Chube is usually so careful to be uncontroversial I have no idea why he didn't realize he was playing with fire with his take on gender dysphoria.
I really wonder what he thought the reaction to this was going to be
He's so blasé about dropping this gender dysphoria take because he's gotten away with saying milder versions of this unchallenged. Someone on his sub pointed out this was basically said in his NHS video (I don't know if
that's true or not; it was so rambling, it took me multiple sittings to get through and I think my brain has insulated itself against it as a defence mechanism).
While some of the REEE is because he's saying the quiet part out loud, I think a lot of it is also that he's undermining personal narratives - both people who genuinely have dysphoria and a bunch of regretful transitioners who tell themselves "no, I didn't make a mistake, I had dysphoria and I would have killed myself if I hadn't done this".
Huh, so chyoob is getting cancelled for this take? I thought this was actually the most current school of thought in genderland, that you don't need gender dysphoria to be trans and relying on the presence of dysphoria is bigoted. And I thought "transtrender" was a bigoted concept? I mean contra did a whole video on this years ago
Perhaps so many people have started taking on a genderspecial label that the SJWs are starting to get gatekeepy about it?
"You don't need dysphoria to be trans" is something shared in social justice spaces - partially as a cope to reassure people they're "trans enough" but also intended in the sense that you're not less trans if you don't have e.g. bottom dysphoria (i.e. someone like Choob who likes having his choob and doesn't have any inclination to get an amhole). There's also the sense that if you want to become a they/them and live outside the binary, that can be more a philosophy than a medical issue.
Very few people openly connected the dots from there. EverydayFeminism posted about this almost a decade ago, bigging up how "transmedicalisation" undermined the right to self determination and self expression blah blah blah. It's a common talking point that the diagnostic pathways for trans people result in barriers or long delays for medical treatment (which is Literally Killing Trans People). I've heard some radical firebrands argue that if we successfully "destroy gender" then gender dysphoria will stop existing.
But pretty much the only people I've seen openly state "you should be able to medically transition if you just fancy a bit of a change" are Helen and Michael Webberly,
the GP and gastroenterologist couple behind GenderGP:
Unfortunately, this deliberate and erroneous definition, binding trans identity to having gender dysphoria, has had profound consequences for many trans people. NHS pathway services still require a formal diagnosis of gender dysphoria for trans people to be able to access care, excluding many trans people from their support.
Trans people, those who experience gender dysphoria and those who don’t, have a right to access gender-affirming support, and should not have to defend who they are, especially not according to arbitrary and unfounded criteria.
At GenderGP we believe that you are who you say you are – we are not the gatekeepers of your identity and experience. Instead, we are here to help you explore your identity and how you best want to express it, living as yourself without judgment or artificial obstacles.
(They
would say that. They've both been struck off because they were giving out testosterone no questions asked to teenage girls, which they were making money hand over fist out of).
Ollie has gone one step further in saying that there's
no such thing as gender dysphoria. I think the argument is that his reason for transition is gender
euphoria, in that he wanted to transition and transitioning makes him happy. But in that sense we're back to what I've been sperging about - there's plenty of women who feel like they'd be happier with a breast augmentation, but that's not a reason for the NHS or private insurance to fund it, and maybe that's what a trans person has transitioned into; a woman who would like a boob job but isn't getting one for free. And on top of that if there's no pressing psychiatric need for HRT, then the NHS has no rationale for funding it either and gumming up their services with frequent blood tests, liver function tests etc etc.
Ollie isn't a pragmatist in this sense. Whether it's because of misplaced anger towards his doctor parents or just because he struggles with being told no (see: the failed book adaptation that I'm pretty sure is Nabokov's Ada) he can't conceptualise needing to work within the limitations of the system and is insulated from how dire the system has become (Ukranian refugees have been horrified at the NHS waiting times we put up with).
He wants something and his transition has given him a narc high - how dare you tell Ollie "no" or even "yes but we just need to make sure you actually need it first" - he
wants something.
Give it to him. Don't you
dare question the princess,
pleb cissie.