the Roosevelt Room of the White House on January 25, 2023 in Washington, DC. President Biden said the U.S. will send 31 M-1 Abrams tanks to Ukraine to aid in their fight against Russia after Germany approved the delivery of Leopard 2 tanks to Kyiv. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Collin Anderson
March 13, 2023

When Cincinnati firefighter Ed Wallace bought a high efficiency Whirlpool washing machine, he came to regret the decision almost immediately. The machine used less water—not enough to clean Wallace's work clothes—and his colleagues at the firehouse quickly took notice. "I walked past my guys and they say, 'Dude, you stink!'" Wallace said. "I smelled myself, and yeah, that's me stinking."

Now, President Joe Biden is pushing regulations that could force Wallace's stinky situation upon millions of Americans.

Biden's Energy Department last month proposed new efficiency standards for washing machines that would require new appliances to use considerably less water, all in an effort to "confront the global climate crisis." Those mandates would force manufacturers to reduce cleaning performance to ensure their machines comply, leading industry giants such as Whirlpool said in public comments on the rule. They'll also make the appliances more expensive and laundry day a headache—each cycle will take longer, the detergent will cost more, and in the end, the clothes will be less clean, the manufacturers say.

The proposed washing machine rule marks the latest example of the administration turning to consumer regulations to advance its climate change goals. Last month, the Energy Department published an analysis of its proposed cooking appliance efficiency regulations, which it found would effectively ban half of all gas stoves on the U.S. market from being sold. The department has also proposed new efficiency standards for refrigerators, which could come into effect in 2027. "Collectively these energy efficiency actions … support President Biden's ambitious clean energy agenda to combat the climate crisis," the Energy Department said in February.

While the Energy Department—which did not return a request for comment—acknowledged in its proposal that "maintaining acceptable cleaning performance can be more difficult as energy and water levels are reduced," it expressed confidence that Whirlpool and other appliance manufacturers can comply with its regulations without sacrificing stain removal and other performance standards. For the Heritage Foundation's Travis Fisher, however, manufacturer concerns over the proposal are justified.

"When you're squeezing all you can out of the efficiency in terms of electricity use and water … you by definition either make the appliance worse or slower," said Fisher, who serves as a senior research fellow at the foundation's Center for Energy, Climate, and Environment. "Why are we so focused on the energy output, as opposed to if it's helping me wash my clothes? That standard has kind of gone off the rails."

Beyond the performance standard debate, the Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers argued that the Energy Department's washing machine regulations "would have a disproportionate, negative impact on low-income households" by eliminating cheaper appliances from the market. The Energy Department estimates that manufacturers will incur nearly $700 million in conversion costs to transition to the new machines.

The department countered concerns over higher appliance prices by arguing in its proposal that consumers will ultimately save money under the regulations through lower energy and water bills. Still, those estimated savings won't apply to all consumers, roughly a quarter of whom "would experience a net cost" thanks to the efficiency rule, according to the Energy Department's proposal.

The Energy Department is required to conduct efficiency standard reviews every six years under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, which Congress enacted in 1975, two years after an Arab oil embargo inflated gas prices in the United States. The Clinton administration subsequently established the country's first washing machine energy and water efficiency standards in 2001, just before former president George W. Bush took office. Those standards led to "ruined laundry, ongoing maintenance, and service calls," prompting Whirlpool to release a cleaning product "specifically designed to address moldy washing machines," according to George Washington University's Sofie Miller.

The debacle has not stopped the Biden administration from moving forward with more stringent appliance energy efficiency standards, which have not been updated for washing machines since 2012. The tightening of those standards "could put performance at risk" but is unlikely to provide "meaningful energy savings," the Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers says, because most appliances covered under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act "now operate at peak efficiency."

"They keep tightening the standards, and I'm not sure their reasoning makes sense anymore," Fisher told the Washington Free Beacon.

Source (Archive)
 
The industrial stuff is really good, but you're going to pay dearly for it. You're going to own it for like 30 years though, so how much does cost matter in the end.
I'm talking other than speed queen. You have to know about them, talk to them, hope your washing room is big enough, and hope you have enough cash
 
I'm talking other than speed queen. You have to know about them, talk to them, hope your washing room is big enough, and hope you have enough cash
I'm not thinking some huge hotel washer, just the kind that go in laundromats. They're still much higher quality than anything you'll find on a sales floor and they fit into normal spaces.
 
I'm not thinking some huge hotel washer, just the kind that go in laundromats. They're still much higher quality than anything you'll find on a sales floor and they fit into normal spaces.
Much of that still applies. And it's gonna be a ton of cash, they don't go cheap.
 
This honestly has been the worst administration in American history
It’s not that bad. Wilson started the “make the world safe for democracy” ideology and dragged the US into WWI. Lincoln was a literal dictator who suppressed the free press in ways modern journos would cream their pants over if it happened to them. Andrew Jackson had the Indian Removal act. Harrison died from pneumonia he contracted from giving the longest inaugural address in the rain.

To say a do nothing admin is the worst lacks historical perspective. A government that does very little is a good government in my book.
 
Last edited:
Oh yeah you guys have huge taxes on everything lol. I'm glad your machine is still working at least, don't give it up if it's still trucking along
I live in a place where it rains constantly, I am absolutely not going to have dirty clothes for the want of water.
If this new machine was that good, Mr government wouldn't need to get involved in enforcing it's usage. Think about that



It sounds smart and that's enough for these people
you could have just an eco setting on a machine, people would use it sometimes for things lightly soiled that just need a freshen up and you’d do more on average than forcing them to wash everything twice.
Maybe it is humiliation focused but the sheer stupidity of our elites is what makes me cross. If they were geniuses sorting things out people would be far less against it all
 
I already know how to handwash and I knew this was on the horizon.

I'm gonna be a dick make the following statement :

People already don't wear deodorant or iron their clothes, what is the harm of removing yet another part of personal hygiene? Having clean, ironed clothes will soon be a symbol of wealth.
 
>You will live in a pod
>You will eat the bugs
>You will own nothing
>You will not...wash the...clothes!?

Something tells me this is not going to be very friendly to cramped pod living if everyone stinks because they can't get their fucking clothes washed. :story:
The kinds of people that are okay with pod life stink already - since they're used to it, they don't see why anyone else would have a problem.
 
>make new machines use less water to save water
>new machines don't clean clothes properly
>people wash clothes twice or wash in twice as many loads to compensate using twice as much water

Yup sure sounds like a smart idea to me.
>use machine more
>ching Chong ding dong "engineering" breaks down faster

Sounds like planned obsolescence/home warranty grift to me
 
Certainly in my lifetime.
At least Bush II gave us the sunset of the AWB and the PLCAA, at this point miring us in pointless foreign wars seems to be universal to the uniparty and only Trump kind of bucked that trend...
 
I guess walking around clean and not smelling like unwashed armpits is a symbol of white supremacy now. Honestly surprised they didn’t go with that angle.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: notafederalagent
I guess walking around clean and not smelling like unwashed armpits is a symbol of white supremacy now. Honestly surprised they didn’t go with that angle.
biden's handlers were too late, someone already did that


 
It's not like the Government is forcing consumers at gunpoint to buy a brand new washing machine. Just keep using your current machine until it craps out, then consider whether or not you want to buy one of these new high-falutin' machines, fix your old one* (assuming your machine that's economically viable to repair) or buy a used machine from Craigslist.

* IMHO the repairability aspect is an important yet overlooked way of being more environmentally friendly but that's a whole other story
They don't outright force. They soft force via pricing most people out of owning the non-globohomo approved product. Just look at the vehicle market.
 
Back