Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.7%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 27.3%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 16.0%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 124 36.8%

  • Total voters
    337
I’d be interested to know if that Mandy pic is also 10+ years out of date. He desperately wants to sleep with her that’s why he wants her to talk to our wife first so she will know if she wants to swing with them it’s pretty transparent.
That image features the remarkably vibrant dithering indicative of a 256 color palette. When was the last time anyone used 8-bit color for photos? The mid-90's?

I know we've all had a few laughs about the ancient phone in some of her thot pictures, but at this point I legit wonder if Mandy is actually older than Sally?
 
Tbh he might have been a rude beligerent drunk there but he's not wrong.
Telling the OLPR he would fuck them in the ass may have been ill advised but I agree with what he said there.

His threats of legal action here.. "I will fuck you in the ass in front of the Supreme Court" are somewhat reminiscent of his invitation to Monty to sue him.

He hasn't yet realized that it's great to be a lawyer when somebody else is paying the bill for your performative outrage (not that Nick would know much about that.) It's not quite as much fun when it's you that's paying the lawyer's bill.
 
If Nick has the money for 5k individual unique pieces of "art", he shouldn't be setting up a GSG for his fans to help pay for his lawsuit.
That's where you're wrong, prude incel child.

If we stretch the definition of "unique" until it is thinner than Nick's skin, technically having his own pope mug wear different hats and assorted paraphernalia would make each piece of art unique, as would different backgrounds and maybe even having rare balldo popes such as "glowing red nose balldo pope" or "zombie blue skin balldo pope"

What I'm saying is that he could produce 5 thousand unique pieces of art if he followed the generating procedure used by everyone's favourite thing, NFTs.

And if he does follow through with monetizing them, I sincerely hope he uses whatever money he grifts from it on lube, as the feds and IRS have been violently sodomizing many a would be crypto-millionaire lately.
 
That's where you're wrong, prude incel child.

If we stretch the definition of "unique" until it is thinner than Nick's skin, technically having his own pope mug wear different hats and assorted paraphernalia would make each piece of art unique, as would different backgrounds and maybe even having rare balldo popes such as "glowing red nose balldo pope" or "zombie blue skin balldo pope"

What I'm saying is that he could produce 5 thousand unique pieces of art if he followed the generating procedure used by everyone's favourite thing, NFTs.

And if he does follow through with monetizing them, I sincerely hope he uses whatever money he grifts from it on lube, as the feds and IRS have been violently sodomizing many a would be crypto-millionaire lately.
I think you overestimate 'uniqueness'. I think they will be mass produced, identical pieces 'you cannot get anywhere else, so they are ''unique'''.
 
I have never understood why he overthought this 5k gift. It could have been so easy and been taken care of 6 months ago, when he first started talking about it. Just take his existing logo and laser etch it on a whiskey glass. It would have been so on-brand for him. And something, I would assume, his audience would have really appreciated.
This is the first thing I assumed he was going to do when he mentioned it oh so long ago. I also assumed it would be something he would wind up selling after the fact. If he wanted to go the extra mile he could have a slight modification for the first 5,000 so they still get to feel special. Like "5k" etched on the other side or something stupid like that. It would be quite affordable as well. If you wanted to buy your own etched whiskey glass from an online store you could get one for $16 USD. Nick going to someone with a bulk order of 5k with the ability to continue making more as they are ordered he could easily get the price including distribution to wind up around $15 for each fulfilled order. That's essentially the first 5k members getting their first three months free. A VERY basic marketing offer. So basic, in fact, that I recently got an email offering me 2 free months for no reason whatsoever if I were to sign up.

1679057584091.png

1679057933445.png

The truth is, in my opinion, that he is lazy and had no intention of ever making a gift. He was hoping it would be dragged on long enough that it became "old news" and the majority stopped caring and eventually stopped talking about it similar to his other unfulfilled promises. The recent spergout about it is a result of that not working and his frustration with the fact that he might actually have to start thinking about what he might do. If this was me, and I'm somewhat lazy myself, I'd have had all this arranged before I even hit 5k and ready to pull the trigger. People would have gotten their shit within a month or two, but any delays would be entirely on the manufacturer/distributor and as someone mentioned earlier that would be an acceptable and understandable excuse. Nick has no excuse, he just has seethe that he's being expected to keep his promises.
 
It's been so bizarre to watch Nick from afar all these years.
I have never been a viewer of Rekieta, but I used to watch The Dick Show (lol) and I remember his rise to fame.
He started off as a TDS fan who just so happened to be a lawyer and wanted to explain the Maddox lolsuit to the dickheads.
He seemed to be an all around cool dude and I would sometimes watch a few of his lolsuit breakdown streams.
Eventually I stopped watching The Dick Show (because it's horrible) and I forgot all about Rekieta for a time.

Then I started seeing him pop up around Null and I thought "good for that dude, he's earned his success."
It was mind-blowing to see how large of an audience he had obtained during the Rittenhouse trial as well. I was kinda proud to see how far he'd come.
I remember people were joking about that thing where he was photographed being stepped on by women at a convention.
A lot of people were giving him shit for it, but I thought they were going a little too far since it was obviously just a joke.

Then out of nowhere I find out that Rekieta is a literal cuckold and his streams have become podcasts where he talks about something called a "balldo" all day.
He did a total 180 and went full retard with no warning. I thought he was perfectly sane this whole time but I guess he wasn't.
Nowadays I watch clips of him on the elissa clips channel where he spergs out and seethes about the farms 24/7.
It's been pretty surreal to watch his rise and fall over this time, when I never really paid much attention to him overall.
It's like this whole B-story that I've been vaguely aware of for awhile but just never got into it.
The ridiculous comical coom brained nigger has speed run lolcow status in record time.
Just go back and look at how positive this thread was towards him in just April/May last year.
Then came "the worst day in his life" where he found out Our Wife was being dicked by niggers behind his back because she got sick of his alcohol induced erectile disfunction, then he discovered the Balldo, a KSD (Knotting Simulation Device) designed by FurFags to simulate animal sex and that it gave him a way to penetrate Our Wifes asshole once again, even if it was only with his testicles while his Broke Dick flopped about sadly.
Since then he's burned through all the goodwill and respect he built over five years, it's been quite a run.
 
Last edited:
That image features the remarkably vibrant dithering indicative of a 256 color palette. When was the last time anyone used 8-bit color for photos? The mid-90's?

I know we've all had a few laughs about the ancient phone in some of her thot pictures, but at this point I legit wonder if Mandy is actually older than Sally?
The fashion/decor/phones put every Mandy picture in the mid to late 00's. If her teen-age/20s ho-phase photos are from then she'd be around 35 or 40
 
His threats of legal action here.. "I will fuck you in the ass in front of the Supreme Court" are somewhat reminiscent of his invitation to Monty to sue him.

He is also deeply confused about the US constitution, the laws at issue here and the difficulty of defending himself in the situation he is in.

- Attempting to claim a sixth amendment right to disclose in public the names of people who made complaints against him will not work. Having a right to confront your accusers doesn't extend to actions which have the appearance of intimidating them outside of the actual process. An argument can be made that his conduct had the effect of intimidating those making complaints about him during the investigation. It doesn't matter if the complaints are invalid, you can't do that. Its a procedural issue.

- His issue has nothing to do with the first amendment and he will be unlikely to find any legal support for first amendment claims in this area. There are all kinds of procedural laws which dictate what can be said at what time in legal processes.

- He also doesn't understand that by attacking people during a professional investigation, that becomes a professional issue even if the original complaints were dismissed as having nothing to do with his professional conduct.

- These comments themselves in the video create even more problems. Because the have the appearance of attempting to both attack, defame and intimidate the state board. That gets into the tricky area of professional conduct around bringing the profession into disrepute.

- Calling them "faggots" brings in the whole issue of hate speech. If Nick really believes that he has an unlimited right to say things, he should call them "niggers". Because attorneys calling out people as "niggers" also has to be protected professional conduct. Except its not.

- He claims a right to sue people for defamation based on complaints made in semi-legal process. Good luck with that in the courts.

- Of course while he claims a right to sue them, he has mysteriously not initiated a single defamation suit against of them in the courts. I mean if you are so sure that they have defamed you Nick, the logical course is to sue them and make your first amendment claims in courts.

- Taking it to the supreme court implies that he expects to lose at the state court, state court of appeals, state supreme court, perhaps federal courts and federal appeals courts. And that he has maybe ten years and alot of money to fight this.

I had not seen this video before. The video itself IMO creates a whole new set of ethical problems for him. If they have the video, I can understand why the investigation is ongoing and not concluded. This is unhindged shit. And he tries to bring this in front of judges, he isn't going to get any sympathy.
 
Did he ever actually say that the 5k gift would be something physical?

For all we know, he could be making "unique" art with the intention of emailing everyone the jpeg for you to go get printed at your local walgreens.
That could very well be true? Although, if I recall correctly, at the time, he said that the 5k gift would come as a code to be redeemed with the manufacturer, who would then be the one to fulfill it. Because he knew that, left up to him, he could never personally ship out 5000 gifts to his Locals supporters.
 
That could very well be true? Although, if I recall correctly, at the time, he said that the 5k gift would come as a code to be redeemed with the manufacturer, who would then be the one to fulfill it. Because he knew that, left up to him, he could never personally ship out 5000 gifts to his Locals supporters.
"With this code + $19.95 Shipping & Handling the free 5k gift can be yours!"
 
He is also deeply confused about the US constitution, the laws at issue here and the difficulty of defending himself in the situation he is in.

- Attempting to claim a sixth amendment right to disclose in public the names of people who made complaints against him will not work. Having a right to confront your accusers doesn't extend to actions which have the appearance of intimidating them outside of the actual process. An argument can be made that his conduct had the effect of intimidating those making complaints about him during the investigation. It doesn't matter if the complaints are invalid, you can't do that. Its a procedural issue.

- His issue has nothing to do with the first amendment and he will be unlikely to find any legal support for first amendment claims in this area. There are all kinds of procedural laws which dictate what can be said at what time in legal processes.

- He also doesn't understand that by attacking people during a professional investigation, that becomes a professional issue even if the original complaints were dismissed as having nothing to do with his professional conduct.

- These comments themselves in the video create even more problems. Because the have the appearance of attempting to both attack, defame and intimidate the state board. That gets into the tricky area of professional conduct around bringing the profession into disrepute.

- Calling them "faggots" brings in the whole issue of hate speech. If Nick really believes that he has an unlimited right to say things, he should call them "niggers". Because attorneys calling out people as "niggers" also has to be protected professional conduct. Except its not.

- He claims a right to sue people for defamation based on complaints made in semi-legal process. Good luck with that in the courts.

- Of course while he claims a right to sue them, he has mysteriously not initiated a single defamation suit against of them in the courts. I mean if you are so sure that they have defamed you Nick, the logical course is to sue them and make your first amendment claims in courts.

- Taking it to the supreme court implies that he expects to lose at the state court, state court of appeals, state supreme court, perhaps federal courts and federal appeals courts. And that he has maybe ten years and alot of money to fight this.

I think this is exactly why I really didn't take to Nick from the outset. Somebody as furious and entertaining as he, talking about a subject that I'm interested in, is would normally be right up my street. And I watched a handful of other YouTube lawyers. That Israeli guy on the skateboard. (Whatever happened to him?) Attorney Tom. Steve Lehto. Viva Frei and Robert Barnes all had subs from me.

But I could never get past the view that Rekieta didn't seem to me to be a real lawyer. I just couldn't believe he was somebody who was actually engaged, or had ever been engaged -- in the actual practice of law for money.

I had no trouble buying the idea that he'd been to law school. He had enough of a grasp on certain legal principles to make that possible. But when it came to how those principles would actually play out in practice, he always seemed to me to be reaching. He reminded me of your typical undergraduate who thinks that they're smarter than their professor and doesn't understand why their essays keep on getting a D. The problem isn't my essay, it's that damned professor who just has it in for me!

And part of that was how he dealt with these issues that really depend on a more pragmatic, more nuanced view of the law and how it operates in practice. Ask Attorney Tom a question about the law and the answer, almost always, is "It depends." This resonated with me, because I'd get hare-brained ideas about legal issues into my head, and I'd ask my lawyer wife questions about this new loophole I thought I'd discovered, and her response would always be 'It depends.' It was a view that was formed by the gap between law in the books and the actual practice of law. Hence why I could never believe Rekieta had an actual legal practice of any sort.

And you can see it illustrated in this clip. His retarded, poorly understood grasp of the first amendment. His complete dismissal of the costs involved in litigating issues like this. His total lack of any professional standards of behaviour. He just seemed like a guy who was LARPing at being a lawyer, not an actual real lawyer at all. I couldn't be wasting my time watching that kind of nonsense. Life's too short.
Of course, once it turns out that the guy is a complete cuckold -- somebody who also LARP's as a Conservative Christian dad, while his wife is getting ploughed by his negro BBF -- somebody who goes rolling on Molly in the gay bars and holidays in Hedonism II -- at that point, the guy starts to be genuinely interesting to me. That's some serious moral contradictions to be putting on display there.
 
Nick needs to get a better light setup in his kitchen if he's going to do late night eating videos. The hard shaddows make him look even more drugged out and weathered than he does at his desk.
Nah it brings out his narcissistic victimhood quite well. When his rampant alcoholism and not occasional drug use become too plain a thing to hide, he can easily blame detractors for helping him down that road rather than admit his free choices. Vblogs are evidence of the struggle of narcissists, not ever admissions. So anything negative we see, it's always us who are at blame.
 
If this were his only stance, it would be fine. The problem is he 1) keeps changing stances 2) He's leaving out the times where he called his former fans prudes for not wanting to hear him drone on about his boring sex life and 3) He was fine to change what he was doing. He just didn't want to do the old thing and didn't want to go back to it. Now he's trying to claim here the show hasn't changed at all...

"The show has basically been what the show has always been" vs:


View attachment 4798072
This lying piece of shit faggot. 5 months of lying and gas lighting to finally just basically admit he has changed and IS rebranding.

What did the 5 months of lying accomplish Nick? Did it ease things over with the fans paypigs better? Did you miss the part of AZ's story where he pissed off his core fanbase and was on the verge of homelessness or having to go back to a 9-5 because all his fans left? He almost lost everything "rebranding" because he didn't have the balls to be honest with his audience.

I'm curious how a ball-less cuck even wears a balldo?
 
Nah it brings out his narcissistic victimhood quite well. When his rampant alcoholism and not occasional drug use become too plain a thing to hide, he can easily blame detractors for helping him down that road rather than admit his free choices. Vblogs are evidence of the struggle of narcissists, not ever admissions. So anything negative we see, it's always us who are at blame.
The low angle of the camera highlights his toothless lamprey-like mouth, his other setup completely hides his massive overbite.
 
Then out of nowhere I find out that Rekieta is a literal cuckold and his streams have become podcasts where he talks about something called a "balldo" all day.
He did a total 180 and went full retard with no warning. I thought he was perfectly sane this whole time but I guess he wasn't.
Nowadays I watch clips of him on the elissa clips channel where he spergs out and seethes about the farms 24/7.
It's been pretty surreal to watch his rise and fall over this time, when I never really paid much attention to him overall.
It's like this whole B-story that I've been vaguely aware of for awhile but just never got into it.
Rekieta is LBJ pretending to be Kennedy.

Edit to add

Elissa Chat commenters may have cracked the case
1679081465266.png

1679081495746.png

Is Rekieta's lack of money because he blew through it in Nigger Vegas?
 
Last edited:
Screenshot_20230317_144150.jpg


So this happened...

I noticed the change about a week ago, and I was somewhat flattered to think that I might be the cause. More likely than not, it is probably them trying to lock things down after signing Crowder, but it was a pleasant fantasy...

I wonder how long until they get the 'block' feature working and fix chat glitches once Stven starts using it... It would be amusing to see Nose meltdown over them listening to an actual big fish...

To be clear, this has no effect on Panoptes' ability to function.
 
Back