Defendant: Ethan Oliver Ralph - Ethan Ralph's Documented Legal Troubles & Other Court Docs

This reminds of the Michel Houellebecq novel 'Whatever' Ralph despite grooming Faifai in his 30s has this deep resentment for "Romeo and Juliet" age relationships because frankly no one naturally desired him in his youth (much less now) the random spic she dated as a youth seems very healthy relative to the RALPHAmale experience. It's a teenage experience he deeply envies and nothing will fill that hole of wasted adolescence.

Sure it's against California law for minors to have sexual contact at all but that's what kids do. The fact he is shrieking about a teenage relationship over a decade ago means that he turned a court filing into a therapy letter session.


My suggestion for the ragepig: See if faifais bigger dick fiance ever publicly praised lolicon on video?
 
Last edited:
This reminds of the Michel Houellebecq novel 'Whatever' Ralph despite grooming Faifai in his 30s has this deep resentment for "Romeo and Juliet" age relationships because frankly no one naturally desired him in his youth (much less now) the random spic she dated as a youth seems very healthy relative to the RALPHAmale experience. It's a teenage experience he deeply envies and nothing will fill that hole of wasted adolescence.

Sure it's against California law for minors to have sexual contact at all but that's what kids do. The fact he is shrieking about a teenage relationship over a decade ago means that he turned a court filing into a therapy letter session.


My suggestion for the ragepig: See if faifais bigger dick fiance every publicly praised lolicon on video?
I mean, first off is that is Faith even to be believed on this shit? I genuinely don't know, but if you look at the schitzo shit she was tweeting around that time about being raped on the bus and the like, which afaik he has not talked about since, all seems to be said in order to get online attention from this gaggle of weirdos she used to speak to online. There was a GWS and PPP stream on it back in 2020. Point is, they are basing this on a Tweet about being fingered in Disneyland - now I am sure people have been fingered at Disneyland, but that is a risky proposition. It's busy, there is CCTV everywhere, just does not seem that credible when put in context with the other Tweets.

Also, this was a family trip, yeah she or they as a family brought along this 18 year old friend of hers, I guess you could call it a date - but it was with her parents. Now, would I go to Disneyland with a 14 year old at the age of 18? No, that's fucking weird, but is it criminal? Does it indicate he is a threat to an infant? No.

So what we have is a dubious claim, made by Tweet, about an alleged incident that there is no evidence of, which occurred nearly a decade ago - what exactly is the court going to say? It is clear as day the Ralph's, trashy as ever, are trying to just slander this individual they have never even met because he has an association with the Vickers. Faith should apply to have him included in the DVRO really, probably make ralph sperg too.
 
Fucking kiwifag judge throwing out King of the Sektur's key witness like that. Had this not happened, the Ralphamale would have blown this whole case open. In fact, the court would have ruled 100% in his favor and not only giving him full custody of Xannie, but also executed that loose whore and her entire family of unjust liars. Next month, Ethan is going to come back, and he won't let that pussy judge big league him, he's the Ralphamale bitch. He don't scare.
 
Fucking kiwifag judge throwing out King of the Sektur's key witness like that. Had this not happened, the Ralphamale would have blown this whole case open. In fact, the court would have ruled 100% in his favor and not only giving him full custody of Xannie, but also executed that loose whore and her entire family of unjust liars. Next month, Ethan is going to come back, and he won't let that pussy judge big league him, he's the Ralphamale bitch. He don't scare.
May being questioned by Ralph on the subject of the diary and being cross examined by Faith's Lawyer would have been corn incarnate. It would have been extremely humiliating for the Ralphamale. May was not properly trained by a lawyer and how to lie and double down on the bullshit. And drunken Ralph would have asked nothing but inconsequential shit.


IS IT TRUE THAT COIN MERCHANT MATTHEW VICKERS TALKS SHIT ABOUT ME ALL DAY EVERY DAY? THERE YOU HAVE IT YAH HONAH, ARREST HIM ARREST HIM!

The judge made him a solid, Judge must be a huge fan of the killstream.
 
Last edited:
Not a single Ay Lawg of Ralph's can claim they have caused as much damage to Ralph than his right hand man Shaggy. Thank god for Shaggy, only someone that retarded can both carry the gunt and spike the gunt at the same time.
Reminds me of that time not that long ago when Shaggyism tried to fool everyone into thinking that Ralph suffered a coma. Then he went around claiming victory, a win and a W when he said that he fooled everyone.

Now if it were some alawg who falsely claimed that Ralph suffered a coma in hopes of provoking a reaction out of Ralph, I'd understand.

However, Shaggyism is trying to make Ralph look good here. If I were Ralph, it'd be SAD and PATHETIC to know my fans have to lie about me suffering a coma to make me look good.

Point is Shaggyism is making matters worse for Ralph more so than an "alawg".
 
Last edited:
I'm just chuckling at the idea of Faith and Isaiah's parents getting together to sign carbon copy contracts stating their children can bang at Disneyworld.

You should really choose your words more carefully in a court filing. You can't just tell the judge they're "co-signing big-leaguing me" with hearsay evidence from your wife and the tweets of a child experiencing a psychotic break whereas everything fucked up that you have provably done is "a work".
fetchimage.jpeg
 
This is old hat at this point, but I'm curious about his assault on the officer that got him in jail and made him a felon. From what I remember, he , didn't actually hit the (female) officer, right? He just drunkenly took a swing at her when she tried to wake him up? I know that it differs when it's a law enforcement officer, but if he didn't actually hit her, would there be a way for a lawyer to argue his innocence or at least walk it back down to a misdemeanor? I don't know the whole context - whether he swung because he was woken up from a drunken slumber and his immediate response was to thrash about or if he really wanted to hit a police officer. Also not too familiar with laws regarding this, I'm just curious about if legally there were any possible outcomes that could've occured that weren't a felony charge that landed him in jail.
 
This is old hat at this point, but I'm curious about his assault on the officer that got him in jail and made him a felon. From what I remember, he , didn't actually hit the (female) officer, right? He just drunkenly took a swing at her when she tried to wake him up? I know that it differs when it's a law enforcement officer, but if he didn't actually hit her, would there be a way for a lawyer to argue his innocence or at least walk it back down to a misdemeanor? I don't know the whole context - whether he swung because he was woken up from a drunken slumber and his immediate response was to thrash about or if he really wanted to hit a police officer. Also not too familiar with laws regarding this, I'm just curious about if legally there were any possible outcomes that could've occured that weren't a felony charge that landed him in jail.
I don't know. I doubt because he's a weak limp wristed faggot that it would change the outcome. Fact is he still tried to assault a police officer, failing at the act doesn't negate it. I suppose if he had a good lawyer maybe they could've bullshitted into a better deal, I'm not a lolyer. However, I do know that he had already been arrested previously for public intox and being a retarded drunk, so he had a history and it wasn't just a one time thing of silly drunk college kid who had a few too many. He was just following his nature, he's a true born wigger after all.
What "felonious" activity is Vickers claiming May and Ralph are currently involving themselves in exactly?
I'm assuming perjury is what he's driving at.
I assumed he was referencing the diary fiasco, I don't know. This shit is a constant whirlwind of homosexuality and it's hard to keep up with the white trash baby mama drama.
 
This is old hat at this point, but I'm curious about his assault on the officer that got him in jail and made him a felon. From what I remember, he , didn't actually hit the (female) officer, right? He just drunkenly took a swing at her when she tried to wake him up? I know that it differs when it's a law enforcement officer, but if he didn't actually hit her, would there be a way for a lawyer to argue his innocence or at least walk it back down to a misdemeanor? I don't know the whole context - whether he swung because he was woken up from a drunken slumber and his immediate response was to thrash about or if he really wanted to hit a police officer. Also not too familiar with laws regarding this, I'm just curious about if legally there were any possible outcomes that could've occured that weren't a felony charge that landed him in jail.
A good lawyer would remove any chance of him going to jail and he would only pay a fine.

A decent lawyer would land him some community work, a fine or at least a couple weeks in detention.

But its Ethan Ralph. He lacks the basic understandings necessary to play the jewdicial system.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fìddlesticks2.0
This is old hat at this point, but I'm curious about his assault on the officer that got him in jail and made him a felon. From what I remember, he , didn't actually hit the (female) officer, right? He just drunkenly took a swing at her when she tried to wake him up? I know that it differs when it's a law enforcement officer, but if he didn't actually hit her, would there be a way for a lawyer to argue his innocence or at least walk it back down to a misdemeanor? I don't know the whole context - whether he swung because he was woken up from a drunken slumber and his immediate response was to thrash about or if he really wanted to hit a police officer. Also not too familiar with laws regarding this, I'm just curious about if legally there were any possible outcomes that could've occured that weren't a felony charge that landed him in jail.
IANAL but my understanding is that Ralph's lawyer tried to plea bargain it down to a misdemeanour but the prosecutors refused and the only deal they'd make was to drop one of the assault charges (Ralph kicked out at the cops when they were putting him in the van so there were 2 counts) and agree to the minimum sentence under the statute. If it had gone to trial there would have been 2 counts and the prosecutor pushing for a longer sentence on conviction and with the video evidence and officer testimony pleading not guilty was really a nonstarter any way
 
IANAL but my understanding is that Ralph's lawyer tried to plea bargain it down to a misdemeanour but the prosecutors refused and the only deal they'd make was to drop one of the assault charges (Ralph kicked out at the cops when they were putting him in the van so there were 2 counts) and agree to the minimum sentence under the statute. If it had gone to trial there would have been 2 counts and the prosecutor pushing for a longer sentence on conviction and with the video evidence and officer testimony pleading not guilty was really a nonstarter any way
Most people don't seem to be aware of the kick. Ralph likes to pretend he never hit the officer so it was a travesty that he was jailed but years ago he drunkenly admitted to "donkey kicking" the officer when he was being put in the police car.
 
Back